one of the most life changing truths iβve heard of is my mentor explaining to me that the vagina isnβt a hole when we were discussing french feminism
so the concept of βphallocentrismβ in french feminism refers to the idea that women are what men lack. and the widespread notion that the vagina is a hole is a symptom of that, because holes are incomplete and lack something. to that end, we have to rethink what a vagina is that isnβt fundamentally in the form of a βlackingβ because it doesnβt βlackβ anything like a hole does. its primary function isnβt just an βunfilledβ, empty space like a hole is. bitch when i tell you my third eye opened !!! ππΏπ―π₯π©π©π©π’π’π₯π₯π―π―
Thereβs an excellent short piece Iβll look up when I get home (written I think by a woman with the last name Martin?) called βThe Egg and the Spermβ about how coded the language around this is. Specifically the idea that sperm are active, eggs are not avtive, and that sperm are produced lifelong whereas eggs are not, even though an egg has to be prepared actively every month.
Itβs a cool little read that contains almost no difficult language- Iβll look it up later. I know I still have the pdf. So the whole concept of lack and lack of activity being built into how we talk about just basic reproductive functions was wild to me when I first read it a few years back.
here is a pdf :)Β
I read this too. It impacted me greatly. I actually think of it often
This is the truest thing! Vaginas are not a hole. A vagina is two muscular walls pressed together, NOT the space in between them, which doesnβt even exist. Iβd say 95% of anatomical figures and drawings are inaccurate on this point. They always show the vaginal canal as some wide open channel, as if in the midst of being spread apart by some invisible penis. Iβve never seen it represented in itβs resting state, itβs natural state.














