Lazy male youtubers love to skim a history wiki or something about an event that wasn't cut & dry, then present one edited version to viewers (some of whom they get to pay for this nonsense) as if what they're telling you is 100% factual.
Imagine reporting a rumor that a historical figure was legally acquitted of as being true. Imagine it's done while also telling the story of a woman and only mentioning she had life-long health problems at the very end of the story like it's unimportant. This site forgave those men far too easily.














