Giant meteor! @endoursuffering - Tumblr Blog

One aspect of feminist beliefs that I fundamentally disagree with is the overwhelming support of motherhood.

I will support a mother's rights as a woman, but I will despise her for her educated choice to bring a new life into this disaster of a world. She will lament about the terrors she has to witness every day, but still make a disgustingly selfish decision to create a new life.

If you really want to be a mother - you can adopt. And if you find it to be the "harder" way into motherhood, you are not supposed to be a parent in the first place.

#always baffle me when a woman endorse this #destroying their own body and torturing their Frankenstein monster just for amusement #I have no sympathy for my mother she was an educated woman with a decent job who could have choose not to breed #without worrying about her parents murdering her for not fulfilling the supposed duty of a woman

•18+ Adults Only

Watch Anya Live on Cam

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.

✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality

Anya is LIVE right now

FREE

Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming

#antinatalism #efilism

secedenconquer

The argument they always use in favor of the belief that every ordinary able-bodied person not of the asset-owning class must spend a certain amount of their waking hours deemed acceptable by society (currently 40 hours/week in most of the western world) working/appearing busy is: "how else are you gonna put food on the table?" Sure, one isolated person alone in the woods cannot produce enough economic output to cover their own basic needs without laboring from dawn to dusk. But as a civilization the level of knowledge, technology, and infrastructure accumulated has allowed us to automate entire industries and drastically increase productivity. At least in the global north, at this point we should be able to run society, meet basic needs, provide modest living standards, and then some, without every, single, last, plebeian adult going all-in in the workforce. And if we can't, we're a joke for fumbling the technological advancements thus far and there are serious inefficiencies and design flaws within the system.

People in general perceive someone whom labour doesn't consume the better part of their day as "not pulling their weight", and as someone who should have food and shelter withheld from them. But what if there is no additional weight left to be pulled? What if all the handles attached to the weight are already taken, and it's gliding smoothly forward? Are we going to add more mass to weigh us down so nobody's left out from feeling "useful"? Why yes, all commoners must be in lockstep performing the worker bee role at a socially-preapproved intensity. Therefore, you have job-seekers fighting over vacancies not because the job serves a legitimate purpose, but solely because they need to embody the role of job-haver, churning out codeslop, emailslop, spreadsheetslop to earn their meal ticket. Then you have people coming up with business ideas that nobody asked for to sell some junk product as part of the landfill economy, or selling courses on how to sell courses, so they can participate in this role-playing game as an "entrepreneur" to earn their meal ticket. And you have the reality of self-checkout machines being something that takes away cashiers' livelihood, rather than something that relieves their burden, because "people have always worked", and that's something that's totally set in stone, and despite the world having been transformed by technological progress, changing our ways is just, totally out of the question. So much for "work smarter, not harder" when it comes to the collective.

radioactivewisdomreactivated

The ethics of biological reproduction being brought up for discussion is a sign of humans evolving. Of course those who reside in their lower and animalistic nature become hostile towards such suggestions. These are the same people who cry accusations of bioessentialism, that is until heterosexual copulation is brought up, then it transforms into “the betterment of the human species.” Birthing new beings into the world is the highest form of approval one can give.

When discussing morality, children, or the possibility of children being present, is what’s used to gauge what’s acceptable. “Drive like your children live here,” “Imagine if that was your child,” and many more. Why, because it’s understood that if you wouldn’t subject the most vulnerable to something, then you should reevaluate the situation. So then, what message does it send when one decides that their children should come into the world as it is? Those who are cognitively impaired will insist that it means nothing, and continue to scratch their heads at the worsening state of society. Why does someone need to be saved from the fate you decided to bestow onto them in the first place?

The “elite” know that the average person approves of living like a pig, as long as they have access to their dopamine inducing products, and can receive a hit of oxytocin by passing on their genes. You signed your own kids up for the mud and trough, so eat up! The world won’t get better until humans progress past reveling in their biological urges, but that would require admitting to acting upon them in the first place. Until the heterosexual breeding program is called out for what it really is, instead of being proposed as the “natural” state of humans, more slaves will be born. To the fault of no other than their parents, who are supposed to be the most selfless and preoccupied with their offsprings ability to cultivate happiness and meaning, not continuing to churn the machine of status and sex.

We all know that’s not happening though, and there is no outside force that can magically turn a degenerate lost world into paradise. That would take hard work, reflection, and the entire reworking of society. The broodmare doesn’t want that, nor does her owner, or the entrepreneurs who realized they could make a big buck off such a pair. Children suffer because their parents belong to the general populace who are only concerned with themselves, and the fleeting feelings of “success” when giving the system exactly what it wants. Sovereign individuals can only do so much. A mess this large requires clean up from multiple pairs of hands, not just those of us who left the farm.

Reading smut only makes me hates my parents more. Those delusional sadist had so many ways they could bang without risking pregnancy. They could do it with fingers and mouth, they could do it through clothes, they could just watch each other without laying a hand on the other. They could do any other activities that isn’t actively trying to give you a disease every time you do it. But nope they decide to go PIV raw. AFTER they already had 2 KIDS. And they decide to keep me anyway even with access to abortion, because haha we’re rich so our kids would love the life we gave us. No you morons, I wouldn’t need to suffer and die and parasite on others to survive if you had an ounce of empathy. You could’ve use your riches to adopt or foster or sponsor a person that already exist. But it’s not worth it to feed a prisoner that might return to their original jailers right?

#antinatalism