excited for the potential of these two reuniting
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă

Product Placement
hello vonnie
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Discoholic đŞŠ

Andulka
macklin celebrini has autism
almost home
occasionally subtle

if i look back, i am lost
dirt enthusiast

Love Begins
Three Goblin Art
will byers stan first human second
wallacepolsom

titsay
ojovivo
we're not kids anymore.
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from France
seen from Sweden

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@greatcookiefire
excited for the potential of these two reuniting

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
FUCK AMERICA HAPPY 100TH BIRTHDAY CEASAR SALAD đ˛đ˝đ˛đ˝đ˛đ˝âââ
Dang rip America
the removal of physical media is not the inevitable progression of improving tech, its like the removal of the 3.5mm jack: purely a result of profit physical games still account for about 1/5th of all sales of video games
but by only selling digital games sony can be the ultimate arbiter of their price. they can stop you lending games and force another sale instead. they can stop the sale of second hand games and keep prices artificially high. they can set any price they want and that will be your only option.
Recent discourse reminds me of that cult indoctrination trick that's often used to weed out more difficult marks early on, where they tell you all that you aren't allowed to eat rice on Tuesdays and then if you protest they go "wow SOMEBODY likes rice a little much huh" as if you're the fucking weirdo who cares too much about how much rice is consumed between Monday and Wednesday instead of them.
And this forces you to decide whether your autonomy matters to you more than the approval of the group - while they'll still act like you're on thin ice either way, if you give in at this point they know you're theirs forever, because now they've established a foothold, you've shown a moral weakness, which they will brand you with so it can be used against you in the future ("hey RICE-addict here doesn't want help break into the city records office") to force you to double-down and isolate you further.
And if instead you do decide to push back further, after your abrupt departure from the group ("You're seriously leaving us over RICE?!? Seriously?") and subsequent ostracism, you can then be used as a demonstration to the others who were more pliable, of how the outgroup is full of people like you who are obsessed with violating the No-Tuesday-Rice rule to the point where they'll abandon all their friends, who cared so much for them, so it clearly isn't an arbitrary restriction, you're the kind of monster these rules are intended to protect them from, thus all the other wise and esoteric precepts of the charismatic leader are implied to be equally justified.
This isn't just for cults either! Shitty partners, bosses, friends - they all do variants of this where if you kick back the first time they make an unreasonable request, it proves you weren't ever committed since you'd let such a small thing ruin everything. And of course, if it's the third or the tenth unreasonable thing they ask of you, it's SUCH A SMALL THING to be a deal-breaker at this late point in your relationship!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
pls god where is the fourth of julie goodbye 2007 hello 2008
dear dire
@arue-23
Rebirth Jaune FMK: Pyrrha, May Z and Rin from his previous life.
MFK: Rebirth
Jeanne: Hey, Jaune! MFK between, Pyrrha, May, and Rin?
Jaune: âŚ
Jaune: Are you talking about this life⌠or the last life we lived�
Jeanne: T-The last one�
Jaune turned to look at his sister, his eyes filled with an ice cold, yet silent rage that screamed in defiance at the audacity that she had just said such things to him.
Jaune: You know very well what happened in my previous life, and you know very well what happened to them! So, why do you dare ask me such a question?!
Jeanne: I-Iâm sorry! I just thought it would be nice to know what you thought of each of them, alright!
Jaune: Jeanne⌠Pyrrha, and May both died in the Fall, and I impregnated Rin. Pyrrha, and May both were killed because I couldnât do anything to save them, and I fucked Rin during a moment of unbridled passion, but I couldnât stay with her so I could marry her, and be the loving husband who looked after his wife, and the caring father who looked after their daughter! So there, thereâs you answer on who I would, marry, fuck, or killâŚ
Jaune: Happy now?
Jeanne: N-No⌠Iâm sorry, Jaune. I thought this would be a fun little game, and you would have fun with it⌠I didnât mean to drudge up such harsh memoriesâŚ
Jaune: Well⌠Itâs not a fair questionâŚ
Jeanne: Itâs not?
Jaune: Iâd probably have a different answer in that life.
Jaune: âŚ
Jaune: No, Iâd give the same answer now as I would back then.
Jeanne: And, that would be�
Jaune: M, M, and M. I would marry them, each of them, make love to them, grow a large family, and eventually die of old age beside one another. Thatâs what I will do.
Jeanne: W-Will do?
Jaune: May was female in both our worlds, so sheâs most likely still is a female in this world too. Weâve both met Pyrrha, hell we correspond with each other regularly. The only person we donât know if itâs Rin in the world, and not Ren. But, if Rin is here, then I will marry her, and live the life with her that I dream of ever since I met my daughter.
Jeanne: But, what if itâs not, Rin? What if itâs, Ren?
Jaune: âŚ
Jaune: Then he will be my, âbrother from another mother.â Just like he did in my last life. Thatâs all I can do.
Jeanne: Thatâs all you can doâŚ
Jaune: âŚ
Jeanne: Sorry I asked you all of this, I didnât mean to drudge up so many bad memories.
Jaune: Well, you can make it up for me.
Jeanne: How?
Jaune: MFK: Yin, Pyrros, and Blake?
Jeanne: âŚ
Jeanne: âŚ
Jaune: Jeanne?
Jeanne: âŚ
Jeanne: âŚ
Jaune: Jeanne⌠are you okay�
Jeanne: âŚ
Jeanne:
Jaune: �!
Jaune: Okay thenâŚ
itâs a shame more vampire media doesnât pull from vampire bat behavior because theyâre such sweeties. they can only survive their incredibly specialized diet because bats will share blood with colony members that didnât find a meal! thereâs evidence that suggests the donors sometimes initiate this behavior themselves by approaching hungry bats! the colonies are mostly harems of females with a few males but theyâve been observed letting unrelated males in when it gets cold so they can all stay warm! cute little social critters!
@yupekosi your tags have created such a beautiful world
me with my quilava
Your quilava.
think I've been mildly cursed by a witch

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Too sleepy to draw have som doodles
Windows 7 4K HD wallpapers free download ...
im so sick of unnecessary dinner scenes in movies đĄ every fucking movie they just want to titillate you with some food because they think youâre a dumb animal who just wants to see mashed potatoes bouncing. if its an IMPORTANT dinner scene where they explain lore then whatever i understand. but they shove useless meals into every movie these days and its disgusting
really? you donât say

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
HATE when u can feel ur intestines writhing. cease your wriggling insolent belly worm
WHEN do you ever feel that
why would u wanna kill me ):
US CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY & GLOBAL TERRORISM (An incomplete list)
US Use of Weapons of Mass Destruction The indiscriminate use of bombs by the US, usually outside a declared war situation, for wanton destruction, for no military objectives, whose targets and victims are civilian populations, or what we now call âcollateral damage.â
Japan (1945)Â
China (1945-46)Â
Korea & China (1950-53)Â
Guatemala (1954, 1960, 1967-69)Â
Indonesia (1958)Â
Cuba (1959-61)Â
Congo (1964)Â
Peru (1965)Â
Laos (1964-70)Â
Vietnam (1961-1973)Â
Cambodia (1969-70)Â
Grenada (1983)Â
Lebanon (1983-84)Â
Libya (1986)Â
El Salvador (1980s)Â
Nicaragua (1980s)Â
Iran (1987)Â
Panama (1989)Â
Iraq (1991-2000)Â
Kuwait (1991)Â
Somalia (1993)Â
Bosnia (1994-95)Â
Sudan (1998)Â
Afghanistan (1998)Â
Pakistan (1998)Â
Yugoslavia (1999)Â
Bulgaria (1999)Â
Macedonia (1999)
US Use of Chemical & Biological Weapons The US has refused to sign Conventions against the development and use of chemical and biological weapons, and has either used or tested (without informing the civilian populations) these weapons in the following locations abroad:
Bahamas (late 1940s-mid-1950s)Â
Canada (1953)Â
China and Korea (1950-53)Â
Korea (1967-69)Â
Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia (1961-1970)Â
Panama (1940s-1990s)Â
Cuba (1962, 69, 70, 71, 81, 96)
And the US has tested such weapons on US civilian populations, without their knowledge, in the following locations:
Watertown, NY and US Virgin Islands (1950)Â
SF Bay Area (1950, 1957-67)Â
Minneapolis (1953)Â
St. Louis (1953)Â
Washington, DC Area (1953, 1967)Â
Florida (1955)Â
Savannah GA/Avon Park, FL (1956-58)Â
New York City (1956, 1966)Â
Chicago (1960)
And the US has encouraged the use of such weapons, and provided the technology to develop such weapons in various nations abroad, including:
EgyptÂ
South AfricaÂ
Iraq
US Political and Military Interventions since 1945 The US has launched a series of military and political interventions since 1945, often to install puppet regimes, or alternatively to engage in political actions such as smear campaigns, sponsoring or targeting opposition political groups (depending on how they served US interests), undermining political parties, sabotage and terror campaigns, and so forth. It has done so in nations such as
China (1945-51)Â
South Africa (1960s-1980s)
France (1947)Â
Bolivia (1964-75)
Marshall Islands (1946-58)Â
Australia (1972-75)
Italy (1947-1975)Â
Iraq (1972-75)
Greece (1947-49)Â
Portugal (1974-76)
Philippines (1945-53)Â
East Timor (1975-99)
Korea (1945-53)Â
Ecuador (1975)
Albania (1949-53)Â
Argentina (1976)
Eastern Europe (1948-56)Â
Pakistan (1977)
Germany (1950s)Â
Angola (1975-1980s)
Iran (1953)Â
Jamaica (1976)
Guatemala (1953-1990s)Â
Honduras (1980s)
Costa Rica (mid-1950s, 1970-71)Â
Nicaragua (1980s)
Middle East (1956-58)Â
Philippines (1970s-90s)
Indonesia (1957-58)Â
Seychelles (1979-81)
Haiti (1959)Â
South Yemen (1979-84)
Western Europe (1950s-1960s)Â
South Korea (1980)
Guyana (1953-64)Â
Chad (1981-82)
Iraq (1958-63)Â
Grenada (1979-83)
Vietnam (1945-53)Â
Suriname (1982-84)
Cambodia (1955-73)Â
Libya (1981-89)
Laos (1957-73)Â
Fiji (1987)
Thailand (1965-73)Â
Panama (1989)
Ecuador (1960-63)Â
Afghanistan (1979-92)
Congo (1960-65, 1977-78)Â
El Salvador (1980-92)
Algeria (1960s)Â
Haiti (1987-94)
Brazil (1961-64)Â
Bulgaria (1990-91)
Peru (1965)Â
Albania (1991-92)
Dominican Republic (1963-65)Â
Somalia (1993)
Cuba (1959-present)Â
Iraq (1990s)
Indonesia (1965)Â
Peru (1990-present)
Ghana (1966)Â
Mexico (1990-present)
Uruguay (1969-72)Â
Colombia (1990-present)
Chile (1964-73)Â
Yugoslavia (1995-99)
Greece (1967-74)
US Perversions of Foreign Elections The US has specifically intervened to rig or distort the outcome of foreign elections, and sometimes engineered sham âdemonstrationâ elections to ward off accusations of government repression in allied nations in the US sphere of influence. These sham elections have often installed or maintained in power repressive dictators who have victimized their populations. Such practices have occurred in nations such as:
Philippines (1950s)Â
Italy (1948-1970s)Â
Lebanon (1950s)Â
Indonesia (1955)Â
Vietnam (1955)Â
Guyana (1953-64)Â
Japan (1958-1970s)Â
Nepal (1959)Â
Laos (1960)Â
Brazil (1962)Â
Dominican Republic (1962)Â
Guatemala (1963)Â
Bolivia (1966)Â
Chile (1964-70)Â
Portugal (1974-75)Â
Australia (1974-75)Â
Jamaica (1976)Â
El Salvador (1984)Â
Panama (1984, 89)Â
Nicaragua (1984, 90)Â
Haiti (1987, 88)Â
Bulgaria (1990-91)Â
Albania (1991-92)Â
Russia (1996)Â
Mongolia (1996)Â
Bosnia (1998)
US Versus World at the United Nations The US has repeatedly acted to undermine peace and human rights initiatives at the United Nations, routinely voting against hundreds of UN resolutions and treaties. The US easily has the worst record of any nation on not supporting UN treaties. In almost all of its hundreds of ânoâ votes, the US was the âsoleâ nation to vote no (among the 100-130 nations that usually vote), and among only 1 or 2 other nations voting no the rest of the time. Hereâs a representative sample of US votes from 1978-1987:
US Is the Sole âNoâ Vote on Resolutions or Treaties
For aid to underdeveloped nationsÂ
For the promotion of developing nation exportsÂ
For UN promotion of human rights
For protecting developing nations in trade agreements
For New International Economic Order for underdeveloped nations
For development as a human right
Versus multinational corporate operations in South Africa
For cooperative models in developing nations
For right of nations to economic system of their choice
Versus chemical and biological weapons (at least 3 times)
Versus Namibian apartheid
For economic/standard of living rights as human rights
Versus apartheid South African aggression vs. neighboring states (2 times)
Versus foreign investments in apartheid South Africa
For world charter to protect ecology
For anti-apartheid convention
For anti-apartheid convention in international sports
For nuclear test ban treaty (at least 2 times)
For prevention of arms race in outer space
For UNESCO-sponsored new world information order (at least 2 times)
For international law to protect economic rights
For Transport & Communications Decade in Africa
Versus manufacture of new types of weapons of mass destructionÂ
Versus naval arms raceÂ
For Independent Commission on Disarmament & Security IssuesÂ
For UN response mechanism for natural disastersÂ
For the Right to FoodÂ
For Report of Committee on Elimination of Racial DiscriminationÂ
For UN study on military developmentÂ
For Commemoration of 25th anniversary of Independence for Colonial CountriesÂ
For Industrial Development Decade in AfricaÂ
For interdependence of economic and political rightsÂ
For improved UN response to human rights abusesÂ
For protection of rights of migrant workersÂ
For protection against products harmful to health and the environmentÂ
For a Convention on the Rights of the ChildÂ
For training journalists in the developing worldÂ
For international cooperation on third world debtÂ
For a UN Conference on Trade & Development
US Is 1 of Only 2 âNoâ Votes on Resolutions or TreatiesÂ
For Palestinian living conditions/rights (at least 8 times)Â
Versus foreign intervention into other nationsÂ
For a UN Conference on WomenÂ
Versus nuclear test explosions (at least 2 times)Â
For the non-use of nuclear weapons vs. non-nuclear statesÂ
For a Middle East nuclear free zoneÂ
Versus Israeli nuclear weapons (at least 2 times)Â
For a new world international economic orderÂ
For a trade union conference on sanctions vs. South AfricaÂ
For the Law of the Sea TreatyÂ
For economic assistance to PalestiniansÂ
For UN measures against fascist activities and groupsÂ
For international cooperation on money/finance/debt/trade/developmentÂ
For a Zone of Peace in the South AtlanticÂ
For compliance with Intl Court of Justice decision for Nicaragua vs. US.Â
**For a conference and measures to prevent international terrorism (including its underlying causes)Â
For ending the trade embargo vs. Nicaragua
US Is 1 of Only 3 âNoâ Votes on Resolutions and TreatiesÂ
Versus Israeli human rights abuses (at least 6 times)Â
Versus South African apartheid (at least 4 times)Â
Versus return of refugees to IsraelÂ
For ending nuclear arms race (at least 2 times)Â
For an embargo on apartheid South AfricaÂ
For South African liberation from apartheid (at least 3 times)Â
For the independence of colonial nationsÂ
For the UN Decade for WomenÂ
Versus harmful foreign economic practices in colonial territoriesÂ
For a Middle East Peace ConferenceÂ
For ending the embargo of Cuba (at least 10 times)
In addition, the US has:Â
Repeatedly withheld its dues from the UNÂ
Twice left UNESCO because of its human rights initiativesÂ
Twice left the International Labor Organization for its workers rights initiativesÂ
Refused to renew the Antiballistic Missile TreatyÂ
Refused to sign the Kyoto Treaty on global warmingÂ
Refused to back the World Health Organizationâs ban on infant formula abusesÂ
Refused to sign the Anti-Biological Weapons ConventionÂ
Refused to sign the Convention against the use of land minesÂ
Refused to participate in the UN Conference Against Racism in DurbanÂ
Been one of the last nations in the world to sign the UN Covenant onÂ
Political & Civil Rights (30 years after its creation)Â
Refused to sign the UN Covenant on Economic & Social RightsÂ
Opposed the emerging new UN Covenant on the Rights to Peace, Development & Environmental Protection
Sampling of Deaths >From US Military Interventions & Propping Up Corrupt Dictators (using the most conservative estimates)
Nicaragua â 30,000 dead
Brazil  â 100,000 dead
Korea â 4 million dead
Guatemala â 200,000 dead
Honduras â 20,000 dead
El Salvador â 63,000 dead
Argentina â 40,000 dead
Bolivia â 10,000 dead
Uruguay â 10,000 dead
Ecuador â 10,000 dead
Peru â 10,000 dead
Iraq â 1.3 million dead
Iran â 30,000 dead
Sudan â 8-10,000 dead
Colombia â 50,000 dead
Panama â 5,000 dead
Japan â 140,000 dead
Afghanistan â 10,000 dead
Somalia â 5000 dead
Philippines â 150,000 dead
Haiti â 100,000 dead
Dominican Republic â 10,000 dead
Libya â 500 dead
Macedonia â 1000 dead
South Africa â 10,000 dead
Pakistan â 10,000 dead
Palestine â 40,000 dead
Indonesia â 1 million dead
East Timor â 1/3-½ of total population
Greece â 10,000 dead
Laos â 600,000 dead
Cambodia â 1 million dead
Angola â 300,000 dead
Grenada â 500 dead
Congo  â 2 million dead
Egypt â 10,000 dead
Vietnam â 1.5 million dead
Chile â 50,000 dead
Other Lethal US Interventions CIA Terror Training Manuals Development and distribution of training manuals for foreign military personnel or foreign nationals, including instructions on assassination, subversion, sabotage, population control, torture, repression, psychological torture, death squads, etc.
Specific Torture Campaigns Creation and launching of direct US campaigns to support torture as an instrument of terror and social control for governments in Greece, Iran, Vietnam, Bolivia, Uruguay, Brazil, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, and Panama
Supporting and Harboring Terrorists The promotion, protection, arming or equipping of terrorists such as:
Klaus Barbie and other German Nazis, and Italian and Japanese fascists, after WW II
Manual Noriega (Panama), Saddam Hussein (Iraq), Rafael Trujillo (Dominican Republic), Osama bin Laden (Afghanistan), and others whose terrorism has come back to haunt us
Running the Higher War College (Brazil) and first School of the Americas (Panama), which gave US training to repressors, death squad members, and torturers (the second School of the Americas is still running at Ft. Benning GA)
Providing asylum for Cuban, Salvadoran, Guatemalan, Haitian, Chilean, Argentinian, Iranian, South Vietnamese and other terrorists, dictators, and torturers
Assassinating World Leaders Using assassination as a tool of foreign policy, wherein the CIA has initiated assassination attempts against at least 40 foreign heads of state (some several times) in the last 50 years, a number of which have been successful, such as: Patrice Lumumba (Congo), Rafael Trujillo (Dominican Republic), Ngo Dihn Diem (Vietnam) Salvador Allende (Chile)
Arms Trade & US Military Presence
The US is the worldâs largest seller of weapons abroad, arming dictators, militaries, and terrorists that repress or victimize their populations, and fueling scores of violent conflicts around the globe
The US is the worldâs largest provider of live land mines which, even in peacetime, kill or injure at least several people around the world each day
The US has military bases in at least 50 nations around the world, which have led to frequent victimization of local populations.
The US military has been bombing one Middle Eastern or Muslim nation or another almost continuously since 1983, including Lebanon, Libya, Syria, Iran, the Sudan, Afghanistan, and Iraq (almost daily bombings since 1991)
This, then, is a sampling of American foreign policies over the last 50 years. The FBI uses the following definition for Terrorism: âThe unlawful use of force or violence committed by a group or individual, who has some connection to a foreign power or whose activities transcend national boundaries, against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.â This sounds like the terrorism we just experienced. It also sounds a lot like the US policies and actions since 1945 that Iâve just described.
This is a version of an an original page atributed to Robert Elias, a US Professor of Political Science , a list which, like so many others, Â has otherwise âdisapperedâ
via https://web.archive.org/web/20161125052245/http://www.the-philosopher.co.uk/whocares/popups/warcrimes.htm