NASA


hello vonnie
Jules of Nature
Cosimo Galluzzi
Misplaced Lens Cap
dirt enthusiast
Stranger Things
noise dept.
wallacepolsom

izzy's playlists!
h
ojovivo
trying on a metaphor

oozey mess
Three Goblin Art
we're not kids anymore.
Today's Document

seen from Lithuania
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Romania

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Nepal

seen from Canada
seen from T1

seen from Türkiye
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Türkiye

seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
@weedmario

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Gospel with silver cover. Armenia, 13th century manuscript, cover made in 1691.
alright I've got to do some quick math to explain attitudes towards AI to my boss.
we're looking to create an AI policy, and when we were talking about this, my boss (older millennial) was genuinely shocked to hear that younger people do not (seem) to view AI positively (a la the recent commencement speakers being booed)
please rb for larger sample size!
Question 1/3
What is your age, and do you feel AI is a net positive or net negative in our lives today?
under 18, AI is a net positive
under 18, AI is a net negative
18-29, AI is a net positive
18-29, AI is a net negative
30-45, AI is a net positive
30-45, AI is a net negative
46-60, AI is a net positive
46-60, AI is a net negative
over 60, AI is a net postive
over 60, AI is a net negative
Question 2/3
How often do you visit or interact with museums/archives (whether in person or online)?
Frequently (multiple times per month)
Often (multiple times per year)
Occasionally (a couple times per year)
Rarely (once every couple of years)
Never :(
Question 3/3
If you saw a museum was using AI in exhibits, marketing, research, etc., would you be more or less inclined to visit that museum?
under 18, more inclined
under 18, less inclined
18-29, more inclined
18-29, less inclined
30-45, more inclined
30-45, less inclined
46-60, more inclined
46-60, less inclined
over 60, more inclined
over 60, less inclined
Thank you for helping with this data collection. Please rb for as big a sample as possible!
🫶
I feel like I need to share this because idk if Europeans are familiar with the presence of Aldi in the US, but at least especially in my area they’ve been growing a lot recently. Like Aldi bought out some local failing grocery chains where I live (Louisiana) and have opened Aldis in all these somewhat rural communities and small towns, which for the record I’m fine with
But as a result of this they are advertising a lot more in my area and also in many cases, the people in these areas have never been confronted with Aldi or any European grocery store. So the ads that Aldi is pushing out to its new US customer base feature a cowboy shopping at Aldi who is explaining to new Aldi customers how Aldi works. Like this cowboy is explaining you gotta put a quarter in the shopping cart and why there are very little name brands. A cowboy is how they want to reach their American customer base. They gave us a cowboy
Here he is, the Aldi Cowboy

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Study with Sandro Botticelli and "What's it like working at Lush"
In Pride month, I think it's important to remind you of this iconic dialogue. You don't have to talk about who you are if you don't want to❤️
"Readers have SHORT attention spans! The average reader takes just TWO sentences to decide whether to put a book down! You have to HOOK them in the FIRST sentence! GRAB them by throat and don't let them BREATHE—"
... have... have we considered that perhaps the average reader just, like, knows what they like in a book? I mean... first sentences are famous for establishing things like *checks notes*... genre, tone, POV, pacing, character, voice, uhhh... writing style...
The average reader is putting your book down because they discovered it's in first person (or not in first person). The average reader put your book down because they wanted a cozy read, or they're sick of cozy reads, or romance, or grimdark, or assassin princesses, or vampires, or or or. The average reader put your book down because they just didn't like your writing style—no, not because it was boring... they just, get this, didn't like it.
The average critical reader put your book down because it had six grammatical mistakes in the first two sentences.
The average reader will read quite a ways if the premise intrigues them, they like the genre, the writing style doesn't get on their nerves, and the characters pop off the page. In fact, they'll probably read the whole book, so long as it delivers on its plot promises and doesn't drag in the middle section.
The average reader will, however, stop reading after just two sentences if it's clear by the second sentence that the only thing they'll like about this book is the opening line.
Idk, I just think like, painting a demographic of people who, you know, pick up full length books to read for fun, as having short attention spans doesn't make too much sense. At least not as much sense as the alternative: words tell people things; namely, the contents of this book.
In general, though, I think we jump to blame short attention spans too often when there is a far more logical explanation. "It takes 0.06 seconds for viewers to scroll past a post." Yes, that is typically how long it takes me to discern whether this post is about something I'm interested in. There's a trillion posts out there, probably a billion books, of course we've gotten fast at sorting through content. That's not an attention span issue. That's just efficiency.
Coming out (2026)
read about this illustration shop + commission enquiries + snail mail + more

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Just saw "Why did some knights only armour their arms" and I'm just
In reference to later surcoats like this
Girl I don't know how to convey this to you but. They wore armour under surcoat. It's a pretty loose garm you can just kind of wear armour under it and you're fine.
I feel like alot of armour misconceptions are caused by people not fully thinking through the practicality of it. Like
People just kind of. Not bothering to think about what material japanese armour was made of (iron, it was colourful because they laquered it for decoration and moisture resistance/rust protection)
Full plate + shields (plate broadly obselesces shields, hence why by the ~15th century forwards a knight or man at arms would more likely be with a staff weapon than a sword and shield. Though small guige-mounted shields still existed at this time. This harness is a good example of that.)
Kind of just. Forgetting that history is really long and things evolved or changed over time. (People are often not satisfied when the answer to "How did x period deal with y threat?" being "by becoming z period" more often than not)
Or Hell some ppl are surprised by the idea that armour. Like. Works. And is very good at its job. And was made by very very clever people. Who designed it to fit a purpose very well.
but yeah if the harness has articulated plates defending the arms it's safe to assume they also have the relatively far easier to make yet far more important for protection breastplate on too.
General rule of thumb, the head is the first thing you armour, then the chest, then the hands, then the arms, then the lower leg, then the upper leg. BROADLY this is the pattern people followed in history. (The choice of which parts to be armoured being a question of budget and how much you're willing to be encumbered. Anyone who could afford it and was on a horse would wear like. A full set of plate armour. This is why all your heavily-armoued historical units were all noblemen cavalry that's the main niche that a full-body covering would arise in.)
"Studded leather" being people misunderstanding what a brigandine is based on looks alone.
You can shove a vacuum formed plastic breastplate under a surcoat made of upholstery fabric and it'll look better than the average "medieval" outfit in these shows. You can do those things for cheap you just have to be smart about it.
I’m gonna propose “I guess you haven’t read the silmarillion then :/” as a default response to anyone not understanding a reference to something obscure. even if it’s not remotely Tolkien related. I want to build up a perception that perhaps the sum total of human knowledge is contained in the silmarillion
This is the polar opposite of this:
Fort Totten, Washington, D.C.
Why is the comet azur guy in a town full of beastmen, was he trying to teach them sorceries?
yeah i think so. there's a couple reasons he could be there
its his hometown, like how lusat returned to sellia after he left raya lucaria. it was clearly once occupied by humans bc there's dominula dancer corpses everywhere.
he was one of the people making contact with the demi-humans and teaching them magic. there's a demi-human queen there and some other sorcerers that appear to be teaching/chilling with them.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Do you know any good con jobs you’ve always wanted to try on the gullible and naive masses
what if i got really into making adoptables
artists spent multiple years raging against the concept of NFTs and then unironically continued their cottage industry that is, by all meaningful metrics, identical. i saw someone selling one for 800 dollars the other day
i find the act of turning pieces of digital art, which are infinitely reproducible and not a precious resource, into high-priced collectors items gauche on its face