Untitled

L is not from kiwifarms. The thread about "transfeminists on tumblr" was started way earlier than the first time of her posting (on july 13th) and was entirely inactive in that time.

In fact, they didn't even mention her blog at all! Almost like they have no idea what's going on or who L even is.

The lolcow thing is a bit more complicated, but for some context, there have been multiple "transfeminists on tumblr" threads on there. The earliest one is from january of this year.

Mousidy had been mentioned way before the tmvp blog even existed

in fact, her replying to the anon telling her about tmvp existing was the reason lolcow even learned about it. There was no prior mention of tmvp before that. Feel free to check out the link and see for yourself, I do not know how to link to parts of the thread on lolcow.

The post they screenshotted is of mousidy answering an ask informing her of the existence of tmvp. This ask was answered the day tmvp was created.

THAT was the catalyst for lolcow talking about tmvp, but they had been talking about trans women on tumblr for way longer than that and L did not kickstart it. They have had transphobic threads for ages, which you can see by just scrolling through the website, but here's some examples.

I'd also like to note that the trans people both kiwifarms and lolcow talk about are not the same as the ones L either mentioned or has put on the blocklist. There has been almost no overlap, because L doesn't tend to target specific trans people. The only target that exists is her blocklist, which doesn't consist of only transfems, which you can find out by looking at the blogs on it or under the blocklist tag, which shows WHY these people are on the list.

"But she's obsessed with mousidy!" Is she though?

Mousidy is mentioned in the context of a project where transfems can submit their stories here. She also linked people to other projects if she judged them as more appropriate for a story.

Mousidy gets mentioned in the context of being someone L admires and looks up to here.

Mousidy gets mentioned for degendering L who was using she/he at the time here and here. The huge amount of degendering led to L choosing to only use she/her publicly.

Mousidy gets mentioned in the context of L commenting on the content of her posts here and here. Notably, they're comments made about screenshots of the posts, not the posts themselves and they're targeted at what the posts says and not at the person making them.

I do not agree that mousidys post was rapey, I think it was talking about her own experience and she is entitled to do that, but L did elaborate on her logic and she is entitled to have her own opinion on a post and post that on her own blog. I think it is fair for her in return to receive criticism for it, but people claiming she is calling mousidy rapey or a rapist are not reading the post correctly, that is not what L said.

Mousidy gets mentioned in the context of critique of how she is running her project here and here.

Two of the mentions of mousidy are L responding to asks she sent.

All of Ls criticisms and opinions of mousidy have been on her own blog and they have been in response to mousidys behavior.

Other mentions are from anons which i am not going to bother linking, because someone elses behavior is not Ls responsibility, feel free to scroll the blog yourself or search up keywords.

Do you want to know why L complained about mousidy asking for financial help?

Because that's what her blog looks like:

Because it is several posts about how much the tmvp sucks and how and why, bracketed by donation posts. That happened especially when mousidy was on her break (just look at the posts on july 16th). She is essentially saying "this person is bothering me (won't anyone do anything about it?) also you can donate to me here!" which, in this context, is scummy. She's implicitly profiting off of people feeling bad for her because of the situation. And she is aware and okay with doing it!

Like yes, there are other posts in between, but there is still a lot of posts about the tmvp. And a lot of reblogs of posts of the tmvp, so everyone sees how bothered mousidy is. And her feelings are valid, but it is not valid to direct harassment towards someone. L asked people to report mousidy for harassment, not to harass her. She explicitly said that she doesn't condone rape threats towards people, including those she disagrees with.

THAT'S why L asked people to report mousidy - because she is indirectly and directly sending hate her way. If you scroll down even a little bit on mousidys blog you'll see dozens of posts and reblogs of posts mousidy has made about tmvp. There is genuinely so many reblogs of the same posts, I don't know how I could possibly put all of them here. All of them are very visible if you just scroll down on her blog or you could check out @mousidyarchive for the statistics about how often she's mentioned tmvp here.

Here mousidy is encouraging the harassment.

"i am not affiliated with tmvp and here's why" is in her bio as a popular blog on tumblr, linking to her posts about the blog.

There is no discouragement of harassment towards L.

here's mousidy claiming L wants her blog deleted and straight up calling L evil and a warped version of the transfem voices project.

Mousidy is the one who blocked L, yet she still publicly responds to posts she makes, directing people her way.

L was gone on a mental health break because the harassment got that bad.

Why do you think L thinks it's a targeted harassment campaign? Because Mousidy makes posts talking about how upset she is over the takeover of her project, directly mentioning Ls blog by name and being glad about the pushback, because she asks people to "keep the pressure on" because she circulates satire posts from another blog (that was imitating L) as if its L saying them, because she was the one publicly saying the @/anhithemisken blog was her. She still reblogged that post with misinformation in it less than 24 hours ago. Oddly, only @tmvparchive found the untagged posts from this random blog and reblogged it right before the blog became inaccessible.

L posted her sideblogs publicly, censoring her main and anhithe got password locked, which you cannot do with a main. There have also been some confusing renamings i dont want to get into.

It is also possible to backdate posts or edit posts later without it changing the original date.

Update: tmvp-archive in the notes pointed out that the posts couldn't have been backdated, since when a backdated post gets reblogged, it shows the date it has actually been created on, not the backdated date. An example of how it works is here.

The posts are therefore not backdated. However, this does not mean they haven't been edited. Posts can be edited without changing the posting date, as you can see with this post. Would you even know what has changed without me coloring it in?

The proof for @/anhithemisken/tifyagami being L is incredibly weak. As @hopebuttoned points out in their post here, the blog was created after tmvp had already been controversial, on the 16th of June,

"Shared beliefs" and "self-righteous confidence" don't mean they're the same person, by the way.

tmvp-archive, in the notes to this post, says this:

Someone found the blog by looking up "mousidy" on tumblr, but oddly, under the jokerposting tag is only one post with "mousidy" in its body. It is the one where the blog "drops the mask" and claims to be L. A claim L denied, several times.

The post with the comment that makes it clear the posts have existed at the date they were published and weren't backdated, is one of the ones that don't specify it's L. It could've just been a post made beforehand, with the others being edited. There simply is no way to know, since posts were deleted and the blog password locked, shortly after the posts got archived. No one has proof that they said what they say now originally.

Do we just believe everyone who is claiming to be another person? Can I just say I am a random blog and keep it up even though they deny it and get believed? That's stupid, we would demand more proof from them than this.

L on her part offered up proof and said she doesn't know what else she could do to prove it isn't her. She even said she thinks she knows who it is and elaborated on it. Does that seem like someone who got caught?

Anhithemisken offered no proof except for their words and editable posts. Posts that, as this post once more, points out have stopped predicting things L was going to say ever since more eyes are on it. If it was really L, it shouldn't be a problem to drop more personal information on the secret account first, right?

That's kind of it, as far as proof goes. No proof these are unedited posts. Notably, anhithemisken got found AFTER L had shared details about her life publicly.

There was no solid proof, yet she ran with it and so did everyone else. L said it wasn't her as soon as she learned of the blogs existence. The blog posted flashing images, which L warned people on her blog on and yet still she received comments implying it was her posting it.

She also still gets accused of being white, despite saying she isn't in her introduction post and implying such in several other posts.

She is being called racist (by mousidy) for this post, where she later on more clearly expressed her position on. Twice. As a person of color, by the way. Complex moral and political projects are possible, you just have to be careful. It's a fine line that can be walked. Attempting to give survivors a space is not an attack on another group of people.

Each time she is mean to a clear bait post it gets framed as her behavior being awful, even though she spent a lot of time taking her time with many survivors stories, affirming them and empathizing with them and trying her best to be supportive. Someone who gets a lot of satire and sarcasm and snappy attitudes (and multiple parody blogs btw) thrown their way can't be patient and kind to every time she gets met with aggression.

She is still kind to those who are kind to her, by the way, even if it is negative criticism.

She gets accused of weaponizing her own assault against transfems, yet there is people in the notes being like "I got assaulted, so you should take down your blog." In what world is it okay to pressure someone to delete their blog, simply because you dislike its existence?

L already said nothing is going to make her delete it, report it if you want, but just block and move on.

Ls point has always been "just because a person is marginalized, doesn't mean they can't be an abuser" which you can see as early as her first day posting.

The literal second post of this blog is of L being surprised about the hate she has been receiving, back before she even said anything beyond the idea of the project. This blog was always supposed to be survivor focussed, not perpetrator focussed. It was supposed to be a space for survivors of intra community violence to be safe and talk about their experiences. That's why the scope is so small, because it is focussing on a specific issue.

It is very "I like waffles" "so you hate pancakes?", it's just a highly specific project with a highly specific scope. A bird rescue doesn't have to also save dogs, there's enough animal rescues that rescue dogs. It's fine for the bird rescue to exist alongside it. It doesn't hurt the dogs.

The transgender voices project and the transfem voices project are not in opposition, they're not against each other, they're tackling similar problems of sexual violence happening to a group of people.