Are we all aware that there are methodological flaws in Ray Blanchard's autogybephilia(AGP) research and that someone has written on pubpeer about those flaws? I haven't seen those that believe in Blanchard's typology confront these problems in the evidence base of agp. In my opinion they haven't because it demonstrates the pseudo-scientific nature of agp and they have no way to cope about it being bad research.
There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Typology of male-to-female transsexualism (1985)
There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Phallometric detection of fetishistic arousal in heterosexual male cross‐dressers (1986)
There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Nonhomosexual gender dysphoria (1988)
There are comments on PubPeer for publication: The Concept of Autogynephilia and the Typology of Male Gender Dysphoria (1989)














