this pussy is a colonial concept;
todays bird
Sade Olutola
Acquired Stardust
cherry valley forever
wallacepolsom

Product Placement

titsay

izzy's playlists!
Three Goblin Art
Misplaced Lens Cap

#extradirty
Cosmic Funnies

Janaina Medeiros
Stranger Things
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸

â
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
One Nice Bug Per Day
Not today Justin

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from Switzerland

seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
@yungleanmorphine
this pussy is a colonial concept;

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
literally thought this was @menalezâÂ
Has anyone actually read the Adrienne Rich Compulsory Heterosexuality essay that everyone keeps talking about? I think weâve been getting the definition of comphet wrong. Comphet is to heterosexuality what political lesbianism is to the sexuality lesbian. Like idk how to explain any better but you have to think of comphet as kind of like the acceptance of violent male sexuality. she cites humiliating porn that directs men to coerce their sexual partners to expand their sexual boundaries, acceptance of the institution of marriage ie. women as private property with doubled workload for women and its sexual divisions of labor, as the most idealized of economic relations. its the âsexual domination perspectiveâ
According to the essay comphet can happens to all women ie. the conditioning and grooming of women into accepting male sexual domination. even cites how lesbian porn is humiliating to women, an invasion into something men are not supposed to be a part of.
The lesbophobia starts in part II of the essay Building on Mary Daly and Audre Lorde âlesbian contirunnâ which is expanding women-women bonds beyond being erotic. She puts forwards the point how lesbianism is different from male homosexuality which I agree with for different reasons. âfemale antiphallic sexualityâ is a term that caught my eye because I think itâs referring to both erotic lesbianism + female celibacy as a reaction male violence like separatism. I still donât think sexuality is political and aversion to males purely from a separatist perspective should come under sexuality.
I actually have no idea how comphet started to be associated with only lesbians? I still think itâs misused in the mainstream definition of âself identified đâ lesbians to use as a justification for male crushes + I think it has been wildly taken out of context too.
If someone knows more Iâd love to know + actually read about it in good faith.
Hereâs the essay : https://web.archive.org/web/20140718162632/http://people.terry.uga.edu/dawndba/4500compulsoryhet.htm
Seeing men perform hyper femininity and then say âcis women have privilege because they can wear makeup and can express themselves freelyâ, like are you fucking daft? Letâs contextualise your struggles for a second and point out that your problems begin only when you do not conform. You will get attacked only when you deviate from the norm. For women the possibility of violence is implicit in whatever they wear, HOWEVER they present. Everyone else has to literally fight for the right to not wear makeup while youâre sitting there saying âoh but cis women privilegeâ, what part of their existence seems privileged to you?? While itâs true that these are real struggles and conformity canât be forced upon people and these are all offshoots of the patriarchy, please stop making it seem like âcis-womenâ are all of a sudden your oppressors, because the entire foundation of misogyny is based on men wanting to control and benefit from female bodies.
Not even intersectionality, because as a gay man who enjoys wearing makeup occasionally I could never look at a woman, even a straight woman or anyone and say âoh atleast you get to do this :/ check ur privilegeâ because what the fuck is your understanding of society then that you think these are privileges bestowed upon women. Do these people fathom the concept of âsex based oppressionâ, you canât suddenly be like âno itâs only gender based oppressionâ because while that is very much there and very real, let us not forget that gender is at the end of the day the cultural interpretation of sex, and these things HAVE to stem from somewhere
âTall, androgynous and armed â she held a state gun permit â Ms. DeLarverie roamed lower Seventh and Eighth Avenues and points between into her 80s, patrolling the sidewalks and checking in at lesbian bars. She was on the lookout for what she called âuglinessâ: any form of intolerance, bullying or abuse of her âbaby girls.â ⌠âShe literally walked the streets of downtown Manhattan like a gay superhero. ⌠She was not to be messed with by any stretch of the imagination.ââ
â From the obituary of Storme DeLarverie, a native New Orleanian who threw the first punch at Stonewall. (via beignetsatwhistlestop)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I will never forget the post going around with a weird amount of support saying that itâs unfair to hate and mock misogynistic men because they might be trans wimmin with internalized misogyny
I wanna be friends with her so bad i wish I could dm her but I donât wanna be a tryhard like what should i say âi love your blog and your opinions an absolute brilliant ilyâ or maybe not
im actually like a very ugly jesus. grotesque n nasty.
I was thinking about this post from yesterday again. Centenarian man says the key to living a long life is to have a woman around. Centenarian woman says the key to living a long life is to have no man around. And that other post about how studies consistently show that girls do better at school when there are no boys around, while boys do worse when there are no girls around. This is a pattern that holds true in other contexts; women tend to be happier, healthier, less stressed, without men; while the opposite is true for men.
It boggles the mind that with this kind of information out in the open, known, with obvious conclusions screaming in our faces, feminists today still ridicule and devalue the concept of separatism. It can take so many forms tooâsupporting female-owned businesses so that more women can earn a living without having a male employer; female-owned housing options because so many women are preyed upon by their male landlord; female-only vacation venues so that more women can have a male-free holiday every once in a while; supporting female creators so that women have more choices if they decide to only read female authors or listen to female musicians, and then of course the more âdrasticâ fight for larger female-only institutions in society. But while some of these struggles (usually the low-stakes, non-threatening ones) are sometimes given perfunctory support in the name of Girl Power, the larger topic of separatism is hardly ever given coherent thought, support or space to grow; the fact that the best thing feminism can do for women is giving more women in all strata of society the possibility to exclude men from various aspects of their life, is still pretty much taboo and rarely given serious consideration outside of small feminist niches (often disparaged as extremist or utopian). Instead, feminists devote most of their energy and resources to activism that still involves men at some level, or on supporting women who choose men and will ultimately siphon all that support and energy and time and money back to men.Â
I didnât expect to get 30K notes on my childbirth post and wonât have time to answer all the asks and comments I got about it, but someone asked what inspired me to write itâit was reading about the lives of the women I mentioned in that post. I read a lot about womenâs lives, be it biographies or diaries or letters, so patterns become obvious, and all other factors balanced, if you value physical safety, intellectual growth and self-realisation, you have to come to the conclusion that not having a man in your home was and is a blessing. And really you could extend this to having any man in your life at allâfather, brother, son, male employer⌠Among the memoirs I read this year there was one by a woman who was exploited and raped by her boss, and then Lydia Cachoâs writings about her fight to help little girls victims of sex trafficking and to keep her shelter for battered women open. I donât exactly seek out this kind of storiesâafter the Cacho book I picked up the memoirs of a Hollywood actress, expecting it to be a fun mindless read, and there ended up being a long section about how she was molested by her older brother as a kid and ended up as an anti-CSA activist as an adult. I discovered that most American male politicians who outwardly portrayed themselves as good family men fought tooth and nail behind the scenes to try and prevent anti-child rape laws from being adopted.
When you read (or hear) enough womenâs life stories you really have to wonder what feminism is good for if it doesnât focus on helping women to keep men out of as many aspects of their life as they want, and fighting for female-only spaces and institutions (like Cachoâs shelter, but not onlyâthe litmus test for useful feminist activism should be âWill this contribute to denying men access to women in some way, thus empowering the women who would like to keep men out of some aspect of their life?â The women who donât want to keep men out will always be able to make that choice because our entire society is structured around supporting it. Feminism should support the other choice, make it possible and safe for more women. Criminalising pimps & johns while helping women exit prostitution contributes to that second choice. So do anti-child rape laws. And womenâs bars or cafĂŠs. And womenâs studies programmes (âgender studiesâ donât). And anti-porn activism. And fighting for womenâs right to father-free parenthood (eg right to use anonymous sperm donors, rather than wanting fathers to be more involved with their children. And generally fighting for the opposite of fathersâ rights, which are coincidentally a major concern of the MRA movement.) And fighting for legal family / social units where women can share property and healthcare and pass on inheritance. Etc, etc.)
The women who scoff at this or rush in with ânot all menâ are typically very self-centered (âI sure donât want to separate from men, so why should I think of the women who do?â), and refuse to look any further than their own Good Dad or nice boyfriend (and itâs worth mentioning that Lydia Cacho said all the men she talked to in brothels, including the brothels offering child prostitutes, were ânormalâ married men, probably described by their wives as good husbands and fathers.) Your average mainstream feminist will tell you that âfeminism is about choiceâ but feminism should not concern itself with helping women choose men, as patriarchy already has this covered. Meanwhile, womenâs choice to distance themselves from men is not currently supported by feminism at all, when it should be the beating heart of feminism. More often than not, it is derided and disparaged. Marilyn Frye explained why in her essay about peopleâs attitudes towards women who want to separate from men even in minor ways:Â
[âŚ] When those who control access have made you totally accessible, your first act of taking control must be denying access. Access is one of the faces of Power. Female denial of male access to females substantially cuts off a flow of benefits, but it has also the form and full portent of assumption of power. [And] if there is one thing women are queasy about it is actually taking power. As long as one stops just short of that, the patriarchs will for the most part take an indulgent attitude. We are afraid of what will happen to us when we really frighten them. This is not an irrational fear. It is our experience generally that the defensiveness, nastiness, violence, hostility and irrationality of the reaction to feminism tend to correlate with the blatancy of the element of separation in the strategy or project. [âŚ]
By comparing Charity and Sylviaâs life to the lives of their contemporary women who had 18 children, what I meant was âbeing able to choose to live free from men is a blessingâ, but a lot of women have interpreted that post to mean âbirth control is a blessingâ. But the makeshift, imperfect shield that protects you from someone who might hurt you and doesnât care if he does is a very minor blessing compared to the power to live your life free from this person and the associated worries. Has birth control empowered women to deny men sexual access if they choose to? (Some women have argued it has done the opposite.) Feminism has become a very hollow word but nowadays I measure the sincerity of a womanâs commitment to feminism by the support, help and sympathy she extends to the women who want to keep men out of their lives / sex lives / childrenâs lives / bars / feminist groups / etc.
Before anyone interprets this as âlesbian extremists want me to become a lesbian, leave my man and live in the woods with themâ because many het/bi women feel threatened by separatism and lash out defensively when the topic is brought upâthis is about being able to choose to keep men out of some aspects of your life, or your entire life. How this choice should be facilitated and how the women who make it deserve to be supported and respected much more than they currently are by feminism (I wonât even touch the obvious lesbophobia behind the rampant ridicule and contempt towards separatism). How feminism becomes just another patriarchal institution if it values & supports choices that include men more than choices that exclude men.
And although the creation of female-only options in society would benefit even the women who do not want to distance themselves from men (because then they would be able to make a real, informed choice between life with men and life without men, having experienced both), the fact that many women would not choose separatism is irrelevant. The feminists who fought for the right to divorce didnât sabotage themselves with âWhat about the women who WANT to stay with their husband??â They fought to give a choice to all the women who donât. They understood that some situations are beyond fixing and you have to be able to divorce. Feminism that fights to improve & reform men or to help women who choose men be happier & more comfortable with that choice is the equivalent of fighting for het couple therapy. Feminism that fights for separatist options and female-only spaces and institutions is the equivalent of fighting for the right to divorce. If you understand why divorce is important, you should understand why separatism is important. Itâs actual female liberationâitâs not forcing any woman to swear off all men forever, itâs giving women as a class the possibility to choose to âdivorceâ men as a class. Giving safe and good options to any woman who isnât interested in âfixingâ men or her relationships with them but just wants out. A feminism that doesnât fight for this has completely lost its vision.
this is shifting the overton window. we need to swing the pendulum further than whatâs currently considered ârealisticâ so that we expand our potential of reality. otherwise weâll continue to live in stagnation as women under the control of men, and thatâll remain the norm and our confines. living under men is like a fish living in water, to reference david foster wallace:Â
âThere are these two young fish swimming along and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says âMorning, boys. Howâs the water?â And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes 'What the hell is water?ââ
asking men to shift the window in favor of us is impossible (or at least virtually impossible) for them to even consider (or want to consider). women need to be in charge of stretching this boundary, showing itâs possible, if we want any form of true empowerment, empowerment that doesnât need to be filtered thru whether or not men have access to our reproductive abilities.
separatism isnât even the furthest we can push the window. honestly, separatism doesnât even sound wild or unreachable to me anymore. i moved past the feelings of âthis is impossible, but a hopeful goal to strive for, like the moon, and being respected a bit more by men will be our starsâ to âthis should be normal, and im not waiting for menâs stamp of approval to embody this way of life and to actively advocate for itâ right quick lol
me whenever i see a male youtuber

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Immaterial Girl: The Myth of the Man-Made Woman by RadFemFatale
âThe foundational Marxist text dealing with the oppression of women is Engelsâ The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. According to Engels, while there has always existed a sexual division of labor in human society, it is not until the rise of private property that this division becomes hierarchical. Before the rise of private property, society was organized under what was called âmother rightâ, i.e. a personâs family is traced through their mother, given the difficulty of identifying with certainty the father in primitive communist society. But because private property grew out of male labor, and became concentrated in male hands, mother right gave way to âfather rightâ. In order to bequeath his property to his son, the father needed to know with certainty who his sons were. This meant controlling the reproductive labor of the female sex, and its subordination to male supremacy; thus the advent of patriarchy. In Chapter II of Origin of Family Engels calls the overthrow of mother-right ââŚthe world historical defeat of the female sex. The man took command in the home also; the woman was degraded and reduced to servitude, she became the slave of his lust and a mere instrument for the production of children.â[3] Note that Engels here is dealing with sex, with biology. Women are not oppressed because of some abstract gender identity, but because of their sex. Class society and patriarchy, the two of which exist in a symbiosis, need to control womenâs reproductive labor to sustain themselves. To put it more bluntly, they need to control the means of reproduction. Thus, womenâs oppression has its origin in material reality.â
â Misogyny is Revisionism Part 1: On the Leftâs âWomanâ Problem
being privileged on one axis or many axes doesnât magically make systemic oppression disappear lol. i feel like so many of you are SO eager to dismiss women talking about misogyny and their experiences and to make it more palatable to other people running in the same circles you dogpile on white cishet rich women and pretend they dont face oppression too or that theyâre somehow cushioned from it, just so you can construct an image of a woman youâre *allowed* to tear to shreds without being rightfully labeled a misogynist :))))) different social circumstances of course affect how the oppression of women manifests but its still always There thats sorta the whole entire point of analyzing this shit in the first place. its almost the 2020s why are we still on this, where have we lost you lmfao
I rant about this all the time but people are really out there acting like rich white women donât get beaten, raped, and murdered by their partners every single fucking day. I can only roll my eyes at the willful ignorance at this point.Â
And letâs not forget every time a white woman comes forward about rape within 4 hours the narrative changes to her white rape victim privilege.
now gods, stand up for girlbosses
do u realize that that male/female brain article supports the radfem ideology ?
tysm for pointing it out, it's deleted now, im not great at spotting radfem/t*rf dogwhistles but im trying to get better
science (the notion that brain sex is fake â a scientific fact) is a terf dogwhistle. you are on CRACK crack

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
âIf you do not recognise the material reality of biological sex or its significance as an axis of oppression, your political theory cannot incorporate any analysis of patriarchy. Womenâs historic and continued subordination has not arisen because some members of our species choose to identify with an inferior social role (and it would be an act of egregious victim-blaming to suggest that it has). It has emerged as a means by which males can dominate that half of the species that is capable of gestating children, and exploit their sexual and reproductive labour. We cannot make sense of the historical development of patriarchy and the continued existence of sexist discrimination and cultural misogyny, without recognising the reality of female biology, and the existence of a class of biologically female persons.â
â Rebecca Reilly-Cooper (source)
being smarter than a twitter user isnât an achievement, thatâs how you get all of these contrarian anti-idpol people whoâs entire politics is dunking on the libs and their radical feminist counterparts dunking on troons or whatever and think saying something a libfem wouldnât say is a radical stance. being hyperonline is truly a disease that weâre struggling with and i mean that honestly. i keep telling myself to go outside and touch grass or something! i donât want to do this anymore!