The Mastermind’s Apprentice

It's a psychological warfare program that in addition to perpetuating the myth white superiority, it prevents Africans in America from pursuing the immense reparation debt owed to them. It literally makes them believe that they're the lucky ones to have been taken away from the poverty and backwardness of Africa.

Greeks are neither Black nor White.

Ancient Greeks like Aristotle in the Physiognomika described themselves as "the middle point between Ethiopians and Milky-white people like the Northeners and women".

"τὸ δὲ μέσον χρῶμα εὐψυχίας σημεῖον"

Homer contains more Africans & Easterners than Scandinavians(none) & Anglos(none).

Why then would WASPS like yourself be more representative of ancient Greeks?

Ancient Greeks had less "Indo-European" DNA(R1b marker) than their modern ancestors, both have very little of it anyway and both have had Aegean/Anatolian markers in their majority.

Memnon the Ethiopian is described by Odysseus in Homer as "the most handsome man he ever laid eyes on".

Ethiopians draw first blood against the Argives and for that it was said that "Zeus dines with the Ethiopians". In the later Epic Cycle they are described as

"more capable [at arms] than Acheans"

"προφερεστεροι των Αχαιων"

Perseus married Andromeda the Ethiopian.

Pelops came from the East.

Kadmos from Phoinicia.

Hephaistus from Egypt where he is known as Aigyptus.

As did Danaos, the progenitor of the Danaans, the largest of the Greek forces in Troy.

Plato relates the story of Solon going to visit and getting the wisdom off Egyptian Priests.

Manetho, the Egyptian Priest wrote the first collated history fo Egypt in Greek.

Euryvatis, Odysseus' kyrix is described as "black, wooly-haired, round-shouldered, wide-stepped/long-legs".

If the majority of the Jewish settlers were black or brown and native population was white, would the majority of White Christians in the United States have ever supported Israel? We all know the answer to that.

Christian nations/civilization: approximately 178 million

Islamic nations/civilization: approximately 32 million

Intrapersonal Integration: The ability to take disconfirming experiences, especially repeated failures, and metabolize them into an updated internal model of self, others, and strategy. Some of the traits high integrators possess are; Internal locus of control, tolerance for discomfort, emotional regulation, pattern recognition, accountability, delayed gratification, reality prioritization, evidence over ideology, consistency between belief and action, willingness to lose status to gain accuracy. High integrators become increasingly wise as they age. Their ability to learn from feedback leads to compounding gains, manifesting as stable relationships, good relative health and solid finances.

In contrast, low integrators, who are the target of this post, possess the following traits; External locus of control, emotional instability, inability to spot self defeating patterns and learn from them, impulsive consumption, entitlement of outcomes, deflection under feedback, the inability to carry mental models into the future. Low integrators confuse their emotional state with truth and hold it above all other considerations. Their driving purpose is to protect their sense of identity as good people and they are willing to perform mental gymnastics to do so. Outcomes are things that happen to them. Conflicts are things that others cause. Negative patterns are coincidences or bad luck. Without an internal locus, outcomes are experienced as granted or withheld.

Phrases like “that’s just how I am,” or “people just misunderstand me” appear early and often. The key is not arrogance, but finality. There is no sense of ongoing refinement. The self is presented as already resolved. You could help them ten times. Forget once. That one becomes the story. You could show patience for years. Lose your temper once. That becomes the truth. You could pour wisdom, support, and time into them. Ask for accountability once. That becomes the betrayal. For the low integrator, morality is not a coherent model of behavior held internally. It’s a social signal and an emotional regulator. It is something you appear to have, not something you audit yourself against.

They judge others primarily on three axes.

The first axis is affect. How does this person make me feel right now? Comfortable, affirmed, soothed, admired, unchallenged equals “good”. Discomfort, friction, exposure, or obligation equals “bad”. This is why someone can be objectively decent but still be judged negatively if they introduce tension, and why someone can behave badly but still be judged positively if they maintain a pleasant emotional atmosphere.

The second axis is optics. How does this person appear socially? Are they seen as nice, agreeable, popular, non disruptive? If so, they inherit moral credit by association. If someone is awkward, blunt, principled, or resistant to group norms, that resistance itself is treated as a moral flaw, regardless of substance.

The third axis is self image protection. Does this person threaten my sense of being a good person? Anyone who exposes inconsistency, lack of reciprocity, or irresponsibility triggers defensiveness. That person will be seen as difficult, negative, or judgmental, not because of what they did, but because of what they expose.

Creep: A man she is not attracted to, who she thinks is attracted to her.

Pervert: A man with a healthy sexual orientation but who she is not attracted to.

A DL (down low) guy: A man who she is attracted to but is not attracted to her, or interested in dating.

A pedophile: A man who is attracted to women in their 20s, irrespective of his age.

A good man: A man who gives without the expectation of reciprocation.

An asshole: A man who waits for her to display requisite value before spending money on her.

Fuckboy: A man who she is willing to have sex with without him spending money first.

When you leave the majority male population out of entry level roles, and hire based on diversity quotas you are going to dilute the talent pool and it will have permanent effect.

The next Half Life or Star Wars might never be made now, because some white guy no one will get to hear of, was cheated out of a job because he wasn’t the correct demographic.