Kayla's Page

Cis Men have always been allowed to be a little fruity with it and wear drag, so long as they call psych at the end of the day.

Tim Curry famously strutted around in lingerie. It has never been in question that Tim Curry is a man because that was a "performance"

Cis republicans can have their fruity drag weekend so long its in the explicit context of mocking women.

You are lit calling for the norm

OP starts off by declaring her hatred for people who use tma and tme, confidently lecturing and reminding 'you' [trans women/fems] about the fact that while 'you' [trans women/fems] experience transmisogyny, 'we' [trans men/mascs, not trans women] experience "regular misogyny"

Set aside for now the way op implicitly positions trans women as not being subject to "regular misogyny" same as her, and watch what she does next.

She recounts a recent shopping experience with her father and then starts going off about how if 'you' [OP's father] would just do a little bit of actual research then 'you' [OP's father] would not be so ignorant about period product. Why are 'you' [OP's father] stigmatizing 'your' [OP's father] child's body!

At the beginning of the post, OP is venting at and lecturing 'you' [trans women], but by the end OP is all caps yelling at 'you' [OP's father].

We can see that her father is the actual source of her current anger and frustration, but OP takes that anger and vents it at trans women and fems instead of her father who it should be rightfully directed at.

.... And that's a rare miss from you.

Sure. From a political class, that system is transmasc, and will always be marked that way. The same way this one's system is marked as transfemme.

But that's neither here nor there.

What is her is that words are approximations. If you don't see why that's relevant, either you need some linguistics, or/and some plurality research.

Did OOP miss with everything else? Big time.

But that isn't what you're angry at.

With all the chaos plural systems can be, fictives, factives, introjects,... But oh. Gender needs to always make neat fucking sense. /SARCASM

Kindly, a transfemme system with mixed gender headmates, and yes, even two transmasc ones. Because that's the closest description that conveys meaning adequately.

Go ahead. Look at this one's history.

OP starts off by declaring her hatred for people who use tma and tme, confidently lecturing and reminding 'you' [trans women/fems] about the fact that while 'you' [trans women/fems] experience transmisogyny, 'we' [trans men/mascs, not trans women] experience "regular misogyny"

Set aside for now the way op implicitly positions trans women as not being subject to "regular misogyny" same as her, and watch what she does next.

She recounts a recent shopping experience with her father and then starts going off about how if 'you' [OP's father] would just do a little bit of actual research then 'you' [OP's father] would not be so ignorant about period product. Why are 'you' [OP's father] stigmatizing 'your' [OP's father] child's body!

At the beginning of the post, OP is venting at and lecturing 'you' [trans women], but by the end OP is all caps yelling at 'you' [OP's father].

We can see that her father is the actual source of her current anger and frustration, but OP takes that anger and vents it at trans women and fems instead of her father who it should be rightfully directed at.

Me: oh my god Jax was abused. That reaction was the reaction of an abused person. He didn't press that button intentionally, that was pure fight or flight. That was a fear response, and he was terrified of returning.

The rest of the internet: Jax killed a child, and is on the run

Me: oh... Oh. Um... Okay... Guess... Guess that makes more sense... Um...

-TADC episode 9-

Jax: I was abused

"bUt ThErE wErE nO SiGnS!!1!"

Then maybe...

Maybe...