Hi, welcome to our blog! Here with the Dragonheart System, we (mostly just me, the host) post resources, tips, art, and some random stuff usually about Plurality, mostly about the practice of Tulpamancy. We don't really do development posts because the system is already well-developed in all areas except imposition. Any kind of system is absolutely welcome to this blog, but sysmeds can stay away, thanks. We don't do syscourse here, so any kind of sysmed ask will be automatically deleted! For mobile users, here are some useful things you should look at before following our blog: Guidelines/Before you Follow | Tulpamancy/Plurality Resources | Our Discord Server | Our Ko-Fi Page
If you acknowledge that Tulpamancy and willomancy are not synonyms, then include tulpas and Tulpamancy in your positivity posts. We want to be included!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
โ Live Streamingโ Interactive Chatโ Private Showsโ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
Hi! Just followed you and joined your server too lol. I'm not exactly new to tulpamancy but I've been more committed to the community itself recently.
I've always heard that "tulpamancy is cultural appropriation," and then went down the willogenic/willomancy =/= rabbithole. Now I'm lost. I understand that willomancy/willogenic systems as a term have been created to "avoid cultural appropriation"? How is tulpamancy appropriating Buddhism?
I can't seem to find any sources that support or debunk this myth, and while I don't believe we're appropriating anything, I'm afraid of saying I'm a tulpamancer out loud because of how many people can tell me I'm appropriating something.
Hence I'm here, as you're one of the more knowledgable tulpamancy blog I know of.
Thanks for being here and providing resources, they're very helpful, just as much as you! ๐ค
Short answer: it's not. It was a bad-faith argument sysmeds and anti-endos came up with to slander Tulpamancy. I've made several extensive posts in detail why this just simply isn't true:
๐ฌ 11ย ย ๐ 45ย ย โค๏ธ 87ย ยทย "Tulpa" and Cultural Appropriationย ยทย I cannot believe I feel so compelled to do this again, but after witnessing an anno
I wouldโve made this post earlier, but thereโs been a flow of positivity posts and anon asks lately, so I didnโt feel as pressured to make a
Hey, so I added a third link about a tweet/carrd thatโs the likely origin of the myth and explaining why itโs not reliable in the slightest.
๐ฌ 4ย ย ๐ 139ย ย โค๏ธ 333ย ยทย Western Tulpamancy is so fundamentally different from Buddhist Emanations that the two practices are only similar in na
Even if you know the bare minimum: Tibetan Buddhism isn't even a closed religion; a simple web search debunks this idea that's it's a closed practice. Tulpa at best is a borked up loanword with a completely different meaning from the original, which loanwords are a very normal concept in language and is not exclusive to this, nor is inherently appropriative. Again, the claim that it's appropriation was made by a sysmed and was NEVER in good-faith. Genuinely fucking pisses me off people took this sh!t remotely seriously and let it fester and spread to this point.
Seeing a post that is literally word for word a Tulpamancy with the only difference using willogenic/willomancy and seeing it get way more notes than the exact same post would get if it used Tulpamancy terminology instead low-key pisses me off. Like, unironically a post you'd probably see on r/Tulpas. I can't help but to feel a little vitriol that we were left in the dust and abandoned because we refused to conform to the Tumblr Plurality community's terminology for a practice that already exists, that a term WAY younger got mass-adopted (at least on Tumblr), deals with the EXACT same controversy/drama, and uses Tulpamancy resources, yet gets way more attention just pisses me off.
Like, oh, now you care about our techniques because you -genic-washed them to your liking. Nearly every time tulpa/willo are put next to each other, tulpa goes after it, even though we were here FIRST. And like, I genuinely kinda don't give a sh!t if willo is slightly different or more geared towards preexisting systems; it is still pretty much the same sh!t in principle: creating systemmates. And don't think we forgot why willogenic was made. It was specifically made because people didn't like Tulpamancy or its history, they wanted to distance themselves from it, down to explicitly mentioning it in the definition itself. That term was not made in good faith.
I've made so many posts like this, but this is still the sh!t that riles me, and it has for years. I will keep screaming into the void about this because I genuinely think it's fucked up how this all happened and what the consequences have been.
Iโm not finished, but hereโs some of what Iโve found out on Tulpas and similar phenomena under the cut
It looks like there may be some sort of scale of human experience where our brains can create some sort of simulated โotherโ in different contexts where some versions are experienced more intensely than others
Dream characters and childrenโs imaginary friends seem like the simpler end of this phenomena, and Tulpas as well as certain evangelical Christianโs who practice in order to hear the voice of god are on the opposite extreme of how much effort is required as well as how intensely they experience it. Interestingly, authors experiencing their characters as coming to life and arguing with them seems to also be a part of this
Parts of the criteria in order to experience this phenomena seem to be the ability to have sensory hallucinations (not necessarily prone-ness which is apparently distinct), fantasy prone-ness, ability to get โabsorbedโ in something, and susceptibility to hypnosis. Thereโs additional factors that can also influence how well this goes
so far Iโm unclear on how amount of effort and the complexity of the goal impact whatโs needed other than the fact that a rare few donโt experience anything on this scale, most have simpler examples of autonomous others, and a few have the ability to intentionally create one and go so far as to have it front like alters in dissociative disorders, and the time and effort it takes to do any given one of those things also varies from person to person
Sources so far:
In this article on Tulpamancy, I attempt to answer three questions: what do Tulpamancers experience, how did these experiences originate, an
PDF | This chapter sketches the outline of a cultural neurophenomenology of sociality โ the tendency to form cooperative groups and experien
Hey, Tulpamancy system of almost 9 years and author of currently the longest Tulpamancy guide here. We can offer some corrections of your findings regarding Tulpamancy specifically.
1. You don't need to be prone to dissociation to make a tulpa. I'm not prone to neither dissociation nor hypnosis (it just doesn't work on me), and I was still able to develop Arcanus, my tulpa really quickly. You can train yourself to dissociate for things like switching, but they're not outright necessary.
2. Same thing with hallucinations. Things like imposition (intentionally hallucinating your tulpa) are optional in Tulpamancy.
3. In fact, visualization and mindscapes (a.k.a. wonderlands) aren't necessary, either. There are people with aphantasia who've been able to create tulpas before. You don't need to have something like maladaptive daydreaming to make or immerse yourself into a mindscape.
4. Switching isn't that rare in the community nowadays, and it's actually become more common than imposition.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask us! We love answering Tulpamancy/Plurality questions.
For the capacity to experience hallucinations, does that also mean itโs not necessarily common/necessary to have internal hallucinations (ie: within your head like an internal monologue) of the Tulpa speaking to you?
Is dissociation required for switching with the Tulpa? And is there any Info on how similar/different the switch and having another person fronting is to traumagenic systems? (Like, are people consistently aware the Tulpa switched in, does the person who created it stay co-conscious or is that variable, is there ever any amnesia barriers)
Do you know any factors that impact how quickly/easily one can make a Tulpa? Or anything that correlates with how complex/fleshed out the resulting Tulpa is and how long it sticks around without intentional focus?
And have you happened to have heard any psychological theories as to how this works? The papers Iโve found had a few but it was just suggestions and what could hypothetically happen without anything solid either way
Also, before I start, most people view tulpas as fully independent people, so you shouldn't refer to tulpas with it/its pronouns unless that specific tulpa is okay with it!
It's definitely common and often deliberately trained to experience your tulpa's voice internally (vocality), but it's not to the same degree as imposing your tulpa's form in the physical world. However, not all tulpas communicate via internal monologue and may communicate through things like images and feelings (tulpish), though this is often considered a precursor to vocality.
No, it's not required to be able to dissociate to switch at all, but most people believe it's needed to do more in-depth or complete switches. I don't have any links off the top of my head, but there are traumagenic systems who also have tulpas, but one thing I can tell you is that with switching with a tulpa, there is often little to no blacking out/amnesia and outside of extraordinary circumstances, it almost always consensual. That's something a tulpa and their host usually would have to train manually (memory separation), and it's often discouraged: https://www.reddit.com/r/Tulpas/comments/1l23eyc/psa_having_full_memory_separation_is_terrible_and/
Take me, for example. When I switch with my tulpas, I can choose to go unconscious, can stick around in co-consciousness, or spend time in a mindscape. For me, when I come back, I vaguely have an idea of what my systemmates did, but the details are lost on me unless I really focus on remembering or said systemmate tells me what they did. Like how yesterday, Arcanus apparently spent time rebuilding his music playlist, and I forgot he did that until he mentioned it/saw he left the folder open.
Regarding how fast a person can make a tulpa... there isn't a clear consensus, but some things that can play a role are:
Preexisting Plurality
Autism
ADHD
MADD
Schizophrenia/Psychotic disorders
How much time you spend forcing every day or how often you force in general
Psychiatric drugs
Etc
It can take people as little as a day or up to years to create a tulpa, but I will say that how long doesn't necessarily determine how independent/fleshed out a tulpa can be. A tulpa made in a day can be as complex as a tulpa that took seven years to become sentient. Once a tulpa's developed enough, they can pretty much exist on their own without needing active attention from their host. For example, we have several systemmates here that are hardly active at all, but can choose to pop in whenever they like without any prompting.
The main theory I know of is the Mirror Neuron Theory where basically, you create a miniature neural network/cluster of neurons in your brain via Tulpamancy techniques that's basically your tulpa, but that theory is a little hard to believe because that implies "you" exist in a localized area in the brain when that's pretty unlikely. Tulpas can exist independently of their hosts, even if the host goes into dormancy/commits egocide. Unfortunately, research on Tulpamancy or non-traumagenic Plurality in general is incredibly scarce, so there isn't anything concrete. However, do keep on the lookout for an FMRI study Stanford's planning on releasing... eventually.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
โ Live Streamingโ Interactive Chatโ Private Showsโ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
Iโm not finished, but hereโs some of what Iโve found out on Tulpas and similar phenomena under the cut
It looks like there may be some sort of scale of human experience where our brains can create some sort of simulated โotherโ in different contexts where some versions are experienced more intensely than others
Dream characters and childrenโs imaginary friends seem like the simpler end of this phenomena, and Tulpas as well as certain evangelical Christianโs who practice in order to hear the voice of god are on the opposite extreme of how much effort is required as well as how intensely they experience it. Interestingly, authors experiencing their characters as coming to life and arguing with them seems to also be a part of this
Parts of the criteria in order to experience this phenomena seem to be the ability to have sensory hallucinations (not necessarily prone-ness which is apparently distinct), fantasy prone-ness, ability to get โabsorbedโ in something, and susceptibility to hypnosis. Thereโs additional factors that can also influence how well this goes
so far Iโm unclear on how amount of effort and the complexity of the goal impact whatโs needed other than the fact that a rare few donโt experience anything on this scale, most have simpler examples of autonomous others, and a few have the ability to intentionally create one and go so far as to have it front like alters in dissociative disorders, and the time and effort it takes to do any given one of those things also varies from person to person
Sources so far:
In this article on Tulpamancy, I attempt to answer three questions: what do Tulpamancers experience, how did these experiences originate, an
PDF | This chapter sketches the outline of a cultural neurophenomenology of sociality โ the tendency to form cooperative groups and experien
Hey, Tulpamancy system of almost 9 years and author of currently the longest Tulpamancy guide here. We can offer some corrections of your findings regarding Tulpamancy specifically.
1. You don't need to be prone to dissociation to make a tulpa. I'm not prone to neither dissociation nor hypnosis (it just doesn't work on me), and I was still able to develop Arcanus, my tulpa really quickly. You can train yourself to dissociate for things like switching, but they're not outright necessary.
2. Same thing with hallucinations. Things like imposition (intentionally hallucinating your tulpa) are optional in Tulpamancy.
3. In fact, visualization and mindscapes (a.k.a. wonderlands) aren't necessary, either. There are people with aphantasia who've been able to create tulpas before. You don't need to have something like maladaptive daydreaming to make or immerse yourself into a mindscape.
4. Switching isn't that rare in the community nowadays, and it's actually become more common than imposition.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask us! We love answering Tulpamancy/Plurality questions.
[Arcanus] I apologize, but I have only interacted with a single post of yours via a single like. To summarize: we have little indication of who you are outside of the brief post I had read. Perhaps sometime in the future when we are more familiar with you.
Okay, so when I went to answer an ask about Tulpamancy by using the 2018 community census, I noticed the main link led to a 404. Then, shortly after, it was brought to our attention that the original Tulpa.io site is also wiped.
Both seemingly being wiped in the past year or so without notice.
I've also noticed several guides vanishing and having to rely on PDF backups. Sites like Tulpa.info have become impossible to search without an account because for some ungodly reason, there is now a full-ass minute timer between EACH search you do on the forum:
Why the fuck??? This is unusable.
Anyway, wayback machine links to both Tulpa.io and the census thankfully existed to use as backups, but I worry for the resources that didn't/don't have that luxury.
This served as a reminder that the internet is not as forever as people say it is, and it's so easy to lose important pieces of history just because some account or site went dark.
Hi! :3 I've been lightly involved in inclusive plurality spaces since my syscovery several years ago, but I've never spent time in tulpamancy specific spaces so my knowledge of the community is limited to the broad strokes. I'm calling upon your experiences :)
In good faith, *why* do people tend to pursue tulpamancy? As a happy plural system ourselves we don't doubt there's good in it, but I'm curious what motivations you've noticed in people newly taking up tulpamancy. Is it a matter of wanting a friend, a "cool factor", or any other reasons? Thanks :D
Well, this census is unfortunately almost a decade old now, so I can't say in confidence it 100% reflects the community now, but it's still worth showing:
Here's the the data on what interested people before and after doing Tulpamancy:
The primary reason was companionship. Again, I can't say with certainty on how that's changed since the last census, but I wouldn't be surprised if that hasn't changed much.
So the most "official" answer I can give you is companionship and/or curiosity before making a tulpa to companionship/self-improvement after making a tulpa.
Okay, so that one radqueer I fucking blocked just block-evaded and dumped a whole-ass text wall response. Ah yes, block-evading is totally acting in good-faith, and them saying me exercising my right to block anyone on this site is bad-faith. Keep projecting, buddy.
So uh, I'm going to err on the side of caution because they did include a screenshot of their reblog I blocked them over and if I had to guess, it's probably bait to give their response a platform on this blog, and I'm not falling for it. So, I'm doing a separate post.
Hey, here's a suggestion if you have more alts I need to block: actually fuck off and don't be a block-evading ass! I blocked you for a fucking reason, and this fucking wall of text is exactly why. Ages ago, I specifically recommended people not fucking engage with radqueers and you proved EXACTLY why!
Now again: I'm not fucking engaging with someone I've blocked. Try this sh!t again, and I'm reporting you for block-evading. I don't need to justify who I do and don't block, you crossed a line by disrespecting that. I am not wasting fucking days of my life and limited energy debating someone who fucking actively defends fucking trans-harm labels and pro-contact pedophiles. I have better sh!t to do in my life.
Also, one last thing: I vaguely recall this system trying to argue that the radqueer label is... somehow about "consent" (fucking LMAO) when it's literally based around giving community to pro-contact people who have paraphilias towards beings who CANNOT FUCKING CONSENT, but then they violated my consent by block-evading. D--do you not see the hypocrisy? It's comical.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
โ Live Streamingโ Interactive Chatโ Private Showsโ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
Hey, so I noticed that radqueers are also infesting the #Tulpamancy tag, so little reminder:
YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE.
Being a radqueer and supporting sh!t like pro-contact pedophiles, zoophiles, trans-IDs like trans-abuser, trans-kidnapper, trans-Nazi is gross as fuck and is not okay! You being radically accepting of any and all labels, including harmful ones allows nasty motherfuckers to build community, create echo chambers, create victims, and perpetuate the cycle of abuse. These people need actual professional help, not be given a fucking community that allows ample access to potential victims and people encouraging their worst impulses. And I know a lot of radqueers are either kids, victims, or both, so let me tell you: you being abused and groomed has warped your perspective on what is and isn't healthy. It is very commom for abuse victims to become abusers because they know nothing else, and that very much applies here.
Here's a more formal definition from the fucking radqueer wiki itself:
Radqueer is the term used to refer to a radical political movement that advocates for paraphiles, transids, and other ostracized identities to be accepted in mainstream queer spaces. The term was originally coined in late 2021 by now deactivated Tumblr user foucault-divine-mephisto as a response to "the puritanism, hypocrisy and general rejection in the Queer community regarding a range of marginalized and stigmatized Queersexualities (paraphilias), internal identities (transage, transabled, transill/transnoso, transpecies, alterhumans/transnonhuman etc) and behaviours (social, sexual eccentricity etc). " Since its original coinage in 2021, the community made a steady increase in popularity, though never branching out of obscurity.
Say it with me, class:
PEDOPHILIA AND ZOOPHILIA ARE NOT VALID SEXUALITIES!!!
Stop trying to conflate actual paraphilic disorders to fucking queer people, you nasty fucks. Get the fuck away from the Tulpamancy, endogenic, and plural tags. These are not communities for you fuckers to infest and draw people in.
You people need to sit down, take long hard look at yourselves, and realize that this sh!t is fucked up. This is not something you should be perpetuating, and this will only create more victims. Stop the cycle, get the fuck out of this community.
Hi, yes, I'm making another post about radqueers because good fucking lord, they are EVERYWHERE in a lot of Plurality-focused tags. I've had to block what feels like dozens of BAH blogs specifically because they're pro-radqueer.
CONTENT WARNING: Discussions of CSA, abuse, paraphilic disorders. You have been warned!
What Is a Radqueer?
A radqueer is basically someone accepting of all paraphilias, including paraphilic disorders like pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia (known as "the big three"), etc. They also support things known as "trans IDs" where they basically put "trans" on a label like race, being a nazi, kidnapping, groomer, etc... Yeah... They've also appropriated terms from places like the Plurality community like bodily age, or transspecies from the alterhuman community.
A youtuber by the name of Jessicur recently did a video about the radqueer community where she also interviewed several people from that community that I highly recommend watching:
Why Is It Harmful?
Now, for most people, I shouldn't have to explain why radqueer is harmful. Paraphilic disorders like the big three shouldn't be allowed community, they shouldn't be "accepted" like people accept things like gender or sexuality. There's a difference between something like BSDM between two consenting adults, and a pro-contact pedophile in the radqueer community. In the interviews of Jessicur's video, you can see some of the radqueers she interviewed legitimately being "pro-contact," which uh, NO. And yet, they also say they're against abuse.
Or this one radqueer who was a part of a Discord server where people uploaded CSAM content and the server was then deleted, this radqueer was asked why the server was deleted, they said it was solely for abiding by Discord's TOS, not the fact that people were posting literal child abuse material. Yeah, pro-contact, yet anti-abuse, sure, buddy.
No, people with these disorders should seek help before they harm anyone, not be given a space that can quickly devolve into an echo chamber with how the radqueer label works. I know people with these paraphilic disorders are highly demonized, and that's often because of the conflation between attraction and action. There is a difference between experiencing attraction and then actually acting on it. A pedophile is not the same as a politician molesting a child. Attraction is not the sole reason why someone may assault a child.
So for the people with these disorders, we should be concerned, not acting on a gut reaction and advocating harm against them if they haven't actually done anything. For the ones that have, yeah, no, they deserve apt consequences and the victims deserve justice. That sh!t can be life-ruining. The demonization of these disorders is what pushes these people into communities like this, and that can legitimately end up making things far worse.
Though in Jessicur's video, you also hear from some of the radqueers that the radqueer community improved their mental health. To that, I say whatever improvement in someone's mental health there is in the radqueer community is far outweighed by the victims it creates. You can notice in the comments that a lot of people are pointing out how radqueer C sounds like someone who was groomed into being a radqueer, and that's exactly what I mean. There's other ways to improve your mental health without it harming others (see my please seek help instead point).
I also acknowledge that not everyone has easy access to help like therapy due to things like finances, and unfortunately, that is a systematic issue that needs to be addressed on a larger scale. Not to mention how the psychiatry industry is rife with patient abuse and just... human rights violations in general depending on where you are in the world. Telling people to seek help in that sense is not always a perfect answer, but I do think it's a better one than telling them to join a community that encourages harmful behaviors.
I wish I had a better answer to the problem, but the point boils down to: please do NOT join the radqueer community and engage with them. I think this comment summarizes the radqueer community's issues pretty well:
IMAGE TEXT: Last year I doomscrolled so badly on the radqueer tags and it literally made me so sick I had to call out for work. Never again.
Seriously, just don't engage with them, block them, and move on. It's not worth risking your mental health or getting sucked in.
And for whatever radqueer who reads this that I haven't blocked yet: know that you are not welcome on this blog, and you seriously need to reconsider what you're doing. This is harmful and you can do better by yourself and others.
For people who want to be able to spot radqueer content, pay attention to the tags. They use the rainbow and strawberry emojis like a calling card. They'll also often post tags like #pro rq, #pro ๐๐, #radqueer, #paraphiles please interact, #radqueers interact, etc.
(Also, can I just say how I hate how they appropriate two things I really like? Goddamnit, man.)
And thanks to Jessicur for making her video! She takes a look into the radqueer community without being a raging bigot and she genuinely tries to look at both sides. I really recommend taking the time to watch it. It helps shed light on this because I think this topic is solely under-discussed.
The radqueers have been coming out of the woodwork lately...
Just to remind everyone: radqueers are actively supportive of pro-contact pedophiles (i.e. child predators), zoophiles, trans-race, etc! Those are not things we should be supporting or welcoming! We should be telling these people to seek professional help before someone gets hurt, not fucking watch them make dozens of BAH blogs. It makes me sick to see how fucking common these people are in the endogenic tag.
stop saying radqueers are supportive of sex offenders.
all of this is too much like the "all gay people are child predators" and you know it, but will you admit it?
1:
Excerpts from the definition of radqueer and it's stances:
"Pro-Cโs on โpotentially harmful paraphiliasโ (if acted upon) are completely welcomed in the RadQueer community if they stay behaviorally non-offending/non-active."
"Debating on contact stances is totally acceptable as long as it doesnโt directly incites to committing offenses. "
2:
I bet that you couldn't give me a definition of trans-race/ethnic and explain why you think it's wrong without just saying "it's racist" and leaving it there.
You know how TERFs say that trans women are misogynists and just want to sexualize women?
Also, I hate to burst your bubble, but your fucking, "All of this is too much like the "all gay people are child predators," doesn't fucking work because the definition of pedophile is LITERALLY someone who is attracted to children. That is such an ass argument, it's actually funny that you thought that was a valid rebuttal.
1. I'm sorry, but uh, why the fuck are you (radqueers yeah, I skimmed your blog) okay with pedophiles that *actively* think it's okay to be in contact with children just because they supposedly have no victims? The fact alone that they're pro-contact should be more than enough to turn them away. Like, ah yes, let's have someone who actively is attracted to children (WHO CANNOT CONSENT) be allowed to seek out children to interact with!!! That totally won't be a massive risk!!! Surely!!!
They don't need an echo chamber that will encourage their worst impulses, they need professional help. Why the hell do I need to explain this??? Like, I've talked about this before and shared experiences of kids who've been abused by predators that have been welcomed with open arms into the radqueer community. You are giving these motherfuckers free real estate of potential victims and that sh!t makes my blood boil.
2. Yeah. It is racist, but apparently you need a more detailed explanation. You people don't seem to understand that race isn't just a fucking label you can adopt and drop. Race is something that affects *everything* in your life, and it's something that you can't just shed. Race is tied to culture and history, to struggles and triumph, and is specific to that race because of their unique history. Yes, you can study and assimilate into a culture, but that is NOT the same thing as being born to a specific race. A black person can't just go, "I'm no longer black, I'm going to be white!" That's not going to magically make their unique struggles as a black person or their history as a black person vanish and fucking vice-versa! So yes, it's racist as sh!t to try and "transition" to a race, especially a fucking marginalized one and act like you've had that history and culture. And god, I didn't even mention the rampant cultural appropriation that's done by white people fucking constantly. Racialized people get enough sh!t as it is, and some fucking radqueer cropping up, saying they're trans to that race is fucked up.
And don't you fucking DARE compare me to a goddamn TERF. I am pro, "Please seek professional help before you hurt yourself or others," and pro, "Don't be a racist ass that treats race like a fun label to adopt and drop at any point." Actually fuck off.
Okay, so, I blocked this system after reading their bullsh!t reply and how they clearly are not arguing in good faith or with basic knowledge... like what a TERF is:
Tell me you don't know what TERFs are without telling me you don't know what TERFs are. Like, sorry not sorry, but I'm not debating someone who doesn't even understand what a fucking TERF is. Maybe they're a minor and don't know better, but uh, yeah no, not wasting possibly several days with someone who doesn't have their basic facts straight.
But one thing I did skim was how they're a victim of RAMCOA, CSA, and some other sh!t I can't recall and I'm just like...
You know that's worse, right? You know that's basically you admitting that you were groomed into fucking having this mindset and having this sh!t be normalized to you? It's very common for victims of abuse to either fall into other abusive relationships because they have zero frame of reference for what a healthy relationship actually looks like, or they end up perpetuating the cycle of abuse because they don't know any different.
It makes me sad to think this system likely is the latter by fucking championing fucking pro-contact pedophiles and trying to allow these types of people to congregate and again, encourage their worst impulses. I genuinely hope they realize how fucked their mindset is and actually get help.
And god, I didn't even talk about the radqueers who do sh!t like trans-harm or god fucking forbid, trans-fucking-Nazi. Fucking defend that sh!t, I fucking dare you. Like, it's clear this person trying so fucking hard to label me like a conservative, pearl-clutching TERF is deflecting because they fucking know they can't defend sh!t like that. They know that yeah, allowing literal pedophiles who are 100% okay with interacting with kids ample access to potential victims is a disaster waiting to happen. I hope they know deep down, being a radqueer is NOT fucking okay.
And shades of grey??? Shades of fucking grey???? That is hilarious coming from a system who picked a fucking identity that is based off of unconditional acceptance of any and all labels, including literal fucking Nazis. Because ah yes, me fucking saying, "These people need help," is apparently black-and-white when the usual black-and-white perspective of pedophiles is, "They deserve to be burned at the stake!!!" Again, very clear that they are not arguing in good faith.
The radqueers have been coming out of the woodwork lately...
Just to remind everyone: radqueers are actively supportive of pro-contact pedophiles (i.e. child predators), zoophiles, trans-race, etc! Those are not things we should be supporting or welcoming! We should be telling these people to seek professional help before someone gets hurt, not fucking watch them make dozens of BAH blogs. It makes me sick to see how fucking common these people are in the endogenic tag.
stop saying radqueers are supportive of sex offenders.
all of this is too much like the "all gay people are child predators" and you know it, but will you admit it?
1:
Excerpts from the definition of radqueer and it's stances:
"Pro-Cโs on โpotentially harmful paraphiliasโ (if acted upon) are completely welcomed in the RadQueer community if they stay behaviorally non-offending/non-active."
"Debating on contact stances is totally acceptable as long as it doesnโt directly incites to committing offenses. "
2:
I bet that you couldn't give me a definition of trans-race/ethnic and explain why you think it's wrong without just saying "it's racist" and leaving it there.
You know how TERFs say that trans women are misogynists and just want to sexualize women?
Also, I hate to burst your bubble, but your fucking, "All of this is too much like the "all gay people are child predators," doesn't fucking work because the definition of pedophile is LITERALLY someone who is attracted to children. That is such an ass argument, it's actually funny that you thought that was a valid rebuttal.
1. I'm sorry, but uh, why the fuck are you (radqueers yeah, I skimmed your blog) okay with pedophiles that *actively* think it's okay to be in contact with children just because they supposedly have no victims? The fact alone that they're pro-contact should be more than enough to turn them away. Like, ah yes, let's have someone who actively is attracted to children (WHO CANNOT CONSENT) be allowed to seek out children to interact with!!! That totally won't be a massive risk!!! Surely!!!
They don't need an echo chamber that will encourage their worst impulses, they need professional help. Why the hell do I need to explain this??? Like, I've talked about this before and shared experiences of kids who've been abused by predators that have been welcomed with open arms into the radqueer community. You are giving these motherfuckers free real estate of potential victims and that sh!t makes my blood boil.
2. Yeah. It is racist, but apparently you need a more detailed explanation. You people don't seem to understand that race isn't just a fucking label you can adopt and drop. Race is something that affects *everything* in your life, and it's something that you can't just shed. Race is tied to culture and history, to struggles and triumph, and is specific to that race because of their unique history. Yes, you can study and assimilate into a culture, but that is NOT the same thing as being born to a specific race. A black person can't just go, "I'm no longer black, I'm going to be white!" That's not going to magically make their unique struggles as a black person or their history as a black person vanish and fucking vice-versa! So yes, it's racist as sh!t to try and "transition" to a race, especially a fucking marginalized one and act like you've had that history and culture. And god, I didn't even mention the rampant cultural appropriation that's done by white people fucking constantly. Racialized people get enough sh!t as it is, and some fucking radqueer cropping up, saying they're trans to that race is fucked up.
And don't you fucking DARE compare me to a goddamn TERF. I am pro, "Please seek professional help before you hurt yourself or others," and pro, "Don't be a racist ass that treats race like a fun label to adopt and drop at any point." Actually fuck off.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
โ Live Streamingโ Interactive Chatโ Private Showsโ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch โข No registration required โข HD streaming
The radqueers have been coming out of the woodwork lately...
Just to remind everyone: radqueers are actively supportive of pro-contact pedophiles (i.e. child predators), zoophiles, trans-race, etc! Those are not things we should be supporting or welcoming! We should be telling these people to seek professional help before someone gets hurt, not fucking watch them make dozens of BAH blogs. It makes me sick to see how fucking common these people are in the endogenic tag.
Just finished reading your extensive tulpamancy guide and it was incredible! I'm practicing dragonwork but there's a lot of similarities to tulpamancy and skills that are transferable, so I gave it a read. It was amazing!!! Thank you!!
You're welcome! I haven't touched that guide in years, and quite frankly, I don't know when/if I'll go over it again. It's funny you say you're doing dragonwork because we all take the form of Dragons in our system. That guide probably is my magnum opus regardless; god knows how many people have read it by now.
dededos
annaxmalina
areudirty
origamiaround
discoholicmusic
janainaart
