in search of tomorrow.

Call out posts are often cyber bullying, be very very careful and think critically. The person behind the post might be biased or have misused/faked the information simply because they want you on their side. 

Minors are completely capable of bullying adults. 

If you care enough, talk to the user(s) in question directly.

Always listen to both versions of the story before choosing sides. 

Do not jump to conclusions so incredibly quickly. 

It’s not everyone else’s responsibility to make sure that you aren’t exposed to content you don’t want to see. Use the blacklist and block the blogs. 

Nobody takes you seriously if you attack them and call them names. No matter how hurt or offended you are, it’s not going to change their mind for the better if you offend them back. 

It’s never okay to mock someone’s appearance. 

Alcohol is not a good coping mechanism and is not cool.

Drugs in general are bad coping mechanisms and are not cool. 

Depression is not cool, it’s scary and an inconvenience. 

Nobody needs to put their pronouns, sexual orientation, diagnose etc. in their description bc sometimes it’s none of your business.

It’s completely okay to enjoy a franchise even thought its not 100 % pc. 

As long as you acknowledge that it’s problematic and why.

It’s okay to not take yourself so fucking seriously.

It’s okay to not engage in all the Drama all the time.

Not everyone who are 18+ are predators by nature, and not everyone under 18 are innocent. 

Everyone under 18 should still be careful with who they talk to. It’s completely okay to say you aren’t comfortable talking to someone simply because they are too old. Block them if necessary. 

Everyone over 18 need to keep in mind what’s appropriate and not when talking to minors. How would you behave IRL?

When Hitler’s party won influence in Parliament, and even after he was made chancellor of Germany in 1933 – about a year and a half before seizing dictatorial power – many American press outlets judged that he would either be outplayed by more traditional politicians or that he would have to become more moderate. Sure, he had a following, but his followers were “impressionable voters” duped by “radical doctrines and quack remedies,” claimed The Washington Post.

Now that Hitler actually had to operate within a government the “sober” politicians would “submerge” this movement, according to The New York Times and Christian Science Monitor. A “keen sense of dramatic instinct” was not enough. When it came to time to govern, his lack of “gravity” and “profundity of thought” would be exposed.

In fact, The New York Times wrote after Hitler’s appointment to the chancellorship that success would only “let him expose to the German public his own futility.” Journalists wondered whether Hitler now regretted leaving the rally for the cabinet meeting, where he would have to assume some responsibility.”