i didnt fuck with it initially, but honestly Mark Thompsons breathy and willowy voice for Marchion Ro makes him even sexier

Origami Around
Fai_Ryy

@theartofmadeline

PR's Tumblrdome
Noah Kahan
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
h

★
sheepfilms

ellievsbear

bliss lane

Discoholic 🪩
EXPECTATIONS
Mike Driver
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
untitled

roma★
RMH
Misplaced Lens Cap

seen from United States
seen from South Africa

seen from Colombia
seen from Brazil

seen from Bangladesh
seen from France
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from Australia

seen from Colombia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from Romania
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Finland
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
@dreadbirate
i didnt fuck with it initially, but honestly Mark Thompsons breathy and willowy voice for Marchion Ro makes him even sexier

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
only 5 seconds
i wasn't ready for that..lol
Immediately recognized that look
The subtitles do really good work at conveying tone and mood here, but it's worth having sound on just for the noise he makes when she gets out of it.
oh no they’re going to start calling democrats the same thing they’ve been calling democrats for 20 years now
The fact that the overton window has shifted to the point where the conservatives recognize that socialism is not as scary as communism to the average voter is fascinating
back during the peak tumblr era (some point between 2012-2015) I saw this post that was like: "for the last time to people who don't practice magic. WITCH IS GENDER NEUTRAL. WIZARD IS GENDER NEUTRAL. W*RLOCK IS A SLUR." and OP was dead fucking serious about it. anyway i hope the angry teenage wiccan that made that post understands their words have lived rent-free in my head for at least eight years now.
im not even saying this to make fun of this person, who was probably as i said a teenager, or even the crazy takes of old tumblr. im saying it because at this point, "w*rlock is a slur" is a (near) decade old inside joke i have with myself and I need to have it exist outside of my brain. it literally haunts my mind.
I FOUND HER AGAIN.
Haha you don’t know how happy this would make Louis(my friend featured in my videos) he loves lonely island 🥹

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
my entire childhood i was threatened with juvenile detention just for being a weird kid. the kids in my class would lie about me doing bad things, or be doing bad things and then i would get in trouble and my school principal said if i didnt 'show remorse' id end up in juvy. neighbors called the cops on me and my own mother wouldnt take my side. so no, i dont think prison is a valid tool for rehabilitation or justice. jail is a threat the people in power use to control us and get rid of people they dont like. get more prison abolitionist now. get more youthlib now. get more transfeminist NOW
I know they are in different canons written decades apart so are probably not even meant to be continuous, but having read the Thrawn 2017 trilogy first, now that I’m reading Heir to the Empire it’s interesting to consider the path that must have taken him from who he is in the imperial trilogy to who he is in the Thrawn trilogy.
In the Imperial Trilogy, Thrawn is fundamentally optimistic, he aims to avoid brutality when he can instead gain a more complete victory. He aims to foster talent to improve the Imperial military, consulting with his underlings and taking their opinions seriously. He has people he cares about, even if he uses them as pawns for his games at achieving what he thinks is the greater good.
In Heir to the Empire, Thrawn is very different. The Empire is a corpse, though Thrawn denies it. He failed to realise that the empire was not a state, it was, in reality, nothing but the great cushion of evil built to protect Palpatine, and with him gone Thrawn keeps the dregs alive through sheer force of will. He’s lost faith in the officers and underlings around him, and in this time of desperation he has decided that there is no room for imperfection, and acts accordingly, acting with brutality in the face of minor failures from his staff. He doesn’t consult or consider, because he no longer trusts anything but his own personal genius.
I think these are distinctions that make sense when you consider his life’s path. Thrawn was always a fascist, who believed in might makes right and authoritarian/totalitarian rule, he always beleived the ends justified the means, he always had an ego and a vindictive streak (look at his campaign against nightswan), but all of these have been amplified and made sharper by years of failure and the slow realization that the empire which he staked his dignity and the future of his people on was a bad idea.
Now, I’ve only read half of heir to the empire so far (I don’t mind spoilers too much), so idk how much his backstory will be different between the trilogies, I’m mainly commenting on the differences in characterization and how those can be explained when patching the two.
The backstory is non existent in Heir. What we see with Thrawn (at least on the book side) is a odd evolution of the character -some argue white washing - to add layers and maybe justification to what he does in the OG Thrawn trilogy.
Oh you're 100% correct there, its pretty clear that Thrawn in Heir is a very different character at the core than Thrawn 2017's protagonist (probably because of the shift from villain to protagonist), but its interesting to draw the paralells i think, the layers it adds to the characters, without justifying it.
Oh absolutely. It is interesting though seeing how much a villain he is in the original Thrawn trilogy. Which to my mind is where Rebels and Ahsoka are drawing their inspiration from. In Heir is very ruthless even towards civilians in order to restore the “Emperor’s new order” compared to later where he tried to not target civilians.
See, brutality towards civillians is something thats not too out of line for 2017 Thrawn. The thing that marked me as the most incongruous in Heir was when Luke managed to escape from the tractor beam, he has the person who failed to keep up with him killed on the spot. Thats not someing the 2017 Thrawn would ever do.
I know they are in different canons written decades apart so are probably not even meant to be continuous, but having read the Thrawn 2017 trilogy first, now that I’m reading Heir to the Empire it’s interesting to consider the path that must have taken him from who he is in the imperial trilogy to who he is in the Thrawn trilogy.
In the Imperial Trilogy, Thrawn is fundamentally optimistic, he aims to avoid brutality when he can instead gain a more complete victory. He aims to foster talent to improve the Imperial military, consulting with his underlings and taking their opinions seriously. He has people he cares about, even if he uses them as pawns for his games at achieving what he thinks is the greater good.
In Heir to the Empire, Thrawn is very different. The Empire is a corpse, though Thrawn denies it. He failed to realise that the empire was not a state, it was, in reality, nothing but the great cushion of evil built to protect Palpatine, and with him gone Thrawn keeps the dregs alive through sheer force of will. He’s lost faith in the officers and underlings around him, and in this time of desperation he has decided that there is no room for imperfection, and acts accordingly, acting with brutality in the face of minor failures from his staff. He doesn’t consult or consider, because he no longer trusts anything but his own personal genius.
I think these are distinctions that make sense when you consider his life’s path. Thrawn was always a fascist, who believed in might makes right and authoritarian/totalitarian rule, he always beleived the ends justified the means, he always had an ego and a vindictive streak (look at his campaign against nightswan), but all of these have been amplified and made sharper by years of failure and the slow realization that the empire which he staked his dignity and the future of his people on was a bad idea.
Now, I’ve only read half of heir to the empire so far (I don’t mind spoilers too much), so idk how much his backstory will be different between the trilogies, I’m mainly commenting on the differences in characterization and how those can be explained when patching the two.
The backstory is non existent in Heir. What we see with Thrawn (at least on the book side) is a odd evolution of the character -some argue white washing - to add layers and maybe justification to what he does in the OG Thrawn trilogy.
Oh you're 100% correct there, its pretty clear that Thrawn in Heir is a very different character at the core than Thrawn 2017's protagonist (probably because of the shift from villain to protagonist), but its interesting to draw the paralells i think, the layers it adds to the characters, without justifying it.
Victor Frankenstein after achieving the impossible and building a fucking person from scraps of the dead: Oh god, ew, ew it's ugly! Yucky! Yucky! Gross! Ew! Ew! Yucky! Yucky! Gross! Ew!
I saw this and felt like it should be shared here too
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimes

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Somewhere out there on a planet very far away is a civilization that has included our sun in a beloved constellation of some animal we couldn't dream up if we tried
it's crazy the amount of character analysis horniness can inspire
step 1: i want to fuck this guy rabidly
step 2: i'm so invested in them I'm going to examine the themes surrounding them
(BRANCHING PATH)
step 3A: i'm going to extrapolate an interesting analysis about the character from these themes
step 3B: those themes don't make me as horny so i'm going to ignore them
you have to be careful, though. reckless boner-based interpretations can result in the development of a "the onceler"
There are 6 genres of sci fi
Hornblower IN SPACE!!!! (Star Trek, Battletech)
Bright White Boy saves the day (Project Hail Mary, The Expanse)
Space Wizard acheives enlightenment (Star Wars, Dune)
If you look at this goo you'll go CRAZYYYY (HP Lovecraft)
Cowboys IN SPACE!!!!! (Firefly, Cowboy Bebop)
Even Worse Capitalism but you get cool robot arms (Snow Crash, Cyberpunk 2077)
I know they are in different canons written decades apart so are probably not even meant to be continuous, but having read the Thrawn 2017 trilogy first, now that I’m reading Heir to the Empire it’s interesting to consider the path that must have taken him from who he is in the imperial trilogy to who he is in the Thrawn trilogy.
In the Imperial Trilogy, Thrawn is fundamentally optimistic, he aims to avoid brutality when he can instead gain a more complete victory. He aims to foster talent to improve the Imperial military, consulting with his underlings and taking their opinions seriously. He has people he cares about, even if he uses them as pawns for his games at achieving what he thinks is the greater good.
In Heir to the Empire, Thrawn is very different. The Empire is a corpse, though Thrawn denies it. He failed to realise that the empire was not a state, it was, in reality, nothing but the great cushion of evil built to protect Palpatine, and with him gone Thrawn keeps the dregs alive through sheer force of will. He’s lost faith in the officers and underlings around him, and in this time of desperation he has decided that there is no room for imperfection, and acts accordingly, acting with brutality in the face of minor failures from his staff. He doesn’t consult or consider, because he no longer trusts anything but his own personal genius.
I think these are distinctions that make sense when you consider his life’s path. Thrawn was always a fascist, who believed in might makes right and authoritarian/totalitarian rule, he always beleived the ends justified the means, he always had an ego and a vindictive streak (look at his campaign against nightswan), but all of these have been amplified and made sharper by years of failure and the slow realization that the empire which he staked his dignity and the future of his people on was a bad idea.
Now, I’ve only read half of heir to the empire so far (I don’t mind spoilers too much), so idk how much his backstory will be different between the trilogies, I’m mainly commenting on the differences in characterization and how those can be explained when patching the two.
Polycules should be able to trade people like sports teams do
Listen -- you're a good defender and your pussy is fantastic, but that's not what our team needs right now. We're trading you to Greater Boston in exchange for someone who has a car.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The midjourney stuff just reminds of when we were trying to find a new platform to host the ao3 donation form, and companies kept trying to tell me about all their "ai" features that would track donor engagement, and figure out the optimal pattern to email individual donors asking for follow up donations, and all the ways they suggest we manipulate people into staying on our websites. It was a great way to filter out who either wasn't listening to us when we described our ethics and donor base, or just didn't believe us.
Now granted ao3 is a unique case based on a) the amount of page views we get in any given time period and b) the fact that most donors absolutely do Not want to be identified as such anywhere, (the default "list of recent donors" module got nuked Immediately) but it surprised me some that the concept of "donors who value their privacy and would be furious at even the whiff of AI" is unique. Some of us really are just existing in different worlds.
Op's tags
#I just started dropping '2.5 Billion page views a month'#into conversations as early as possible bc they would Not believe me otherwise#it was right up there with having to say 'csam attacks' to get them to take my compartmentalization of information concerns seriously#turns out those are the magic words#otw#op
The last part was kind of insane, honestly. When we started changing platforms for the donor database, I kept telling them that yes I was aware we already had an account for the volunteer database, and no that could not be connected to the donor database. And they said yes fine sure and then connected them anyway. And I called them back and said, excuse me, I'm confused, I can see both databases. And they said, well, yeah, but it's only you, someone has to be able to see both databases to give other users access. The other users can't see both. And I said, no, we have been asking for a completely separate database. I should not be able to see both. And they said, you are one organization, one organization can't have two databases. And I said, last year someone used our volunteer email list to commit approximately one thousand felonies. Please feel free to imagine how much worse it could have been had they had a way to use volunteers' email addresses to get their legal names. We do not want this to be something anyone can do no matter how much we trust them. Let me describe those felonies to you in more detail. And they emailed me two hours later and said, you can have two separate databases.
This post feels like watching an iceberg go by in clear water. The amount of stuff going on beneath the surface of AO3 just astonishes.
(ID in alt)
Approximately one THOUSAND felonies
I pull up my slide show. The first slide says “I do not want to financially support the Church of the Latter Day Saints in any way”. There are murmurs of agreement and approval from the room
Next slide. “Brandon Sanderson is a member of the LDS”. The muttering has changed tone
“It’s not a very big amount of money though.” Someone in the audience pipes up. “His cut is only a small fraction of the cost of the book, and then-“ my next slide shows an income breakdown, it is titled ‘a small fraction of $10,000,000 is still a big number’
I’m sweating. The following slides explain tithing rules. The vibe of the room has shifted. I start to doubt I’m getting out of here alive
#huh#i wonder how much of his success is due to the support of the mormon church#that's the sort of grassroots i fluence they'd be able to pull off#or just church leaders 'asking' people to buy his books till he becomes a bestseller#and well once you do that a few times money prints itself a bit
Actually this is a big part of why you see so many successful mormon authors! Not necessarily people being deliberately pressured to buy the books, I've never heard of that happening, but there's a big writing culture and it's generally easier for mormons to get published in the first place because of their accessible English university classes and their internal book distribution network giving many authors a leg up. It's worth noting that while I'm unaware of any deliberate attempts to game bestseller lists like these tags imply, simply being mormon authors helps sell books to other mormons, because mormons tend to be very wary about reading inappropriate content. A mormon picking out a book for themselves, or especially picking out a book for their children, will likely favour a book available through their mormon bookstore or a book written by a mormon in a bookshop, because they know that the material in the book will be appropriate and morally acceptable. (That or Disney, which is al,so apparently very popular among mormons.) Since mormons tend to have a strong reading and writing culture, this captive audience certainly isn't nothing.