i’ve long wondered if women’s competitive disadvantage in sports is manufactured, to an extent, by men themselves: our athletic contests favor men, and that’s why we hold them. we put them on year after year, not only to rank men amongst each other, but also to reinforce the “fact” of female weakness.
i was in an ultradistance trail race last weekend and the second place finisher in the 50 mile was a woman, which i had never seen in a road race (and i know that a woman won this race outright last year). there were 5 women in the top 15 finishers in the 50k. the men were more numerous, but the women were running almost as well as them, on average.
and this was not because of the sheer distance, because men can run long distances on a circular track much, much faster than women can (i don’t think any woman is ever going to run 6:50 miles for 400 laps on a 400m track, for instance).
the women ran fairly well, compared to the men, because of the course, not the distance. twisting, turning single track trail with ankle deep mud everywhere from the spring rains, swamp crossings, sudden sharp climbs, gullys and ravines with running water and slippery rocks, these awkwardly tall platform bridges where you had to climb these 18” steps. you could not run more than 3 steps without having to make a decision. it took great patience and psychological resilience just to finish.
i think this more natural kind of environment eroded the extravagant male advantage we’re used to seeing. pure power, pure speed, matters less in the woods than on a perfectly beveled artificial track, which is why men have chosen to measure running performance in this “man-made” environment, and why they imposed these practices on women when they started allowing us to compete, less than a century ago.
the point is not that men have no athletic advantage over women, because they definitely do. but they choose to measure their athletic prowess in contexts that disproportionately favor themselves.
and we women accept these results as proof of female weakness. some women consider strength itself “unwomanly”, and they’ll avoid strength-building exercise because “i’m not trying to look like a man.” but we are not naturally weak. it just appears that way in athletic contests designed by men for men.