Why so serious?

It has been speculated that women who bonded more strongly with each other in the alpha male’s harem would have increased their genetic fitness by reducing the chances of their children getting killed by other women or not having access to enough resources to survive and procreate. Thus, sexual relations between women under polygamy would have dampened female intrasexual competition, increasing co-operation and reproductive success.

It has also been suggested that women who had a preference toward bisexuality while their husband was away would not have cuckolded him and were therefore less likely to draw his fatal ire than those who engaged in heterosexual infidelity. I think both explanations are valid, which provides much of the scientific basis for the view that women are more naturally bisexual than men. The lack of jealousy men feel about amorous lesbianism is explained by its impossibility of cuckoldry.

The truth is that asian and other girls don’t really have a chance with actual legit white nationalists. The closet they can get is maybe being a maid or au pair. They simply cannot compete with white girls, not just in appearance but also because they can’t have white children.

Most women in White nations want two or three children rather than the 1.5 they currently have in our societies yet despite women’s stated preferences, feminists are fanatical proponents of life-denying, psychologically harmful careerism, birth-control and abortion. When our nations were healthier in the generation between 35′-65′, our women wanted 3-4 children on average. It’s a tragedy that feminists have been partly successful in brainwashing women to painfully repress healthy, natural feminine instincts.

Why do feminists oppose (Europeans) breeding?

1. It underlines a fundamental and indisputable biological sex difference

2. Pregnancy symbolises the patriarchal ownership of woman’s womb by man

3. It makes women more dependent on men and less able to engage in labour

4. It reminds feminists that women are biological breeding stock and are happy to be so

5. There is a 100% chance of having a White child and a 50% chance of another White male

6. Many lesbian feminists oppose any form of heterosexuality and pregnancy is a product of the heterosexual bond

7. Misery loves company: resentful spinsters spread spinsterdom out of perverse sadism as well as a desire to normalise their degeneracy, curb their jealousy and dull their pain

8. Feminists are usually life-denying: they oppose the healthy, vital instincts that natality expresses (passing on one’s genes and racial phenotype indicates self-love, purpose and a will-to-live)

Paglia: “In the Seventies, women runners, developing amenorrhea and calcium-related shin splints, were the first to realize that nature is hovering over us, ready to shut down our systems if our fetus-feeding fat reserve drops below a certain percentage of body weight. In other words, in nature’s eyes we are nothing but milk sacs and fat deposits.”

This woman essentially created her own clan, with men who’ll protect her and women who will draw more men into the clan: the best insurance for an unstable future. She’s not only happier and protected, she’s biologically contributing to the survival of her racial-genetic community. This is real feminine power.

Pregnancy gives women a justified feeling of power over the creation of another life and motherhood is the defining aspect of womanhood. A pregnant woman is given social privileges; assisted and protected, expected to relax, showered with gifts and compliments. Women glow during pregnancy due to elevated estrogen production; surplus nitric oxide is released though the skin which creates a shiny effect. Women who breed live longer lives than women who do not: this is due to a sense of micro-community with her family and a stronger drive to abstain from unhealthy practices like alcohol/drug abuse. Traditionally and still today, having a baby can compel long-term provision and protection from her partner, provided he’s not an absolute lowlife. Women rarely regret having children but frequently regret having too few or not having any at all. Having to live for 40-50 years past one’s prime with this failure in mind must be psychological torture, misery it’s not even socially-acceptable to acknowledge or talk about.

A woman can be the richest ceo in the world but if she’s old and childless, everyone knows deep-down she’s a loser. Don’t be like her.

Feminists have this very extreme misanthropic view of life, rejecting nature in favour of bizarre delusional ideas in order to protect their own ego from collapse. How anyone could look at a beautiful white couple with lots of white children in a loving family and feel anything but joy is beyond me from an emotional and instinctive point of view. Thanks to posts like this though I am starting to understand the twisted machine-like thought process that leads to feminist / leftist hate and jealousy of anything that’s good.

Now I realise I’ve seen it before from people like Alexander Jahans. Feminists are just the female version of him, gradually becoming more and more extreme as they sink further into their ridiculous self-destructive narratives. They suffer from a kind of sunk-cost fallacy. Can they really give up all the bullshit they’ve invested so much time and money in even when they begin to doubt?

And we never will.

So be cute and adorable instead of angry and bitter.  You’ll get more attention and are more likely to get what you want.

Femininity - empowering girls since the dawn of time.

Feminists care very much what men think about them … without the attention of men, they won’t be able to carry out their agenda.  How would feminists get anything accomplished if they don’t get the attention of men?  Men still hold 98% of the power and wealth in the West.  If feminists don’t get the attention of men, the plan will fail, so feminists MUST get the attention of men in order to succeed.  But they’ve failed.  People aren’t listening to you anymore.  If they were, Hillary Clinton would have been elected in 2016.  Instead, America chose Trump.  Because no one takes feminists seriously anymore.  If you want further proof, watch the midterm elections.  That will confirm that America doesn’t care what feminists think.

And of course you want me to shut up … I’m having a major effect on feminists - helping them to transition from feminism over to Traditional Gender Roles through my blog and by writing essays for college students in gender studies courses - essays that are clearly subversive to the entire feminist movement.  So, of course feminists desperately want me to shut up.  I actively undermine the feminist agenda every day.

But me shutting up is not going to happen.  I get paid handsomely by the feminists in gender studies classes who can’t be bothered to do their own work, and I get a great deal of satisfaction from helping people transition out of your cult and into happiness through Traditional Gender Roles.

There’s a big difference between you and I.  I make people happy.  You revel in your misery and the misery of others.

That’s why I undermine your movement every opportunity I get.

Any person who makes a false allegation of rape or sexual assault should face the same jail time that the accused would have served had the charges been proven true and should be publicly shamed for making a false accusation.

You see, false accusations of sexual misconduct hurt not only the accused, but make genuine rape survivors less believable.

As shocking as it may be, I don’t “believe all women” when they claim they have been raped.  It’s sad, but it’s true.  And the worst part is that my cynicism stems not from a brotherly connection to other men, but from the sheer volume of false rape allegations I have seen leveled against innocent men by unethical women.

In order to stop this decline of believability, people must face harsh jail sentences for making false accusations of rape and, like the people they accuse, should be publicly and openly shamed for their despicable actions.

What’s really funny is that it’s usually the “nice guy feminists” that are deep down the most bitter about a lack of any real female attention. They project their own insecurities and bitterness on others so strongly that they show a blatant obsession with things like penis size and sexual prowess because they’re deep down angry about being a beta male stuck in the “friend zone”.

You’re pathetic attempts can have no possible effect on me because I know just how foolish they are. Especially considering I’m happily married to the type of woman strong enough to pave her own way without needing to make excuses to cover up the short comings and lack of ability inherent in most radfems.

I keep seeing this meme going around.  I’m sure you’ve seen it, too.  For example:

What's really funny is that it's usually the "nice guy feminists" that are deep down the most bitter about a lack of any real female attention. They project their own insecurities and bitterness on others so strongly that they show a blatant obsession with things like penis size and sexual prowess because they're deep down angry about being a beta male stuck in the "friend zone".

You're pathetic attempts can have no possible effect on me because I know just how foolish they are. Especially considering I'm happily married to the type of woman strong enough to pave her own way without needing to make excuses to cover up the short comings and lack of ability inherent in most radfems.

Whenever someone asks what I do and I respond with, “I’m a homemaker,” I get reminded how little value society places on that role (I’m sure stay-at-home-mom’s feel this even moreso).

“What do you do all day?” “What if he leaves? You need a back-up plan!” “You don’t respect yourself, how can you enjoy serving a man?”

I spend all day learning and trying to facilitate a calm, peaceful, and restful home for myself and my boyfriend (who works an extraordinarily stressful and demanding job).

My mom has a saying that “9 times out of 10, if a man leaves a woman, he’s leaving her for someone else.” While we aren’t married, most divorces are initiated by the wife. I also trust, love, and respect him. You cannot build a healthy relationship if you’re constantly worrying that your partner will abandon you.

I respect myself very much! I acknowledge that my mental health improves when I work in the home, that my relationship flows more naturally, and I don’t try to force myself into a role where I would be more unhappy.

Choosing to respect, honour, and care for the man I love isn’t demeaning - I’m not fearful of him, nor is he unreasonable. If those things were true - guess what? I wouldn’t be with him.