A soft clanking from below draws your attention to a fully armored Meow:
Meow lifts the visor, slow blinks, lets the visor drop, turns, and clanks off.
This has been your regularly scheduled, parole-mandated feline show of affection.
I would likely want to attempt to pursue for the sake of giving pets in compensation, but perhaps they are armies up partly to avoid them? Regardless, I shall not degrade their feline dignity beyond a slow eye blink in return.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Ah, Corellon Larethian and elves in a Pride post. How unexpected.
Corellon has been one of the queerest deities in D&D since inception, but in a way that is testament to how trans (and particularly nonbinary and genderfluid) identities get treated. This is going to be a long one, so a cut's necessary.
Y'know that part in the 5e PHB that talks about how some elves are hermaphromorphs? And how they get that in reflection of Corellon? Yeah, that's been part of Corellon Larethian's bit since his/their original printing in 1st ed. AD&D's Deities & Demigods. Corellon is usually androgynous in appearance and can shapeshift between sexes to suit their mood or as needs merit. Do note that as a shapeshifting god, Corellon's apparent sex is necessarily a reflection of their gender (with only certain contexts changing that), so it is safe to say that Corellon is canonically nonbinary (an androgyne) and genderfluid.
Mind you, Deities & Demigods came out in 1980. The USese context for the game is important: that's the year Ronald Reagan took office in the wake of reactionary backlash against the various civil rights movements (the Civil Rights Movement, the Women's Liberation Movement, and the start of the Gay/LGBT Rights Movement) and stagflation under Jimmy Carter, but a year before the AIDS epidemic started making headlines. Gay people were not widely accepted and frequently vilified. Trans people had it worse: the idea of being transsexual specifically was foreign to most and treated with contempt by most who knew about it -- if not ridiculed, then reviled and met with violence.
Yet of the "demihuman"/humanoid/monster gods in that book, Corellon is more powerful than any other greater god except possibly Moradin -- and that's being somewhat generous: Moradin has more HP and higher damage, but Corellon's casting is so much more expansive that it puts every other god to deep shame. Corellon is not treated at all as an object of ridicule; like the other demihuman deities, Corellon is a paragon of their race (in almost all ways: they lack Thief ability, which was a thing Elves could have), but even among other paragons, Corellon stands out.
At face value without the historical context, this makes sense: Elves are pretty much the Letoides (Apollo and Artemis) as a race and Corellon is pretty much Apollo, though without quite as expansive a list of associated concepts ("portfolio" in D&D terms). (For the record, Ehlonna, Eilistraee, and Mielikki have all served as Artemises. Artemes. Dianas.) Elves are also, in practical terms, the second race to be considered for inclusion in fantasy -- and now nearly any genre fiction -- setting after humans, with dwarves getting consideration mainly if more Tolkienian, less fey elves are already present (to act as foils). And I could go into the laundry list of reasons why that's the case, but suffice it to say that fairy folk have the cultural clout and psychological complexity that many other races lack while also serving as more than just foils with humans.
Corellon's gender is an expression of attitudes towards elves regarding gender and sexuality norms that have been present in pop fantasy for at least the last fifty years, with echoes going back to the thiasos of Dionysos. When elves aren't beautiful maidens in one stock trope or another, they're androgynous.
Or were. It's not that neither elves nor Corellon didn't receive ridicule for not being masculine enough -- because it is always about masculinity. All forms of queerphobia are inseparable (at least in Western culture) from misogyny because they all have to do with breaking norms that undermine expectations of male performance -- both as in performing masculinity and as in performance in bed. There has been a norm about how a man is defined by his dominance, specifically as expressed by being the active/topping/penetrating partner, in various forms through history and various levels of tolerance for different expressions and genders going all the way back to Ancient Fucking Egypt. So it should come as no surprise that the most common criticisms of elves amongst gamers were first that Tolkienian elves are too perfect (that's kinda Tolkien's point) and/or arrogantly racist (everyone in Middle Earth is racist) and second that they're effeminate/gay.
So almost immediately, we get a backlash. Some of this is due to the times: Corellon uses masculine pronouns almost without exception, but it wasn't until the mid-2000s or later that use of the singular "they" had become a major movement; "he" was treated as the default pronoun and neopronouns in fiction were largely reserved for sci fi/other speculative fiction involving aliens. Use of "he or she" or just "she" took a couple of decades from 1980 to replace "he" more prominently. But plenty was not. Corellon was immediately opposed to Lolth due to racial representations -- and, surprisingly, the elves were formed from the blood he shed banishing her from the surface in this telling; Gruumsh (also present) isn't yet Corellon's archfoe nor is Corellon responsible for Gruumsh having only one eye. But the form of the myth would become the telling we're more familiar with fairly quickly. And then the Forgotten Realms came out (1987), which would push Corellon from a nonbinary deity to patriarch of all elves, with at least two and possibly four or five consorts (depending on how you count Aerdrie Faenya, Angharradh, and Hanali Celanil). Indeed, because it mattered because of patriarchy and homophobia, Corellon was exclusively given female romantic partners.
I'm not saying that you cannot be gynophilic and nonbinary. I'm saying that the choice to make one of your few queer characters conform to standard expectations of apparent gender without other characters operating differently is a narrative decision rooted in queerphobia. Corellon has been a major deity for all editions since debut, but has been treated as a male performing male roles and having expected cishet male relationships despite being nonbinary to mitigate that nonbinary identity. In 3rd edition, this came to a head: Corellon is exclusively referred to as male except in that edition's Deities & Demigods -- and he features prominently in the edition.
By that point, we had three different depictions of the god: the "official" portrait in said book, which tries to make Corellon look androgynous by adding lipstick, eye shadow, jeweled hair pieces, and ribbons; the one in the obligatory Forgotten Realms clone supplement Faiths and Pantheons, which so dramatically masculinizes the god that you could mistake him for Heironeous (were this a Greyhawk book); and Todd Lockwood's 1999 portrait of Corellon fighting Gruumsh (with fellow artist Randy "RK" Post modelling Corellon, giving it the title "Randy the Elf God"), which portrays Corellon with biceps and triceps a bodybuilder would envy -- ones which rival his opponent's.
This was not a theoretical critique of pop culture from a queer perspective, either. The early oughts saw the beginning of a movement retaliating against elves as non-masculine. 2000's Majesty: the Fantasy Kingdom Sim and Dungeons & Dragons 3rd edition kept to an earlier idea of elves as slender, graceful, and somewhat androgynous. While there were rumblings beforehand, things shifted not long afterward: WarCraft III's Night Elf men were at least as buff as its humans (with dwarven beards!) and that tendency was being seen throughout fantasy. And there was discussion on this. Male Blood Elves in The Burning Crusade (released Jan 2007) had to be buffed up from their beta counterparts to meet growing outcries about them looking effeminate/gay; while their builds weren't atypical for an average human male in real life, within Azeroth they were skinny, so their models changed.
Despite being very muscular, Night and Blood Elf males still received regular ridicule for being "gay" -- and Cam Clarke's performance for the playable Blood Elf male only added fuel to that fire.
Now, of course, 5e decided to change gears and emphasize queer identities as a matter of play. 5e came out seven years after The Burning Crusade did, by which point the discourse had shifted. Even my (extremely red) hometown had had a SOGI ordinance put in place (and then repealed the next year). The shift had begun in 4e (released not long after TBC), but only just: "Elves" (Wood Elves) in 4e are no longer canonically glabrous, as Elves had been prior, and Corellon is now the god of beauty, but still exclusively uses masculine pronouns. The pendulum had begun swinging, in fact, in the wake of TBC: the vocal men on the WoW forums were not unopposed and the controversy that had ensued remained a topic of occasional conversation for years afterward.
Why this upsurge in queerphobia aimed against elves? It's not as though homophobia or transphobia were suddenly new. Two things did it: the Peter Jackson Lord of the Rings trilogy put elves in the forefront of public imagination, but in the crosshairs of reactionary men in the wake of 9/11. This is not speculatory: the need to cater to male identities became a feature of the oughts (as tends to happen within cultures facing such crises -- a known phenomenon) and led to lots of decisions in culture and media towards that end. For example, Amy Lee of Evanescence is on record saying that the male vocalist in "Bring Me to Life," who was not a band member, was added on the insistence of the record label (as a compromise for not adding rap); the part is notably absent in the 2017 rerelease. While Legolas was the idol for teen girls above and beyond most others, his long hair and graceful movements were derided among men (bearing in mind that most men in LotR have long hair; the elves just have long, well-kept hair). The trend started before the release of Fellowship of the Ring, but picked up steam quickly thereafter. (I'm not going to get into positive/negative reactions regarding imported Japanese culture [anime and video games], but that was also a part of it.)
Like I said, by 2014, the culture had shifted, queer rights were becoming mainstream, and acceptance was rising. As a result, Corellon returned to being genderfluid once more and elves followed suit.
So why aren't elves the main focus of queer characterization? Tieflings. But that's for another time.
Last time I posted an attractive women doing some absolutely dope shit the lesbians claimed her and you know what? Fair... but this... this is for the bisexuals
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
INTERRUPTING COW SPECIAL PRIDE MONTH EDITION OF DOOOOOOOM!
Look, I gotta get through this book. Maybe you'll like something in here?
There are a weird number of rainbow-flavored monsters in here.
It's not unusual for certain high-level CR monsters to have prismatic spray as one of their spell-like abilities. When I was drafting my list of monsters and such to cover this month, I got such things as the Solar and the Aurumach Rilmani, neither of which are especially queer. They used to just hand out random high-level spells to high CR monsters to shore up power.
It is, however, unusual to have monsters that are rainbow colored or rainbow themed in some other way, especially in abilities.
And yet, here we are. "Weird," by the way, is more than one. (TBF, by that criterion Monster Manual III is weirder still.)
Chaos Roc: This is a bigger, higher CR Roc, with colorful plumage (unlike the regular Roc until 5e) that can fire enlarged prismatic spray laser eye beams at-will, but without the Violet beam (plane shift) for some reason. It's Chaotic Neutral, but otherwise its connection to Chaos is just because (which is perfectly Chaotic).
Corollax: Usually, 3rd ed. D&D doesn't quite go for Pokémon-style evolution. This birb makes you wish it did. The Corollax is a parrot (gray if female, flame-colored if male -- you would be right to say flamboyant) that can cast color spray at will. (It also has damage reduction and spell resistance, so it's not a terrible familiar hypothetically.)
A reminder that the Crystal Dragon is in this book and also gets color spray, as does the Phoenix. I'll end up covering the similarly-themed primal dragon of the same name later this month. But dragons in general are colorful. Someone really needs to get on making a Pride flag of dragons.
Y'know, with all these laser creatures, I'm sad that this book didn't conduct a laser weasel experiment.
Elemental Weirds: Not the serpentine Water/Earth/Bone Weirds of other editions, these are elemental sibyls with Sorcerer casting (yay blog!) who prefer to dwell on the Material Plane in feminist communes of mixed element. Think Neutral hag covens. They move to the Material Plane through portals that generate pools of elemental matter; their bodies are made from this matter and are inseparable from it unless they go back to their home planes. If this doesn't scream "lesbians moving in with each other after the first date," I don't know what does.
Spell Weaver: I love these guys: a race of multiarmed Sorcerers (yay blog!) who can cast multiple spells at the same time. (How they do so when they don't speak and lack Silent Spell isn't discussed.) What adds them to this entry is that they carry chromatic disks (not to be confused with chromatic orbs or my relevant typo, chromatic dicks) that give them extra, more powerful spell slots. Otherwise, they're so alien that communication (if they want to communicate at all, which is unlikely) and mind reading can cause confusion. Or maybe the Chromatic Disks they carry are actually Orbs of Confusion.
Stained Glass Golem: Set aside for a moment the religious trauma you had triggered when you came across this while reading/playing Wild Beyond the Witchlight and recognize this literally glorious monster.
Two gifs from Spongebob in one post?
Anyway, while it is a 2nd ed. monster, I know it from a movie/TV show I caught a glance of as I was leaving the house years before I ever knew what D&D was. I have no idea what that movie/TV show was or whether or not it predates the monster's use in D&D.
Teratomorph: This Gargantuan Ooze isn't just a rainbow-colored monster, it's an upgraded Chaos Beast. Its touch can polymorph, mutate, or partially disintegrate you (or do regular ooze things) and its mere presence warps reality in several ways, all of which are random (and include color spray and prismatic spray). Despite all of this, it's True Neutral -- because it's a mindless Ooze, not an Aberration or an Outsider, so can't have an alignment.
Other than The Little Mermaid (both the Hans Christian Andersen original and the Gisnep version), I do not get why mermaids are so big in the trans community specifically, but if my understanding is correct, they are.
I say this as a trans person. I'm just on the periphery of the discourse.
Anyway, since
I can stretch that to mean "mermaids are queer." Whatever.
Yes, I'm writing this entry now so I can use that meme. It's entered my reaction image repository.
What is there to say about mermaids in D&D? Sadly, not much. Prior to 3rd edition, they were called mermen collectively, and core books had little to say about them: their origins were left vague and they were treated as just aquatic humans with similar write-ups. (2nd ed.'s Monstrous Manual [1993] had the audacity to make them "heavily patriarchal.") Very little was written about them elsewhere; their god, Eadro, first appeared in Deities & Demigods (1980) and was eventually given credit for creating them and the Locathah (now reverse mermaids) in Monster Mythology (1992 -- yes, predating the Monstrous Manual's refusal to be definite), but his/its entries weren't that long. That was about it. With WotC acquiring the rights to D&D, 3rd edition switched its terminology to merfolk and credits Eadro as their creator in its Monster Manual, but otherwise rarely talks about them; they appear in more artwork than text in that edition. 5e (possibly 4e) decided to go with the trend of making them fishier/frillier. Y'know, like Vaporeon.
I get now why this thing is noted as being mistaken for a mermaid: it has the same head frills as the one in the 5e Monster Manual.
Anyway, I think this exclusion has mostly been because of merfolk's inability to walk on land, because it even crops up in books that avoid the Atlantis is Boring trope. Nothing says "disability inclusion" like a refusal to engage with mobility assistance in a game that has both magitech robots and levitation magic.
I could go on. There's a lot of prejudice wrapped up in treatment of mermaids and I don't want to write that entry here and now.
Instead, GO! MAKE MERMAID CHARACTERS! AND MERFOLK OF OTHER GENDERS! DROWN THE PATRIARCHY!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
@- ing someone on social media is a type of summoning, it may work, it may not. But if it does work and the summoning you used was rude, you can’t be shocked that you summoned a demon ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
I've been using this tool called tumblr-utils to back up my tumblr blogs. it creates a locally navigatable archive of a given tumblr url's posts, which is more convenient than the post soup you get from tumblr's native blog export feature.
what that means is that I have a folder on my computer with the name of my url with an index.html file in it, and when i click on that file to open it in a browser I get a simple page with a list of years and months. selecting a specific month will send me to a list of the posts i made or reblogged in that month, similar to tumblr's own archive page. the contents of the post including images are stored locally on your machine.
It can also make a separate index file that organises posts by tag, which is great if you're a consistent tagger, but it will list every single tag you've ever used so it can take a while to find the tag you're looking for in the list if you're a habitual tag commentator. generating the tag archive also takes a while depending on how many posts have to be processed.
you can make it back up any blog as long as it's not set to private. I have backups of both my main and sideblogs and it keeps them in separate folders.
it's had some trouble going all the way back to the start of my main blog in 2012 just by sheer volume of posts, but by making it fetch posts from one month at a time I've been able to go back to 2015 (that's tens of thousands of posts), which was good enough for my purposes.
it might be a little scary to use if you've never touched the command line before, but there's both text and video instructions to set it up and using it is just a matter of typing the command and letting it do its thing in the background.
This document has a really good guide for setting it up, along with some other options for backup. I've been using tumblr utils for a while myself, and I run an incremental backup once a week.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Creature Codex already covered this, which was how I was reminded of its existence. No exaggeration: the Iridescent Naga's only official appearance is in 3.5's Serpent Kingdoms, which would be one of the most obscure books in all of D&D (all editions) were it not notorious as the main source for Pun Pun (and as such is basically forbidden by reputation at most 3rd edition tables -- not that there's much of anything of use to players in it). There is a 5e conversion of the naga in a 3rd party book, suggesting WotC had no intention of ever using the thing again.
The Codex Keeper prefers the 5e art's cobra hood to the feathers in the official description, saying it sounds too much like a Couatl. I do have to agree that the 5e art is slightly better, but mainly because the 3rd edition art doesn't have feathers, just weird spikes. (Sadly, all images online are versions of the file on the Forgotten Realms Wiki, which is too small for a good look. My enlargement is badly pixelated.) Well, and the colors are better -- it's actually iridescent, not just vaguely rainbow colored.
The connection to Couatls is debatable, but mostly in how direct it is.
On the one hand, the Iridescent Naga is an aesthete with feathers for hair and a Chaotic Good alignment who speaks Celestial, all of which fit the description of the Lillend (the other CG Couatl naga -- the kind with arms and a torso). Lillendi have never been tied to Couatls in lore despite looking like them.
On the other, this is the book that introduces a now-deceased (devoured) naga god both to explain the naga goddess Shekinester's multiple personalities/aspects and to connect that to her main myth -- that of her mating with the Couatl god Jazirian to birth Parrafarie (CN male demigod of guardianship and puzzles). Parrafaire resembles a Water Naga with color-shifting scales, feathered ears, and Couatl wings. Guardian, Iridescent, and Water Nagas each have qualities they share with Parrafaire that do not overlap with the others.
So it's probable that Iridescent Nagas are meant to resemble Couatls somehow, but why that is and how removed the connection is are both unclear.
At any rate, I like the description in the book: they have a mane of rainbow feathers from their scalps and silvery feathers running down their backs, so kinda resemble feather boas. Y'know, to be ab fab.
Besides, cobras are overdone. I get that mythological nagas are supposed to be cobras by default and snakes otherwise by extension.
The Iridescent Naga is for the most part your standard prismatic naga, but both of those things are weird.
As we'll see this month, prismatic creatures are fairly rare and either cast from the standard array of rainbow-themed spells or create similar effects, most often hypnosis. Iridescent Nagas hypnotize by dancing. The allusion to the short story "Kaa's Hunting" is likely unintentional, but a good coincidence.
Entirely coincidental is that this is a JoJo Pose and/or Armstrong flexing mechanic.
Nagas in 3rd edition are Aberrations (for no reason) with viper venom and Sorcery. Monsters don't usually cast spells (they use spell-like abilities ["innate magic" in 5e], which lack components), though those that do are usually Celestials (which cast as Clerics) or fall into a small group that cast as Sorcerers (true dragons, Araneae, Couatls, Formian Queens, Nagas, and Rakshasas), with rare exceptions.
Iridescent Naga are also queer in that they are immune to all mind-affecting effects. That's usually reserved for creature types that include mindless things. The only other monster I know of with that blanket immunity is the Feytouched.
S'yeah: this is about the queerest Sorcerer you're going to get without being explicitly LGBTQ+. You can only aspire to such greatness!
Magic Incarnate @wearesorcerer - Tumblr Blog | Tumlook