Things are not going great over here.
ojovivo
almost home

gracie abrams
The Bowery Presents
NASA
The Stonewall Inn
untitled

Origami Around
🪼
RMH

pixel skylines

ellievsbear
Not today Justin
EXPECTATIONS

Kiana Khansmith
art blog(derogatory)

#extradirty
Sade Olutola

seen from Netherlands

seen from TĂĽrkiye
seen from Spain

seen from Venezuela
seen from Netherlands

seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Pakistan
seen from Russia

seen from TĂĽrkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from Spain
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
@cdarklock
Things are not going great over here.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
female bodybuilders across india
captured by keerthana kunnath
she's the best of us
"lock in" is probably one of the most important phrases to enter the public lexicon in the 2020s

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I'm gonna say it, I do think that even the laziest person imaginable should have a roof over their head, food in their stomach, and access to healthcare
sonce the sports are happening big rn where i live i made a handy chart of all the phrases i use to communicate with my loved ones during these trying times. i thought others might find it useful too
ive discovered you can have whole conversations with people using just these phrases and none will be any the wiser that you dont even know what sport it is theyre talking about
If the answer to the first question is "Too early to tell" it's cricket, and the correct response is to start talking about the weather or what people in the crowd are wearing, and thus divert the conversation away from the cricket.
There will be plenty of time for that later.
Did you see that ludicrous display last night
the change from AD to CE feels really emblematic of how surface-level and meaningless the supposed secularization of the western world is
Common Era is definitely preferable over Anno Domini, if only because christ is no lord of mine, but it’s only less christianocentric in that it doesn’t overtly make reference to christ in its title. the benchmark is still the same. you’re still measuring when the common era began using the (supposed) birth of christ, separating history into “the period before jesus” and “the period after jesus”. this conception of history is no less defined by christianity than it was before, except that now it’s easier to ignore because you’ve draped it in a “secular”, “modern” veneer and done nothing to actually unpack the ways in which western society intrinsically centers christianity.
Okay now I need a point in history that could be a benchmark to start counting the years from, and would be a common point for most of the world
What year would it be today?
UTC
Coordinated Universal Time.
The system by which every computer in existence now keeps count of the passing seconds.
And I mean that literally. To a computer system "now" is a number that represents the total number ov seconds that have passed since midnight on the 1st of January, 1960.
1960/01/01 00:00:01 is literally the beginning of time as far as a computer is concerned.
This would be the year 66UTC
I like this idea but if we changed it now then next year would be the year 67 which would make a lot of people angry
Almost left this as a comment but you would be the typa mfer to have a problem with jobless reincarnation. You'd be like "oh the protagonist is icky" as if the core of the story isn't him stopping from being a sleezey scumbag to make better choices and protect the people around him and try for a better life with this second chance he's stumbled into. You'd be like "I didnt even say I had an issue with the protagonist" and nitpick some other random ass thing about the show without ever watching past the episode. Tbh I think if I didn't enjoy your music so much ida blocked u over your dogshit takes you drop at times cause like bro you genuinely owe it to yourself to at least try to experience half the shit you say you dont like cause we both know the bulk of it you took one look at or read one YouTube comment on and swore it off when in reality youre robbing yourself of some pretty cool stuff and inspiration youd find value in. Like the issues you seem to take with a lot of things seem to be super surface level which speaks to how little you've engaged with them. I guess it really just comes off as you being too good for a lot of the stuff your moots recommend you, and it makes us not want to recommend you stuff. Read and delete, but try some things Puki. Some things arent meant for everyone, but you should try, especially if the people your music gels with are reccing it to you.
This is a you-problem. Most people don't have issues recommending me things. It was a follower who suggested I watch Ascendance of a Bookworm, which I loved enough to pick up the novels and read the entire 33 volume series over. I think you're projecting a lot of your own personal tastes onto everyone else, but it's not as widely-applicable a stance as you might believe. I guess I've mentioned a few things I've outright disliked that you liked? Sorry 'bout that... ahhahah.
I watched season 1 of jobless when it came out, so your assumption about me being 'too good' for certain shows is off-base. The show had good qualities, but was ultimately marred by its sleazy protagonist coupled with its own weakly-reinforced themes, and the tonal-incongruency that that caused for me. There's a pretty crucial difference between intent and claiming intent. I don't think claiming a story does something always means it actually succeeds in doing said thing, and in this instance, it doesn't. At least, it didn't do enough regarding his perversity for me to feel he learned the lessons needed in order for the story to justify his adventure happening as it does.
I felt the karmic scales hadn’t quite been equalized in the story from where I left off. Perhaps that changes, but I don't care, it changes too late for me to care. I have no qualms with a bad-guy protagonist IF the story supports such a thing, but jobless doesn't do that for me. I have no interest in a story that claims to be about a man reforming his creepy ways as he: an adult reincarnated as a kid - uses that opportunity to peep, flirt and get intimate with literal, non-reincarnated, normal children (even after his reformation, if I recall). That's an oxymoron that I feel no desire trying to find a loophole within.
For what it's worth, I really like Mushoku Tensei, but it is ABSOLUTELY NOT for everyone and if someone says it is not for them just fucking trust them on that and leave them be.
You do NOT "owe it to yourself" to watch shit you don't want to watch! You can say no! And you do not need to explain yourself to ANYONE. "No" is a complete sentence and does not require a justification.
It makes sense that dog organs can’t be used inside people, because their organs are weird and no good. But in my opinion, our organs should work inside them, because our kidneys and livers and stuff are straight up normal as hell and good

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Truck comes first and if there is any money left over the kids may eat. - Modern Consumer Patriarchy
she got her degree and started removing the parasite 🙏
Tinfoil hat moment but I don't think he was dumb, I think he was strategic. He put her in a situation in which she had to either: sell her car (so the only means of transportation is now in his name), or maybe even to drop out (to have time for the second job) if she wants to feed the kids. He did it right when she was aaaaaalmost done with her degree. Either way, it's sabotage.
Sometimes when an action makes NO sense to us ("he's like a stupid alien"), it's bc we are not understanding its true motivation/purpouse. If his goal was control, financial pressure and limiting her options due to lack of funds, it makes perfect sensie to buy the truck.
Tinfoil hat moment over!
No, this is not tinfoil stuff.
This is classic abuser behavior: maneuver the partner into a situation where they feel trapped and cannot escape. The timing on this is too perfect; he saw her gaining agency & power in the relationship and moved to short circuit that.
I am SO GLAD she got out.
If this happens to you, try reaching out to friends & family first. Chances are they've been watching your situation and are aching to help, but have felt powerless. I can't tell you how many times I've watched this scenario unfold. Ask. For. Help. Nobody will judge you, and they're probably waiting for you to make a move. People notice abuse and want to help.
if you feel truly alone, start out with some free online resources.
There's also online legal help for filing no-fault divorce papers or how to find a lawyer you can afford.
To reiterate: this cannot be fixed. You cannot negotiate with your abuser to stop abusing you, and YES this was absolutely abuse. You 👏 have 👏 to 👏 leave 👏
I love it when they prematurely admit that they're going to go after cis women like they did trans women next.
Well, these things ARE "social transgenderism," but what this actually means is that all the things people are worried about with the trans community are already happening and have been happening for decades and nothing has gone wrong at all. Maybe it is just fine to have transgender people in our societies and communities, and the gender-critical shitheads need to shut the fuck up. Maybe they're stupid and wrong and always were and if you listen to them it will just make you stupid and wrong, too.
men really be like “well this woman has studied this subject her whole life, and i am a man, so we have equal knowledge on this”
it’s ok you could have just said “i hate men”
okay, i hate men
Men who tell you things you already know are trying to connect with you.
They're trying to signal that they, too, like the thing you like -- enough to know some things about it that most people do not know, which you will certainly recognise (as you are an expert), and thereby understand that they are cool and smart and into the same things you are.
If you watch men with each other, you'll see things like a man at a barbecue grill cooking weenies and burgers, and several other men will come over and talk to him about why he should use a gas grill -- which he is already using -- and how he should tell whether the food needs to be turned, which he is doing just fine. They will all stand around, five or six guys who all know perfectly well how to make burgers and weenies on a gas grill, telling one another how to do it and why you do it that way while the rest of the men nod sagely and make encouraging noises.
AT NO POINT does the guy running the grill lose his shit and snap another guy's head off for telling him things he already knows. This is how men interact. It is how we relate to one another. It is how we make friends.
Now, when a guy tells you something completely wrong and you go "actually that's wrong" and he says "nuh-uh, it's right, this is a thing that I know" when you are an expert and he is some random jackass who doesn't know shit?
That guy's an arsehole. He's still trying to make friends, but he's an arsehole and you don't want to be his friend. That's valid.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
you can't say "hey has anyone noticed that M/M fic outnumbers F/F like 100:1” or “it feels racist that only 3/202 characters on the ao3 top 100 ships list are Black and two of them are Alastor HazbinHotel” bc some ppl will start going like “oh so you think we should FORCE people to write about things they DON’T CARE ABOUT for WOKE????” and you’ll be like “no, i’m pointing out that the conditions that created this disparity are informed by racism & misogyny” and ppl will say “it’s not BIGOTED to only care about WHITE MEN” and then the gargoyle king appears
why don't they just build more housing? are they stupid?
The essence of the problem is that a builder effectively pays for the walls and charges for the space inside them. Fewer walls and more space equal more money, so builders want to build homes with the largest area and the smallest perimeter with minimal interior walls. Hence all the "open floorplans" out there.
If you draw some rectangles on a piece of paper and imagine that every inch of line you draw costs $5,000 but every square inch of space inside the lines is $10,000 you'll see fairly quickly that a one-inch square costs $20,000 to draw but is only worth $10,000. Meanwhile, if you draw a two-inch square, that will cost $40,000 and be worth $40,000... breaking even... and if you draw a three-inch one it will cost $60,000 and be worth $90,000. A four-inch square cracks the 100% profit margin at $80,000 to draw and $160,000 value, and if you draw a five-inch square it will cost $100,000 and be worth $250,000.
This doesn't take into account building codes. It's not hard to work out that you can save a lot of money by building row houses or town houses, so two homes can share the same wall. A pair of two-inch squares will share one wall and save $10,000. Line up half a dozen of them and you save $50,000 -- more than the cost of an entire unit. You turn six break-even houses into a fairly decent 20% profit. But imagine if you build another six houses right behind them, sharing a back wall: that saves another $60,000. Now you have $480,000 worth of housing that only cost $320,000 to build. This is a Good Idea. We should do more of...
Not so fast there, bucko. First of all, every bedroom is required to have a window, so you can get out if there is a fire. Eight of those houses have only one exterior wall, which means they can only have bedrooms at the front of the house. But in addition, every home is required to have front and back exits, so if there is a fire blocking one of them you can get out the other one -- and with only one exterior wall, you can't do that, so the home cannot legally be built. And then you can add the further issue that houses often must have a minimum amount of space between them, again because of fire: if the houses are too close together, fire can jump from one to the next.
We have a lot of building regulations because of fire, and it's because a lot of those cheap houses you could buy on a working man's salary were absolute firetraps that burned down and killed the people living in them. That's why you're required by your mortgage lender to carry fire insurance, and... well, they won't insure a place they don't think is safe. So even when you're passing all the building codes, you still have to make the insurance companies happy, which is more rules and more requirements and more expense.
So the short answer to "why don't we build more housing" is because we don't want you to die in a fire.