One of the most startlingly effective things Iâve seen in the psychology literature is the power of âself-affirmation.â
The name is a bit misleading. The âself-affirmationâ described in these studies isnât looking in the mirror and telling yourself youâre beautiful. Â Itâs actually values affirmation â writing short essays about whatâs important to you in life (things like âfamilyâ, âreligionâ, âartâ) and why you value them. The standard control intervention is writing about why a value thatâs not very important to you might be important to someone else.
Values affirmation has been found in many studies to significantly improve academic performance in ânegatively stereotypedâ groups (blacks, Hispanics, and women in STEM), and these effects are long-lasting, continuing up to a year after the last exercise.[1] Â Values affirmation causes about a 40% reduction in the black-white GPA gap, concentrated in the middle- and low-performing students.[4]
This was startling and fascinating to me for a couple reasons. Firstly, if thatâs true, that would be huge. Weâve thrown billions at the achievement gap mostly without results.Â
Secondly, Iâd heard âself-affirmationâ thrown around before, and I assumed it was sort of like generic âpositivityâ messages - you know, âlove yourself!!â and âyou deserve the world!â and I find all that stuff vaguely icky. (âlove yourselfâ is super underspecified. What does that even mean? Is it an emotion? A belief? Do I have to be able to experience it persistently? On demand?)
But values affirmation - well, values affirmation makes a hell of a lot of sense to me. Sarah continues (bolding mine):
There is a kind of personal quality that has to do with believing you are fit to make value judgments. Â Believing that you are free to decide your own priorities in life; believing that you are generally competent to pursue your goals; believing that you are allowed to create a model of the world based on your own experiences and thoughts.
If you lack this quality, you will look to others to judge how worthy you are, and look to others to interpret the world for you, and you will generally be more anxious and more likely to unconsciously self-sabotage.
I think of this quality as being a free person or being sovereign. Â The psychological literature will often characterize it as âself-esteemâ, but in popular language âself-esteemâ is overloaded with âthinking youâre awesomeâ, which is different. Â Everybody has strengths and weaknesses and nobody is wonderful in every way. Â Being sovereign doesnât require you to think youâre perfect; it is the specific feeling that you are allowed to use your own mind.
Iâve noticed people who have this thing. Iâve aspired to be a person who has this thing, and aspired to write in a way that carves out space for other people to find this thing. I didnât have a word for it.
I think itâs the way that a lot of social justice goes wrong. Iâve seen a lot of activism that doesnât feel like itâs coming from a place of âI want to empower others to decide their own priorities; I want the people around me to feel competent and supported in achieving their goals; I want to build a movement that lets us take our own experiences seriously in building a model of the world.â Iâve read stuff that feels like itâs saying âyeah we already got the answer to that step; now do what youâre toldâ.Â
And the research suggests that people canât live like that, and shouldnât.