Hazbin Hotel and VivziePop Drama
Iβve been hearing/seeing a lot of drama concerning Hazbin Hotel and itβs creator VivziePop, and while I donβt know her personally or really care what people think, I do hate slander and the spread of misinformation. Truly nothing in this world upsets me more thanΒ when people believe rumours while making no effort to fact check, and thatβs exactly whatβs happening right now. That said, I wanted to try and clear up some of the rumours going around about Vivzie and the show, because I think some of them are absolutely outrageous and need to be addressed.
1. Vivzie hired an abuser onto the show.
Now, Iβm not here to burn anyone at the stake, especially since I donβt know anything aboutΒ Chris Niosi (the alleged abuser), who I believe openly admitted to the allegations? Regardless, this is a moot point. Heβs not credited anywhere at the end of the episode. So either he was booted before production wrapped up or he had nothing to do with the show in the first place.
2. Vivzie supports bestiality.
Admittedly I thought this one might be true, since she draws so many anthropomorphic animals. In the very least, I figured she was probably a furry, but I havenβt seen any evidence supporting this accusation either. Near as I can tell, this rumour started for two reasons. One, because of her famous Zoophobia comic, which revolves around a therapist named Cameron who gets assigned to work with human-like animals. Ironically, poor Cameron suffers from crippling zoophobia, which makes for some pretty decent comedy. I didnβt read the whole comic because, quite frankly, itβs not my cup of tea and I just donβt have the time. But from what I saw there areΒ noΒ examples of bestiality anywhere in its contents.
Two, this message, which blew up all over social media:
To me, this just proves that people are more interested in virtue signalling than checking to see if their claims are actually true. Everything about this message is 100% false, which Iβll touch on in my next point.
3. Vivzie is a pedophile and sheβs drawn child porn.
This is hands down the worst allegation and holy shit, IΒ reallyΒ wish people would stop using it to defame someone when they donβt have any proof. This is aΒ life-ruiningΒ accusation and youβre disgusting if you believe it based solely on hearsay. This rumour began to spread when Vivzie allegedly shipped the two underage characters in the above photo and drew them NSFW-style. At the time, one character was 19 while the other was 14, and the relationship was a very illegal student-teacher relationship.
This is WRONG! The characters wereΒ notΒ 14 and 19, they were actuallyΒ 18Β and 19, the legal age of consent! Additionally, the relationship wasnβt student-teacher. One character is a student and the other is Alumni (a student teacher). This one pisses me off the most because itβs obvious the person who sent that message didnβt even bother to conduct any research. They said, βHeβs a teacher,Β sheβsΒ a child.β Both characters are MALE!
Since then, Vivzie has apologised for any NSFW art she drew in the past and stated that itβs not a reflection of her art today, and Iβm inclined to believe her. Almost every artist has drawn NSFW content at some point in their career, and hers wasnβt even distasteful. Other than this one example, there is no evidence anywhere that suggests sheβs drawn βchild pornβ. In fact, sheβs never even drawn explicit NSFW.
PleaseΒ stop spreading this rumour. Itβs dangerous and completely incorrect.
4. Vivzie said the βNβ word!
No, she didnβt. It was a fabricated tweet. That is all.
5. Vivzie is copyright striking every video that criticises her!
No she isnβt. YouTubeβs DMCA isΒ automaticallyΒ strikingΒ people who are using full clips without permission. Vivzie has gone public several times, telling people exactly how to avoid getting a copy strike from the algorithm, which is something she absolutelyΒ does notΒ have to do. At this point, she doesnβt owe you anything. In my opinion, she should just sit back and watch these channels burn.
6. Vivzie copies and traces other artistsβ work.
This is another one Iβve seen going around, but I looked into it as thoroughly as I could and failed to find any concrete evidence to support the allegations. As of right now, there are only two examples of VivzieΒ βcopyingβ orΒ βtracingβ other artistsβ work, and both of them can be explained. The first is a gif she made with a character from her Zoophobia comic, which looked a lot like the girl from ME!ME!ME!:
Damn, thatβs pretty incriminating. She obviously stoleβ oh, wait. This gif was part of a ME!ME!ME! MEP (multi editorβs project) and Vivzie didnβt take full credit, despite the fact that itβs not even a direct trace. Itβs supposed to look like the original, which she fully cited. The second example comes from a short dance sequence from her Timber video, which seems to have been inspired by several Disney movies. As Vivzie herself stated, that was an homage to the original animations. Lots of artists and shows do this, including the beloved Stephen Universe series.
Regardless, this doesnβt count as stealing character designs or plagiarising someoneβs work. Itβs meant to be respectful, an admiration of other projects. Other than these two instances, however, there isΒ noΒ evidence of her tracing or stealing other peopleβs art. From what Iβve discovered, all other designs sheβs been accused of βstealingβ are characters she bought and paid for. Theyβre quite literally HER characters.
7. Vivzie supports problematic creators.
Iβm getting really tired of guilt by association. Vivzie follows and enjoys some controversial figures, but who cares? We can argue all day about whether or not the accusations against them are true, but it ultimately has nothing to do with the show or Vivzie as a person. I do the exact same thing, to be honestβ follow and listen to people on all sides so I can learn, understand, and form my own opinions. The fact that some people think this is bad, to me, is absolutely mesmerising. Vivzie doesnβt control what the people she follows post, and if they do something overly questionable she publicly criticises and denounces it.
Now that thatβs been dealt with, Iβd like to address some complaints/claims about the actual show.
8. Vaggie is an angry Latina stereotype and a lesbian stereotype. Vivzie is appropriating Hispanic culture and misrepresentingΒ the gay for profit.
First off, I see a lot of people passing around yet more misinformation regarding Vivzieβs race. So many people seem to think sheβs white? Well, Iβm here to tell you theyβre wrong. Very incorrect. Vivzie is in fact Latina, and Vaggie is meant to mirror some of her own personality traits.
Second, who is Vaggie mad at? Context matters, and if we take a look at the episode, we see that Vaggie is literally only mad at two specific people: Angel Dust and Alastor. Why? Well, for starters, itβs her girlfriendβs dream to run a rehab hotel for sinners, and Angel Dust nearly demolishes that dream single-handedly. Vaggie has every right to be over-the-top vitriolic. Then thereβs Alastor, a known sadist, narcissist, and murderer who loves trapping people in his nefarious schemes. He invites himself in, effectively takes over the hotel, and pushes both her and Charlie aside. At one point he even sexually assaults her by slapping her butt during his musical number. So yeah, I think her seething ire is totally justified. Keep in mind, however, that when sheβs around Charlie sheβs calm, collected, and happy. I wouldnβt call that a stereotype.
Thirdly, the lesbian stereotypes. I keep hearing this argument but I really donβt see it. Both Vaggie and Charlie have so much personality and trust for each other. Maybe Iβm wrong, but the stereotype I know always totes a more butch, tomboyish woman with a ditsy, innocent, naive woman. Charlie is optimistic, but she isnβt stupid. She refuses to shake Alastorβs hand because she knows heβs likely trying to screw her over. Sheβs also not entirely innocent herself and uses words like βfuckβ and βshitβ. I also wouldnβt call Vaggie butch or tomboyish. She has a cute, girly presentation, complete with a pink ribbon in her hair, lace stockings, and a dress. Sheβs protective of her girlfriend, as I think we all are with our partners, and thereβs nothing wrong with that. Theyβre flawed characters, as every character is meant to be. This isnβt a problem.
9. The show is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, blah, blah, blah.
Iβm amazed this is even an argument. The show is supposed to be a dark comedy that takes place in HELL. You know, the place the worst of the worst end up after they die? What were you expecting? Everyone gets a shot or two fired at them, but that doesnβt make them bad characters nor does it make the show itself horrible. Take, for example, Katie Killjoy, the news reporter so many people are up in arms about. She says she doesnβtΒ βtouch the gaysβ because she hasΒ βstandardsβ. Well, hereβs a newsflash of my own: weβre not supposed to like her! Sheβs anΒ antagonist. Not to mention ten seconds later Charlie insults her and isnβt the least bit slighted by her pretentious attitude. The characters are strong and donβt take shit from anyone, because to some degree theyβre all terrible people who can throw down when itβs called for.
Obviously if you donβt like the show or think itβs offensive, Iβm probably not going to change your mind. Thatβs perfectly fine. Youβre entitled to your opinions and you donβt have to watch the show. Just stop lying and stop trying to take it away from everybody else. Stop attacking Vivzie and spreading misinformation without checking the facts. I realise a lot of people probably arenβt trying to be vindictive and only want to do something good, but just remember this: the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
