WOMEN'S EXISTENCE IS NOT INAPPROPRIATE
STOP CENSORING WOMEN'S EXISTENCE
noise dept.

roma★

JBB: An Artblog!
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
will byers stan first human second
art blog(derogatory)
DEAR READER
Xuebing Du

JVL
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
wallacepolsom
$LAYYYTER
Mike Driver

ellievsbear
Three Goblin Art

Kiana Khansmith
trying on a metaphor
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Peru
seen from Australia
seen from Azerbaijan

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Japan
seen from United States
@youmakemybrainfeelworm
WOMEN'S EXISTENCE IS NOT INAPPROPRIATE
STOP CENSORING WOMEN'S EXISTENCE

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Religion really is just kinda the worst thing ever "follow my rules or eternal punishment" fuck you fuck your books fuck your religion fuck every religion
The fact that religions are seen as something normal and acceptable is the most concrete proof of misogny and patriarchy.
I have a sister who's transgender.
My grandmother and uncle have the typical religious "I don't like it but it's going to happen whether I like it or not" response to it. They don't agree with her being transgender but they mostly stay out of her way.
I have another sister who's a fascist. Fascist sister has been harassing transgender sister by telling her that she's going to hell and reading Bible verses at her.
Take a wild guess which sister my grandmother and uncle side with.
That's why you can't accept mild forms of bigotry like "love the sinner, hate the sin" or "I disagree with the lifestyle but they can do what they want". When shit hits the fan and they have to choose between acceptance and fascism, they'll choose fascism.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
whenever people bring up proof god exists i can’t help but laugh because they think the points they’re bringing up is indisputable proof that their god exists.
what if these instead prove some tiny religion with 100 people max ascribed to it is the truth?
and let’s say god is real. your god.
how do you know an afterlife even exists? what if he created this world and everyone on it and that’s it? what’s your proof that the divine will judge us and condemn a lot of us to hell?
what’s your proof that you’re even believing in the correct way?
that if you repent, he’ll forgive you?
your book doesn’t count. you don’t know if god wrote that. there’s no proof there. i’m talking about real, tangible proof that your specific belief set is true.
we can debate about how precisely the world was created. how perfectly the earth is positioned to sustain life, whatever.
but you don’t know that was your god that did that.
you can’t prove that.
beyond the whole heaven being materialistic thing, do any other aroaces feel like religion literally can’t appeal to you?
all of the rules were made on the basis that we’re all allo/hetero. i have to cover my legs. why? they’re just legs.
i never understood that people (men, in my case) are genuinely attracted to them.
the concept of modesty, which i hate in general, literally has made no sense to me. why do people need to cover up? who is getting attracted to some guy’s kneecaps???
so, islam was never really able to grab me. because i didn’t feel the necessary things they needed to could control me.
if i resist my urges here, i can have them all in our non guaranteed afterlife.
but i have no urges, what now?
oh…no. no you’re not supposed to do that either. are you crazy?
because yea one side of the coin is to make more muslims. there’s a reason it’s the fastest growing religion. it’s because women are being used like cattle and are just popping out more and more indoctrinated children.
on the other side, if you’re asexual, aromantic, or both, there’s nothing enticing about the religion.
i follow these rigid rules that prove this earth is a prison for the believer…for what?
so i can be miserable in heaven, too? i’ll get to sleep with my husband that is forced on me!! yayyyyy!!!!
a biological process that only exists for reproductive purposes, meaning it wouldn’t even make sense to exist in a place like heaven, is my reward?? oh how kind. surely if pleasure was the goal, sex wouldn’t be a requirement. if you wanted humans to experience pleasure in heaven, why would you make them do the reproductive process to obtain it?
why’s our reward that our spouses get infinitely more beautiful the more we look at them? endless sex. endless beauty.
WHO is this for? what god, who created us all and knows the diversity of sexualities he gave us, would create a heaven that’s just one giant cishet orgy?
no god would. a man, however… heaven is one giant male fantasy. 72 virginal creatures, a soulmate you can also fuck that isn’t jealous you’re cheating on her constantly, AND she just keeps getting hotter the more you look at her??
so, as an aroace woman, i might as well disobey and go to hell. it’s the same experience, only this time i lived my only guaranteed life happily on my terms.
remember seeing a post complaining about how churches are illegal in Saudi arabia so there is none in the entirety of tge big ass country. and people were defending the idea by saying "well there are no mosques in the Vatican either" which was a ridiculous comparison since the Vatican is quite literally a church. like it's entirely consisted of a church. it's not an actual country it's just one church.
anyways. fast forward to now. there is indeed a muslim prayer room in the Vatican. so yeah.
This kind of cultural relativism, and more broadly equation of cultural and national identity to religiosity is a dangerous trick up Islamic governments' sleeves, used to justify their unwillingness to relinquish Islamic superiority in favor of equality.
examples of such is:
refusing to secularize by claiming that is "western colonization and erasure of identity" (when Islam literally is a colonially-imposed identity on most Islamic countries historically)
justifying cruel capital punishments and restriction of freedoms such as the execution or criminalization of LGBTQ individuals, or modesty and hijab laws, by saying "it's their country, and we should respect their rules", when no such "respect" is given to Western countries when they impose rules limiting religious freedoms and expression (regardless of whether they are just or not- that is a conversation for another post)
equating religious dissent to "treason", blasphemy to "insulting religious feelings and disrupting religious harmony"; claiming these give arise to societal violence and unrest, while ironically having overblown reactions to these "offenses"; heavily persecuting and punishing people who do these things against Islam- but letting those who do it against other religions (often to minority groups in the regions under Islamic law) free to insult, as loudly and unabashedly as they like- with some even calling for violence and restrictions against followers of these religions.
Imposing religion on people born from certain cultures, ethnicities, and races; claiming that the religion is a key, inseparable aspect of these identities, and declaring those who don't abide by religious customs as "mentally colonized", "westernized", or not a part of the identity anymore. Ironically, Islamic ideals weren't part of these cultures in the first place as they have been imposed forcefully in a lot of cases, often erasing or muting down these cultures.
if you’re wondering (probs not lmao) why i say god instead of allah, it’s bc allah means god in arabic. arabization has stolen so much from my parents’ country’s culture already. i refuse to give them my tongue as well.
it icks me out when my family members opt for abayas and thobes instead of traditional wear. why are you guys doing that? our clothing isn’t “immodest” (ew i hate that word).
don’t let them shame you into changing who you are.
islam is nothing but a colonization effort. it’s not a religion, it’s a doctrine of control. so the powerful remain in power and you bow before them like the sheep you are.
does anyone else feel unnerved by the concept of modesty?
i don’t mean just wearing more clothing because you want to. how much or how little clothes you decide to wear is completely up to you.
i mean modesty itself.
“Physical modesty is a mode of dress and behavior intended to avoid encouraging sexual attention or projecting excess.”
when muslim women say they dress modestly for god, i laugh a little. because no, you don’t. that’s not what modesty even intends to do. the concept itself is male centered.
islam teaches that physical modesty is an expression of self respect and “a way to ensure that a person is valued for their character rather than just their physical appearance.”
right…
but when a hijabi has a single hair poking out, she’s a whore. her clothing is too tight? slut. too glittery? she wants attention from men.
how’s that valuing her for her character rather than her physical appearance? you’re fantasizing about her sexual life just based on what you see and getting angry at your fabrications.
and the guidelines get stricter and stricter. niqabs, burkas. i can see your eyes, you shameful whore. cover them.
your fabric cage is too colorful, you just want to attract men, don’t you? wear black. black is good. black hides you. your face unnoticed, your eyes covered and unseeing through the net. your body engulfed in layers of suffocating fabric.
don’t eat in public, you mustn’t uncover your face to perform basic human functions.
don’t speak in public, your voice can seduce men.
don’t wear a jacket in public, it hugs your figure.
in fact, just don’t go outside. it’s better for women to stay home.
away from prying eyes. because no matter what you do as a woman, you’re “not leaving it up to the imagination”
because, of course, the aim of this game is to leave it up to the imagination. you must hide yourself so that they can fantasize about you.
that’s all this is.
modesty is a fetish. it’s a way to turn you into a trophy. to hide you. to stroke a man’s ego because he’s the only one who can see you.
but he won’t see you. no one will. he won’t see the person under the mountain of clothing. he will see a body to use.
a body he controls. one he can do anything he pleases to because it’s a sin to refuse him. don’t you know the angels will curse you if you disobey?
your modesty means nothing. men will ogle and harass you. you will be blamed no matter what because there’s always more that you could be doing. always something you did wrong to deserve it. a rule you broke.
modesty as a concept forces the blame on women every single time.
wore a miniskirt and got assaulted? if you wore a hijab, that wouldn’t have happened.
wore a niqab and got assaulted? if you wore a burka, that wouldn’t have happened.
what were you thinking walking outside like that?
stupid, stupid woman.
this is all your fault.
you should be unseen and unheard, only then are you safe.
oh but actually, not really.
because it will still happen. your clothing, your modesty isn’t the problem.
they fed you a lie and you believed it. your hair isn’t sexual, it’s a part of your body that provides warmth. your legs don’t just exist to be stared at by men. they exist so you can walk. so you can give yourself the freedom to move. your breasts exist to nurture and feed a life that you created.
covering your natural body won’t stop these males from hurting you. modesty wasn’t made to protect you.
it was made to control you. to turn you into a fantasy so that males could jerk off to the idea of what you look like under there. what they could do to you. how innocent and naive you must be.
that’s what it is.
wear as much clothes as you want. wear as little as you want. but not under the guise of modesty.
modesty was created to trap you. douse you in fabric so you don’t realize what they’re doing. it’s hard to breathe under there. to see. to move freely. quickly.
because they don’t want you to. the less you see, the better. if you can’t see, you won’t know how badly you’re suffering. if you can’t move, you can’t chase freedom.
modesty is disgusting and perverse.
muslims don’t even stop to ask themselves why slave and working women in the past were forbidden to wear the hijab. they claim modesty is decreed by god. it’s fardh.
so why were only free women allowed to wear it?
when you were taken as a female slave, your clothing was controlled in the opposite way. if you wear too much, how will your captors access your body? it doesn’t matter that you’re muslim, you’re forbidden from covering your body. because the concept itself is centered around men and what they want.
modesty a fetish. and you’re what’s being consumed.
it’s a power play. it’s just flipped now, but the essence is still the same.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i do find the rules around clothes fascinating because of how made up it all is. we invented the idea of covering our bodies from the elements because we lack fur like other mammals and then made up all these rules around it and now people will unironically tell you "men cant wear skirts its unnatural" girl none of this is natural. we are born naked and made up the rest as we went along. hope this helps.
people annoy me to no enddddd 😭 no, your religion is not compatible with feminism. no, pornography is not empowering. no, your eyeliner is not sharp enough to “slay the patriarchy”. no, your lazy husband is not funny. no, you are not entitled to women dating you. no, it’s not okay to cheat on your girlfriend and expect people to feel sorry for you. no, it’s not her fault that you refuse to listen. no, it’s not all on his mom for his behavior. no, i don’t believe in “rehabilitating” rapists.
why do people keep trying to rewrite what feminism is actually for? it’s for female liberation, you’re not making any progress by decorating your cage.
it's not that white liberal feminists truly believed the hijab is honorable, empowering, and a choice, it's just that they care more about "political correctness" than women's rights
Not only the hijab represents purity culture for the middle eastern/muslim woman but it clearly sexualizes every inch of a woman's body, contrary to popular belief. It imposes that unless a woman is covered, she is inherently sexual. And not just her hair, her arms and her legs, in some cases her feet, her face, her hands, and even her eyes. Even the outline of her body has to be concealed because there is always a man who will find it enticing, and this from the ripe age of 9. No matter how inconvenient it is. Not to forget, women are always to some degree pressured if not forced into this "choice" lest they bring shame to their family. How many arab girls have grown up hearing "You can do whatever you want, just keep a hijab on your head."? How many girls have been scolded, threatened, hit, because they were merely talking to a boy? How many girls were forbidden to go to school, to go out of the house until they abandoned their "westernized ideas" and started "dressing decently"? And how many were killed, charged with prostitution, stoned for not not wearing it?
Now, you want to convince me that libfems, the same group that wants to "free the nipple", thought the hijab was empowering for the last decade? Hell nah.
They just don't care. They don't care because they view middle eastern, brown, and Muslim women as lesser. Our suffering and our objectification are nothing compared to their inconvenience. So why would they even think about it? Why would they upset conservative muslim men and women ? They have been overlooking every honor killing for years now to not make muslims look bad.
Today it's trendy to oppose forced hijab, tomorrow, they'll forget about us.
This will probably be my most controversial post by far, but it needs to be said.
Gendered socialization is unequivocally real. Boys and girls are treated and socialized differently before they're even born.
Female babies are disappearing en masse, because male babies are more valued.
From an extremely early age, parents respond to their childrens' emotions differently based on gender. Mothers over-estimate the crawling abilities of their infant sons compared to infant daughters.
Mothers speak to their infant daughters more and talk them more about emotions than they do their sons.
By the age of 2, boys already show an avoidance to the color pink and other items traditionally seen as feminine, laying the ground work for early demonstrations of misogyny in childhood.
When children enter pre-school, there is no difference in math abilities between boys and girls. But such gaps begin to appear as children grow older.
The vast majority of girls report feeling unsafe going outside, and at least 2/3 of girls have reported experiencing sexual harassment at school by the time they 16.
Further on in education, women will understimate their scores, while men will overestimate their scores. Women will perform worse on tests when first told that women, on average, perform worse.
Researchers argue that the prevalence of sexual assault against women is so high specifically because of early gendered socialization. The men who commit sexual violence consistently demonstrate specific ideals about gender and perform hostile masculinity.
The patterns reach well into adulthood, influencing occupational choices.
I could literally go on and on and on. There are countless studies and entire fields of academia dedicated to researching this. The fact that children are socialized differently paced on assigned or percieved gender is really not debatable.
I am sympathetic to the fact that transphobes have warped the concept of socialization to insinuate that trans women are destined to be violent or predatory, or that trans men are destined to be submissive and helpless. However, people weaponizing these frameworks does not mean that the phenomenon does not exist.
Furthermore, individual people's nuanced experiences with gendered socialization does not mean that these patterns don't exist on a large scale. Any interaction with society will confer the influence of gender biases, especially upon children to are extremely vulnerable to both subtle and overt social cues.
Again - gendered socialization is real. This is a core aspect of feminist analysis. I am not going to pretend otherwise.
Socialization is the main concept that debunks gender essentialism. If gender has no innate traits, why are there clear patterns in the behavior of men vs women? The answer is socialization. The whole concept of gender liberation in the first place doesn't make sense without acknowledging socialization. We cannot replace "the concept of socialization has been weaponized" with "socialization isn't real" lmao; that's doing ourselves and our movement a disservice.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A little doodle brought to you by religious trauma. 😆
"actually, the bible doesn't condemn homosexuality!" but are you saying that if it did condemn homosexuality, that you would be homophobic? "actually, the bible doesn't condone slavery!" but are you saying that if it did condone slavery, that you would be okay with it? "actually, the bible doesn't condone genocide!" but if it commanded you to, if He commanded you to, would you take up the sword? "actually, the bible doesn't command the killing of unbelievers!" but if it did, would I stare at the blade at my chest and see you holding the handle? There isn't a god. when you take Isaac up to the mountain, lay him across the altar, hold the blade above him; there will be no angel to call your name; to stop you; to declare it was all a test. The knife will fall and you will call yourself justified. I've spent the time studying the bible; and I know that these aren't true. It condemns homosexuality. it condones slavery. it condones genocide. it condones the killing of unbelievers. Sometimes in the back of my mind, I fear that the people I know will look a little closer and follow what the bible actually says. And in the front of my mind, I fear those who follow it just enough to try to justify their bigotry. There is a class, a category of people - those that follow their religion as truth, and are willing to do whatever it tells them, even if it commands things that would be evil and disgusting to a non-believer. There are millions, maybe billions of these people. Some of them are homophobes. Some of them are murderers. Some of them are gay-affirming. Some of them are your friends. Some of them are world leaders. Some of them are your family. The only way we can end religious violence is by condemning these people wholesale. The 9/11 attacks, the Crusades, Sharia Law, and more were caused by people believing lies. A liar is a liar and liar cannot be trusted to self-regulate and make sure their lies aren't truly in reality harmful.
not every religious person is one of these people. Some of them follow it as cultural practice, some of them are agnostic theists, some hold their religion as a hope rather than a fact. Some people observe pikuach nefesh and never let their belief override the value of a human life. But is the duty of every person to ensure that the difference between them and Heaven's Gate cultists is more than just luck, environment, and a lack of follow-through.