I never properly got through Lord of the Rings as a kid and I read it all the way through for the first time a couple years ago. The first time the One Ring shows up I was like, βI remember the basics of what this thing is. Itβs super cursed and Sauron put some of himself in it, but what exactly were the deets?β
So I go over to The One Wiki to Rule Them All (a fun title, but not as catchy as Wookiepedia) and look up the One Ring and get a full download. When it was made, where and how and why. How Sauron pretended to be a dude to trick people into accepting it. Just the whole thing.
And I was like, cool. Iβm sure all the stuff isnβt explained in the book until deep into Return of the King, but Iβm familiar with the gist and not afraid of spoilers. So I proceed with the novel.
My beloveds. Do you know when literally all of that is revealed in the text? Chapter Two. Chapter two of the first book of The Fellowship of the Ring. Like, Chapter One is βA Long Awaited Partyβ and it has Bilboβs Eleventy First Birthday Party, but then Chapter Two is βThe Shadow of the Pastβ and it fully explains everything about the Ring. To my knowledge nothing meaningful, or even particularly noteworthy, about it is revealed after that point.
The most important single item, the most important working of magic, the MacGuffin of all MacGuffins and it is completely outlined in chapter two of book one out of six. Sanderson could never.
All of the rest of the story, all of the tension and twists and the like, all come from people and events. Will they get to a place in time? Can this person be relied upon? Will these folks put aside their immediate fears to focus on the bigger picture? Can Sauronβs pride continue to blind him to our heroes plan?
I can only think of two βtwistsβ in the proper sense in all of the Lord of the Rings: Gandalfβs return and the foreshadowed but still kind of out of nowhere appearance of the Ents (maybe that Dernhelm was Eowyn?). And you know what? Itβs still a deeply compelling story. I was so fully engrossed in the Battle of Pelennor Fields. The climax at Mt. Doom is not lessened by the fact that no new power or quality of the Ring is revealed, or suddenly leveraged in a clever way.
I like a lot of modern fantasy. Iβm a huge Sanderson fangirl and Iβm enjoying The Will of the Many right now, so Iβm not intrinsically opposed to a bit of a mystery around a thing. But the sort of JJ Abrams-ification is as detrimental to good story telling than any Whedonified quips.
JJ Abrams, with his belief that people are more interested in mystery and tension than in resolution and catharsis makes him the perfect storyteller for a capitalistic system. He gets people interested, builds hype, and predicates his appeal on never-ending growth without any hope of proper resolution or closure. He shouldnβt be allowed anywhere near a story that anyone loves or anyone hopes to and the tactics he trades in, while not irredeemable in themselves, should be used sparingly and responsibly.