☣

love is not control, love is not a locked door. people are free to come into your life and leave as they will. the people who matter will show up for you and forgive you and choose you. you're going to be okay. you're going to miss people and you're going to meet new ones. you'll fall in love with new cities and you'll make a new favorite meal. letting go is what makes it stay, so let go.

[with the biggest heart eyes and the most in love voice you'll ever hear] i hope my favorite character is getting tortured helplessly today

just because youre made of stardust & other gay shit doesnt mean that a bug isnt. be nice to a bug today

Don’t give up. We can beat them! The kinder they are the harder they fall.

Puki, be honest with me... Are we the baddies?

Whatever

I lowkey hate when programs talk to me in a friendly way. "don't worry, nearly there!" Shut up. It should say "loading 64.3% completed. Do not turn off device" and absolutely nothing else. You arent my friend you are computer. Act like it

"why is this person drawing sexualized art of hatsune miku, isn't hatsune miku canonically 16?" hatsune miku is a voice bank. she's pretty much an electronic piano that goes Oo Ee Oo. hatsune miku is not a person with a life. nobody is doing CSAM of hatsune miku, because hatsune miku is not a C you can do M featuring SA about. that's a glorified slide whistle on the compyooter. you cannot psychologically abuse a theremin. it's generally agreed to be impossible to traumatize a harmonica. hatsune miku is a nonsapient synthesizer software addon. you can't do child abuse to a nonsapient synthesizer software addon. you cannot. do. child abuse. to a nonsapient. synthesizer. software addon. hello hello hello can anyone hear me

do you understand that drawing a picture of a cartoon software mascot in a swimsuit is a different type of action from abusing a child. that's not the same kind of thing. those are two different types of action. there is no connection between those actions. if someone draws a boob that person is not now guilty of assaulting a minor. do you understand. do you understand. do you understand. do you understand.

i understand, why are they drawing it though? it's still kinda weird

why should I give a fuck. who cares

I need to stop replying to “how do you make friends in your 30s?” threads because all my answers boil down to “you have to want to know people instead of have friends” and I don’t think people wanna hear that

It’s like. People can tell if you don’t really like or connect with them. If you aren’t truly enamored with someone you will have a hard time coming up with activities to do together to deepen the friendship. Because you don’t really like that person that much.

what people fail to understand is that in the current political and social climate if we are truly going to support lesbians during pride month we need to be paying better attention to lesbian-specific issues. like the psychological and emotional distress caused by the PWHL expansion protocol.

This Wilderness Years won't be like the first Wilderness Years because no company is ever letting their IP fall into the hands of fans who want to use the brand to write weird experimental books where Doctor Who characters say fuck ever again. There was a casualness about brand tie-ins where they were largely unobserved and not seen as pieces in a corporate synergy plan like they are now. Whatever Doctor Who content we get in the interim will still be looked over tightly by the BBC and might be even *more* restricted in what they can feature lest they step on any future plans

1989 was a really loose time for licensing where the BBC straight up didn't care who read Doctor Who books and so they were allowed to do whatever. When Doctor Who started in 2005 it was still a fairly loose time for licensing & so the BBC only really cared about the books and the DWM comic moving on to feature the new Doctor but like. The way of things now is that they care too much about brand integrity. When they made the prequels it didn't stop the post-OT novels from being published, when Disney bought Star Wars they jettisoned all of that as "Legends". When Paramount started making Star Trek shows again they *literally* killed off the timeline of the novels. I can't see the BBC starting a new Doctor Who, presumably with a new commercial co-producer, and continuing to hold a "there's no canon so be yourself and have fun :)" attitude. HBO or whoever is gonna ask "why are there all these podcasts starring actors from the 80s? That doesn't further our brand's current synergistic narrative" The exact opposite of ye olde wilderness years