Yeah okay, those edits were made by her dad, a cishet person - and also her dad, a Holocaust survivor, who would have been brutally aware that when the diary was first published in freakinā 1947, had he included anything which people could use to demonize his daughter or tar her as some kind ofĀ āpervertā, it would prevent the message he was trying to send about the horrors of the Holocaust and the heroism of his daughter from being properly understood and accepted the way he hoped.
That isnāt fair. It isnāt just. But it is reality. If Otto Frank had let this be included in the published version, thereās a large chance the homophobic backlash would have prevented the book from reaching the audience it did and spreading the message it needed to. It was NINETEEN. FORTY. SEVEN. The Holocaust had ended TWO YEARS AGO. The acceptance of LGBT identities was basically nonexistent. Otto Frank made a decision based on the time and place he was living in, about what the world at that time was and wasnāt ready to accept.Ā
Let me say this as bluntly as I can - I am a bisexual Jewish girl and I would have made the same decision Otto Frank did. Making sure Anne Frank was unambiguously seen as sympathic and heroic was more important. Making sure people werenāt sidetracked from the main issue of the Holocaust was more important. He shouldnāt have had to make that decision, without doubt. Anne Frankās sexuality (however she would have identified in modern terms) shouldnāt be considered relevant to her status as a hero or a sympathetic victim. But in 1947, it undoubtedly would have been.
Otto Frank survived Auschwitz and lost his entire family (a wife and two teenage daughters)Ā to the horrors of the Holocaust. He hoped that publishing his daughterās diary would spread awareness and sympathy for the victims of the Holocaust. If he had to make sacrifices to do that - well frankly, so fucking be it. I donāt know who alive today has the right to judge him.Ā
annaxmalina
turnnoffyourmind
jacobvanloon
titsay
prguitarman
