No amount of Jewish blood spilled will ever cleanse you of your white/western guilt. The fact that you use Jews in this way is beyond twisted and makes you more aligned with Nazism than actual leftist positions.

Many of you have showed me exactly where you’d stand during the Holocaust.

You said thet the deaths of real fucking people is zionist propaganda. you harassed random people on the internet because of their nationality.

You've done nothing to stop the suffering of the Palestinian people. you only caused more suffering to jewish people.

and now kfir bibas is dead.now Ariel bibas is dead. now shiri bibas is dead. so we'll done.

The very name of the movement is genocidal.

I had a conversation with my former roommates last semester where they refused to understand why "Free Palestine" in and of itself as a statement is a problem.

To them, it's a liberation movement. But the first issue arises when we ask who or what is being liberated.

What, in modern geographical terms, is Palestine? Where is Palestine? Who is the ruling party of Palestine?

Anyone with even a bit of knowledge would realize that this is a trick question. There isn't any country actually called Palestine.

When people refer to Palestinians, they typically talk about the people either in Gaza or the West Bank, which are two separate entities with two separate governments.

So who are we supposed to be freeing? Gaza, which has its own government in the form of Hamas? Or the West Bank, which has the PA as its governing group? (By the way, the PA has this little thing called pay-for-slay I suggest you look into, but that'd be a post for another time.)

The actual term "Palestine" most commonly is used to refer to the entire area of where Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank are located.

Which brings me to my main point. When people call to "Free Palestine" they aren't calling for a two-state solution. Identically to their call for "from the river to the sea", this slogan calls for the complete destruction of Israel.

A lot of people have already spoken on the issue of why "from the river to the sea" is genocidal in nature, so I won't be going too in depth on that. My point is more so that those two phrases are equivalently malevolent in nature.

There's also the people who call themselves "pro-Palestine". If we take into consideration what "Palestine" as a term means, we're left with two interpretations.

First, they just use that instead of "Free Palestine", making their use of it still equivalent for wanting the entirety of Israel gone.

Second, they want Palestine to "win" in the war.

Now, since we've established that there isn't actually a country called Palestine right now, they're either rooting for the PA or Hamas to win.

As I recommended before, it'd be fantastic if you could just take time to read up on what pay-for-slay is. As a quick summary, that's exactly what it sounds like. The PA pays people money for killing Israelis/Jews. (That's the very vague version, since this isn't the point of the post.)

Therefore, you can probably imagine what would happen to Israelis if the PA were to take over Israel (G-d forbid).

If, G-d forbid, Hamas were to take over Israel, we'd end up with a series of atrocities akin to the horrors of Oct 7th. How do I know? Hamas leaders have repeatedly promised to repeat Oct 7th again and again and again.

Both the PA and Hamas have killed their own people for suspected collaboration with Israel, in rather cruel ways. So you can probably imagine what'd happen to Israelis in both scenarios.

I have seen very very few people who align themselves with either phrasing of the movement actually calling for two states, or for any viable solution. (And no, a ceasefire that leaves Hamas in power is not a viable solution. We had a ceasefire until the moment they attacked on Oct 7th.)

(I say "very few" as an allowance that some may exist, but in reality I haven't seen any.)

If your solution involves the dissolution of Israel and giving power to either the PA or Hamas, congratulations. You are actively backing a genocidal "solution".

Four people. Siblings. They totally should have gone back to the "community" - you know, all the non-Jews who definitely didn't sell out the Jewish community

Here's the wikipedia page for Frydek-Mistek. There is no mention that the Jewish population was completely liquidated. In fact, the only thing the Germans apparently did was join the once separate towns.

Frydek-Mistek Wikipedia

The last Jews of Syria were rescued by Israeli commandos in 2015, because they lived in Aleppo and were all elderly.

Lebanon has 20 Jews left.

Yemen has 1 Jew left, in prison facing torture for helping one of the last Jewish families in Yemen to escape with a Torah (funnily, there is huge protest now among English speaking "activists" that Israel has stolen Yemeni artifacts because 60000 Yemeni Jewish artifacts were accepted by an Israeli museum. Literally "You are stealing Yemeni heritage!" the clownishness of that statement cannot be overstated.)

It goes on and on. Every country in Asia, North Africa, and Europe is like this, every single one. FRANCE has the largest population of Jews in Europe, and the population has shrunk 70% since the 1970s DESPITE receiving 120,000 Algerian Jews who were fleeing Algeria.