This is a kink blog. Kind of. There’s gonna be smut. If you follow me and your age isn’t in your bio, I will block you. (If you’re following from a side blog, I can’t see that and your age needs to be in your main bio.)
I wouldn’t read too much into recurring themes, as a lot of what I write is in reaction to content I see on Tumblr.
Finally - and I know I'm a stereotype of a writer here - but I'll never be sad if you give me feedback. DM me. Ask me. Whatever, I like hearing what does and doesn’t click with folks.
As I have a working computer again, I've begun indexing my posts! I've Tried to put the ones that are more informative or educational at the top.
But it's a work in progress:
Hypnosis Concepts
Fractionation
Hypnotic Susceptibility and Other Myths
The Mind
Psychonautica
Astrology is Good, Actually
Hypnotic Memory
Cognitive Schema Schemata Stuff
Practical Play
Touch Training and Conditioning
Practical Check-ins
Hypnotic Amnesia
Roleplaying Consent
Negotiating Up (Long, Consent)
Being Brainless
Being Mindful
Hypnokink Tropes
Ask FPPP
Safety & Getting Started w/ Hypnosis
Unlearning & Memory Play: What If I Forget?
Why Do People Like To Hypnotise People? Why Do People Like To Be Hypnotised?
Feminism and Patriarchy
Barbie Girl in a Barbie the Real World (Barbie Movie Spoilers)
Girlboss
Liberal Feminism and Sadistic Glee
Proper Patriarchy
Overcoming Your Problematic Kink With Marxist-Feminism
Sex and Politics
Sex and The Silly
Intelligence as a Social Construct (And How That Explains Your Fetishes)
Feminism is Good, Actually (Please Stop Being A Reactionary On My Blog)
Your Kink Is Problematic. What To Do About It?
Kink and Politics (And Why You Shouldn't Try Not To "Be Political")
It's Not Corruption, It's Political Education
All The Good Smut Is Woke
Neurodiversity and Hypnosis
Neurodiversity Is Not A Barrier To Hypnosis
Neurodiversity and Hypnosis, Redux
The Neurodiversity and Hypnosis Will Continue Until Morale Improves
Things That Really Grind My Gears
You're [Not] Being Hypnotised Wrong
NLP, Stagework, and Hypnokink
Hypnosis-Adjacent
Why You Should Practice Storytelling
An Intro To Spirals (1st ed. 2022)
Fun Chloroform Facts!
Hypnotic Fiction
HR
Premonitions
Duplicates (Cora pt 1) (CW: Death)
Prototypes (Cora pt 2)
Hypnotic Thoughts
Gardening
Sustainable Brainwashing
Absolution
Why Wake Up At All?
You’re Not Into This Sort Of Thing
Adaptability
Seduction
Is Hypnosis "Real?"
Thought-Terminating Clichés
Role Models
OK!
Losing All Meaning
What's a Little Craniotomy Between Friends? (CW: Medical)
Thinking For Yourself (CW: Degradation)
Raw Materials (CW: Degradation)
Dumb Fuck (CW: Degradation)
Dumber (CW: Degradation)
Dehumanization and You
Posts I've Muted Notifications On
Does it hurt?
There are another couple but I'll add them when I see them again.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I’m having perfectly normal thoughts about the procedures that prevent “resting bitch face.” Totally normal about altering my physiology to adhere to society’s standards of beauty. This does not touch on my kinks at all. This is unrelated to my desire for blonde hair and big boobs.
One thing I genuinely don’t understand the appeal of is tan lines. Or tanning in general. And not just because I’m a vampire. Sure, the consequences of my kinks may mean I have no will of my own, but at least that doesn’t increase my skin cancer risks.
I have some question regarding your touch training piece if I may, as a very touch averse person, I hope you don't mind because I find your thoughts interesting on the subject.
Can positive reinforcement and touch conditioning strengthen autonomy, or do they inherently create dependency on the handler/trainer?
How does touch training differ from consent-based human interaction, and where do they overlap?
Are you describing genuine trust and cooperation, or is it primarily describing behavioural conditioning?
Thank you!
I'll go ahead and link the post you're referring to for anyone who may be curious
Looking at the number of questions you're positing here, this will probably be a bit long, so I'll address all of them and try to summarise above the cut:
Context is critical: you can teach somebody that they are choosing to trust someone in a way that they are comfortable being touched, or you can teach somebody that they aren't entitled to a bodily autonomy. It should be self-apparent that these differing approaches will yield different results.
In general, I think that training any animal only works when you build genuine trust and cooperation. Animal training through coercion and positive punishment gets you a neurotic mess, not a functional animal. It changes behaviour, sure, but not with any precision or utility.
Touch training as I'm playing with it in that post is wholly stolen from animal training. Tangentially, I've also heard it referred to as "medical training", in the sense of training an animal to be handled by a veterinarian.
The kinky version of this is teaching or training someone to accept touch uncritically. That is, to make the relative loss of bodily autonomy and personal space with regard to the handler a non-issue. "Of course my owner is touching me, and of course I love it. Why wouldn't I?"
You could probably write a book or two on how consent and shaping desire interact, but for the sake of this post I think it's sufficient to say that consent regarding assumed boundaries isn't a trivial problem.
I think this kind of kinky version of things is distinct from simply acclimating people who are touch averse to touch. Said simply, there is a significant difference between touch training in my post as a kinky subversion of consent and bodily autonomy and therapeutic intervention meant to address touch aversion. While there's probably overlap, I think it's important to address the distinction.
I do not think there is an inherent problem with or risk of dependency in acclimating oneself or a partner to touch, but this is contingent on framing and context: There is a marked difference between teaching someone that they are only safe with you and teaching someone that they can feel safe in general or with those people they choose to feel safe with.
Generally, I think that doing these things "right" is empowering, and can let you decide for yourself if and when you want - or don't want - to be comfortable with somebody touching you. The kinkier iterations can definitely made disempowering, - and that's something can be very fun in an otherwise appropriate context - but again, the framing and context are critical here. Are we helping you choose how to feel or are we teaching you that you never get a choice?
This dovetails into your question about consent. Personally, I think either the kinky or therapeutic incarnations are things that should be done collaboratively and that consensuality follows from that. I suppose you could nonconsensually try to make someone accept being touched without complaint, but I think this would likely be a traumatic process that leaned on learned helplessness rather than anything I've described. (No shade if you're into that, but it's something different.)
Similarly, - at least in my imagining - I think that the goal is both to build genuine trust and to condition a response, both in a kink context and in an animal training context. Animals let you train them when they trust you, and conditioning (at least, effective and non-harmful conditioning) requires cooperation.
I hope those are useful answers to your questions. Thanks for the ask!
The common refrain of "transmascs will shit themselves when they realise that T is making them look like a man, not an androgynous femboy twink" has always bothered me for two reasons. The more minor reason is that "man (on T)" and "androgynous femboy twink" are pretty obviously not mutually exclusive categories. There are a ton of men (cis and trans) with normal T levels who are androgynes, femboys, and/or twinks. There are people who may not end up looking like that when they are on T, but it is still within the realm of possible outcomes, and if it's what one wants to look like, there are things one can do to get closer to one's goal.
The more major reason I am bothered by this refrain, though, is the fact that people who say "why do transmascs always want to look like androgynous femboy twinks?" use this demeaning tone that indicates they have a low opinion of transmascs, androgynous people, femboys, and twinks. It is said as if transmascs are too stupid to know even the basic facts of what they're doing with their bodies, and as if wanting to be an androgynous, feminine, or visibly queer man/masc is inherently a bad and absurd thing to desire. The principle of "some people say 'twink' when they really mean 'fag'" is on full display here. It becomes more obvious when it's paired with overt transmedicalism, e.g., "Why do these trender wannabe twinks feel the need to tell everybody that they're trans?", or "'Transmascs' who want to be feminine twinks are basically not even trans". I can only conclude from statements like these that they think being a "real man" means not being a feminine twink, and that it is unacceptable and undesirable (for a man/masc) to be visibly queer and/or GNC. Otherwise, this would not be said with such derision. Needless to say, it is not the hill pro-trans people should ever be dying on.
By way of a heads-up, FPPP, while "transmasc" is the accepted form generally, transphobes have started using "transman" (and indeed "transwoman", in both cases as single words rather than two-word phrases) as a dogwhistle. The logic appears to be that saying "trans man" legitimises that these are a subgroup of men while "transman" frames them as a separate thing. Naturally in this instance your tone makes it pretty clear that's not what you're going for, but I thought you'd want to be aware.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
you want to be mindless? well then you never get to talk again. you never get to make another decision for your entire life. you didn't read the fine print when you asked for me to take away your thoughts and that isn't my problem, mutt. now bark :)
The common refrain of "transmascs will shit themselves when they realise that T is making them look like a man, not an androgynous femboy twink" has always bothered me for two reasons. The more minor reason is that "man (on T)" and "androgynous femboy twink" are pretty obviously not mutually exclusive categories. There are a ton of men (cis and trans) with normal T levels who are androgynes, femboys, and/or twinks. There are people who may not end up looking like that when they are on T, but it is still within the realm of possible outcomes, and if it's what one wants to look like, there are things one can do to get closer to one's goal.
The more major reason I am bothered by this refrain, though, is the fact that people who say "why do transmascs always want to look like androgynous femboy twinks?" use this demeaning tone that indicates they have a low opinion of transmascs, androgynous people, femboys, and twinks. It is said as if transmascs are too stupid to know even the basic facts of what they're doing with their bodies, and as if wanting to be an androgynous, feminine, or visibly queer man/masc is inherently a bad and absurd thing to desire. The principle of "some people say 'twink' when they really mean 'fag'" is on full display here. It becomes more obvious when it's paired with overt transmedicalism, e.g., "Why do these trender wannabe twinks feel the need to tell everybody that they're trans?", or "'Transmascs' who want to be feminine twinks are basically not even trans". I can only conclude from statements like these that they think being a "real man" means not being a feminine twink, and that it is unacceptable and undesirable (for a man/masc) to be visibly queer and/or GNC. Otherwise, this would not be said with such derision. Needless to say, it is not the hill pro-trans people should ever be dying on.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Air to air combat is the easiest form of warfare to argue that both parties consent to. Dogfighting is basically kink and it should turn you on at least a little.
This honestly does it all such little justice. You need to know your opponents airframe intimately- how it handles, turns, how much it weights and how it pulls against the air. How to dance with her body elegantly, and all for just a brief moment under the sights. The strain of your body as you pull the stick, the strain of the engines as they try to give all the force you need. All for a glimpse. The blood rushing from your head as you push forward, the fight for elevation, dominance, potential energy. Position is gained slowly and lost quickly. Eagerness can find you vulnerable, under the eye of your enemy. And all they need too, just a brief glimpse. Just one moment under her sights till you’re undone, penetrated, bleeding oil and smoke and shuddering.
