🩵 Blue 🩵

- aromantic people who aren't asexual.

- asexual people who aren't aromantic.

- cishet aromantic and cishet asexual people.

- aromantic men in general.

- intersex people who are trans.

- intersex people who are are cis.

- intersex people who are cistrans/tris and those who are neither.

- intersex people who are cishet.

- intersex people in general.

- nonbinary people who don't personally identify as transfem or transmasc.

- nonbinary people who don't want to be androgynous.

- cis people who use neopronouns and/or xenogenders while still feeling cis fits just fine.

- people who feel gender dysphoria or misgendered when referred to by they/them, especially after telling you not to use they/them.

PART TWO.

We're getting there little by little, sure. But it's a road.

Just to be perfectly clear, none of those things is hugely egregious or problematic on its own (the 'LGBT' acronym especially, I've seen a fair amount of 'Q+' people that associate with it just fine and that's understandable), it's just a lot of little things that tend to pile up over time. And yes, most of the time none of them are intentionally pushing us aside – but again, that's 'cus we'd have to exist in people's eyes for that intention to even exist in the first play.

JonMartin week ~ Apocalypse Road Trip

Just some fun games for on the way ~

A minute of silence to the suffering plant now also being made fun of, sorry, morale isn't very high right now

This is the most stupid one in this row yet, I apologise.

Edit: yippie I found a typo in the text after posting </3

Disabled aspecs

Neurodivergent aspecs

Low/No empathy aspecs

Caedsexual/caedromantic aspecs

Sex/romance repulsed aspecs

Young aspecs