Hot Gay Mess

Hace mucho que no subo nada por aquí 😅

Espero que sea de tu agrado esto!!;)

She was assaulted by her father. In Prime Earth, her father is a billionaire crime lord. Sure, it's realistic. But does it convey the same thing?

She ran away and was groomed and forced into prostitution. In prime earth, "Mia was able to provide for herself by stealing money from people and blending into crowds, often escaping using skilled gymnastics. Though she often used the money she stole to try and help her fellow street orphans have better lives." So, she is a cool teen protagonist in a ya novel who had enough to share.

She saved herself. She freed herself from her pimp cause one person told her she was a kid who deserved to be a kid. And then SHE FIGURES OUT HIS IDENTITY AND INVITES HERSELF OVER. In prime earth, that one person saves her in a damsel in distress story, reveals his identity and offers her a place to stay.

She got HIV either from the sex work or substance use that she was forced to do to survive. She sees no future. But she tries to show a brave face. Cause her father figure is crashing out over it. A storyline where she explicitly states that she isn't to be some pitied castaway just because she has HIV. This was in 2005 btw. In prime earth, I see no mention of it.

Batman: faces

Omegavers x Literal brothers (one mom or dad) Jaytim

Courting necklace from Jason🥺

In this one both brothers by blood and both were left on the street the same age Jason was in comics. Jason makes everything he can to protect and feed both of them.

“The darkness he feared was in his own mind and there was no light in the universe powerful enough to take that darkness from him.”

is that kiriko and hanzo have to already know that mizuki is a hashimoto spy

like, barring exceptionally bad writing, there is no way that they do not know

and i'm not even talking about how he's being sus as shit with sharing his knowledge of the hashimoto compound, conveniently having a key card to get in, and how shimada "paranoid weirdo" hanzo would not just let that slide

because mizuki's wielding the kusarigama out in the open for them to see

and they would recognize it

kiriko's already said it; she would know her father's handiwork anywhere

so they have to know he's hashimoto, because that is the only way for him to be in possession of one of toshiro's weapons

but they also have to know that this is someone toshiro trusts, someone he cares about, because the kusarigama is special; it's a masterpiece, the way the weapons he forged for the shimada are, the way kiriko's grandmother's ofuda are

the way the weapons he's been forced to make for their enemies aren't

so they must have known what he was before walking into the hashimoto headquarters by his side

and they must have chosen to trust him to make the right choice anyway

Don't get me wrong: I investigate warnings, and I act on them if they're true and relevant. But callout posts are, on a very fundamental level, not about what people say they're about. There are exceptions, but generally speaking they're made for one or more of the following reasons:

OP didn't like the subject to begin with (often for bigoted reasons), and they wanted a reason, and a following, to justify and validate that.

OP wanted to gain popularity, so they made themselves look like either a victim, a hero, or both.

OP wanted to claim victim status in a private falling-out in order to preserve good standing with their own friends/their community.

OP didn't like what the subject was saying, and wanted to silence them (often for bigoted reasons).

OP genuinely just wants "revenge" on the subject, or otherwise wants to ruin their reputation and have them sent harassment.

Again, there are exceptions: there are "callouts" that just unravel a subject's lies, or point out problems in already public actions. If OP is claiming to have been personally victimized in a legitimately serious way, and especially one that indicates the subject might be a danger to others, I'm definitely more willing to believe it- one obvious example being sexual violence.

But oftentimes, callouts are incredibly personal, misleading, emotionally manipulative, blatantly untrue, or all of the above.

This person came to me on anon; I have absolutely no way of knowing what their motives are or how trustworthy they are. There is no credibility or accountability here.

And I did read the post. Lo and behold, it's riddled with emotionally manipulative language, false accusations, and the biggest reaches I've ever seen:

"DON'T READ THIS CALLOUT, IT'S SO TRIGGERING TO EVERYONE, JUST TAKE MY WORD FOR IT. But the proof is here if you REALLY don't believe me"

"Proof" is a scarce handful of screenshots taken out of context that contain emotionally evocative language, but do not support the accusations at all.

Some accusations are genuinely just weird logic leaps with no support, others are matters of personal opinion obviously driven by bigoted motives.

OP themselves expresses very publicly that they believe people who are marginalized in the ways the subject are, who speak on that marginalization, should be silenced.

I try to assume good faith here, and I want to believe this anon was just guilt-tripped and manipulated by the post in question. I don't hold any ill will here.

But anon, I want you to ask yourself:

Are the accusations you're making something you have personally investigated and found to be true?

Does this person deserve the harassment and ostracization they will likely receive as a result of your accusations?

Will you hold yourself accountable for the damage you've caused if you're wrong?