Opinion on Jason Todd/Bruce Wayne relationship as a father-son?
ALRIGHT the human rambling disaster that I am struck again
Jump to the conclusion if itās too long!
Itās just really hard discussing anything about Jason without acknowledging the sheer mess that DCās whims made of him. To take that inconsistency into account letās consider his relationship with Bruce from three angles:
Before Jasonās death / during his Robin days as portrayed before Starlin;
Before Jasonās death / during his Robin days as portrayed since Starlin and up until Jasonās resurrection, through mentions & flashbacks;
Sadly enough the first era is the only one that bothers to portray a father-son dynamic with enough content to have a real opinion on, but Iāll take what I have. And what we have then is pretty great.
Weāre in the 80ās, and Jason & Bruceās relationship is the most ridiculously pure thing to have graced our poor souls. Itās soft and good.
They have great interactions, a real proximity, and overall bring a lot into each otherās life. Alfred and Bruce are happy to have another kid at home, and Jason is as much in need of guidance & of a family as any other kid. Jason doubts himself a lot and Bruce does his best to reassure him. Heās also is a teasing little shit and thatās great.
[Batman #377 || Detective Comics #579]
[Detective Comics (1937) #573]
JASON YOUāRE TOO CUTE. Also the tired dad feel is strong in that one lmao. Jay, lad, my son, my life,, what have you done to the newspaper,,,,
Ahem right, less gushing more commenting.
As you can see, Jason and Bruceās relationship before his death/resurrection is pretty peachy. The slice of life sequences strengthen their father-son bond into the readerās mind. Weāre shown theyāre father and son rather than just told so.
At some point Bruceās custody of Jason is temporarily threatened, and that arc is a vivid telling of how strong their bond is.
[Detective Comics #542 || Batman (1940) #377]
Just. That whole speech. āOnly Jason is real.ā Definitely one of my favorite papa-bat moments.
And as Robin? Jason is clever, often brings valuable insight during cases, and respects Bruceās teaching and authority. Bruce makes a good job at addressing Jasonās insecurities and guiding him, both through his training and by honing his moral compass.
(Note that I said honing, ācause Jayās moral sense is very much present well before he meets Bruce. He was cool with stealing to survive but Ma Gunnās school was too much for him.)
Heās initially nothing like the violent angry kid heās now known as. Pre-Starlin, the only times Jason acts brashly is when confronted with his fatherās killer. When Bruce addresses the matter, itās not about blaming or judging him. āCause he gets it, but itās also his job to make sure Jasonās not compromised.
[Detective Comics #580 & 581]
And when Jason promises to keep himself in check, itās all it takes for Bruce to take him back on the case. Thatās how much he trusts him. Read the end of the issue and see how Jason proves himself worthy of that trust.
Not only does Jason understand Bruce as much as Bruce understands him, but heās very perceptive in general. He tends to be straightforward with whatās on his mind⦠at least when it comes to calling out Bruce lol
(Theyāre talking about Leslie on the last one btw. She was Bruceās surrogate mom after his parentsā death and they have a great dynamic. Another pearl straight outta the 80ā²s!)
They get each other, they trust each other, they respect each other. Honestly Bruceās relationship with Jason was the most healthy heās had with any of his kids.
We can kiss all of that goodbye after Starlin has his way with Jason. And since Starlinās āāācharacterizationāāā is the one that crossed the years, of all things,Ā we can consider Jasonās initial portrayal pretty much retconedā and his relationship with Bruce with it. Shame, huh?
Of Flashbacks and Victim-Blaming Robin days, 2.0
From the 90ās to the reboot there is⦠few material about Jasonās relationship with Bruce. Or about Jason outside of his death/Robin.
Whether Jason is mentioned or appears in a flashback, the goal isnāt to recall a father-son relationship. Itās to drive through the point that Jason was reckless and violent. That new portrayal has its predictable impact on their relationship, and thatās pretty much all there is to say.
Obviously Bruce doesnāt trust Jason, since Jason is now a āreckless angry kid who likes to inflict pain on criminalsā. Beatty delivers cool stories, but if you read that arc youāll see that he lies it very thick when it comes to victim-blaming Jason.
Depending which writer/comic book youāre reading, itās implied or affirmed that Jason is Bruceās son. Youāll probably have a line about Bruceās unending guilt, or Jasonās (*sigh*) recklessness. Mostly Jasonās a cautionary tale addressed to either Tim (who never gave much of a shit about Jason btw) or Cass (Batgirl #7 is a rare instance where itās done without victim-blaming because Pucket is da bomb).
But thereās legit no material about Jasonās childhood in the Manor, or how him and Bruce acted around one another, what they talked about, Jasonās personality aside ofĀ āangryā, how Bruce addressed his sonās self-doubts ā oh right modern!Jason is an arrogant brat who claimed the Robin mantle for himself so thatās out.
DC rolled with Starlinās portrayal, and didnāt bother to construct anything else between Jay & Bruce to replace the parts they chose to erase.
The point is: Jason and Bruceās father-son relationship before Jasonās death is barely spoken of. We donāt know shit about how Jason was as a kid. Bruce loved him but didnāt trust him since his āmean streakā made him sooo dangerous and unmanageable. Thatās it. Jason is the bad Robin first, the dead Robin second, and Bruceās son last.
Jason and Bruceās relationship post-resurrection is complicated, for obvious reasons, and has interesting potential. My main problem with it is that itās seldom addressed after Jason makes his dramatic return in UtH & the arc is closed.
For all that I have a love-hate relationship with Winickās writing, and for all that I donāt like everything heās done with Jason, his narrative is mostly coherent (and a good read overall!).
Winick doesnāt talk outward about Jason and Bruceās bond before Jasonās death, but enough is implied. Jasonās damaged psyche centers around Bruce and what wrongs Jason considers to have suffered from him. He reorganizes his entire identity and actions around Bruce.
Itās not only consistent with Jasonās mental health at this stage, itās telling of Bruceās importance for him. The same way Bruce must have been his world after he took him out of the streets, Bruce is still very much his world when Jason is on a vengeance frenzy.
Killing Bruce, taking revenge against Bruce, making a point to Bruce; everything is about Bruce. Itās the whole āthe opposite of love is apathy not hateā thing. DC couldāve expanded on that and made it evolve into whatever, but they just, yāknow. didnāt.
I like Under the Hood and Lost Days well enough except for the Jason/Talia ugh. Problem is, DC obviously had no idea what to do with Jason after that, so his relationship with Bruce stays at a status quo.
Post-resurrection Jason isnāt so much estranged family than an antagonist who makes some cool appearances here and thereā when theyāre not so terribly written that they make me cringe.
There are some other interesting things here and there, giving depth to Jasonās estrangement from Bruce & the batfamā¦
⦠but those elements are few and far between, and fail to establish a solid construction/development of any kind between Jason and Bruce. UtH!Jason put on some interesting bases but afterwards? Jason as a character is stagnating, and so is his relationship with any member of the batfam.
And then thereās the n52 & Rebirth I guess. It obviously wants to deliver a father-son narrative, but doesnāt do great job at it. Again, aside from a few cute scenes, the āheās my son but he does baaaad thingsā eternal dilemma, and Jasonās newfound proximity with the batfam coming out of nowhere (especially with Tim wtf), I didnāt find much content to have a solid opinion on.
My opinion of Jason & Bruceās father-son relationship is that itās hella cute pre-Starlin and that Winickās version of it makes sense within his Under the Hood & Lost Days narrative (I personally cut out ābad seed Jasonā and keep most of the rest).
I think we lost a lot of potential when Starlinās work became the reference. I think the Red Hood and his baggage with the whole fam couldāve been richer and more interesting if Jasonās initial characterization was kept in mind.
Yes, Jason and Bruceās initial relationship couldāve used some more tension/conflict in between the sweet moments but⦠as far as Iām concerned Starlinās writing wasnāt the way to go.
I think the only way to build a coherent interpretation of Jason & his relationship with the fam is to make a patchwork of canon elements and to fill in the blanks yourself. Thus what I have on Jason & Bruce that takes the Red Hood into account isnāt so much an āopinionā on canon material than a personal construction.
Iām sorry Anon, I bet thatās not what you expected when you sent that ask, but itās all I have to give :ā) Hope the answer is still okay & thanks for the ask!