Why I Love Scott Hunter, as a gay man
So I've seen a lot of weirdness in the HR fandom over the last few months, which I have tried to ignore, but one thing that always gets me is people who cannot fathom why someone would gravitate to Skip over Hollanov, and to Scott in particular. I get that everyone has their favs. However, I've also seen some people suggesting that Skip is "not really gay", or that it's aimed at straight men (??). So, as a gay Iraqi, who spent a solid 10 years in the closet out of genuine fear of persecution and homelessness, I thought I'd write a little about why Scott Hunter, specifically Francois Arnaud's interpretation of Scott Hunter, is so deeply meaningful to me and so many other gay men.
loved this, thank you so much to OP for sharing. I don't particularly relate to Skip, and this was a great read to help me understand why and how that relationship resonates so deeply with other people. "she doesn't quite get the nuances of how it is to be closeted, which is, to me, the one weakness in Hollanov" -- fascinating! because for me (a queer cis woman (ish, what is gender really) whose cultural background is very similar to OP's), Hollanov felt much more relatable -- especially the parts where you are hurting the person you love (and they are doing the same) with denial and your joint fear of homophobia.
Of course, my experience of homophobia as someone who was assigned female at birth will be quite different from OP's in certain ways. I suspect though that the bigger difference is that Hollanov are portraying a different...phase? version?... of the closet than Skip. specifically, they spent a lot of time pining while not acknowledging their feelings to themselves -- and I don't know, maybe that's more of a common sapphic experience? I personally relate hugely to Shane's experience of the closet as depicted in the first season of the show, in that it took me a really long time to admit how I felt and who I was to myself; but once I did, I was very ready (I know I know, Shane is still not ready to come out at the end of the show, but I related to the Great Leap in Readiness). like kids who don't start talking until they're 5 and then it comes out as fully formed sentences or something. the single thing I love most about HR the show is that it is what I've been calling a queer Rorschach. I've been astonished at the wide and conflicting spectrum of reactions and interpretations that my queer friends and acquaintances have of the show. that speaks of course to the diversity of queer experiences, but also to the fact that the show trusts its audience and leaves room for ambiguity. the interiority of the characters is largely preserved. we have to judge how they are feeling based on their unreliable narrations and actions, just like in real life. it's so delightful!
Thanks for your reply! I love the idea of a queer Rorschach, it really made me think.
Yeah, it's difficult for me to remember exactly what I was getting at when I wrote that line (my brain does not recall things very well) but I think a lot of it has to do with the way Shane and Ilya are written in the books rather than the show. The only bit of the show that I massively struggle with believing/relating to is Shane's joke about preferring to be the hole, when I could not fathom any gay man in any level of repression responding so cavalierly to being called out as gay by even their closest friends, let alone someone they barely know. I found it very believable that Shane could spend years having sex with a man and still convincing himself it was a totally straight thing to do - I think everyone goes through that kind of baffling self-denial for at least a little while, and Shane's in that state for a while, but I wouldn't call that unusual. That kind of active, deliberate self-denial, I feel, is fairly accurate.
From the book, what really strikes me as unbelievable is how long it takes for Shane to even suspect he might be gay - he basically seems to be completely unaware of the possibility until age 17 when he meets Ilya. Which... I could understand if it was a kind of subconscious self-denial, where he was refusing to even think the word 'gay' because he was worried it's what he was, but the way it's written, it seems like... the idea just hasn't even occurred to him (unlike in the show, where it is far more ambiguous). Which... I mean, I was in subconscious self-denial from the age of 7 or so, and I wasn't an especially self-aware 7 year old. Most gay men would know WELL before they turn 17, because when you're a man, the word 'gay' is applied to... basically everything you are not supposed to do, from the moment you can toddle. You prefer dolls over legos? Gay. You're not a very fast runner, or you cry too much (things that all boy-children do, because "too much" becomes "at all" by age 6 or so)? Gay. Even most straight men I know went through adolescence wondering if they were gay because they were bad at kicking a ball or whatever. For Shane, who was born in 1991 (and therefore who lived through probably the worst time in recent history for these kinds of attitudes, because gay men were widely talked about but not very respected in the late 90s/early 00s), and who is an athlete, an environment where these kinds of attitudes are STILL rife, to not even comprehend the idea of being gay until he meets Ilya is... very romance novel, but not very realistic. Whereas Shane in the show is far more open to the "I secretly know what I am but if I never acknowledge it, it will go away" interpretation, which is much easier for me to believe.
Whereas, on the opposite end of the spectrum, (book) Ilya seems to be almost entirely self-assured and confident about who he is at age 17, which is possible, of course, but I'd still expect a fair bit of internalised homophobia left behind. For a guy who went straight from Russia to the NHL with very few positive role models in his life, he really does seem incredibly immune to homophobia. Even in the show, whilst his actions seem to suggest some internal struggle (especially the way he pushes Shane away), the narrative focuses almost entirely on the external impediments to his coming out (Russia and his family, his visa situation) rather than any internal ones. All of this could be going on in the background, of course (ten years is a long time!) but I would expect at least some nod in the narrative to him having internalised biases to overcome, which... doesn't really exist. In fact, we tend to see the opposite - he has no problem kissing his teammates and telling them he loves them!
Of course, as I've mentioned, the books have many other glaring issues when it comes to depicting gay characters, and the show manages to fix many of those (Book Kip's total lack of empathy for people in the closet, for one. The fact that characters get outed against their will a shocking number of times and this is never really dealt with as the seriously traumatic thing that it is, for two. Time will tell if Jacob will fix my third example, the particularly tiresome depiction of 'homophobic bully is just a self-hating gay guy', in season 2, but these three are just off the top of my head). I think for both Skip and Hollanov, the transformation from book to show makes for a far more compelling and relatable depiction of queerness. Show Skip just feels much closer to my personal gay male experience, and that of most of my gay male friends who have watched the show (though we are, of course, not a monolith, and the arguments from some fans that 'men prefer Skip/women prefer Hollanov' or 'gays prefer Hollanov and straights prefer Skip' or whatever drive me insane.)










