wuffleslover

Far Left/Antifa Looters Rioted in Paris, not “Yellow Vests” . How to Spot the left wing rioters : Find the masked ones usually found fighting flaming trash cans while spray painting anti capitalist and pro anarchist nonsense on the walls . The yellow vests went for the banks, they did not attack other people’s businesses.

“Macron won’t listen, not yet”. I’m here in Paris interviewing French citizens participating in the Yellow Jacket protests, and it’s clear that their real motives are being buried by the mainstream media. I spoke to one man who said that many protesters had come in from small villages, and he explained their motivations.

“The Level of Treason from the Press in France is Astounding” Yellow Vest Interview. I was just in Paris to speak with the Yellow Vest protesters. One man told me that he’s participating in the movement, which started out as a demonstration against taxation, but has grown also to protest the constantly dropping standard of living and illegal immigration.

I don’t trust wikipedia, it is compromised.

Pamela Hemelrijk, Leiden, Holland, April 3, 2004.04.16 (via think-critically)

it ends in starvation, ask Venezuela

Twitter’s mission is to give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information, and to express their opinions and beliefs without barriers. (As long as those opinions, beliefs and ideas are left leaning and they mean far-left leaning.)

Well why else do you think they are indoctrinating children and trying to hijack the hard sciences? the social engineers what human beings to be dependent on drugs and miserable and suicidal, the Left think they are the perfect example of a happy stable community despite their eating each other, promoting and glorifying detrimental and unhealthy life choices and all the sexual and mental and child abuse run rampant. 

Makes sense why the Left want to import the 3rd world. Whites are a global minority of 8-10% of the world’s population. The left’s actions, rhetoric and intentions is only validating the Alt-Right and more people are seeing that. Just saying. Authoritarians will never learn!

Australian NSW firefighters removed the “carry a 90kg dummy” portion of the test to get more females through - time everyone lost some weight or they could be left in a burning house for the sake of EQUALITY!

The best thing that communism produced was dead communists.

Vladimir Lenin 

Joseph Stalin had at least 62 million murdered as part of U.S.S.R. Socialism, a red flag.  

Mao Zedong/Mao Tse Tung had at least 50 million murdered (oh that little red book) . 

Mussolini and Hitler also added to the many deaths via their own forms of Socialism. These are the RED flags of Socialism.

Karl Marx; 

- Never ran a company. 

- Never held political office. 

- Never oversaw any accounts. 

- Never even held a job – any job. 

- Supported throughout his life by Friedrich Engles, the son of a wealthy factory owner. 

- Considered by many to be the “greatest social, political, and economic philosopher of all time”….ROTFLMAO 

Thus, ALL applications of Marx’s theories have ended in failure. Just like socialism and communism always fail.

They just see “diversity” which is really a shield they like to hold up and hide behind like a for the SJW ideology and to prop themselves up with dopamine on social media. 

I stand with what Stan Lee said. In my years of being a fan of pop culture and entertainment since I could friggin crawl and work the VCR when I was a toddler to wear out my favorite movies on VHS tape, I have always stuck by keeping established characters as their original race, gender and sexuality. I am a fan of that character regardless of their gender, race and sexuality because of their personality and journey, however their identity is WHO THEY ARE. Their traits should be left intact. 

There is talk about changing Indiana Jones to be a woman, we already have that, her name is Lara Croft. I grew up playing her games as a kid, my sisters and I loved those games, not because we’re female, but because they are fun games, she is a character in her own right and yes it reminded us of Indy. But to us she was never a rip off of Indy, she stands well on her own. What I like about new characters is the many cross-over ideas. Indy and Lara team up? Yes please.

These slactivists like to go on and on about how important identity is and wield identity politics but in their stupid farce of “fighting the status quo” they believe only white straight characters identities are interchangeable. 

If some asshole were to suggest to change Black Panther to be anything than black - I would stand with the fans to protest that.

If some asshole were to suggest change to Captain Jack Harkness to be straight - I would stand with the fans to protest that.

But when it is white straight characters that these bigoted feminist SJWs target it is “controversial and racist, sexist, homophobic” to protest changes to the character’s identity.

See, this hypocrisy is all one needs to see to know the SJWs, these post modernists that rather butcher other people’s creations than make their own to put their message/politics across (that is post modernism for ya) are full of shit when they claim to be fighting the status quo and for minorities. 

When they do try to make their own characters, they fail to resonate because all they focus on is what identity group they are from. That makes it hard for people outside that group to relate to that character. SJWs and feminists make it all about the character’s gender, their race or sexuality, Which I find is sexist, racist and homophobic because these activists only see them as a token of a collective (through the SJW feminist lens, which means they are poor fragile victims), not an individual. 

They prefer the easy, lazy route of changing established characters because it gains them the following, name/brand recognition and they don’t need to create a personality. These activists love to deconstruct and revise, they like to destroy instead of create.They think “compelling stories” is to invert everything the character stood for, examples: Luke Skywalker being turned into a coward and Captain America being revealed as a hydra agent nazi. 

They are not fighting the status quo, they are pissing off a lot of core fans that have been there since the start, and they’re politicized escapism and making it harder for new minority characters because there are people now that expect them to be some a token or political propaganda mouthpiece, instead of a new character. And that is a huge problem. Bravo, activists, good job. They alienate and berate fans and then complain when no one watches or buys their crap. That is regressive “logic” for ya. get your activism out of entertainment. Get active by creating new stories and characters. Or BTFO, hacks.

Their shaming and attacking and smearing people who call them out on their bullshit, or fans that just don’t choose to watch their useless remake/reboots/re-imaginings is unwarranted. Problem easily solved: create new characters and don’t make the political ideological bs priority one above character and story. Someone else mentioned the other day that with the internet and free market it is much easier to use word-of-mouth to get independent content noticed, if mediocre stuff like Twilight and 50 Shades can do it then we’ve all got a chance.

Another reason they want to put “women/minority characters” (token characters)  is as usual, they are using women/minorities to be the propaganda tools in their entertainment/ far-left propaganda. Because when fans call that shit out the critics and feminists SJWs can then shut down fans by calling them racist, sexist, white supremacists, nazis, bot, trolls, etc They can’t do that if the characters were white men, white men are not a protected group. They pulled this with Ghostbusters2016 and they pulled this shit again with The Last Jedi. Notice they couldn’t exactly pull this tactic off with Solo’s bomb at the box office.

Rey and the sad devolution of the female character.  

“Don’t attack women in video games reeeeeeee!” 

Feminist NPCs in video games are now a protected class.

Tolerance - the thing that NPCs and SJWs fear the most.

​Because as soon as you introduce a value hierarchy Marxism makes no sense.. who knew!

watching a livestream of starship troopers book and movie study 

^ Heinlein describing Karl Marx :D that sums it up.

Sources and reading list: https://www.minds.com/Sargon_of_Akkad/blog/the-politics-of-starship-troopers-899788292908392448

27 FBI background checks wouldn’t be good enough for the demonrats. Let’s do some FBI background checks on the demonrats. I can only imagine the dirt!!

“This is what whining looks like.“  Those were the people organized by McCabe and scattered in key cities. Funded of course by Open Society foundation/Soros and tech moguls if California! #organizeddemocratsocialterrorism

Leftists are freaking out!!! So what’s new? Screaming and yelling because they are told to do it and what to say. No independent thinking among them.

Don’t ever go near these women. They will accuse you of some crime just to get back at those they hate. #leftwingbigotry #leftwinghatemob #feminismiscancer

Arrest Soros and these nut bags will go home. No check…no protests. #sheeple

Let the Democrats cry today make them bleed in November. Hopefully this will wake a lot of the (so called)  'Activists’ up and realise that, to the Democrats, they are nothing more than Lab rats that have been spinning their wheels of hate and deception without even realizing it.

[video transcript:]

An often heard quote in the past few years goes something like this: “I didn’t leave the Left, the Left left me.“ 

And for many on both sides of the Atlantic, it’s actually very unclear what the Left even stands for anymore. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the anti capitalist economic preoccupations of the old Left began to take a back seat to the new way of understanding oppression. The politics of redistribution were replaced by a politics of recognition and with this transformation modern identity politics was born, and what makes identity politics significant and a departure from earlier movements is the demand not for the inclusion within the fold of a universal humankind, nor is it for respect in spite of one’s differences, rather what is demanded is respect for oneself as different.

Democrats still cling to the idea that they represent the true interests of the working class and that blue-collar voters who supported the GOP have been tricked, however in the last election cycle the Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton was a technocrat who openly disdained a large percent of the population and ironically made up mostly of white middle-class voters, calling them “deplorables”. Clinton was the symbol of what the Democratic Party has become and what its core values consist of for the DNC identity politics trumps all others and they believed it more important to elect the first female president by repositioning the party to represent the interests of a coalition of minorities upper-class professionals living in gated communities of course and powerful interests in Silicon Valley and Hollywood then to convince working-class Americans that the Democrats were still their party. 

In the aftermath of Hillary Clinton’s spectacular defeat the party has fragmented and the strongest voice in the Democratic Party isn’t even a registered Democrat, senator Bernie Sanders is a socialist and registered independent, who was himself thrown under the bus by the DMC, as well as newcomer and corporate media favorite Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who is also a member of the Democratic socialists of America. The key takeaway is the abandonment of the middle and working classes for identity politics. 

Identity politics favored for different reasons by academic and corporate interests alike is now the central operating principle within which the parties on the Left orbit. However once identity politics gains momentum it invariably subdivides giving rise to ever poll if rating group identities demanding recognition. LGB becomes, LGBTQ becomes LGBTQ rstuvwxyz, other letters have been added to the acronym and even the order has been rearranged at times. As different identity groups battle in their oppression Olympics over which group is least privileged, for today’s Left; blindness to group identity is the ultimate sin. 

On the other side of the Atlantic in the United Kingdom, Jeremy Corbyn, a socialist who became the Labour Party leader, by accident no doubt, imagines himself to be a champion of the working-class, but this is a working-class of his imagination rather than of the real world, he himself was brought up in a manor house and has spent his life working as an MP in a constituency that has never been touched by either industrialization or deindustrialization. What Mr. Corbyn is in fact presiding over is the transformation of the Labour Party from being one that champions the working and middle classes to a coalition of three main groups; ethnic minorities - particularly Muslims, public sector professionals and radicalized Millennials, most of them the University educated children of the salaried middle class who can’t get their feet on the property ladder. And just like in America identity politics as well as oppression Olympics spiraling is at the center of the Labour Party. And of course the British case is different from the American case which is different from the German case which is different from the Canadian case, but the Left in virtually all countries in the Western world is unified by their utopian messianic complex that has taken on cosmopolitan globalism as their main tenants and world view, and at all times emphasizes internationalism over national interests, group interests, over shared interests and in doing so have completely abandoned the role of representing the working and middle class voters. 

In the USA it was Democratic presidents who signed NAFTA and pushed for the trans-pacific partnership trade deals have their pros and cons, but the working class bore the brunt of the damage these deals caused in both the US and the UK. The Left champions mass uncontrolled and unrestrained immigration, but again it is the working class both in wage stagnation and in their neighborhoods that have to deal with the consequences of these political positions. And because the modern Left has ensconced itself in a shell of radical identity politics and shouts fascist and racist at anyone that disagrees with their insane view of reality. 

Things in countries around the West are changing. The political parties enjoying the most success and growth currently are those that espouse some combination of nationalism, populism and economic protectionism. The old parties of the Left have failed to grasp that this ideology appeals to the broad majority of the working and middle classes as well. The political tribalism of the Left has gone from inclusion to division and never-ending purity spirals, although inclusivity is presumably still the ultimate goal - at least in theory - in reality the contemporary Left is pointedly exclusionary. And all of this is coming at a time of Titanic and seismic demographic transformation currently taking place in the hyper diverse cities of the Western world. The working and middle classes who are now starting to live with the effects that will completely transform their society in the near future are looking for anyone that will speak to them, and for them, most are interested in safe streets, a stable economy, quality of life and a future for their children. 

Things such as radicalized gender politics and pronouns unrelenting and unending immigration and the creation of an ever dizzying array of phobias, ‘ist’s’ and ‘isms’ concocted almost daily at this point, grievance politics, the professionally offended and the transformation of language are not very compelling political positions to get behind for most people past the age of 25 or those with a job. 

And Democrats control the social narrative by shouting down anyone who points this out, by calling them “racist”. I care more about values than race, but it’s clear that many new immigrants don’t share the values that made America strong and prosperous….but at the same time, I see right through the large scale immigration con being perpetuated on America, by the left.

Yes, the plan is, to end freedom and bring in socialism. There is no need to lie about it, or kid ourselves. The left is deliberately trying to do this, and they have been at this plan for a very long time, and may very well succeed. …and all this is highly problematic for a country trying to stay socially stable and survive as a democracy.

As a for instance, there is a very long list of groups in America that are non-whites, and earn more money than whites: Americans with parents from India, Chinese Americans, Japanese Americans, Filipino Americans, Korean Americans….and of course Jewish Americans, who I consider white, but many don’t. And this is not even a recent phenomena. There is data going back to the 1970s, that show non-whites on my list, economically out-performing whites in America. So the left’s economic narrative is simply not true.

No, commie scum, you do not have the right to assault people from behind a mask.

US congressman has tabled a bill that aims to unmask Antifa and I think that’s a fucking good idea. If you’re gonna turn up as a bunch of violent thugs all massed up with flag poles that are thick and made of solid wood then you have come to cause trouble and we should be able to identify you because you will need to be held to account.

So any activists who do this could be jailed for up to 15 years for wearing masks under the bill called the unmasking antifa act of 2018, which I’m in full support of despite the fact that they’re actually the only thing that’s targeted, anyone who would turn up with their complete faces covered would be targeted under this bill. 

The bill was introduced by Republican representative Dan Donovan of New York around June and has drawn widespread condemnation from critics who claim it “unfairly targets antifa activists” …why is that unfair? What’s unfair about it? They’re a bunch of violent left wing radicals who go around assaulting people and smashing up property, why is it unfair? That they are unable to hide their identity and evade prosecution why the fuck is that unfair? I think it’s completely fair. It doesn’t just target these people, it’s just these leftists are the only cowards that do it and they claimed “it could embolden far-right demonstrators and for protest against how they don’t go around covering up their faces”. Um we never see the alt-right or the proud boys or any of these other far-right ones doing it. It’s just antifa who cover their faces because they’re the ones in the institutions, they’re the ones of the middle class backgrounds who need to keep their identity secret because they don’t have a legitimate leg to stand on, they’re ideological radicals, they’re not people who are actually suffering, they’re people who won’t shut the fuck up and just get on with their lives and leave the rest of society alone.

 "This is another draconian measure to actually criminalize dissent of the United States" said Scott Crow, a former antifa organizer and despicable fucking commie. Well get bent Scott, maybe if your dissent was peaceful and political rather than violent I would have no problem with it.You don’t see me climate change activists beating people up - I’m not saying they don’t, I just personally never see it but I’m sure they don’t, I’m sure they’re relatively peaceful, same thing like the Women’s March, I laugh at it, I think they should dress up in vaginas all day long and make it as public as possible, just walk around and protest Donald Trump’s pussy grabbing they should do that all day, it gets them off their asses because it’s their right to look like lunatics and peacefully protest, but these fuckers [Antifa] don’t peacefully protest, and everyone knows it. So fuck them. Fuck them. They are well outside the bounds of what is acceptable in a liberal democracy. They don’t have the rights to be hidden while they commit crimes. Fuck them. 

But the filthy commie says “that this is because the law - even if it doesn't  explicitly state leftists who mask up - that’s who the largest potential target of the law is for more than white nationalists” …well I’m glad to hear that. I’m glad to hear that the KKK aren’t that much for a problem lately, I mean they were masking up back then so yeah fuck them too, but masking up and beating people up or smashing property - I see antifa do that rampantly. The KKK seem to be a tiny fringe minority who do nothing newsworthy, there is tons of footage of antifa but KKK are only brought up for leftwing media narratives, whereas antifa are a relatively populist and large and violent organization [also supported by many leftwing organizations and by leftwing mainstream media outlets and academia even hollywood] who have been committing more acts of violence of late, like beating up people who are in restaurants, sending death threats to their homes and families and things like that. These people need to be stopped. This can’t go on. 

This Republican is doing exactly the right thing. Scott Crow said “that the bill is an attempt by lawmakers to avoid tackling the issue of hate speech and instead address a symptom of it by targeting protests”  because you can’t be expected to control your actions? That’s what you’re saying? You can’t be expected to not become a violent thug? Just because there are people who have opinions that you don’t like? Listen closely: Hate speech is free speech. If you don’t like it don’t listen to it. That’s your option. Or go and argue with them, go and address what they’re actually saying on the merits of what they’re actually saying and prove them wrong because I look nine you could actually do it if you were prepared to put in the work but you’re not. Because mentally you’re an immature toddler.

Walter Shaw the former director of the Office of government ethics tweeted about the bill on Tuesday suggesting it “advanced authoritarianism” No, it’s preventing authoritarianism. The authoritarianism is coming from the Communist radicals who mask up and then intimidate and beat people for having a difference of opinion. It’s not like antifa actually have a good track record of being able to identify an actual white nationalist, they will call literally anyone and everyone a white nationalist if you get in their way. So no this is not advancing authoritarianism, this is rolling back authoritarianism. This is allowing peaceful protests to go on whether you agree with the thing being protested or not. That’s a good thing. Charlottesville is one out of dozens and dozens probably now hundreds of cases of antifa thugs beating people up. Charlottesville is one case. Where were you where were you in Berkley? Multiple times in fact in Berkeley - no you’re not even thinking about it, you don’t care just because these fucks are beating unconscious people on the floor, smacking women or macing women, doesn’t matter. Calling cops the n-word, you don’t care about that. I find it interesting how they don’t interview the Republican putting this forward but they do get a statement from his spokesman that I assume was just a public statement he says “My bill expands on a long-standing civil rights statutes to make it a crime to deprive someone of constitutionally-guaranteed protections while master disguised good the Americans have the natural rights speaking protest freely it’s not a right to throw a Molotov cocktail and beat people while hiding behind a mask"