[something] Brainrot Brrrrr

12 WIPs in my document folder

12 WIPs in my folder

Write one down, finish and post

17 WIPs in my document folder

--

Sweetheart, guess who else was a child before they became an adult? I'm not even sorry this is stupid in another level. Wtf? Like that person sure did put a lot work there to be this stupid.

I sure hope they don't look at their partners childhood pictures by their logic.

--

"Sexualization" discourse is just another way of saying "You dishonor someone by being attracted to them."

Yes, fictional characters are objects, etc. etc., but my real problem with this line of reasoning is that it is always about how desire is a problem you could pray away if you tried hard enough. They'll tack on any justification they can think of—the character's childhood being shown or anything else—but it all boils down to "Horny bad!"

and the Salty Spitoon are

competing gay bars

It's always under the pretense of "I'm not here to tell you what to do," but the implication is always "if you did interrogate why you're kinky, you'd realise it's for misogyny/internalised misogyny reasons and you'd stop." If you told them "actually, I did interrogate why I'm kinky, and I've concluded that it's not for misogyny reasons and I'm not contributing to patriarchy by being kinky," they wouldn't be satisfied with that answer.

I'd seriously rather them just say "all kink is irredeemably misogynistic and there is no way to be kinky without contributing to patriarchy." At least it's honest about their actual beliefs.

What particularly annoys me is the idea that "kink critical" people have anything to say about kink that hasn't already been said by kinky people. Almost no one is claiming kink can never be a reflection of misogyny, racism, or any other -ism. Almost no one is claiming kink can never be a tool of abusers. I guarantee whatever critique of kink "kink critical" people have has already been well-discussed by the kink community lol. I guarantee almost every kinky person on the planet has agonised about why they're kinky. And in most circumstances, it is in fact the deeply ashamed, deeply repressed kinksters that are most likely to hurt others, not the self-accepting kinksters.

--

She literally went “debate me! Debate me!” Over and over like the grifter she is and when she couldn’t get what she wanted and when “no” wasn’t enough she resorted to retaliatory sex-pestery, posting an image of somebody’s body with intention to shame and embarrass and spawn more waspish tittering from her internet followers.

(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—

(a) A intentionally shares a photograph or film which shows, or appears to show, another person (B) in an intimate state, (b) B does not consent to the sharing of the photograph or film, and (c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

(2) A person (A) commits an offence if—

number one check yourself. Number two comparing TMA/TME to anti-Blackness is a false dichotomy and I need white queer people to stop trying to compare themselves to Black people every single chance they get. oh my god

The two are NOT similar. If you really wanna play the game of equating race and gender, then the equivalent to “Black and nonblack” would be transfem/trans woman and non-transfem/trans woman, not TMA/TME. I can assure you that NO black person is going around saying “antiblack racism affected vs antiblack racism exempt.” Because That Is Stupid.

EVERYONE is affected by antiblackness, because of how deeply it’s ingrained into our entire societal structure. You cannot write off specific demographics as not being affected by certain forms of oppression or discrimination, because the nature of living in a white supremacist-capitalist-patriarchy is that ALL of these systems are INTRINSICALLY connected with each other, and affect EVERYONE to some degree. There are countless historical examples of antiblack legislation directly impacting poor communities of other racial groups- including white people. There are primary targets of discrimination, obviously, but nobody is truly “exempt” from any sort of oppressive system unless they are at the VERY top of the damn food chain.

In the same vein, the intersection of transphobia and misogyny is ALSO deeply ingrained into our society. And because of that, nobody is truly “transmisogyny-exempt.” Even people who aren’t the primary targets are still directly impacted and negatively affected by transmisogynistic systems. I find TMA/TME to be useless in terms of categorization because it directly posits that everyone who gets sorted into the latter group just doesn’t experience any oppression or discrimination derived from transmisogynistic bases at all, which is ridiculous, because that happens All the time.

A trans man or enby who’s mistaken for a trans woman and is assaulted for it, a cis man who’s belittled and attacked on the basis of being Too Feminine, a cis woman who’s publicly shamed, derided, and transvestigated for having testosterone levels that are “too high,” are all examples of non-transfem/trans woman groups being negatively affected on the basis of transmisogyny.

Poor white people being affected by legislation meant to target and attack Black populations and the massive trend of colorism throughout Asian communities are examples of nonblack groups being negatively affected on the basis of antiblackness.

You cannot sort people by what oppression they do and do not face, and attempts to do so are inherently exclusionary and are bound to lead back into denying people of their lived experiences, just because they don’t line up perfectly into these specific categories of “this genre of person goes through this” vs “this genre of person doesn’t go through that.”

I believe that TMA/TME was coined with the best intentions, but the problem is that it’s a clumsy dichotomy and the way a lot of people tend to use it ends up leading back into the same issues of being binary (“amab trans people experience this, afab trans people don’t experience that”) and then THAT leads back into a whole heaping mess in and of itself

Talking about the way transfeminized people are targeted by transmisogyny is not a bad thing in and of itself! But like, you can just say transfem/non-transfem- or even just “transfeminized” to describe the position oppressors will often place people into in order to enact transmisogynistic violence against them- instead of directly trying to state what different groups of people Do And Don’t Experience. you can say “primary targets of transmisogyny” without directly implying that certain groups are exempt from it all together.

Here it is again. You might want to save it just in case an accident like that happens again

They started messaging. Cachét complimented his drawing of a human-bug threesome and asked for a print. Three years later, Cachét and David got married. The human-bug threesome drawing hangs on the wall of their home.

--