'While I came from poison, you came from love'

‘I wasn’t raised there.’ Kara knows that, she saw him get sent off, she saw her planet blow, there was no Krypton for him to be raised on.

She sees him and realises and knows all these little things about him, but he can’t even speak the language that escapes her tongue, cannot understand her words nor her trauma.

She holds in her arms a little scruffy dog who she spent those twenty or so years asleep with, the one she found and saved when she was so sad and dreading things, when her planet was falling apart. She holds in her arms the first life she ever saved, and across from her is the other life she was meant to save and raise but didn’t get to.

Then the powers kick in, and all that was too much in her head is made worse by all the things she can see and hear around her, and she can’t understand any of noise. An explosion of sound and sight and feeling, an explosion just like her home.

because in most versions of the myth she’s already queen, structurally tied to camelot’s legitimacy and eventual collapse through the lancelot storyline. she’s not really starting from outside the system—she is the system.

but in bbc merlin they make her a servant. they pull her all the way down to the bottom of camelot’s hierarchy and then slowly move her upward until she becomes queen.

and like… that changes everything. she’s no longer the “pressure point” that destabilises camelot, she becomes someone shaped by how unfair camelot already is, someone who has to learn the rules of power from the outside before ever touching it.

so why do that?

why take a figure who is usually tied to downfall and turn her into someone who rises through the system instead of breaking it? why shift her from symbolic tragedy to emotional grounding for arthur’s rule? why remove her from the role that myth almost always gives her?

what was the story trying to say by changing her starting point so completely?

and like… was it about making camelot feel fixable? or just making her easier to root for? or something else entirely?

idk. but it feels too intentional not to mean something.

or maybe it’s less “one big reason” and more a bunch of overlapping choices that all point in the same direction:

maybe it’s because bbc merlin isn’t really interested in repeating the myth’s tragedy structure at all. the original arthurian cycle is kind of built on inevitability—camelot doesn’t “fail,” it must fail, and guinevere/lancelot often become part of that machinery. but the show spends five seasons pretending, emotionally, that things could actually work out. so gwen can’t really stay a mythic “collapse point” without breaking that tone from episode one.

or maybe it’s a modern adaptation instinct: make her a servant so her rise feels like a story you can follow instead of a story you inherit. noble-born guinevere is static in a way that doesn’t suit a long character arc on television.

or it could be about audience positioning. making gwen lower-status at the start makes her easier to read as “relatable” in a modern TV sense—less symbolic queen, more grounded emotional entry point into court life. the show wants you to watch her become important, not just accept that she already is.

but there’s also a more thematic possibility: maybe it’s about shifting where “danger” in camelot comes from.

in older myth, danger often comes from personal desire (guinevere/lancelot) breaking political order. in bbc merlin, danger is almost always systemic: uther’s authoritarianism, morgana’s radicalisation, merlin’s secrecy, destiny itself. so gwen is removed from the “personal betrayal causes collapse” slot and rewritten into the “personal growth within a broken system” slot instead.

and then there’s arthur himself.

maybe gwen has to be a servant first so that arthur’s ideology actually has something to mean. if his whole arc is “a king who tries to do better,” then his queen being someone who lived the opposite reality makes that ideology concrete instead of abstract. she becomes proof, not just partner.

or maybe it’s just that the show is fundamentally uncomfortable with the older myth’s tendency to make women structurally responsible for collapse. so instead of letting guinevere carry that narrative burden, it redistributes it elsewhere—and rebuilds her into someone who stabilises rather than fractures.

but even then… none of these answers fully “complete” it.

because the bigger question underneath all of this is still there:

Going out by light of day to do good in the world. First thing in the morning. That's you.

For @dukethomas-week Day 5: Sunlight/Poetry!

linked tree (includes options to donate to Ghanaian projects)