Ferranda is back. Let's theorize again
Pale Lights, book 3, Chapter 55
You saw the subject line. It's Ferranda time. Let’s have fun with wild theories.
For the talk between Angharad and Ferranda, I think two things are notable.
Neither of them really want to make peace with the other person, and
Ferranda cares so little about Angharad, she isn’t even talking to her. Throughout most their talk, Ferranda is talking to Song. It doesn’t matter that Song isn’t there. Ferranda is perfectly capable of continuing the talk she and Song had, just using Angharad as a rubber duck stand-in to say “Song, I am better than you and here’s why.”
Now, from both Ferranda and Angharad’s perspective, they are right and the other person is wrong. But seriously, Ferranda’s arguments to Angharad specifically are horrible. If I really thought she was meaning to talk to Angharad (rather than actually addressing a Song not there), Ferranda should have her stripe privileges removed.
Song acknowledged to Ferranda she shot Isabel for the wrong reasons. Ferranda is not an idiot. She knew the wrong reason’s can be summed up as “Angharad”. Ferranda goes “Angharad is not the main character in my world, so I had the right reasons AND did the right thing”, without giving the background talk for this to Angharad.
Imagine someone walked up to the Thirteenth, shot Tristan’s brains out in front of them, and then went “you can’t be mad at me, because I knew Tristan back in Sacromonte and he deserves this. And seeing how this is not about you that I murdered someone you care about, you have no right to be upset about it. Stop acting like you are the main character just because I murdered someone you care about. Pft! Self-important much?”
THAT is Ferranda’s argument to Angharad.
Shockingly, it’s not very effective.
Angharad in contrast comes after having been up against Nathi. So she doesn’t dare using anything but the core fact she feels can’t be argued about: “Shooting an ally from behind during enemy combat is WRONG”, and no fancy wordplay will change that”. No talking about her feelings. No trying to actually argue against what Ferranda says. She just sticks to her one truth no matter what Ferranda says.
The irony in all of this is that while neither of them moved on the Isabel part, I think Angharad may very well have been an instrumental part in shattering a part of Ferranda’s upbringing at the end of this chapter.
Going off information from Tristan, Sacromonte is a capitalist hellhole that chews up everyone. Ferranda was part of the 1% at the top, but I think she too has learned her own “eat or be eaten” lessons. I think Ferranda has had most her kindness and altruism clinically removed during her upbringing much like Tristan.
Especially in book 1 – on the “no rules and everything goes” murder island, we actually see Ferranda choose to do the right thing repeatedly, even when it might cost her.
She confronts Isabel and tells her how much she hates her, even though this is a horrible idea for long term relationships should they both survive.
She ruins the second gate, so Tupoc’s group has to go with her group and Angharad’s group. Even though letting Tupoc die probably would have been to her advantage. But she didn’t want Lan, Aines and Felis to get hurt.
I think Ferranda wants to do good things. But I think she has been taught this is bad. So, she keeps doing selfish things instead. Or try to do good things but make them also selfish at the same time. Cao would be proud over this.Â
And here’s Angharad going “just help people, you dum dum”. And for once, Angharad isn’t meet with eye-rolls or people going “so naïve, but that’s why we like her”. Ferranda seems to listen.
Because Ferranda wants to hear this. She wants to be told that helping people just because you can, will also be the smart and cunning action she has been taught she always should take. She wants an excuse to do something good for the sake of doing good.
And I desperately want to see Ferranda succeed in this.