Now they're saying they might cancel the daytime portion of my sleep study because I didn't meet the minimum data threshold for overnight sleep.
I.. I think I failed my sleep test 😂
The Stonewall Inn

Product Placement

if i look back, i am lost
untitled
NASA
YOU ARE THE REASON
Cosimo Galluzzi
Color Me Curious
Claire Keane
todays bird

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
𓃗
Keni

gracie abrams

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Monterey Bay Aquarium
The Bowery Presents
hello vonnie
Sade Olutola
cherry valley forever
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Senegal
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from Armenia

seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Paraguay

seen from Brazil

seen from Iraq

seen from United States
seen from Kazakhstan

seen from Germany
seen from Thailand
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Philippines
@viventlespeuples
Now they're saying they might cancel the daytime portion of my sleep study because I didn't meet the minimum data threshold for overnight sleep.
I.. I think I failed my sleep test 😂

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
this post aged like a fine wine
my favourite Bernini statue isn’t a real statue, but the damaged clay and straw angel that was the model for the bronze statue.
you can tell the whole “Victor Hugo was paid by the word” thing is wrong because it sounds reasonable and realistic! every true thing about Victor Hugo sounds completely made up
“Victor Hugo was paid by the word” scurrilous perfidy
“Victor Hugo sewed one of his friends into a sack and made him share a bed with Hugo’s mistress”, true, attested by multiple primary sources
“Victor Hugo sent the shortest telegram in history” anecdotal, doubtful “Victor Hugo ate lobster shells” witnessed and noted on several occasions
Animal prints in Roman tiles! One of my favourite things from Verulamium!
From Segedunum: a cat print and a human print!
Eboracum!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
pathologic 2 + herb brides
“average June Rebellion participant brought three guns” factoid actualy just statistical error. average June Rebellion participant brought zero guns. Guns Combeferre, who brought 10,000 guns and would save your life regardless of which side you were on, is an outlier adn should not have been counted
Is that new Barricade Day content I smell
Old houses in the Rue Mondétour - Adolphe Martial Potémont
Another album of Paris images I just dumped on Photobucket: A.M. Potémont’s engravings of old Paris. He did a lot of them; if you do an image search for Potémont on gallica.bnf.fr you’ll get hundreds of results. I cherry-picked a couple dozen of them for being relevant (however fleetingly) to Les Mis fandom’s interests, but if you like them and want to see more of what old Paris looked like, go check out more of them on Gallica!
(Note: Gallica leaves huge amounts of whitespace around the images, which can make them look tiiiiiny, but as the above cropped version demonstrates, once you download them they’re high-res enough to zoom in on details.)
Bonus tidbit: the first factoid Hugo mentions about Corinthe and its vicinity in Les Mis is a basket-maker’s shop advertising itself with a giant wicker Bonaparte and a sign that says “Napoléon est fait / Tout en osier.” Nothing so flamboyant here, but note the sign painted on the house on the right: “vannier” means “basket-maker.”
This might be as close as we’ll ever get to seeing Hugo’s conception of where the barricade was built–it’s dated 1839, the year after the Rue de la Chanverrerie was demolished to create the Rue Rambuteau, but the old houses in the Rue Mondétour would’ve been the same as in 1832. And Hugo’s knowledge of old Paris was so extensive that I wouldn’t be surprised if he was referencing a real basket-maker’s shop.
Les Mis fandom, hold my hand. I’m scared for us.
I feel like Holding Hands is kind of an ominous move for us this week
Pilf NO

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The show’s creators imagine confrontation where it was unthinkable—and, in doing so, they cross the line from conjuring a fiction to creating a lie.
The famous journalist Masha Gessen talks about the show.
More often, however, we are given to believe that the three men who were put on trial—and especially one of them, a particularly unattractive villain by the name of Anatoly Dyatlov (Paul Ritter)—are to blame. We see him strong-arming younger, better men into actions that will ultimately lead to catastrophe. All because, it seems, he wants a promotion. In fact, it wasn’t the carrot of a single promotion, or even several promotions, and it wasn’t one nasty and abusive boss. t was the system, made up primarily of pliant men and women, that cut its own corners, ignored its own precautions, and ultimately blew up its own nuclear reactor for no good reason except that this was how things were done. The viewer is invited to fantasize that, if not for Dyatlov, the better men would have done the right thing and the fatal flaw in the reactor, and the system itself, might have remained latent. This is a lie.
It would be harder to show a system digging its own grave instead of an ambitious, evil man causing the disaster. In the same way, it’s harder to see dozens of scientists looking for clues when you can just create a single fantasy character who will have all the good disaster-fighting traits. This is the great-men (and one woman) narrative of history, where it’s a few steps, a few decisions made by a few men that matter, rather than the mess that humans make and from which they suffer.
Also agree with her that Soviets just…didn’t act like that or say those kind of things in a few instances, and that the court scene was awfully Hollywood. While I felt the show was excellent, this article is well worth reading.
joly and bossuet
victor hugo: and they were roommates
us: oh my god they were roommates
So I have way too much to say about the portrayal of Anatoly Dyatlov (Mr Everything’s Fine *pukes on the table* from episode 1) and about the real Anatoly Dyatlov, strap in for a ride because I’m a huge weirdo who knows way too much about Chernobyl. Anatoly Dyatlov seems like one of the most unfairly maligned characters in the drama that unfolded in April 1986. He was indicted alongside Brukhanov and Fomin but unlike them refused to play the part of a disgraced repentant administrator who caused the accident with gross incompetence and various oversights. From the very beginning up until his death in 1995 he was adamant to the point of belligerence in defending his subordinates working at the plant at the time. Contrarily to the official state position he claimed that none of them - Toptunov and Akimov in particular, the guys at the control desk at the time of the accident - made mistakes or caused the explosion. Those two died weeks later in the hospital in Moscow, but instead of a pension and medals for courage their families received curt notices that the only reason they won’t be prosecuted for criminal negiligence was because they were dead. It was Dyatlov who fought for their recognition. He spent years in a labor camp and dedicated the rest of his life to campaigning to clear their names, writing letters and articles, digging up documentation and blueprints and basically proving that the reactor flaws were well known to its designers at the Kurchatov Institute and intentionally kept secret. In his own words, the flaws of the reactor design were so severe that if the explosion hadn’t happened in Chernobyl it would have happened somewhere else. While it’s probably true that Dyatlov was in denial about the amount of rads present in the plant immediately after the accident, portraying him as a bad guy is silly because he wasn’t actually in charge (he was Fomin’s deputy, and Brukhanov - as plant director - was a superior to both of them) and was very quickly put out of commission via acute radiation syndrome. Fomin and Brukhanov meanwhile never were in the control room or anywhere near the explosion and continued to cause damage via denial and minimizing long after Dyatlov was flown to the hospital in Moscow. Sorry about the wall of text, again I’m a huge weirdo about Chernobyl but I feel very strongly about how Dyatlov was made into a scapegoat by the Soviet courts and maligned for a long time afterwards (as he writes in his book, everyone knows you can’t trust a zek). His book is titled Chernobyl: How it happened but only avaiable in russian and (I think) german.
Yeah, I felt pretty much the same way. The series doesn’t really portray him as merely a scapegoat, but actually actively villainizes him with stuff like sending men to look at an exposed reactor core on open the valves to pump water into the emptiness. Also there’s an interview where old Dyatlov explaining the whole situation from his point of view. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVthWR4cR1g
friendly reminder that this show’s portrayal of Anatoly Dyatlov as a villain is extremely hurtful and unfair.
He was a real person, and he was not at fault for the numerous wantonly cruel things that the show accuses him of. It’s widely acknowledged that the trial conducted wrt the Chernobyl accident in july 1987 was a show trial, something the soviet governments are notoriously well known for, so please employ some critical thinking in that regard.
The showrunners did exactly what the soviet higher ups did at the time - made Dyatlov into an easy villain to pin all the blame on. This time, he’s not alive to defend himself. This treatment is insensitive and irresponsible and I’m honestly very sad and disgusted that an otherwise good show would smear a real person and make him a cartoonishly evil villain in the eyes of an entire generation just for the drama of it.
How would you feel if it was your grandfather who happened to be present at the site of a terrible industrial accident and then made into a villain because the tv drama needed one?
Ok the real reason I’m mad about the Chernobyl poem is because the poem is about retreating across Belarus from nazi invasion in 1941, and for a second there I thought they were about to draw some sort of connection between Belarus getting hit with 70% of the nuclear fallout and the utter devastation of WWII and I was gonna be very impressed. But turns out it’s actually there to illustrate that the Soviets are a bunch of masochists who are born to die for their “miserable” country.
CHERNOBYL ‘Please Remain Calm’
‘Remember, Alyosha, the roads of Smolenshchina’ ‘Ты помнишь, Алеша, дороги Смоленщины’ the poem by Konstantin Simonov (July 1941) поэма Константина Симонова (Июль 1941)
suggested by @lovetaylor-s

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I just started watching Chernobyl and aesthetically a lot of things remind me of my childhood so the discomfort level is raised 30x
This, plus wondering every five minutes if the residual radiation fucked up my thyroid.
that graphic with three hands clasping each other but labeled grad students / freelancers / karl marx
https://twitter.com/haley_s_/status/1125193679893934080?s=19