https://medium.com/@maradydd/when-nerds-collide-31895b01e68c

ellievsbear
The Stonewall Inn

Andulka
NASA

titsay

#extradirty
official daine visual archive

bliss lane

Kiana Khansmith
occasionally subtle
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
The Bowery Presents

🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

gracie abrams
sheepfilms

Discoholic 🪩

Claire Keane

seen from India
seen from Slovenia
seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Brazil
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Uruguay
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@magus7a
https://medium.com/@maradydd/when-nerds-collide-31895b01e68c

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
extremely pro gatekeeping
everyone gatekeep your hobbies HARDER right now before they’re sanitized and watered down to appeal to as many 0 iq no inner monologue larping posers as possible
“Musk talks about Mars as a lifeboat for humanity, which is among the very stupidest things that someone could say,” says Adam Becker, an astrophysicist and author of the book More Everything Forever, which outlines the messianic, sci-fi fantasies of the tech oligarchs. “There are so many reasons why it’s such a bad idea, and this is not about, ‘Oh, we’ll never have the technology to live on Mars.’ That’s not what I’m saying. What I’m saying is that Earth is always going to be a better option no matter what happens to Earth. Like, we could get hit with an asteroid the size of the one that killed off the dinosaurs, and Earth would still be more habitable. We could explode every single nuclear weapon, and Earth would still be more habitable. We could have the worst-case scenario for climate change, and Earth would still be more habitable. Any cursory examination of any of the facts about Mars makes it very clear.”
What You’ve Suspected Is True: Billionaires Are Not Like Us
I really like sci-fi stories where people have to go off and terraform a planet, or figure out how to rebuild civilization after some disaster, or ideally both. "The last ark-ship leaving Earth right before it becomes uninhabitable" sort of deal. But lately I've been coming around to this same idea, that it will always be more practical to try to save Earth than to try to start over elsewhere.
I was reading one story where the apocalypse was impossibly-rising oceans. Like, water is appearing from *waves hand* the Earth's crust or something, and literally all dry surface land on Earth is going to become underwater in X years. Part of the story was about a giant research project to invent FTL to send a few hundred humans to a nearby star which might have a habitable planet. You know what they were hoping to find? A planet with liquid water. Their plan was to descend from their starship and restart civilization using just the tools they brought with them, on a world with no life and no breathable air and the wrong gravity and the wrong temperate and the wrong sunlight and the wrong day-night cycle, just because it had liquid water. You know where else has liquid water? The flooded Earth you just abandoned. Instead of researching starship technology, you could have spent that time loading up all the same civilization-restarter tools into boats.
And this is really true of any futuristic apocalypse scenario. If you can terraform Mars to have a thick oxygen atmosphere, why not just do that to Earth? Even if you smash an ice comet into Earth and destroy basically everything, Earth will still be more habitable than Mars! It'll still have roughly the right atmospheric pressure, and magnetic field, and heat balance, and it'll still have whatever life the comet didn't kill... Same with a starshade to cool Venus. Same with excavating asteroids into city-stations. Same with abandoning Sol System entirely and heading to another star. If an ark-ship arrived in a new star system and found Earth-but-choked-by-climate-change, the crew would be ecstatic. They would never have thought to get that lucky. So why bother with the trip? Just stay and fix the damn Earth.
It's true that colonizing Mars wouldn't be very useful right now. It would be really cool, though! Plenty of non-billionaires think it would be really cool too. Building a chapel with lots of fancy ceiling paintings isn't very useful and involves a lot of human drudgery, but we tend to still be happy that the hyper-rich of previous eras did that sort of thing.
Also, I'd say the Timnit Gebru quote on AI aged poorly, but frankly it was also poor in 2025.
I feel like there's just a fundamental misunderstanding going on.
If you can terraform Mars to have a thick oxygen atmosphere, why not just do that to Earth?
Illegal on Earth
Same with a starshade to cool Venus.
Illegal around Earth
Same with excavating asteroids into city-stations.
Illegal on Earth.
So why bother with the trip? Just stay and fix the damn Earth.
You, and people like you, have made it illegal to make Earth better. They're hoping to reach Mars before you also make it illegal to leave.
this. Making mars comfortable is probably impossible, it is however less impossible than convincing a significant portion of the population to stop trying to make things worse for people like Elon
For everybody. Those people have made it so you can't build a high speed rail that doesn't even cross state borders, how the fuck are you supposed to fix an entire planet when they live on it?
is this one of those pithy jokes like "death and taxes" that only work in like a cutesy folksy level?
like, even taking political opposition into account, on a purely raw, net consideration of "what is possible to achieve" with our currebt access to raw materials and power geberation it is still like orders upon orders of magnitude easier to reshape the earth than to make mars habitable.
like what are we saying right now, "we would be fixing the earth if it werent for all these naysayers and busybodies making it illegal, so clearly mars continues to be the more feasible option"?
Do you disagree? Do you see them stepping out of the way and letting Earth's problems be fixed before or after the first SpaceX rocket reaches Mars? Before or after the first human lands there? Before or after the first month of continuous habitation? Before or after the year 3000?
Is this simply ignorance? Were you not aware that most of our problems are man-made, and illegal to fix?
You see that there is no red tape about civilisation on Mars, and you naively assume that this state of affairs will remain for the centuries it would take to produce a self sustaining civilisation on Mars, on the millennia it would take to terraform it. The USA has existed for 250 years. It will last another 250 before civilisation on Mars could even be considered as the solution to any problem, and you presume that you know what the government of that time will look like?
You are drastically overestimating the rigidity of existing power structures and underestimating how difficult it is to build anything of value on Mars. We have never landed a person on Mars. No person has ever spent longer than 3 years off planet. No civilian has ever spent any significant amount of time off planet. No baby has ever been born in space, and it’s an open question whether it is possible for a baby to be healthy in conditions in orbit or on Mars. Our current stage of space travel is that we can, in theory, get a person to Mars’ surface alive. We have not developed 99% of the technology we need for a colony to sustain itself, and we have not done 90% of the research we would need to do to know whether such a thing is feasible. A colony on Mars could only be achieved in our lifetimes at ridiculous expense and would have a high chance of all the colonists straight up dying; and in the best case, would still accomplish nothing of material value, because there is nothing valuable on Mars.
And obviously your argument hinges on the idea that the world government has omnipotent and malicious regulations that prevent any actions being done to improve Earth, but they will never, ever ever interfere with anything on Mars and it will remain a free and libertarian paradise even as trillions of dollars of Earth-based projects go into making it marginally more habitable. Be serious
Wrong from sentence 1.
will the owner of the goalpost out in the bailey please move it down the slippery slope towards the middle ground where a strawman is currently begging the question. we have a bandwagon waiting to help you, unless youre too much of an uneducated dipshit to handle any of that, in which case we can circle back to a true scotsman who will be able to appeal to our authority.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
just saw a chair so photogenic I had to reevaluate my feelings towards plastic furniture
do you see this. beyond ridiculous
what are our thoughts
I understand your feelings for the chair robin crabussy
unpost this right now you strange strange man
I hired a wizard to cast png on it. effervescent
Oat milk was discovered much more recently than you may have known. Like many now-familiar technologies, it was discovered by accident during the Apollo program when NASA discovered what a zero-g environment does to goat milk.
antagonists should never be part of a story because it promotes sabotaging other people's goals. you'd only write such things because that's how you treat your friends.
don't even get me started on "foils". flattening people so you can twist around everything they stand for, what a vile concept. hellooooo, it's called a strawman.
and character sheets??? do you really think you can capture a whole person with a personality test???
“Musk talks about Mars as a lifeboat for humanity, which is among the very stupidest things that someone could say,” says Adam Becker, an astrophysicist and author of the book More Everything Forever, which outlines the messianic, sci-fi fantasies of the tech oligarchs. “There are so many reasons why it’s such a bad idea, and this is not about, ‘Oh, we’ll never have the technology to live on Mars.’ That’s not what I’m saying. What I’m saying is that Earth is always going to be a better option no matter what happens to Earth. Like, we could get hit with an asteroid the size of the one that killed off the dinosaurs, and Earth would still be more habitable. We could explode every single nuclear weapon, and Earth would still be more habitable. We could have the worst-case scenario for climate change, and Earth would still be more habitable. Any cursory examination of any of the facts about Mars makes it very clear.”
What You’ve Suspected Is True: Billionaires Are Not Like Us
I really like sci-fi stories where people have to go off and terraform a planet, or figure out how to rebuild civilization after some disaster, or ideally both. "The last ark-ship leaving Earth right before it becomes uninhabitable" sort of deal. But lately I've been coming around to this same idea, that it will always be more practical to try to save Earth than to try to start over elsewhere.
I was reading one story where the apocalypse was impossibly-rising oceans. Like, water is appearing from *waves hand* the Earth's crust or something, and literally all dry surface land on Earth is going to become underwater in X years. Part of the story was about a giant research project to invent FTL to send a few hundred humans to a nearby star which might have a habitable planet. You know what they were hoping to find? A planet with liquid water. Their plan was to descend from their starship and restart civilization using just the tools they brought with them, on a world with no life and no breathable air and the wrong gravity and the wrong temperate and the wrong sunlight and the wrong day-night cycle, just because it had liquid water. You know where else has liquid water? The flooded Earth you just abandoned. Instead of researching starship technology, you could have spent that time loading up all the same civilization-restarter tools into boats.
And this is really true of any futuristic apocalypse scenario. If you can terraform Mars to have a thick oxygen atmosphere, why not just do that to Earth? Even if you smash an ice comet into Earth and destroy basically everything, Earth will still be more habitable than Mars! It'll still have roughly the right atmospheric pressure, and magnetic field, and heat balance, and it'll still have whatever life the comet didn't kill... Same with a starshade to cool Venus. Same with excavating asteroids into city-stations. Same with abandoning Sol System entirely and heading to another star. If an ark-ship arrived in a new star system and found Earth-but-choked-by-climate-change, the crew would be ecstatic. They would never have thought to get that lucky. So why bother with the trip? Just stay and fix the damn Earth.
It's true that colonizing Mars wouldn't be very useful right now. It would be really cool, though! Plenty of non-billionaires think it would be really cool too. Building a chapel with lots of fancy ceiling paintings isn't very useful and involves a lot of human drudgery, but we tend to still be happy that the hyper-rich of previous eras did that sort of thing.
Also, I'd say the Timnit Gebru quote on AI aged poorly, but frankly it was also poor in 2025.
I feel like there's just a fundamental misunderstanding going on.
If you can terraform Mars to have a thick oxygen atmosphere, why not just do that to Earth?
Illegal on Earth
Same with a starshade to cool Venus.
Illegal around Earth
Same with excavating asteroids into city-stations.
Illegal on Earth.
So why bother with the trip? Just stay and fix the damn Earth.
You, and people like you, have made it illegal to make Earth better. They're hoping to reach Mars before you also make it illegal to leave.
this. Making mars comfortable is probably impossible, it is however less impossible than convincing a significant portion of the population to stop trying to make things worse for people like Elon
For everybody. Those people have made it so you can't build a high speed rail that doesn't even cross state borders, how the fuck are you supposed to fix an entire planet when they live on it?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
“Musk talks about Mars as a lifeboat for humanity, which is among the very stupidest things that someone could say,” says Adam Becker, an astrophysicist and author of the book More Everything Forever, which outlines the messianic, sci-fi fantasies of the tech oligarchs. “There are so many reasons why it’s such a bad idea, and this is not about, ‘Oh, we’ll never have the technology to live on Mars.’ That’s not what I’m saying. What I’m saying is that Earth is always going to be a better option no matter what happens to Earth. Like, we could get hit with an asteroid the size of the one that killed off the dinosaurs, and Earth would still be more habitable. We could explode every single nuclear weapon, and Earth would still be more habitable. We could have the worst-case scenario for climate change, and Earth would still be more habitable. Any cursory examination of any of the facts about Mars makes it very clear.”
What You’ve Suspected Is True: Billionaires Are Not Like Us
I really like sci-fi stories where people have to go off and terraform a planet, or figure out how to rebuild civilization after some disaster, or ideally both. "The last ark-ship leaving Earth right before it becomes uninhabitable" sort of deal. But lately I've been coming around to this same idea, that it will always be more practical to try to save Earth than to try to start over elsewhere.
I was reading one story where the apocalypse was impossibly-rising oceans. Like, water is appearing from *waves hand* the Earth's crust or something, and literally all dry surface land on Earth is going to become underwater in X years. Part of the story was about a giant research project to invent FTL to send a few hundred humans to a nearby star which might have a habitable planet. You know what they were hoping to find? A planet with liquid water. Their plan was to descend from their starship and restart civilization using just the tools they brought with them, on a world with no life and no breathable air and the wrong gravity and the wrong temperate and the wrong sunlight and the wrong day-night cycle, just because it had liquid water. You know where else has liquid water? The flooded Earth you just abandoned. Instead of researching starship technology, you could have spent that time loading up all the same civilization-restarter tools into boats.
And this is really true of any futuristic apocalypse scenario. If you can terraform Mars to have a thick oxygen atmosphere, why not just do that to Earth? Even if you smash an ice comet into Earth and destroy basically everything, Earth will still be more habitable than Mars! It'll still have roughly the right atmospheric pressure, and magnetic field, and heat balance, and it'll still have whatever life the comet didn't kill... Same with a starshade to cool Venus. Same with excavating asteroids into city-stations. Same with abandoning Sol System entirely and heading to another star. If an ark-ship arrived in a new star system and found Earth-but-choked-by-climate-change, the crew would be ecstatic. They would never have thought to get that lucky. So why bother with the trip? Just stay and fix the damn Earth.
It's true that colonizing Mars wouldn't be very useful right now. It would be really cool, though! Plenty of non-billionaires think it would be really cool too. Building a chapel with lots of fancy ceiling paintings isn't very useful and involves a lot of human drudgery, but we tend to still be happy that the hyper-rich of previous eras did that sort of thing.
Also, I'd say the Timnit Gebru quote on AI aged poorly, but frankly it was also poor in 2025.
I feel like there's just a fundamental misunderstanding going on.
If you can terraform Mars to have a thick oxygen atmosphere, why not just do that to Earth?
Illegal on Earth
Same with a starshade to cool Venus.
Illegal around Earth
Same with excavating asteroids into city-stations.
Illegal on Earth.
So why bother with the trip? Just stay and fix the damn Earth.
You, and people like you, have made it illegal to make Earth better. They're hoping to reach Mars before you also make it illegal to leave.
this. Making mars comfortable is probably impossible, it is however less impossible than convincing a significant portion of the population to stop trying to make things worse for people like Elon
I fully understand why describing a character of an unclear ethnic background as "ambiguously brown" is Not Good, but I started thinking about how the more you narrow it down, the funnier it gets to describe a character as "ambiguously" something.
"Ambiguously brown" - frankly that's just lazy, that could be anywhere. Just say "brown" if you really have to.
"Ambiguously African" - okay you have a vague guess of a continent
"Ambiguously Central Asian" - plausible to narrow down on sight if you're very familiar with people from around this region
"Ambiguously Baltic" - this mf is either Latvian or Lithuanian, and I am intrigued by the fact that your estimate is this precise but you still aren't confident enough in your assessment to guess which one
"Ambiguously Grevenan" - if you can tell greeks apart that closely, then frankly you're just flexing at this point
writer: "he was ambiguously American"
reader: "so wait, was he white? black? hispanic? Samoan?"
writer: "in the low light and dense fog, it was impossible to make out, but he was definitely eating a burger."
Did I miss something?
Leo Frank raped and killed a 13 year old girl who worked in his factory in the 1910s, he tried to accuse his black employees, Jim Conley, the Janitor whom he made dispose of the body, and Newt Lee, the Night Watchman who found the body, the ADL was formed to shield him from the consequences of his crime.
Leo was to be hanged, but his sentence was changed by the Judge to life imprisonment, most likely after the ADL or Frank paid him.
Oh, and you know you fucked up when the KKK doesn't even believe you, sides with the black guys, breaks you out of prison and lynches you two years after your conviction.
Which is what the meme is about.
Ya'll are so fucking antisemitic it's unreal.
Thank you for quoting the wiki, let's take a look at their sources.
Here's a source from the wiki, Jessica Ravitz, on November 2, 2009, on CNN said the following; "The consensus of historians is that the Frank case was a miscarriage of justice. [...] Frank's conviction was based largely on the testimony of a janitor, Jim Conley, who most came to see as Phagan's killer."
Who is Jessica Ravitz? Well, she's the Director of Communications Strategy, ADL Southern Division and worked on CNN.
Another source, shall we?
Let's go with your screen cap, [213] is an opinion piece written in the History Atlanta on 02/08/2020, the article goes over how his wife mourned his death, it neither proves his innocence or disproves his guilt.
[228] is Jeffrey's book in which he claims another source claims Conley confessed to the crime and his lawyer said so, however the records make no indication of this and is a rumor spread around the time of the trial to sway public opinion against Conley.
[N 36] is an opinion piece by someone called Woodward, repeating the narrative Frank was innocent while providing no evidence.
[N 37] is a continuation of Woodward's plea for everyone reading to just listen and believe when he says Frank is innocent.
[N 38] a man named Watson is giving an opinion on another piece of "scholarly" work in which someone compared 3 Court cases around the world involving Jewish people, and makes no case as to why Frank would be innocent, just that because the others were he therefore is.
[231] another opinion piece, this time written by a Trotskyist.
[N 39] another opinion written by a one Myron L Scholnick, no evidence, yet again.
[233] doesn't say anything, it just says Friedman.
[N 40] doesn't provide new evidence, simply just refers back to others saying he's innocent and that the evidence provided exonerated him, don't worry, we'll go over the evidence.
[58] like 233 just says Woodward, so it's most likely just saying to go back and read what Woodward already said, which isn't much.
Now, onto the evidence.
On April 21, 1913, Phagan was laid off due to a materials shortage. Around noon on April 26, she went to the factory to claim her pay. The next day, shortly before 3 a.m., the factory's night watchman, Newt Lee, went to the factory basement to use the toilet. After leaving the toilet, Lee discovered Phagan's body in the rear of the basement near an incinerator and called the police.
Her dress was up around her waist and a strip from her petticoat had been torn off and wrapped around her neck. Her face was blackened and scratched, and her head was bruised and battered. A 7-foot strip of 1⁄4-inch wrapping cord was tied into a loop around her neck, buried 1⁄4 in deep, showing that she had been strangled. Her underwear was still around her hips, but stained with blood and torn open. Her skin was covered with ashes and dirt from the floor, initially making it appear to first responding officers that she and her assailant had struggled in the basement.
Two notes were found in a pile of rubbish by Phagan's head, and became known as the "murder notes".
One said: "he said he wood love me land down play like the night witch did it but that long tall black negro did boy his slef."
The other said, "mam that negro hire down here did this i went to make water and he push me down that hole a long tall negro black that hoo it wase long sleam tall negro i write while play with me."
The phrase "night witch" was thought to mean "night watch[man]"; when the notes were initially read aloud, Lee, who was black, said: "Boss, it looks like they are trying to lay it on me."
Lee was arrested that morning based on these notes and his apparent familiarity with the body – he stated that the girl was white, when the police, because of the filth and darkness in the basement, initially thought she was black. A trail leading back to the elevator suggested to police that the body had been moved.
In addition to Lee, the police arrested a friend of Phagan's for the crime. Gradually, the police became convinced that these were not the culprits. By Monday, the police had theorized that the murder occurred on the second floor (the same as Frank's office) based on hair found on a lathe and what appeared to be blood on the ground of the second floor.
Both Newt Lee, after the discovery of Phagan's body, and the police, just after 4 a.m., had unsuccessfully tried to telephone Frank early on Sunday, April 27. The police contacted him later that morning and he agreed to accompany them to the factory.
When the police arrived after 7 a.m. without telling the specifics of what happened at the factory, Frank seemed extremely nervous, trembling, and pale; his voice was hoarse, and he was rubbing his hands and asking questions before the police could answer.
Frank said he was not familiar with the name Mary Phagan and would need to check his payroll book. The detectives took Frank to the morgue to see Phagan's body and then to the factory, where Frank viewed the crime scene and walked the police through the entire building. Frank returned home about 10:45 a.m. At this point, Frank was not considered a suspect.
On Monday, April 28, Frank, accompanied by his attorney, Luther Rosser, gave a written deposition to the police that provided a brief timeline of his activities on Saturday. He said Phagan was in his office between 12:05 and 12:10 p.m., that Lee had arrived at 4 p.m. but was asked to return later, and that Frank had a confrontation with ex-employee James Gantt at 6 p.m. as Frank was leaving and Lee arriving. Frank explained that Lee's time card for Sunday morning had several gaps (Lee was supposed to punch in every half-hour) that Frank had missed when he discussed the time card with police on Sunday. At Rosser's insistence, Frank exposed his body to demonstrate that he had no cuts or injuries and the police found no blood on the suit that Frank said he had worn on Saturday. The police found no blood stains on the laundry at Frank's house.
Frank then met with N. V. Darley, his assistant, and Harry Scott of the Pinkerton National Detective Agency, whom Frank hired to investigate the case and prove his innocence. The Pinkertons were required to submit duplicates of all evidence to the police, including any that hurt Frank's case. Unbeknownst to Frank, however, was Scott's close ties with the police, particularly his best friend, detective John Black.
On Tuesday, April 29, Black went to Lee's residence at 11 a.m. looking for evidence, and found a blood-smeared shirt at the bottom of a burn barrel.
The blood was smeared high up on the armpits and the shirt smelled unused, suggesting to the police that it was a plant. The detectives, suspicious of Frank due to his nervous behavior throughout his interviews, believed that Frank had arranged the plant.
Frank was subsequently arrested around 11:30 a.m. at the factory. Steve Oney states that "no single development had persuaded ... [the police] that Leo Frank had murdered Mary Phagan. Instead, to the cumulative weight of Sunday's suspicions and Monday's misgivings had been added several last factors that tipped the scale against the superintendent."
These factors were the dropped charges against two suspects; the rejection of rumors that Phagan had been seen on the streets, making Frank the last person to admit seeing Phagan; Frank's meeting with the Pinkertons; and a "shifting view of Newt Lee's role in the affair."
The police were convinced Lee was involved as Frank's accomplice and that Frank was trying to implicate him. To bolster their case, the police staged a confrontation between Lee and Frank while both were still in custody; there were conflicting accounts of this meeting, but the police interpreted it as further implicating Frank.
Now, let's go over this, she was raped and killed on the second floor.
Her body was taken to the incinerator, most likely by Lee or Conley who was Frank's nightwatchman and Janitor respectively, remember this was during Jim Crow, he could've threatened them into doing what he said at threat of a lynching.
Frank lied about knowing who Phagan was, despite being the one to lay her off, and being the last to see her alive as he admitted.
Frank's behavior was highly suspicious when questioned.
The letters found by her body don't make sense, how would she write "the black guy did it" if she was being raped and murdered, or even better, why would the two black guys write the incriminating letters?
Frank hired Pinkerton agents, which worked against him as when the detective found the bloodied shirt in Lee's home it was an obvious plant as the shirt was fresh and unused.
So, with this evidence, we can come to our own conclusions about the case rather than following the ADL's narrative, especially since they were formed specifically to run cover for Leo Frank.
Remember kids, just because the accused is Jewish doesn't mean calling them out makes you Antisemitic, take it from me, your local quarter Jew.
Wow, you did so much work and yet, did not link to your source so.....
Also your seem to believe that lynching by the kkk is an appropriate carrage of justice. Apparently life in prison is not enough for you. Got it.
It's literally taken verbatim from the same wiki you screenshotted you absolute rook.
I got that. You just went through and derided every source so I was just wondering if you were going to do the same for the parts you quoted. But of course not, why would you.
Fine you want the sources, I'll provide them since you seem dead set on swallowing ADL cock.
Here is the text of the book Wikipedia cites, which details the events that took place, the book "And The Dead Shall Rise" goes on to cite numerous sources in its bibliography.
And yes, while I disagree with the KKK and mob justice, I still feel nothing for Leo Frank as he was a monster who raped and killed a 13 year old girl who worked for him and tried to frame his black employees.
Just think about it, at the height of Jim Crow in the Southern states, why would the KKK side with two black guys against their employer? What could they have seen in that court case that could have swayed ardent racists like the KKK to go after Leo Frank?
I mean, clearly they couldn't have seen anything, the ADL has been saying there's no evidence against him for over 100 years, and why wouldn't we trust an organization that was founded specifically to defend him by saying any criticism against him is antisemitic.
I'm being sarcastic if you can't tell.
Squid blocked me, AND deleted all of their reblogs.
"Apparently life in prison wasn't good enough."
The KKK didn't lynch him before sentencing and they didn't break into prison to do it either. His sentence got commuted and he was released.
No, his death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment, he was never released.
They did break him out of prison two years after sentencing as I said.
The June 21, 1915 commutation provoked Tom Watson into advocating Frank's lynching.
He wrote in The Jeffersonian and Watson's Magazine: "This country has nothing to fear from its rural communities. Lynch law is a good sign; it shows that a sense of justice lives among the people."
A group of prominent men organized themselves into the "Vigilance Committee" and openly planned to kidnap Frank from prison. They consisted of 28 men with various skills: an electrician was to cut the prison wires, car mechanics were to keep the cars running, and there was a locksmith, a telephone man, a medic, a hangman, and a lay preacher.
On the afternoon of August 16, the eight cars of the lynch mob left Marietta separately for Milledgeville. They arrived at the prison at around 10 p.m., and the electrician cut the telephone wires, members of the group drained the gas from the prison's automobiles, handcuffed the warden, seized Frank, and drove away.
The 175-mile trip took about seven hours at a top speed of 18 miles per hour through small towns on back roads. Lookouts in the towns telephoned ahead to the next town as soon as they saw the line of cars pass by.
A site at Frey's Gin, two miles east of Marietta, had been prepared, complete with a rope and table supplied by former Sheriff William Frey. The New York Times reported Frank was handcuffed, his legs tied at the ankles, and that he was hanged from a branch of a tree at around 7 a.m., facing the direction of the house where Phagan had lived.
Bringing this back because people are still pushing the narrative that Leo Frank was innocent.
Yes, there is an increase in antisemitism, the Leo Frank case is not an example of that, and should not be cited as antisemitism, Jews can do bad things.
You know he's guilty too, because what the KKK saw in that court room made them side with two black men in the deep south of Atlanta, Georgia during the height of Jim Crow.
They cry out as they strike you.
Finding my mother’s sugar daddy’s tumblr with a handful of furry drawings on it was easily the worst thing I’ve done in my life
Unrestrained summer fun
* crazy tire-screeching noises*

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I fully understand why describing a character of an unclear ethnic background as "ambiguously brown" is Not Good, but I started thinking about how the more you narrow it down, the funnier it gets to describe a character as "ambiguously" something.
"Ambiguously brown" - frankly that's just lazy, that could be anywhere. Just say "brown" if you really have to.
"Ambiguously African" - okay you have a vague guess of a continent
"Ambiguously Central Asian" - plausible to narrow down on sight if you're very familiar with people from around this region
"Ambiguously Baltic" - this mf is either Latvian or Lithuanian, and I am intrigued by the fact that your estimate is this precise but you still aren't confident enough in your assessment to guess which one
"Ambiguously Grevenan" - if you can tell greeks apart that closely, then frankly you're just flexing at this point
writer: "he was ambiguously American"
reader: "so wait, was he white? black? hispanic? Samoan?"
writer: "in the low light and dense fog, it was impossible to make out, but he was definitely eating a burger."
It cannot be overstated just how positive the "hipster" phenomenon was for culture, and it is especially apparent now in the twilight of its influence. It was a repudiation of everything we now call "goyslop": McDonald's and Applebee's, Budweiser, Folgers, everything frozen and out of a can, radio rap and pop, music written via focus group.. It valued taste and craftsmanship and appreciation of excellence but also rejected consumerism at least in theory (thrifting, etc). Aesthetically it was a nostalgic movement, wearing old clothes, the goofy mustaches, the revival of bluesy or folk music. All of this combined spoke to an attitude that somewhere along the line, things had gone wrong... But there was also an optimism, we could set things right if we just slowed down a bit. Despite near universal ridicule, so many elements of hipsterdom sublimated into the culture and remained a dominant and positive force on it for the last couple of decades. I think it's been fading quickly since COVID and since Doordash. I will miss it. Nobody will weep for stomp clap or for the girls in stupid little flat brimmed trilby hats or for the waxed mustaches or the mustache finger tattoos or even for the thick rimmed glasses that dominated style up until just recently... But hipsters are the reason your morning coffee isn't shit. Thank you hipsters. I love you.
Hey cool post! Btw do you mind explaining what "goyslop" means to everyone
Thank you! I am happy to explain, goyslop is low quality food/media for gentiles, the nations, etc.