adding to the pile of little colorful dragons i've been drawing lately
(also available on my kofi as adoptables!)

JBB: An Artblog!
Xuebing Du
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

JVL
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

⁂

@theartofmadeline
Not today Justin
will byers stan first human second
Cosmic Funnies

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Jules of Nature

Discoholic 🪩
Claire Keane
Today's Document

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia
seen from France
seen from Malaysia

seen from France

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@coolest-capybara
adding to the pile of little colorful dragons i've been drawing lately
(also available on my kofi as adoptables!)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I think people need to understand that everyone has to unlearn misogynistic behaviors and thinking patterns. Cis women and trans women and cis men and trans men and anyone who doesn’t fall under those categories are all completely capable of being misogynistic and actively hurtful to women. Trans men are included in this, obviously, but when you only call for trans men to unlearn this mindset, you are no longer being progressive and fair. You are singling out a minority.
it pisses me off to see cis women saying 'trans women are misogynistic because they were raised as men' and trans women replying 'no we aren't because no we weren't!' and i'm sitting there staring at the camera like it's the office. because like women are ALL raised to be just as misogynistic as men. it's a notable goddamn feature of the patriarchy.
like if you are marginalized it is in your own self-interest to interrogate and deconstruct the cultural narratives that position you as subnormal. this is what starts a lot of queer people on wanting to reform the world into something more compassionate and egalitarian.
but it's not the marginalization that makes you any more or less ethical than anyone else. it's the work. you gotta do the actual work.
I feel like part of the problem is a really popular misunderstanding of bigotry.
Misogyny is not just prejudice experienced by a woman. It is not simply something that happens TO a woman. It has nothing to do with the woman. It’s about the misogynist.
Bigotry is not determined or defined by the target of that bigotry. The bigotry is stored in the bigot.
Misogynists will be misogynistic towards any person they associate with femininity, including cisgender men.
When a misogynist cis man tears another man down for liking something he thinks is girly, he is still being misogynistic.
A cis male coach telling his cis male student he runs like a girl is being misogynistic.
A cis woman punishing her son for wanting a “girl” toy or policing her boyfriend’s hygiene habits and interests for anything she considers emasculating, is being misogynistic!
When a woman gets in a car accident and is injured more severely because the safety testing on that car was only done using crash test dummies and models based on men, she’s experiencing misogyny.
When the medication she takes for her injuries doesn’t work right or has unexpected side effects because it was only tested on men, she’s experiencing misogyny.
When the tools she uses at work that are the wrong shape for her hands, and the jumpsuit that’s part of her uniform which she has to take off completely to use the bathroom, and all the spaces she moves through and everything within them are designed with the assumption that an average male body is the only body that matters— she is experiencing misogyny.
Misogyny is the belief that women are inherently inferior, and the systems and institutions built around that belief. It can be experienced by anyone, and anyone is capable of having misogynistic beliefs and doing misogynistic things.
Bigotry is not about the target. It’s about the bigot, and what the bigot believes, and the way those bigoted beliefs have shaped our world.
I don’t care what race gender or sexuality you are, you were raised with racist, sexist, homophobic beliefs. Because it’s literally impossible not to be.
And the harder you try to cling to the idea that misogyny is something that happens TO women, rather than something coming FROM misogynists, the more blind you’ll be to your own misogynistic beliefs, and all the ways everything in our society is a product of or directly reinforces those beliefs.
"Sweeping Off the Male Gaze" by Japanese illustrator Yuko Shimizu.
Now that I've finally put up some instructions for the Traveling Stitch/False Decrease, maybe I can also post about some of the things I've been doing with it.
One category I've been exploring is lace, because I always seem to revert to lace. Knitted lace often has lines of decreases, which distort the vertical columns of stitches into emphasized diagonals. Here is a small swatch of a lace diamond pattern, fairly bog-standard except for the cable crosses at the points of the diamonds. The top half of each diamond shape is framed by its decrease lines, while the bottom half grows vertically out of the YO increases.
By using some False Decreases, it's possible to add diagonal framing lines to the lower edges of the diamonds as well. Now they look more symmetrical, and have a nice kind of crispy-edges effect.
Here are charts for both stitch patterns:
They are identical except for the False Decreases. The outlined diamonds end up looking a bit smaller, because the area of stockinette stitch gets more covered up by the diagonals.
everyone play this game, it's art history wordle. I did surprisingly poorly on account of two way-off guesses. only top 59% 🙄
A daily game. Ten objects. 5,000 years of human history. Guess where and when each artifact was made. See how you rank.
Anthropeum.com · Jun 10 2026
🟦🟩🟦🟩🟦🟨🟨🟩🟩🟦
78,762 · top 5% of players today!
I’m quite pleased with myself. Also whoever designs these is very clever — one of these questions, when i saw the right answer, had me going “oh come on that’s practically cheating”.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Best thing about watching my grandparents cat is that while I'm there I can rifle through the great Quilt Stash and bring out beautiful works of art to sleep under.
god save me from people with a platform being confidently incorrect about my field of study online
this Youtuber best known for (very funny!) videos mocking luxury fashion brands posted a video about the history of "poverty-core" fashion
I was immediately concerned
her thrust was the Consumptive Chic quasi-myth (ARGH NO BAD), but she followed it up with "women were literally taking poison to look like this." End Video.
thing is, if she was talking about what I think she was talking about. it IS an example of Poverty-Core! just a different, more commonplace kind of Poverty-Core!
in 1851, Johann Jakob von tschudi published an article in a Vienna medical journal documenting a village in Styria where the inhabitants took small, regular doses of arsenic. this practice, he claimed, made the women's complexions beautiful (in what way, he didn't specify). cue cosmetics companies in cities jumping on this idea and producing "arsenic complexion wafers"
this ad also specifies that the wafers are free of certain abortifacient herbs. just in case ladies think it's that kind of coded Female Irregularity ad. fascinating
note that these ads generally tout the product as "safe." the idea, not so foreign to us today, was that a tiny dose of a dangerous substance could have a beneficial effect. Botox, anyone?
...except not like Botox, exactly, because a Boston medical journal tested some popular brands in the 1870s and found that they were mostly dried lactose with no detectable arsenic. womp womp.
Oh For the Simple Country Life :3 was a really common kind of Poverty-Core in the 19th century! and it was being used to scam people into buying products they thought contained poison, with only a random ad's assurance that the products were safe! this Youtuber could EASILY have talked about that and been 100% factually correct!
but I guess Oooooh they Wanted to Look terminally Ill!!!!!! gets more views. ugh
.... I'm not kidding, that video had just popped up on my feed before I saw this post. Incredible timing
Oh yeah, I forgot that the fact that she quotes AI overviews also seriously impacts her credibility in my mind.. Like if you want people to take you seriously, maybe don't believe the hallucination engine?
help some Racist Nonsense someone came at me with has sent me down the rabbit hole of trying to figure out how common enslaved dressmakers were in the antebellum southern US, but the continued lack of understanding even among historians that Seamstress and Dressmaker were two different things in the 19th century is making it REALLY difficult
(the Nonsense being "well of course it's realistic in Gone With the Wind that Scarlett makes the curtain dress herself with patterns her mother formerly used to make clothing! plantation mistresses had to know how to make adult clothing from scratch so they could direct the enslaved women who made their clothes!")
(like. yes, enslaved clothing-makers were AI clothes generators who had no skills of their own and had to be given very precise instructions to produce the desired output. of course. sounds legit. </s>)
Also just speaking of the book in question, genuinely, it is so 1930s to be like "oh yes, we make clothing ourselves now, so in the olden days before modern technology, they must've made their own clothes even harder!!!!!"
Filtered through a heaping dose of the classic "well, women of the past could do everything and women of the present are spoiled and incapable!" Which in the US you see all the way back to the 19th century fiction of the totally self sustaining colonial household where the wife did absolutely every domestic task somehow 
Like just in case you had any suspicions that Margaret Mitchell did a lick of research when writing this. Please throw those suspicions in the trash 
(really the period when it was at all a money saving endeavor to make your own clothing at home from scratch was so small in western history, and the practice was geared at such a specific subset of the population, that it's not at all what people today imagine it was. Like for most women, making your family's own clothing at home being a thrifty or even just viable proposition was more likely to happen in the 1950s than in the 1850s. I'm not saying that nobody in the 19th century was in that position, but far fewer people than anyone imagines in the present)
I recently read a book* on British women dressmakers in the 18th and 19th centuries.
There was a whole invisible, disregarded and mostly unrecorded economy of independent self-supporting businesswomen making clothes for sale. (The author had to pore over local records all over the UK just to pull together the information. Working women were not given much visibility or mention in those centuries.)
One thing that's really clear is most women did not make their own clothes.
Rich people had servants and professionals to make their garments, and later on couture houses. Many of them used enslaved labor which would have had to have been highly skilled.
Middling sorts had local dressmakers, sometimes professionals, sometimes a local woman or neighbor who would do it for pay. There were itinerant dressmakers too, who would come into houses and make up the family's wardrobe. And there were shops of readymade garments far earlier than most people realize.
Poorer people bought their clothes secondhand. There was a huge secondhand garment trade.
American pioneers in homespun is pure modern-day fantasy. Women in the territories had mail-order catalogues from which they could have clothes delivered by trains or by ship.
As far as I can tell, the idea of self-sufficient women doing a constant round of spinning, weaving, and sewing is a fantasy of the post-industrial age projected onto women. But spinning, weaving and clothing-making has long been a professional industry.
*The book is Busks, Basques and Brush-Braid: British Dressmaking in the 18th and 19th Centuries, by Pam Inder, Bloomsbury Visual Arts 2020.
Book recommendation! Thank you! And such a good breakdown too
(worth noting that slavery was in something of a legal gray area in the UK during the 18th and early-mid 19th century when it was legal in other parts of the Anglosphere; it was never technically legal in the UK itself, but of course it was legal and commonly practiced in their colonies, and many enslaved people who were brought to the UK Were treated as though they were still de facto enslaved until they were taken back home again. And of course you don't have to rely on chattel slavery to make a business off of unfair labor practices, which was extremely common even after slavery was outlawed and/or fell by the wayside)
it's interesting also that some dressmakers offered a sliding scale of services, from making up entire outfits on the high end, to cutting and fitting and basting the pieces together in the middle, to cutting and fitting but leaving the women of the household to do the physical sewing themselves as the Budget Option. I find that fascinating
Did land horses evolve from sea horses or did sea horses evolve from land horses? You posted about land horses recently so I figured you might know.
Both evolved from this thing, which is currently not living
This is too funny to leave in the tags
"Now I've shot so many Nazis, Daddy will have to buy me a sable coat." (From his Wikipedia article).
Neil Munro "Bunny" Roger
June 9, 1911-April 27, 1997.
Bunny Roger killed a bunch of Nazis and then invented Capri pants.
He was expelled from Oxford for his indiscrete gayness (discrete gayness being perfectly fine at Oxford and part of the curriculum until...today probably, at least like 1992?). Then, having been sent down to London, he started his own fashion business, and his first client was Vivien Leigh.
Bunny served in WWII, killing fascists in North Africa and Italy, and often wearing a mauve scarf in the field. Roger claimed that he had gone into a battle brandishing a rolled-up copy of VOGUE and commanding: "When in doubt, powder heavily!"
Roger was known in high society for his themed soirées; Diamond, Amethyst, and Flame Balls were held to celebrate his 60th, 70th, and 80th birthdays. He wore a curious plum colored catsuit with a feathered headdress at his 70th birthday ball in 1981. At his 80th, he made his entrance in a catsuit of scarlet sequins with a cape of orange organza, greeting his guests from behind a wall of fire. His parties were covered by the newspapers, including a New Year's Eve Fetish Ball where the proper upper class mixed with young guests in rubber S/M gear.
From an obituary: "Beneath his mauve mannerisms, Bunny was stalwart, frank, dependable and undeceived; to onlookers a passing peacock, to intimates, a life enhancer and exemplary friend."
From another obituary:
He served valiantly in every way.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i used to publish papers with her but then she took et al in the divorce
Still in the works, but nearly done with this, then hopefully will have the tutorial up soon.
Here’s how to make one for yourself
💬 0 🔁 31 ❤️ 56 · Here is the tutorial, I don’t get paid doing this and I’m not an expert at this so please don’t think I can answer everyt
Another week's worth of bird people.
Have you studied enough alchemy to synthesise The Dialectic Material?
I've got an ingot of pure context on my side table
My favorite Tolkien illustrations by Cor Blok in no particular order:
Bilbo and Gollum. Bilbo is the moon for some reason which is cool i guess
Smeagol and Deagol. I love the seaweed in the background, great attention to detail
Frodo serving Robin Hood-realness at his and Bilbo’s birthday party. Literally iconic
Isildur taking the ring from Sauron. Its great but I would like to see more of Sauron than just his hand, because I think he has the potential to look really cool
Pippin jumping into the bath at Crickhollow… no comment
Bilbo gives the Mithril coat to Frodo. Great poses, very stiff and awkward. I like it.
The fellowship. This one is a classic.
Gandalf and the balrog. Amazing
Boromir trying to take the ring from Frodo. I love the way he reaches for his sword, it looks very natural
Merry and Pippin and Treebeard. I like his legs and the fact that it looks like he’s wearing shorts.
The battle of Helms Deep. This one is just great for a lot of reasons. I like how the orcs in the background are just happy and sad smileys. Gimli is throwing a rock at them. I don’t know who the guy with a red hat is in the background, but I love him.
Gandalf, Theoden, Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli finding Merry and Pippin in Isengard ft fucked up Shadowfax. Look at them smiling!
Sam, Frodo and Gollum. Frodo got rid of his Robin Hood hat which is a shame, but Gollum with a beak makes up for it.
Eowyn protecting Theoden from the Witch King. The fellbeast is a crow or perhaps a raven. Merry is hanging on the side, stabbing Witch King in the leg and he looks amazing
Mt Doom. Frodo looks very chill about getting his finger bit off, and Sam is just kind of floating there. I love everything about Gollum
They don't make art like this anymore (possibly because various laws forbid it), which is a shame.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Vanessa Stockard | Kevin the Kittin
Starry Night Microsweater
2022 1.3" x 1.6" ~50,000 stitches, 76 stitches/inch 500+ hours in the making. Over 70 different colors of silk thread including thread combinations
That’s Althea Crome’s work. You’ve seen her work before if you’ve ever seen the movie Coraline because she did the teeny tiny star sweater and gloves for the stop motion puppets to wear.
She does, however, work even smaller.
Thank you @eloso - look at the tiny knits!