Ohh yeeaah, I am a badass muthafucken Princess

Pamela Hemelrijk, Leiden, Holland, April 3, 2004.04.16 (via think-critically)

it ends in starvation, ask Venezuela

Far Left/Antifa Looters Rioted in Paris, not “Yellow Vests” . How to Spot the left wing rioters : Find the masked ones usually found fighting flaming trash cans while spray painting anti capitalist and pro anarchist nonsense on the walls . The yellow vests went for the banks, they did not attack other people’s businesses.

“Macron won’t listen, not yet”. I’m here in Paris interviewing French citizens participating in the Yellow Jacket protests, and it’s clear that their real motives are being buried by the mainstream media. I spoke to one man who said that many protesters had come in from small villages, and he explained their motivations.

“The Level of Treason from the Press in France is Astounding” Yellow Vest Interview. I was just in Paris to speak with the Yellow Vest protesters. One man told me that he’s participating in the movement, which started out as a demonstration against taxation, but has grown also to protest the constantly dropping standard of living and illegal immigration.

I don’t trust wikipedia, it is compromised.

This is G. Edward Griffin’s shocking video interview, Soviet Subversion of the Free-World Press (1984), where he interviews ex-KGB officer and Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov who decided to openly reveal KGB’s subversive tactics against western society as a whole.   Bezmenov explains how Jewish Marxist ideology is destabilizing the economy and purposefully pushing the U.S. into numerous crises so that a “Big Brother” tyranny can be put into place in Washington, how most Americans don’t even realize that they are under attack, and that normal parliamentary procedures will not alter the federal government’s direction.   He then explains how Marxist leaders use informers to make lists of anti-Communist and other politically incorrect people who they want to execute once they - actually a Jewish oligarchy - come to power.  The oligarch’s secret lists include “civil rights” activists and idealistically-minded “useful idiot” leftists as well.   Bezmenov provides several real world examples of how Marxist leaders even execute and/or imprison each other.  Also he explains how American embassy employees were known to betray Soviets attempting to defect, how there existed a “triangle of hate” in the Soviet government, why he realized that Marxism-Leninism was a murderous doctrine, and how the CIA ignored (or didn’t care) about Communist subversion.   He also mentions that revolutions throughout history are never the result of a majority movement, but of a small dedicated and highly-organized group who seize power, whether for good or bad.  Next he explains how the American mass media spread lies about life in the Soviet Union.   Bezmenov also explains how the LOOK magazine article falsely claimed that the Russian people were proud of their victory in the Second World War, where in reality the Judeo-Bolshevik-Communist-Marxist government was happy that Hitler had been defeated so that they could remain in power.

Apply the Modern Leftwing dogma lens to everything and everything suddenly becomes “racist, sexist,” etc, etc, etc, Ad Nauseam. No wonder there has been a common trend of the Woobification of villains and malicious characters. Could it be that those are the only characters that Leftists can relate to and want to make people perceive them as misunderstood and feel sorry for them? …despite these characters aiding evil agendas, slaughter and so on.

Because they’re so into recycling, the left are at it again, reviving an old trope about how Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings series of novels is “racist.” Why? According to these critics, the evil characters called the Orcs are depicted as “dark” with “slanted eyes,” so OBVIOUSLY Tolkien was sending out some kind of bigoted dog-whistle. Right…

Twitter’s mission is to give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information, and to express their opinions and beliefs without barriers. (As long as those opinions, beliefs and ideas are left leaning and they mean far-left leaning.)

Well why else do you think they are indoctrinating children and trying to hijack the hard sciences? the social engineers what human beings to be dependent on drugs and miserable and suicidal, the Left think they are the perfect example of a happy stable community despite their eating each other, promoting and glorifying detrimental and unhealthy life choices and all the sexual and mental and child abuse run rampant. 

Makes sense why the Left want to import the 3rd world. Whites are a global minority of 8-10% of the world’s population. The left’s actions, rhetoric and intentions is only validating the Alt-Right and more people are seeing that. Just saying. Authoritarians will never learn!

Australian NSW firefighters removed the “carry a 90kg dummy” portion of the test to get more females through - time everyone lost some weight or they could be left in a burning house for the sake of EQUALITY!

The best thing that communism produced was dead communists.

Vladimir Lenin 

Joseph Stalin had at least 62 million murdered as part of U.S.S.R. Socialism, a red flag.  

Mao Zedong/Mao Tse Tung had at least 50 million murdered (oh that little red book) . 

Mussolini and Hitler also added to the many deaths via their own forms of Socialism. These are the RED flags of Socialism.

Karl Marx; 

- Never ran a company. 

- Never held political office. 

- Never oversaw any accounts. 

- Never even held a job – any job. 

- Supported throughout his life by Friedrich Engles, the son of a wealthy factory owner. 

- Considered by many to be the “greatest social, political, and economic philosopher of all time”….ROTFLMAO 

Thus, ALL applications of Marx’s theories have ended in failure. Just like socialism and communism always fail.

I stand with what Stan Lee said. In my years of being a fan of pop culture and entertainment since I could friggin crawl and work the VCR when I was a toddler to wear out my favorite movies on VHS tape, I have always stuck by keeping established characters as their original race, gender and sexuality. I am a fan of that character regardless of their gender, race and sexuality because of their personality and journey, however their identity is WHO THEY ARE. Their traits should be left intact. 

There is talk about changing Indiana Jones to be a woman, we already have that, her name is Lara Croft. I grew up playing her games as a kid, my sisters and I loved those games, not because we’re female, but because they are fun games, she is a character in her own right and yes it reminded us of Indy. But to us she was never a rip off of Indy, she stands well on her own. What I like about new characters is the many cross-over ideas. Indy and Lara team up? Yes please.

These slactivists like to go on and on about how important identity is and wield identity politics but in their stupid farce of “fighting the status quo” they believe only white straight characters identities are interchangeable. 

If some asshole were to suggest to change Black Panther to be anything than black - I would stand with the fans to protest that.

If some asshole were to suggest change to Captain Jack Harkness to be straight - I would stand with the fans to protest that.

But when it is white straight characters that these bigoted feminist SJWs target it is “controversial and racist, sexist, homophobic” to protest changes to the character’s identity.

See, this hypocrisy is all one needs to see to know the SJWs, these post modernists that rather butcher other people’s creations than make their own to put their message/politics across (that is post modernism for ya) are full of shit when they claim to be fighting the status quo and for minorities. 

When they do try to make their own characters, they fail to resonate because all they focus on is what identity group they are from. That makes it hard for people outside that group to relate to that character. SJWs and feminists make it all about the character’s gender, their race or sexuality, Which I find is sexist, racist and homophobic because these activists only see them as a token of a collective (through the SJW feminist lens, which means they are poor fragile victims), not an individual. 

They prefer the easy, lazy route of changing established characters because it gains them the following, name/brand recognition and they don’t need to create a personality. These activists love to deconstruct and revise, they like to destroy instead of create.They think “compelling stories” is to invert everything the character stood for, examples: Luke Skywalker being turned into a coward and Captain America being revealed as a hydra agent nazi. 

They are not fighting the status quo, they are pissing off a lot of core fans that have been there since the start, and they’re politicized escapism and making it harder for new minority characters because there are people now that expect them to be some a token or political propaganda mouthpiece, instead of a new character. And that is a huge problem. Bravo, activists, good job. They alienate and berate fans and then complain when no one watches or buys their crap. That is regressive “logic” for ya. get your activism out of entertainment. Get active by creating new stories and characters. Or BTFO, hacks.

Their shaming and attacking and smearing people who call them out on their bullshit, or fans that just don’t choose to watch their useless remake/reboots/re-imaginings is unwarranted. Problem easily solved: create new characters and don’t make the political ideological bs priority one above character and story. Someone else mentioned the other day that with the internet and free market it is much easier to use word-of-mouth to get independent content noticed, if mediocre stuff like Twilight and 50 Shades can do it then we’ve all got a chance.

Another reason they want to put “women/minority characters” (token characters)  is as usual, they are using women/minorities to be the propaganda tools in their entertainment/ far-left propaganda. Because when fans call that shit out the critics and feminists SJWs can then shut down fans by calling them racist, sexist, white supremacists, nazis, bot, trolls, etc They can’t do that if the characters were white men, white men are not a protected group. They pulled this with Ghostbusters2016 and they pulled this shit again with The Last Jedi. Notice they couldn’t exactly pull this tactic off with Solo’s bomb at the box office.

Rey and the sad devolution of the female character.  

“Don’t attack women in video games reeeeeeee!” 

Feminist NPCs in video games are now a protected class.

Tolerance - the thing that NPCs and SJWs fear the most.

27 FBI background checks wouldn’t be good enough for the demonrats. Let’s do some FBI background checks on the demonrats. I can only imagine the dirt!!

“This is what whining looks like.“  Those were the people organized by McCabe and scattered in key cities. Funded of course by Open Society foundation/Soros and tech moguls if California! #organizeddemocratsocialterrorism

Leftists are freaking out!!! So what’s new? Screaming and yelling because they are told to do it and what to say. No independent thinking among them.

Don’t ever go near these women. They will accuse you of some crime just to get back at those they hate. #leftwingbigotry #leftwinghatemob #feminismiscancer

Arrest Soros and these nut bags will go home. No check…no protests. #sheeple

Let the Democrats cry today make them bleed in November. Hopefully this will wake a lot of the (so called)  'Activists’ up and realise that, to the Democrats, they are nothing more than Lab rats that have been spinning their wheels of hate and deception without even realizing it.

[video transcript:]

An often heard quote in the past few years goes something like this: “I didn’t leave the Left, the Left left me.“ 

And for many on both sides of the Atlantic, it’s actually very unclear what the Left even stands for anymore. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the anti capitalist economic preoccupations of the old Left began to take a back seat to the new way of understanding oppression. The politics of redistribution were replaced by a politics of recognition and with this transformation modern identity politics was born, and what makes identity politics significant and a departure from earlier movements is the demand not for the inclusion within the fold of a universal humankind, nor is it for respect in spite of one’s differences, rather what is demanded is respect for oneself as different.

Democrats still cling to the idea that they represent the true interests of the working class and that blue-collar voters who supported the GOP have been tricked, however in the last election cycle the Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton was a technocrat who openly disdained a large percent of the population and ironically made up mostly of white middle-class voters, calling them “deplorables”. Clinton was the symbol of what the Democratic Party has become and what its core values consist of for the DNC identity politics trumps all others and they believed it more important to elect the first female president by repositioning the party to represent the interests of a coalition of minorities upper-class professionals living in gated communities of course and powerful interests in Silicon Valley and Hollywood then to convince working-class Americans that the Democrats were still their party. 

In the aftermath of Hillary Clinton’s spectacular defeat the party has fragmented and the strongest voice in the Democratic Party isn’t even a registered Democrat, senator Bernie Sanders is a socialist and registered independent, who was himself thrown under the bus by the DMC, as well as newcomer and corporate media favorite Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who is also a member of the Democratic socialists of America. The key takeaway is the abandonment of the middle and working classes for identity politics. 

Identity politics favored for different reasons by academic and corporate interests alike is now the central operating principle within which the parties on the Left orbit. However once identity politics gains momentum it invariably subdivides giving rise to ever poll if rating group identities demanding recognition. LGB becomes, LGBTQ becomes LGBTQ rstuvwxyz, other letters have been added to the acronym and even the order has been rearranged at times. As different identity groups battle in their oppression Olympics over which group is least privileged, for today’s Left; blindness to group identity is the ultimate sin. 

On the other side of the Atlantic in the United Kingdom, Jeremy Corbyn, a socialist who became the Labour Party leader, by accident no doubt, imagines himself to be a champion of the working-class, but this is a working-class of his imagination rather than of the real world, he himself was brought up in a manor house and has spent his life working as an MP in a constituency that has never been touched by either industrialization or deindustrialization. What Mr. Corbyn is in fact presiding over is the transformation of the Labour Party from being one that champions the working and middle classes to a coalition of three main groups; ethnic minorities - particularly Muslims, public sector professionals and radicalized Millennials, most of them the University educated children of the salaried middle class who can’t get their feet on the property ladder. And just like in America identity politics as well as oppression Olympics spiraling is at the center of the Labour Party. And of course the British case is different from the American case which is different from the German case which is different from the Canadian case, but the Left in virtually all countries in the Western world is unified by their utopian messianic complex that has taken on cosmopolitan globalism as their main tenants and world view, and at all times emphasizes internationalism over national interests, group interests, over shared interests and in doing so have completely abandoned the role of representing the working and middle class voters. 

In the USA it was Democratic presidents who signed NAFTA and pushed for the trans-pacific partnership trade deals have their pros and cons, but the working class bore the brunt of the damage these deals caused in both the US and the UK. The Left champions mass uncontrolled and unrestrained immigration, but again it is the working class both in wage stagnation and in their neighborhoods that have to deal with the consequences of these political positions. And because the modern Left has ensconced itself in a shell of radical identity politics and shouts fascist and racist at anyone that disagrees with their insane view of reality. 

Things in countries around the West are changing. The political parties enjoying the most success and growth currently are those that espouse some combination of nationalism, populism and economic protectionism. The old parties of the Left have failed to grasp that this ideology appeals to the broad majority of the working and middle classes as well. The political tribalism of the Left has gone from inclusion to division and never-ending purity spirals, although inclusivity is presumably still the ultimate goal - at least in theory - in reality the contemporary Left is pointedly exclusionary. And all of this is coming at a time of Titanic and seismic demographic transformation currently taking place in the hyper diverse cities of the Western world. The working and middle classes who are now starting to live with the effects that will completely transform their society in the near future are looking for anyone that will speak to them, and for them, most are interested in safe streets, a stable economy, quality of life and a future for their children. 

Things such as radicalized gender politics and pronouns unrelenting and unending immigration and the creation of an ever dizzying array of phobias, ‘ist’s’ and ‘isms’ concocted almost daily at this point, grievance politics, the professionally offended and the transformation of language are not very compelling political positions to get behind for most people past the age of 25 or those with a job. 

And Democrats control the social narrative by shouting down anyone who points this out, by calling them “racist”. I care more about values than race, but it’s clear that many new immigrants don’t share the values that made America strong and prosperous….but at the same time, I see right through the large scale immigration con being perpetuated on America, by the left.

Yes, the plan is, to end freedom and bring in socialism. There is no need to lie about it, or kid ourselves. The left is deliberately trying to do this, and they have been at this plan for a very long time, and may very well succeed. …and all this is highly problematic for a country trying to stay socially stable and survive as a democracy.

As a for instance, there is a very long list of groups in America that are non-whites, and earn more money than whites: Americans with parents from India, Chinese Americans, Japanese Americans, Filipino Americans, Korean Americans….and of course Jewish Americans, who I consider white, but many don’t. And this is not even a recent phenomena. There is data going back to the 1970s, that show non-whites on my list, economically out-performing whites in America. So the left’s economic narrative is simply not true.

[Video transcript:] So, here we go again. Draconian articles 11 and 13 is about to be voted on and the future of the relatively free and open Internet depends upon it being defeated. If you thought the EU s GDP or was bad you can barely imagine how much worse things could get if this new copyright legislation comes to pass. First things first, article 13 has been dubbed the censorship machine or the upload filter which will make it mandatory for social networks and other such publishers to create a massive and I would argue impractical copyright database of everything from written articles, videos, website code, music, photos and other imagery, you name it, basically this system would allow for copyright owners to identify their work and flag any content that infringes their rights. Imagine YouTube’s already broken copyright reporting system only considerably worse. 

The problem is that it would also not only be rife for abuse but it would potentially destroy the concept of fair use. You wouldn’t be able to produce content making use of any imagery you didn’t own, even under transformative fair use, unless you first received authorization from the original rights holder. This would make everything from news blog websites, alternative news media, remix videos and memes almost impossible. Suffice to say this would greatly advantage the mainstream media as well as the entertainment industry. 

The second area of concern is article 11 the so called “link tax” which directly relates to news reporting. Link tax article 11 which will only allow Internet users to post links to news sites if the service they’re using has bought a linking license from the news source they’re linking to. Under a current proposal links that contain more than two consecutive words from an articles headline will be illegal without a license.  

We’ve previously seen the EU attempt to regulate social media with hate speech laws and all that kind of stuff so this is part of a broader attempt to regulate the entire Internet in the same way that governments have previously regulated television and radio. The internet is the new printing press and governments have always eventually attempted to regulate and control whatever new form of media emerges in order to control the spread of ideas. More importantly, this bureaucracy of the EU will likely be seized upon as an opportunity by the mainstream legacy media to also maintain their control over the spread of news and information online, it will be exploited, it would make independent news reporting and journalism virtually impossible as well as seriously jeopardizing websites and networks that rely on linking like news aggregators, blogs that use news snippets and social networks that include site previews - as you might imagine that’s basically almost everywhere online, this would be a war on the hyperlink itself. 

To say that this would destroy the Internet and turn it into a passive media consumption platform to void of user-generated content is an understatement. I’m not even sure how bad the web would look if this came to pass, the web would be little more than a shadow of its former self. 

As you probably expected there’s been some serious commercial clout brought to bear in recent weeks in an attempt to get this new copyright directive pushed through as fast as possible. Their narrative is that the directive will ensure that copyright holders will be fairly compensated for their work. The trouble is copyright laws as they stand are already ridiculously detrimental to creativity and innovation (for more on this check video called “ridiculous copyright laws are destroying creativity” linked below). 

Major publishers and the music industry are unsurprisingly behind this directive with 18,000 700, signatures in a worldwide petition of screen writers and filmmakers advocating for this new copyright framework to get the go-ahead. When I read their declaration it really becomes clear that this is also part of the long-standing fight for the dinosaur movie, music and TV industries to protect their old-school outdated revenue models which have struggled to keep up with the age of the Internet. 

Even YouTube is against this EU directive because quite honestly video sharing sites like YouTube would simply find it impossible to operate. YouTube slams article 13 as it weighs in on European copyright directive, YouTube has officially voiced its side of the arguments ahead of a vote in European Parliament on September 12th, that’s tomorrow, that will decide the future of the copyright directive. The platform’s chief business officer, Robert Kinsel, has said the ability for creators and artists to find fans and build a business online is now at risk thanks to the heavily debated article 13, he continued this outcome was not only stifle your creative freedom it would have severe negative consequences for the fans, the communities and the revenue you have all worked so hard to create. 

Suffice to say this directive cannot be allowed to come to pass I would encourage those of you in the EU to contact your local MEP and make your voice heard in a polite manner of course (linked below). The internet is not perfect but it is most definitely not broken -well with the exception of the rising social media censorship that we’re currently fighting, that’s a whole other problem but other than that the basic way in which the internet works is just fine, don’t let the European Union and a handful of corporate lobbyists fundamentally break the web forever with draconian copyright legislation. (For more on this there’s two other videos called “the EU is about to destroy the Internet hashtag delete art 13″ and “an update on the EU copyright reform proposal”, so check out those videos if you haven’t seen them already. Linked below.) 

Suffice to say from a political perspective such massive control over the spread of information and news online will serve as an unbelievably powerful weapon for the establishment. We’re talking about China levels of control of the Internet and if the public doesn’t realize this soon people are going to wake up to an Internet that basically isn’t worth using, an Internet where the mainstream news media is all they will see. I cannot make this any clearer: we have to win this fight. The EU copyright directive with articles 11 and 13 must be defeated.

Sources: http://ow.ly/MZUV101fvOM

Boing Boing article: https://boingboing.net/2018/09/10/not-in-our-name.html

Ridiculous Copyright Laws are Destroying Creativity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY-Q6hmR36o

Venice Declaration: https://www.saa-authors.eu/en/news/539-venice-declaration

The EU is About to Destroy The Internet #DeleteArt13:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvXOfq3AB8s

Update on EU’s Copyright Reform Proposal #DeleteArt13:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwR34cT1grw