Emixunn

using violence to liberate people from sweatshops, unsafe mines, and grinding poverty isn't the same as using violence to impose those things on people. the idea that violence is morally repugnant regardless of context is a belief that every oppressor throughout history would love for the oppressed to hold

There will come a day, when someone will make a huge ass show with a huge ass budget, which will be based entirely on queer romance and would straightbait the fuck out of this world, and I am damn sure that it will be a byler fan, who has risen from the ashes like a goddamn Phoenix to bless us with what we've wanted all along.

If I get the chance I promise all of you that I will deliver

"don't worry, it'll pay off in the end" well i declare bankruptcy

The pay was in the negatives

"you understand me more than anyone" you two literally share no interests

mike not saying i love you back to el when she's DYING proves to me that the subtext was on purpose. but why they didn't pay it off i have no fucking clue

btw not all affectionate friendships are queerplatonic. platonic is not the same as queerplatonic. you can have a good friendship with someone and even cuddle and kiss and get married and have a child together and it can still be platonic (as in neither queerplatonic nor romantic). let people love deeply without requiring them to make it about partnership

"screw conformity" yeah and have the bleakest heterosexual couple have the bleakest love story of all time ever and use your only gay main character's feelings to further that bullshit I HAVE TO LAUGH i wish i could spit in the duffer brothers' faces