As an addition to a previous post, you should not be treating word of mouth as canon, especially when there are no sources from official producers, writers, directors, etc. mentioned. Gear Project has lacked sources for apparently years. Most of what he claims to be canon is pulled out of his ass because he has 0 credible sources for anything he claims. Treating him as a wikipedia for GG lore is not a good idea. He is racist, homophobic, transphobic, and most likely more. He is not a good person. By reblogging him, you are endorsing the content he makes as well as his views on Guilty Gear. GG is not a series meant for people such as himself, and I hope the community shares that same sentiment. With that said, theories and headcanons ( that are not racist, homophobic, etc ) are another discussion altogether. Gear Project, Blade, would be less problematic if he treated his theories as theories and headcanons. They are not canon, they do not have sources, and they are founded in misunderstandings of actual GG material. While I am by no means a martyr in the Guilty Gear community, please be sure to never take what someone says as 100% canon. At best ( unless it is directly taken from word of an official within the series ), it is a theory. Furthermore, do not accept theories from bigots in your community.
