Workplace Resistance: A Handy Guide
hello vonnie
Show & Tell

#extradirty
RMH
Claire Keane
Noah Kahan
art blog(derogatory)
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
The Bowery Presents

ā
EXPECTATIONS
š
trying on a metaphor
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Jules of Nature

shark vs the universe
sheepfilms

Discoholic šŖ©

Andulka

seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from Jordan
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Australia
seen from Italy

seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from Algeria

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from Italy

seen from Germany
@appletreepear
Workplace Resistance: A Handy Guide

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
āHow high is he gonna go?ā
āAll the way, Patrick. Up to the great beyond! Goodbye, friend!ā
āHappy trails!ā It took me a bit longer than I wouldāve liked, but I finally finished my tribute to Stephen Hillenburg. There isnāt much I can say that hasnāt already been said, and even then there arenāt enough words that can fully describe just how much these characters and this world he created mean to me on a personal level.
More under the cut because this got kinda long (Btw, click the picture for full size/higher quality)
Keep reading
this may be an Unpopular Opinion (even on tumblr) but like the 8-hour workday is just Too Gotdamn Long
like even sitting in an office for eight hours a day isnāt particularly pleasant (or healthy, as we are beginning to see) but when weāre talking about doing *actual work* for that same amount time it gets pretty fucking brutal
doing literally *anything* (even leisure activities) for eight hours straight tends to be less than enjoyable but when weāre talking about things like construction, landscaping, factory work, and hell, even foodservice and retail, eight hours is a fucking ETERNITY
i might just be a lazy weak-willed bitch but honestly i think iām not entirely wrong
this was being worked towards by leftist labor unions way back in the day after the time of FDRs new deal. people in the 40s and 50s were already starting to realize that we no longer actually needed an 8 hour work day or even a 5 day work week.
even with the comparatively primitive factory tech of the time we were already creating a huge amount of excess production back then and companies were making massive amounts of profit. So it already stood to reason that companies should either let their employees work less and thus each employee could work a shorter shift without lowering the yearly compensation of each employee, or in cases where businesses provide an active service they would shorten the shift but hire more people to cover the necessary operating time. but of course that would mean less money for people at the top so companies fought back hard and we ended up with nixonās bullshit and so on and now its considered the norm for us to spend the vast majority of our lives doing work that really just amounts to waste.Ā
The IWW realised this and were fighting for it all the way back in the 1930s. This is a take with a lot of historical and theoretical grounding, OP, so youāre standing in good stead.
Iād also like to add itās also been studied and scientifically proven that after 6 hours, we have an extremely noticeable drop in productivity. Sweden saw nothing but benefits from a 6-hour work day, including worker productivity, happiness, and half the amount of sick-leave used when applied to nurses.
https://onlinemasters.ohio.edu/the-six-hour-workday/
It ceases to be about production and more about subjugation.
DING DING DING
WE HAVE OURSELVES A WINNER!
ćć¼ć³
This whole ātrust Tumblr blindlyā thing is eventually going to kill someone, as I became pointedly aware of on one occasion I was making fun of how poorly a particular bleach-based drain declogger was working on my sink and got a chorus of really dangerously misinformed people telling me to pour vinegar in after it because all cute little cool kid diy home care blogs theyāre following talk about vinegar like it itās the big secret the cleaning companies donāt want you to know.
And I cringed knowing that someday, some Well Actually expert who read a blog article once is going to give that advice to someone who unfortunately didnāt take high school chemistry and isnāt aware that MIXING VINEGAR AND BLEACH MAKES CHLORINE GAS.
holy fucking jesus tits reblog to save a life
OK I actually got a full on A* for GCSE Chemistry and if I ever knew this Iāve forgotten it. Seriously reblog this.
Also donāt use bleach to clean up if your cat pees outside the littlerbox (or urine in general for that matter, species doesnāt really matter here I think). I did that in a small space and it took me a bit of coughing and wheezing and wanting to tear my eyes out before I went, āwait, fuck, I just gassed myselfā.
Be aware of the chemicals you are using even if they are natural cleaners.
16 Common Product Combinations You Should Never Mix
If you donāt donāt know what chlorine gas is itās a gas that can kill you.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The Justice Department today told the U.S. Supreme Court that businesses can discriminate against workers based on their gender identity without violating federal law.
This is fucked up
Incredibly fucked up
hi! i saw your post about men being exhausting and like yes? but not all men. I'm male and i like to help out at local shelters, the community garden, im an advocate and supporter for the lgbt community. im a feminist and against people who think trump is doing good things, and much more. dont let men set a precedent for what masculinity is. there are good guys out there, i promise. im sorry if this was rude in any way, i didn't intend for it to be like that.
so. iĀ think thereās a good chance this was a joke. i lost my mind laughing when i first got it. but also? this is exactly how men talk, so iām gonna break it down seriously.Ā
i made that post after dinner with my friendās family. his dad, letās call him john,Ā was belittling his wife so she wasnāt talking much and heād made a few jabs about his sonās painted nails so his son was kind of wilting. johnās aĀ nice guy, smart guy, really likes me & thinks iām smart. i was pretty much carrying all the emotional labor at that dinnerātrying to make my friend and his mom feel comfortable while also engaging with john. we were making conversation about lots of things, it wasnāt a particularly controversial or heated discussion at really any point in time. again,Ā johnās a cool guyāheās liberal and progressive and knows that iām a lesbian and all sorts of nice things. he works for a bigggg banking companyāi donāt wanna say which one, but youād know the name. we were talking about #metoo and he starts talking about how sexual harassment isnāt really an issue where he works.Ā
three hours before he said this, a man in times square had grabbed my boob. at a restaurant i worked at, a rapist who worked there got my number off the scheduling app and would text me vile things while we were both working to make me uncomfortable. heād also touch my ass every shift but always managed to pretend like it was an accident. it wasnāt. my best friend, who was also at dinner with us, worked at her moms law firm when she was 17, and the man across from her had a countdown on his whiteboard to the day she turned 18 and every day he would look at her as he changed the number. iāve been sexually assaulted multiple times outside of these instances, and so has she.Ā
but otherĀ men donāt see these things.Ā
and this man looks at me, and tells me sexual harassment doesnāt happen, because he doesnāt see it. and hereās the thing: thatās not why iām mad. iām not mad because he didnāt know.Ā
iām mad because i know this man. he is my friendās father, he is my father, he is my uncles, he is my professors, he is my cousins, and my bosses, and my colleagues. i know how you have to talk to these men. itās a game. and you have to play along whether you want to or not, because they wonāt hear a word you say if you donāt.Ā
hereās how the game works: john talks about everything like heās the authority on the matter, because he canāt get it through his brain that someone, especially someone who is not a man, could possibly know something he doesnāt. so john starts talking about things very confidently. and because nobody knows everything, he gets a lot of things wrong. things that i refuse to let him be wrong about. so if i want to change johnās mind, if i want him to hear my point of view, i have to speak to him in the only way he will listen. i have to be, above all, pleasant. john has been taught for years to laugh at a womanās anger, so if any hint of indignation sneaks into my voice,Ā he wonāt take me seriously any more and iāll lose him entirely.Ā Ā i have to smile and laugh a little and be charming. but i also have to be articulate. i have to make sure i sound intelligent or else heāll dismiss me as a stupid teenage girl who doesnāt know what sheās talking about. but i also canāt sound too intelligent because if he starts feeling threatened by my intelligence heāll get defensive. (sidenote! he has a tiny dick.) so itās quite a complicated game but iām good at it. in fact, iām one of the best. so here i am, carefully navigating the best way to hold this manās hand and babysit him as i give him a kindergarten level course on sexual assault in the workplace, while also not letting him realize that iām having to condescend to him because his brain is as tiny as his dick, and can only handful little bits of new information spoonfed to him like applesauce. i have to make it sound like i think he is not only smart, but smarter than me. i have to scatter in little phrases like,Ā āin my experienceā orĀ āi could be wrongā and constantly undermine myself, even when speaking on a topic i am incredibly well-versed in, because i have to suggest that i think he is smarter than me or else he wonāt deem me worthy of his attention.Ā
iām good at it. i play the little fucking game and before i know it, iāve got john here nodding along and acting like he agreed with what iām saying all along, acting like he came up with it, acting like he DIDNāT totally contradict what i just told him minutes before. but since he didnāt come up with it, heāll likely interrupt me before i even get to the end of my point and say something totally misinformed and now iām trying to educate him on both of the things he got wrong but before i can even do that heās interrupting me again and now thereās THREE things iāve gotta teach this guy without him catching on to the fact that iām teaching him.Ā
now. hereās the best part about the game. itās soul-shatteringly dehumanizing. to disregard your own trauma, your own emotion, your own incredibly valid anger that you have fought and fought and fought to believe you have a right to feel, to tone down your beliefs in order to make them more palatable to someone who is thisĀ deeply ignorant, to force yourself to giggle and be charming as you discuss the thing that has ripped you into shreds, to ignore how triggering it is to even breach this topic in conversation, to be complicit in making yourself small in order to get your point across, to look into the eyes of a man who has, unwittingly, because of his ignorance, enabled other men to engage in this same behaviorāit turns a dinner conversation into a thing that isĀ traumatizing in itās own right.Ā
and i feel obligated to put myself through this because of my privilege, because as an attractive, white twenty year old, i can hold this manās attention better than a massive portion of the population, who he likely wouldnāt give the time of Ā day to. i refuse to let him live his life unchallenged, so i do what i have to do to make myself heard.Ā
and i feel the repercussions of this so strongly i dissociate more viciously than i have in weeks and lose all memory of a solid 3 hours of my life after this conversation.Ā
and i come on here, and post: men are useless and exhausting. because i am angry at what men have done to me. at what they continue to do to me. at what i must do to myself in order to force them to wake up and realize what other men are doing to me and to please, for the love of god, MAKE IT STOP.Ā
and i get this message from you, a dumbass whoās got his head shoved so far up his own asshole that itās about to come back up through his esophagus, assuming you know what iām talking about. assuming you know more than me about men and about my experiences with them, about why i made this post. assuming that because youāre not the scum of the fucking earth and because you do three good things, it somehow balances out the treatment i have received for years from men, and makes my anger towards them, and my hatred of them: unjust. and my post wasnāt even me being angry! it was me being exhausted!!!!! if iām tired of men, why the fuck would you,Ā āa maleā deem it at all appropriate to come near me, to send me a message, to engage with me at all? leave me alone! you know nothing!Ā
and as much as i thought this was a joke at first, the more i read the message the more iām convinced that it was written by a man, because even a girl pretending to be a man as a joke wouldnāt manage toĀ sound this fucking stupid. i have dozens of stories exactly like this over the course of at least 10 years of my life. i know more than you. and this isnāt FUCKING about you. if you werenāt useless and exhausting, you would have happily scrolled by and went on with your night. but by sending me this message you proved yourself to be IMPRESSIVELY: useless and exhausting. shut the fuck up for about 3-4 years. you might learn something. also, read men explain things to me by rebecca solnit. she says all this better than i do.Ā
Hence why Toph Beifong is my favorite badass character ever. Followed by Zuko of course. š
what else do ya want, buddy?
I must show all my friends
āI didnāt just pick this name, I dedicated myself to itā is so powerful.
Leslie Jamison, āI Used to Insist I Didnāt Get Angry. Not Anymore.ā
[image text: āThe phenomenon of female anger has often been turned against itself, the figure of the angry woman reframed as threat ā not the one who has been harmed, but the one bent on harming. She conjures a lineage of threatening archetypes: the harpy and her talons, the witch and her spells, the medusa and her writhing locks. The notion that female anger is unnatural or destructive is learned young; children report perceiving displays of anger as more acceptable from boys than from girls. According to a review of studies of gender and anger written in 2000 by Ann M. Kring, a psychology professor at the University of California, Berkeley, men and women self-report āanger episodesā with comparable degrees of frequency, but women report experiencing more shame and embarrassment in their aftermath. People are more likely to use words like ābitchyā and āhostileā to describe female anger, while male anger is more likely to be described as āstrong.ā Kring reported that men are more likely to express their anger by physically assaulting objects or verbally attacking other people, while women are more likely to cry when they get angry, as if their bodies are forcibly returning them to the appearance of the emotion ā sadness ā with which they are most commonly associated.ā]

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Finally got character bios up for everyone in Maple!! Click here! Plus the real title and extra comic goodies! Drawing Maple as a comic is still way off for me (want to get a stable job firstā¦), but at least this way I can share a bit of it with you all. Hope you enjoy!
ARCADE
philosophy
Here, some philosophy Iāve posted elsewhere. (And by philosophy, I mean conclusions because writing arguments is hard)
I define what matters as what you would care about if you were omniscient.
You can seemingly only tell what matters based on what seems to matter.
What seems to matter seems to depend upon context (including memories, sensations, thoughts, etc.).
What seems to matter and context both seem dependant on complex webs of variables.
Also, if it matters to act based on/towards/etc. anything, then it matters to act based on/towards/etc. that; if it doesn't, then it doesn't matter if you try.
All such opinions spring from the notion commonly entertained, that all things in nature act as men themselves act, namely, with an end in view. It is accepted as certain, that God himself directs all things to a definite goal (for it is said that God made all things for man, and man that he might worship him). I will, therefore, consider this opinion, asking first, why it obtains general credence, and why all men are naturally so prone to adopt it? secondly, I will point out its falsity; and, lastly, I will show how it has given rise to prejudices about good and bad, right and wrong, praise and blame, order and confusion, beauty and ugliness, and the like. However, this is not the place to deduce these misconceptions from the nature of the human mind: it will be sufficient here, if I assume as a starting point, what ought to be universally admitted, namely, that all men are born ignorant of the causes of things, that all have the desire to seek for what is useful to them, and that they are conscious of such desire. Herefrom it follows, first, that men think themselves free inasmuch as they are conscious of their volitions and desires, and never even dream, in their ignorance, of the causes which have disposed them so to wish and desire. Secondly, that men do all things for an end, namely, for that which is useful to them, and which they seek. Thus it comes to pass that they only look for a knowledge of the final causes of events, and when these are learned, they are content, as having no cause for further doubt. If they cannot learn such causes from external sources, they are compelled to turn to considering themselves, and reflecting what end would have induced them personally to bring about the given event, and thus they necessarily judge other natures by their own. Further, as they find in themselves and outside themselves many means which assist them not a little in the search for what is useful, for instance, eyes for seeing, teeth for chewing, herbs and animals for yielding food, the sun for giving light, the sea for breeding fish, &c., they come to look on the whole of nature as a means for obtaining such conveniences. Now as they are aware, that they found these conveniences and did not make them, they think they have cause for believing, that some other being has made them for their use.
As they look upon things as means, they cannot believe them to be self-created; but, judging from the means which they are accustomed to prepare for themselves, they are bound to believe in some ruler or rulers of the universe endowed with human freedom, who have arranged and adapted everything for human use. They are bound to estimate the nature of such rulers (having no information on the subject) in accordance with their own nature, and therefore they assert that the gods ordained everything for the use of man, in order to bind man to themselves and obtain from him the highest honor. Hence also it follows, that everyone thought out for himself, according to his abilities, a different way of worshipping God, so that God might love him more than his fellows, and direct the whole course of nature for the satisfaction of his blind cupidity and insatiable avarice. Thus the prejudice developed into superstition, and took deep root in the human mind; and for this reason everyone strove most zealously to understand and explain the final causes of things; but in their endeavor to show that nature does nothing in vain, i.e. nothing which is useless to man, they only seem to have demonstrated that nature, the gods, and men are all mad together. Consider, I pray you, the result: among the many helps of nature they were bound to find some hindrances, such as storms, earthquakes, diseases, &c.: so they declared that such things happen, because the gods are angry at some wrong done to them by men, or at some fault committed in their worship. Experience day by day protested and showed by infinite examples, that good and evil fortunes fall to the lot of pious and impious alike; still they would not abandon their inveterate prejudice, for it was more easy for them to class such contradictions among other unknown things of whose use they were ignorant, and thus to retain their actual and innate condition of ignorance, than to destroy the whole fabric of their reasoning and start afresh. They therefore laid down as an axiom, that Godās judgments far transcend human understanding. Such a doctrine might well have sufficed to conceal the truth from the human race for all eternity, if mathematics had not furnished another standard of verity in considering solely the essence and properties of figures without regard to their final causes. There are other reasons (which I need not mention here) besides mathematics, which might have caused menās minds to be directed to these general prejudices, and have led them to the knowledge of the truth.
- Baruch Spinoza, Ethics

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
[ image description:
A tweet from Scott Westerfeld that reads
āIf every incel somehow got a girlfriend, the net violence in the world would only go up. Because guys who think like this are violent to their girlfriends.
Itās not their singleness thatās dangerous; itās the way they think about women.ā
/ end of description ]
i feel like the role colonialism plays inĀ ādeindustrializationā of colonized areas (eg; India went from 25% of globalĀ industrial output in 1750 to only 2% in 1900 ) is an important concept and one that contradicts myths that you see not only in colonial apologia but even some kinds of misguided anti-colonialism set up on myths of idealized pasts
Lotsa people asking for references so Iāll just put that stuff here
This passage from the textbookĀ āThe Process of Economic Development" by James Cypher is good at giving a very basic rundown of how this worked in places like colonial India. Here is another paper that gets much more detailed about the general process. In the specific example of India you have a region going from being the single largest textile manufacturer in the 18th century to essentially having its textile industry killed off by the end of the 19th. Indian textiles had a heavy presence in European markets initially and while the decline was certainly related to the advent of machine factories it was not caused by it and predates it by some years
By the end of the 17th century, Indian calicos were a major force in European markets (Landes, 1998, p. 154). For example, the share of Indian textiles in total English trade with southern Europe was more than 20 percent in the 1720s, but this share fell to about 6 percent in the 1780s and less than 4 percent in the 1840s (Inikori, 2002, p. 517). India was losing its world market share in textiles during the 18th century, long before the industrial revolution.
Economic policies by the British helped with this process. High tariffs were put in place in the UK on Indian textile goods while within India the importation of British goods was done without any tariffs thus making British manufactured goods cheaper in India while Indian manufactured goods were made more expensive in Britain. This was occurring even when the textile industry in both areas was still largelyĀ ācottageā (ie without machine factories) and the rise in industrial machinery in the UK was partially (not solely) caused by the specific desire to make the balance of trade favor the economy of the imperial center over that of colonies