my favorite thing about reading The Three Musketeers is the way Alexandre Dumas stops occasionally after one of his heroes does something kinda scandalous (i.e., all the characters' mistresses are married women) to remind you that morals back in the 1620s were VERY DIFFERENT and everything his heroes do was totally fine according to the morals of "that gallant time" even if we may find them terrible and scandalous in this more enlightened period of 1844
it reminds me of reading The Decameron in college, even though The Decameron was set more or less in what was modern day for its time (unlike The Three Musketeers which is more a historical action/adventure novel). because like the stories are told within a narrative frame of these young nobles fleeing the Black Plague together, but gasp! the nobles are young men and women traveling together with no chaperon!
so there's a whole author's note from Giovanni Boccaccio explaining that you must understand, morals were loosened because everyone was more worried about dying from the plague than what the young people were doing! he's not condoning this sort of behavior! it's just that sometimes this happened because of the plague and should not be taken as a commentary on his own views!
...which sadly makes me think of how authors today are assumed to be condoning morally questionable things that happen in their books unless they pause the whole narrative to say to the reader, "I don't condone this, though"
but the POINT is
I don't actually know what my point is, I just find it very funny. maybe precisely because it's sadly relatable lol
I think what it is is that Boccaccio wrote a whole author's note, whereas Dumas keeps throwing it into the narrative but like SO briefly. it almost feels like an editor was like "alexandre please, I enjoy what you're doing here but you KNOW readers are not going to think your heroes are so heroic when they're constantly making love to married women! please, you must address this!" so Dumas would just throw in half a sentence like "remember, this was totally fine according to the morals of the time. anyway,"
like I think I find it funny bc it feels like Dumas didn't care at all, because he LOVES his Inseparables (particularly Athos) and d'Artagnan, like they can do no wrong, literally everyone is constantly complimenting d'Artagnan all the time, so I'm convinced HE did not find it scandalous or even worry about readers finding it scandalous when they got up to things that were considered morally wrong by his own time
lmfao in last night's chapters it wasn't even one of his faves, this time it was Lord de Winter walking out of Milady's prison, swearing, "which was not ungentlemanly at the time." it's so funny. it just fucking slays me. Alexandre Dumas pausing the narrative very briefly to say, "man, if only it weren't ungentlemanly to swear NOW I'd do it all the time"
(okay maybe he's not saying that, but in my heart he is)













