a response to the âcanon did it firstâ excuse for racism
Whenever someone points out that certain metas/fics/headcanons have racist implications, the overwhelming response tends to be that it canât actually be the product of racial biasâbecause itâs just âcanon.â After all, if a character really is cruel, petty, or abusive in the source material, how can Fandom be held responsible for writing them in character?
On the surface, this can seem like a perfectly good argumentâexcept that it completely sidesteps the actual implications.
Consider, for example, the following interpretations (all from real metas):
Finn from Star Wars is a predatorâheâs obsessed with Rey.
Scott from Teen Wolf is a rapistâhe attacked Derek.
MJ from the MCU is a fake MJ who should be replacedâher hair colour is wrong & sheâs mean.
Iris from The Flash is a b*tch who should be killed offâsheâs useless & whiny.
Each of these statements could be explored at length for the bad faith readings that they are, but for the purposes of this meta, letâs assume they are all correct.
What would be the implications of that?
If Finn, the first Black character with a leading role in a Star Wars film, is a sexual predator towards a white womanâa trope that has a horrific, racist historyâwhy then is the meta using that discovery to explain why the white fave is superior, instead of a furious exposĂŠ on Disneyâs racist depiction of a Black man?
If Scott, one of the few heroic Latino leads on US television, is a rapist and secretly the villainâwhen only 3% of all leading roles go to Latino men, as opposed to 22% of all Latino roles being related to crimeâwhy then is the meta using that to elevate three white male faves, instead of calling MTV out for its bait and switch? Why is it not righteously angry at yet another racist depiction of a Latino character?
If Michelle, a mixed Black woman in the role of the most iconic superhero love interest of all time, is just a fake MJ and not the ârealâ love interestâwhen Black women are already relegated to less than 4% of all speaking roles in film, never mind the rarity of playing a romantic leadâwhy then is the meta focused on getting a ârealâ (white) MJ to take over her position, instead of pushing Disney to make her status as MJ as explicit as possible?
If Iris, one of the few Black women in a lead role on network television, is a b*tch whoâs useless and whinyâwhen Black women are consistently over disciplined for being seen as louder/more disruptive than their peersâwhy does the meta choose to solve this by murdering Iris, instead of petitioning the writing staff to stop leaning into racist tropes?
This is only a sampling of popular metasâand only a few of the endgame conclusions that have to resultâbut the point is that the racism is not a bug; itâs a feature. If they were actually true, it would make the source material so reprehensible as to make supporting it unconscionableâbut thatâs not what theyâre used for. Instead, time and time again, theyâre just used to push the COC out of their own narratives.
If a meta wants to claim it cannot be racist because itâs simply restating what canon did, then it must consider whether or not that makes canon also racist. And if it doesâwhat does it want to say about that? Is the meta going to continue that racist pattern? Call out the creators for their stereotyping? Create additional metas and fics to attempt to address the revealed problem?
And denying thatâif none of those options seem tenableâthen maybe the correct response is to question whether the original meta was all that accurate to begin with.