Anyway dickheads, i will continue to research the fuck out of whatever false allegations you want to throw at JKR and demonstrate, point by point, that you are full of shit. It is my privilege and my joy!
d e v o n
NASA
dirt enthusiast
almost home
Peter Solarz

JVL
DEAR READER
art blog(derogatory)
hello vonnie

Love Begins
AnasAbdin
Sweet Seals For You, Always
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
RMH
sheepfilms
Three Goblin Art
Jules of Nature

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Uruguay

seen from Belgium

seen from United States
seen from United States
@joannerowling
Anyway dickheads, i will continue to research the fuck out of whatever false allegations you want to throw at JKR and demonstrate, point by point, that you are full of shit. It is my privilege and my joy!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Saw the latest Spielberg and i really think it's gonna be the last Spielberg now. I don't think i've ever seen a movie that screamed so loudly "I'M OLD!!!" at my face for 2 hours
No one talks about how much bisexuals pushed gender ideology and pushed conversion therapy beliefs on us.
It wasnât lesbians. It wasnât gay men. It was bisexuals. Let me explain.
Bisexuals have nothing to lose when it comes to TRAism. Sure, sometimes trans identified people will say to them they should be attracted to trans identified people or else theyâre bigots but homosexuals are, and will always be the main targets of trans individuals to hate on. Why is this? Because they think a lesbian or gay man being attracted to them will be the highest level of validation even though no lesbian will be attracted to a male and no gay man will be attracted to a female, itâs a sick fantasy they have.
Bisexuals donât see the issue with trans identified people hating on us for our sexuality because they simply canât relate. For them, genitals and sex doesnât matter so surely it shouldnât for homosexuals either. They canât fathom that for homosexuals, biological sex matters, because they donât understand from their perspective.
Therefore, most bisexuals donât stand up for homosexuals. They call us bigots for not being attracted to the opposite sex. They validate trans identified individuals because they donât see anything wrong with the way they act towards us.
Not only do they have nothing to lose (unless theyâre womenâŚbut many women support misogynistic causes), but they have so much to gain. Gender ideology positions bisexuality as the one moral sexuality. So many bi people are so excited to get to wax poetic about how superior they are to everyone else for ânot seeing genderâ or for ânot caring about genitalsâ, or how they care about âhearts not partsâ. Unlike those horrible gays who only care about genitals and donât even care about personality.
It also gives them an opportunity to punch down at homosexuals. Again, theyâre viewed as the one moral sexuality, so now they get to take on an Educator role and lecture homosexuals about how horrible and transphobic we are, and how we should open our minds, hearts, and beds to the opposite sex. And they are so smug about this.
As far as the whole âbut bi people are also told theyâre transphobic if they donât date trans peopleâ argument goesâŚIâm sorry but it isnât the same. When bi people are told this, they arenât facing demands to change their natural sexuality. In their case, not wanting to date trans identified people really is a preference. One that should absolutely be respected, of course, but still a preference. In the case of homosexuals, itâs our biology. Lesbians cannot be attracted to males no matter how they identify, and gay men cannot be attracted to females no matter how they identify. When weâre told that not wanting to date the opposite sex is transphobic and that we should change, weâre facing homophobic conversion rhetoric.
Big of you all to make a wide call for biphobia and to spread the same kind of uninformed hatred and bigotry that has harmed us consistently throughout time, and then restrain the comments on that message. There are few things uglier than misguided self-satisfaction upon throwing people under the bus just because it feels nice to use whomever you don't understand as scapegoat, since your empathy cannot extend beyond your own libido.
You are not miraculously spared from being an intolerant imbecile just because you are gay. Persecution does not absolve the smugness of your wallowing in the prejudice you actively contribute to layer. You are not right because you feel like you should be. Bisexuality is not a preference, it is a sexual orientation. No one chooses who they desire and love. And there are many bisexual people out there with a deeper attraction to the same sex.
It's not because one is theoretically compatible with a partner that they should be forced into any kind of relationship meant to 'affirm' the other person's warped idea of self-worth. That works for everyone and everything. As a matter of fact, the awful discourse from activists who will demand other people to narrate them into existence is wrong in and of itself, not relatively depending on whether you happen to be personally involved. Gender ideology as it stands today is harmful for women of any persuasion. Gender stereotypes erected into so-called identities harm boys and girls alike.
You all pretend to stand separate from those militants you loathe when in reality you're two sides from the same terrible, postmodern coin. You can't analyse for shit, and you defend nobody: you content yourselves with redirecting bigotry, hoping it'll distract the bigots away from you. It won't. You're only giving them fodder for their cannons. You project. You miss, but you don't miss yourselves.
since your empathy cannot extend beyond your own libido
Thanks for proving the entire point of my post! Another bisexual that hates homosexuals because we can only love the same sex, aka fork found in kitchen đ´
Possibly your reading comprehension leaves even more to be desired than your social aptitudes.
OP what is the point of this? What about the gay men who still quietly support or at the very least don't object to trans ideology and didn't bother to intervene while Magdalen Berns was basically pioneering terfism with a handful of gay and bi women (remember the febfems?).
Obviously being a sex pest does seem to correlate nastily with being a gender proponent in trans women most especially, but when you know that some trans women fantasise about having sex with animals and children, i'm not sure what kind of objective parallel you can draw with bi people who are, you know, fucking normal.
I'm not a "biphobia!!!!" type of bi woman, but this post stinks, hel is right.
Is there any worse feeling in the world than being offered a gift that you instantly hate?
currently maybe possibly single-handedly crashing whatever servers eton hosts its archived student newspapers on because me and a friend are getting obsessed with a single outspoken prefect from 1883
@queenlua Happily! This is going to be long, so here's some set dressing first:
Eton College, for anyone unfamiliar, is a prestigious boys' school in England that has famously educated MANY MANY politicians, royals, nobility, and other assorted famous people. All you really need to know about it is that's it's incredibly posh and expensive and exclusive
The Eton Society (called âPopâ internally) is a self-selecting body of senior students at Eton that have historically held a decent amount of power at the school. If youâve ever attended a school with a prefect system/house system etc you probably know a little bit about how obnoxious this kind of group can get. Now imagine they're all called Lord Godfrey Pickerington or something. Are you getting it? Is the set being dressed? Good.
Now that the scene is set, hereâs our tale!!
I stumbled into Etonâs archives while doing research for a fanfiction and weâll just leave that admission where it is!! It was in reading old issues of their student-run paper, The Chronicle, from 1883 that myself and @carebewear started becoming fixated on one guy in particular.
Cecil B. Gedge (from this point on known as Gedge) was a member of the Eton Society in 1883/84. He won a few Science awards during his time there (Biology!!) and seemed to like rowing during school sports events. He went on to become a barrister, which will make sense once you know more about him.
The best part of Gedge, though, is his appearances in the minutes for the Eton Society meetings. At least at Gedgeâs time, the Eton Society seemed really fond of staging debates (more like loosely organised discussions) on a wide variety of topics.
Here are some of the riveting questions they discussed!
And my personal favourite: "Are Ghosts Real?"
(They were very divided)
Gedge first came to our attention in debate about the annexation of New Guinea, in which he apparently started an "abusive attack on the British army and missionaries":
Wow! Based Gedge!? He continues to spit period-typical truths about things like how we shouldn't tax bicycles actually because it would disproportionately affect poor people. YIMBY Gedge?? He would've loved light rail.
The final nail in our Gedge obsession was a debate on women's suffrage, in which Gedge vehemently advocates for women's right to vote and then gets no supporters at the end of the meeting. But I appreciate that he said it anyway and kept saying it. He is more persecuted that Christ, to me.
Here are some more, from anti-conscription sentiment to indirectly calling his classmates stupid to weirding everyone out by saying he wants to donate his body to science (his friend dissecting him for fun):
We started getting the feeling people might not have liked Gedge that much, mainly since one of the Society members wrote a poem about all his friends and Gedge isn't in it.
In 1884, there was some extended drama in the Chronicle where someone whom I groundlessly suspect was Gedge under a pseudonym ("A Socialist"), wrote to the editor complaining that the "debates" published by the Eton Society were "bad" (genuine quote) and that they should make a REAL debate society at the school that ALL boys, not just the self-selected seniors, could participate in:
To make a long story short most of the vocal members of the Eton Society threw up their hands at this and refused to do anything, basically boiling down to "Just because we're the prefects of the school doesn't mean we should have to actually DO anything!! Unfair!!" and also this quote which reads exactly like at least a thousand real tweets I've seen in my life
Liberal. Gedge, of course, was there giving practical suggestions, but the discussion was ultimately cut short because their principal died and they had to push a memorial issue of the paper. We have a working theory that the staff might've used that interruption as an opportunity to get the boys to cut it the fuck out.
Anyway it's a little unclear what happens to Gedge after that. He isn't credited as being in the 1884 Eton Society in the larger school register but it's unclear if that's because he wasn't re-elected or if he just graduated. Either way, he went on to become a barrister in London, which makes a lot of sense. Sadly though, he passed away in WW1, which we were really normal about
Thank you Lt. Gedge, for truly embodying the eternal spirit of an outspoken debate-kid, a friend to the lefties, a proto-yimby, a terminal back-talker, and the kid in a biology class that's a little too excited for the dissections. I hope your life, however short, was a rich and bright one. Thanks for the incredibly entertaining afternoon, brother đŤĄ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Orientalism aside, if anything relgious modest dress makes your status as a woman more easily perceived. These people like to point to revealing outfits meant to show off womenâs bodies as this opposing equivalent evil but nobody is forced into wearing crop tops
i was raised kinda trad, long skirts, head coverings in church etc. its every bit as objectifying as wearing scrunched yoga pants or whatever -- your body is objectified to the point that even as a child, you are told that failing to obscure it /as much as possible/ can lead others to grievous sin. ie not covering your hair in church can distract men, take their thoughts down an unclean path, and take them to hell. and thats on YOU. it cultivates a profoundly cruel relationship with your body. i cant imagine the dynamic is particularly different just bc its not christianity...
i am coerced into wearing something like this and my sisters do the full burka plus niqab. let me tell you this has never stopped men from staring like their lives depend on it. ppl are fucking stupid
Though in a different but still important sense, *you* aren't being perceived. Simply because we can't know who *you* are.
What is actually being perceived is a template of a woman, a placeholder that is simply a mother, a wife, a background character depending on what's needed. And that's its own flavor of tragedy.
leitmotifs never get old to me like holy shit dude thereâs this melody that corresponds to this one guy and if you hear the melody it means the guy is there. holy shit. and sometimes it refers to ideas too not just guys. has anyone heard about this
Late 2010s and 2020s horror movies will be remembered as hot women going insane and often terrorising, maiming and/or killing men (often their boyfriend / love interest); and i can't pretend i haven't enjoyed this genre, but also it's sort of interesting that it's happening meanwhile we're hearing all this noise about "male loneliness epidemic", men panicking that women are stealing their jobs and taking up their place in society, men generally feeling like women don't want or need them, etc etc. Especially since i'm still not seeing much of these horror pics actually being written or directed by women. Like it's a fascinating phenomenon but i don't know if it really is all that feminist at the end of the day.
I also notice that so far this seems to be a genre exclusively reserved to white male directors (and white actors of both sexes). Non white prestige horror has very little focus on misogyny, that i've seen anyway. Take all the male characters in Jordan Peele's movies, they are perhaps flawed but still sympathetic and heroic. Whereas in films like Ex Machina, Midsomar, Companion, Obsession, Pearl, etc., the men are consistently punished for their own insufficiency: they're not serial killers, they're weak, impotent, ordinary men, at worst casually cruel, at best kinda dumb and disappointing, whose selfishness has catastrophic consequences for everyone around them, starting with their girlfriend or love interest. So we have a phenomenon where men, specifically white men, are portraying white men - themselves - very harshly, focusing on male inadequacy and humiliation. Meanwhile a) non-white men are NOT doing that, b) other white men are outraged by and blaming women for this trend, when actually c) female directors are putting out there films like Raw, Titane, or the Substance, where men are not portrayed like this at all and in fact barely focused on. So it's in that sense that i don't see this trend as feminist, although it's not strictly anti-feminist either, it's just intensely (white) male-focused.
#cant remember who Men was directed by but that shit was fucked up#and iâd like to see some feminist analysis of it
@cassandra-the-unbelieved That's Alex Garland, who also did Ex Machina! Despite the themes, i would not place Men in that category of horror movies about mediocre male protagonists unleashing catastrophe with their inadequacy. The men portrayed in the film are all unambiguously monstruous. Also, while there is still an undercurrent of Harper being, like many female protags, driven insane by the horror, the ending does seem to suggest that she was really being haunted / hunted by something.
What i really liked about Men was the contrast between her ex, and the menacing same-faced men in the British village. They are total opposite: her ex is a modern man, a good-looking one, probably one who works a white collar job like her, he's black (represents the more modern and cosmopolitan face of the UK), and we only see him in their expensive looking flat (penthouse?) in London; meanwhile the men in the village are the stereotypical white countrymen you see in old BBC programs with awful teeth, a funny accent and sitcom jobs (the priest, the cop, the pub owner, the annoying neighbour). Yet in the end it turns out that they are all pretty much the same guy. I liked that because it really underscored the point that a) yes all men, and b) there is no escaping them. Busy cities, countryside? Nope, not safe, either option. Even in the middle of the woods, you can't drop your guard. Inside? Not safe either. Also, even if the point is made rather disgustingly, it's nice to see a film directly calling out men's womb envy.
there should be a term for characters you personally don't care about but you defend them anyways because the way people treat them is really uncomfortable. like ok this is a very middle-of-the-road character for me but the fandom's either been super misogynistic, racist, etc. about them or harassed innocent people who try to genuinely explore that character warts and all, and i find that more annoying than the actual character.
the term should by 'my client', like you're a lawyer defending your client that you are completely indifferent to but you are obligated by your job (or your morals) to defend
So I read Persepolis a while ago...

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
i enjoyed all those movies (particularly midsommar/the witch) but it also kind of coincides with a trend of both men and women both hating âweak menâ/passive men with poor boundaries more than anything else (which can sometimes coexist with weaponized incompetence which is imo a whole different thing). i really really see it on sites like reddit. iâm almost surprised christian midsommar didnât have an overbearing MIL and overly close girl bff. it also coincides to me with the social trend of people hating those who are slightly annoying or rude (like people who block the sidewalk/play music from speakers in public) more than like ⌠people who seriously harm others.
i donât know, iâve just noticed these trends recently and i feel like these films do fit into them. âk*ll your shitty boyfriendâ is a kind of hyperbolic but not really meme iâve seen floating around various communities for years. at the end of the day, i donât know how to articulate my point about what exactly this all means but thereâs definitely some dots to be connected.
Interesting. I wasn't necessarily connecting it to a general hatred of mediocre and rude people above actual harmful acts (which is a trend i've noticed too), but it doesn't sound far-fetched.
Re: Christian in Midsommar; what's always intrigued me about it is that the character is really put from the start in a morally impossible situation, regardless of his personal flaws. He's been thinking about breaking up with Dani for a while, but she has just lost her entire family in a freak murder-suicide event. If Christian had broken up with Dani right after that awful event, wouldn't it have made him an even worse person? And yes after that he makes selfish choice after selfish choice, but this feels like the film is really designed to make you pity him AND hate him at the same time.
Also, as far as i'm aware the majority of murder-suicides are done by men, but in Midsommar it's Dani's sister doing it to their parents. It's a bizarre narrative choice in a film about men and women's relationships, yet not one i see brought up a lot.
literally tumblr
Late 2010s and 2020s horror movies will be remembered as hot women going insane and often terrorising, maiming and/or killing men (often their boyfriend / love interest); and i can't pretend i haven't enjoyed this genre, but also it's sort of interesting that it's happening meanwhile we're hearing all this noise about "male loneliness epidemic", men panicking that women are stealing their jobs and taking up their place in society, men generally feeling like women don't want or need them, etc etc. Especially since i'm still not seeing much of these horror pics actually being written or directed by women. Like it's a fascinating phenomenon but i don't know if it really is all that feminist at the end of the day.
I also notice that so far this seems to be a genre exclusively reserved to white male directors (and white actors of both sexes). Non white prestige horror has very little focus on misogyny, that i've seen anyway. Take all the male characters in Jordan Peele's movies, they are perhaps flawed but still sympathetic and heroic. Whereas in films like Ex Machina, Midsomar, Companion, Obsession, Pearl, etc., the men are consistently punished for their own insufficiency: they're not serial killers, they're weak, impotent, ordinary men, at worst casually cruel, at best kinda dumb and disappointing, whose selfishness has catastrophic consequences for everyone around them, starting with their girlfriend or love interest. So we have a phenomenon where men, specifically white men, are portraying white men - themselves - very harshly, focusing on male inadequacy and humiliation. Meanwhile a) non-white men are NOT doing that, b) other white men are outraged by and blaming women for this trend, when actually c) female directors are putting out there films like Raw, Titane, or the Substance, where men are not portrayed like this at all and in fact barely focused on. So it's in that sense that i don't see this trend as feminist, although it's not strictly anti-feminist either, it's just intensely (white) male-focused.
Kinda feeling like i'm having a conversation with myself at this point lmao but another thought about this has occured! A different reason i don't see these films as really feminist is that at least a few of them don't seem to be particularly criticising male power, but male weakness. Christian in Midsommar isn't physically abusive to Dani, he hurts her by being conflict avoidant, lazy (he also doesn't know what he wants to do with his life in general). Caleb in Ex Machina is naive and deluded. Bear in Obsession ends up causing a horrible sequence of events because he didn't dare confessing his feelings to Nikki. It would be a stretch to say those films endorse traditional masculinity, but they're not exactly endorsing the "modern sensitive man" either, and in that sense they can be read as a bit reactionary.
Late 2010s and 2020s horror movies will be remembered as hot women going insane and often terrorising, maiming and/or killing men (often their boyfriend / love interest); and i can't pretend i haven't enjoyed this genre, but also it's sort of interesting that it's happening meanwhile we're hearing all this noise about "male loneliness epidemic", men panicking that women are stealing their jobs and taking up their place in society, men generally feeling like women don't want or need them, etc etc. Especially since i'm still not seeing much of these horror pics actually being written or directed by women. Like it's a fascinating phenomenon but i don't know if it really is all that feminist at the end of the day.
I also notice that so far this seems to be a genre exclusively reserved to white male directors (and white actors of both sexes). Non white prestige horror has very little focus on misogyny, that i've seen anyway. Take all the male characters in Jordan Peele's movies, they are perhaps flawed but still sympathetic and heroic. Whereas in films like Ex Machina, Midsomar, Companion, Obsession, Pearl, etc., the men are consistently punished for their own insufficiency: they're not serial killers, they're weak, impotent, ordinary men, at worst casually cruel, at best kinda dumb and disappointing, whose selfishness has catastrophic consequences for everyone around them, starting with their girlfriend or love interest. So we have a phenomenon where men, specifically white men, are portraying white men - themselves - very harshly, focusing on male inadequacy and humiliation. Meanwhile a) non-white men are NOT doing that, b) other white men are outraged by and blaming women for this trend, when actually c) female directors are putting out there films like Raw, Titane, or the Substance, where men are not portrayed like this at all and in fact barely focused on. So it's in that sense that i don't see this trend as feminist, although it's not strictly anti-feminist either, it's just intensely (white) male-focused.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Womenâs protests in Afghanistan are an important issue that deserves much more attention from the media.
A few months ago, I was on a tram when I met an Afghan woman speaking Persian. Since Persian is my first language, I joined her conversation. She shared her hope that one day Afghan women will be able to protest against the Taliban, just as women in Iran have done.
Today, Afghan women are showing incredible courage by standing up against policies that try to control their bodies and their lives. These policies, introduced since 2021, have included restrictions such as revoking access to education and limiting womenâs presence in public spaces.
I hope they will be safe, free, and heard.
Gender equality agency UN Women is âgravely concernedâ by the arrest of at least 30 women in Herat city last weekend in Afghanistan for alle
The demonstration, in the western city of Herat, was broken up after police are alleged to have opened fire.
TRAs using ancient hermaphrodite gods as âproofâ trans people have always existed feels not that much different to if furries used ancient animal headed gods as proof furries have always existed tbh