Billy's Inferno

Chapters of the videos we will COUNTER in this volume:

21. Haters want CONTROL

*

22. Haters Love Screenshots

23. Your haters identities can still be found even behind their Alternative ACCOUNTS

*

*

21.

In her 21st video, Mirei stages the absolute pinnacle of gaslighting by framing the community's public archiving and exposure as a serious felony: "Blackmail." Through this, she is treating the general public as mere criminals.

First, she twists our public outcry into a "felonious act driven by extortion." Here, she states:

"Blackmail is a serious crime that is fundamentally about power, control, and exploitation. When people—often referred to as 'haters'—resort to blackmail..."

And further claims:

"Financial Gain: Many perpetrators believe that the victim will pay any amount to keep their secret quiet, making it an 'easy' way to extort funds..."

Think about this. The title of this very playlist is "Some Advice For You," and its description reads: "This playlist is to spread awareness and help educate online creators." Yet, there is absolutely no actual advice that a real creator could benefit from. Instead, it is packed with nothing but strategies and warnings against "haters." And now, what? A felony? Is she out of her mind?

These sisters are actively defining the act of exposing their past scandals as a "blackmail and extortion" tactic used by low-life criminals to wring money or power out of them. However, what this community demanded was never money; it was "the truth and genuine reflection." What the victims want is an apology and the prevention of further harm, not financial compensation. To dare downgrade this into a petty, low-life crime is nothing more than a cowardly smokescreen to hide their own moral bankruptcy.

Furthermore, she brands her critics as "empathy-lacking contrarians seeking revenge." Here are the two exact sentences she uses:

"Revenge or Retaliation: If someone feels wronged... they may use information they possess to inflict maximum emotional or professional damage as a form of 'payback.'"

"Lack of Empathy and Ethical Boundaries: Individuals who turn to blackmail... view the victim merely as a resource to be exploited rather than a human being."

She is painting those of us who lead the public exposure—including myself and my friends—as if we are sociopaths burning with personal vindictiveness, trying to ruin someone's career without a shred of empathy.

Do not listen to a single word of this video. This, too, is a textbook act of DARVO.

Who is the one that genuinely shattered ethical boundaries and exploited the trust of minor fans? Who is the one that lacked empathy so severely that they stabbed their own fans and fellow creators in the back, choosing to control the entire fandom through the tool of mass-blocking? The true perpetrators are the sisters themselves. Their cruelty truly knows no bounds.

The most mind-boggling part has to be this next section. She stages a grand "victim cosplay" by presenting a set of safety guidelines:

"Important Safety Note: Blackmail is illegal... Do not pay... Do not engage..."

And she goes on to say:

"Report it: Contact local law enforcement. In the United States, you can also report online crimes to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)."

I cannot believe she is actually bringing the FBI into this. By explicitly mentioning a federal reporting channel like the IC3, she finishes her video with a dramatic masquerade, pretending they are victims of a massive national cybercrime syndicate. This is a classic scare tactic designed to instill legal fear into critics and force them into silence.

However, we have absolutely no reason to stop. Public criticism, rooted in undeniable evidence that is already openly available on the internet, can never be a subject of an FBI investigation. This desperate attempt to intimidate the public by hiding behind the names of federal laws and institutions is the ultimate proof of how cornered this pathetic "advice" series truly is.

This is barely the starting point of Vol. 3, and I honestly dread to imagine how the rest of their narrative will unfold.

22.

In her 22nd video, Mirei attempts a psychological analysis of the online exposure culture known as "Posting Receipts (sharing evidence screenshots)." Through this, she frames the victims and the fandom—who exposed their past predatory behavior (minor grooming)—as "clout-chasers, power-hungry criminals, and privacy violators," staging a pinnacle of gaslighting.

First, she claims that "exposing conversation captures (Receipts) is an act that tramples on privacy and trust." Here, she states:

"The Reality of the 'Receipts' Culture erodes the fundamental expectation of privacy in relationships. A screenshot is a static, narrow slice of a conversation that rarely captures the full history."

Shamelessly enough, despite the fact that this duo committed wrongdoings in the past, Brittany previously showed behavior of threatening the community and declaring mass-blocking rules in a video from three years ago, saying, "Don't talk trash about my sister, watch your mouth." When a powerful figure blocks communication and conceals the truth, the only remaining solution for the vulnerable is "public whistleblowing" by sharing objective evidence through conversation captures. Having created an environment where they themselves refuse communication and hide the truth, whining now that it is a "breach of privacy stripped of context" is nothing more than a logical fallacy aimed at shifting the nature of public whistleblowing into a personal betrayal.

Second, she claims that "those who post evidence are playing a power game (Power Play) to seize control of the narrative." Here, she states:

"Sharing a conversation is a way of seizing control of the narrative. It is a power play designed to humiliate the other person and demonstrate that they have the 'receipts' to ruin the other person's reputation."

Who is the actual entity that played a dictatorial power game? It is none other than these sisters themselves. They are the ones who ignored the copyright they had handed over to another artist and forced the unauthorized continuation of the series starting about three years ago, while recently mass-blocking 400 innocent fans without discrimination. For individual fans who hold absolutely no power in front of this massive creator privilege to bring out "Receipts" and unite is an exercise of the right to resistance for survival. For the duo—who previously silenced the fandom with absolute platform dictatorship—to turn around and call the solidarity of the weak a "power play fueled by a desire for control" is an absurd logic that completely reverses the dynamics of power.

(And although it has recently come to light through the latest posts/reblogs that SingularityOfKhaos, who took over the copyright of TPC, is not entirely innocent either, I still wanted to make it clear that what the sisters did was explicitly wrong, even when taking that into account.)

Her third claim was the most absurd. She asserts that "ignoring criticism and cutting off communication is the correct way to establish boundaries," stating:

"If someone is posting your private conversations to harass or discredit you, it is often best to avoid engaging with them publicly. Responding on the same platform usually just feeds the 'drama'..."

Perhaps those who have been relentlessly and permanently banned by these sisters while reading this text might already know. This claim connects flawlessly with the hypocrisy of the younger sister, Brittany, who newly posted OC Boundaries this year (2026), strictly shouting "Hell no to NSFW, no toxicity," acting as if she is a clean and pure creator.

It is a shameless and disgusting semantic whitewashing that downplays their past unauthorized serialization and the community's demand for moral accountability as mere lighthearted internet "drama," while wrapping their cowardly refusal to communicate as "mature maintenance of peace." For those who break rules as a daily routine yet shield each other while infringing on others' rights to turn around and impose strict moral standards and blocking rules onto the fans—such double standards can never be a righteous "boundary."

As I have stated previously, "A fandom has to be built on trust between the creator and the fans." They need to realize this. They need to understand that "because of the boundaries they speak of, trust has been shattered and the fandom is dying."

*

Furthermore, by uploading over 20 videos of gaslighting, they are destroying the values of the fans. Do not buy into their narrative. I sincerely hope that they, or at least Brittany, will eventually realize that building a fake fortress made of such easily shattered glass will yield nothing but an anticipated downfall.

23.

In her 23rd video, Mirei stages the absolute pinnacle of gaslighting by framing the community's mass-reporting as a serious cyber-attack. Through this, she is treating the general public as tech criminals.

First, she twists our public outcry into a "malicious spam attack." Here, she states:

"When a user is caught doing this, the platform typically penalizes the attacker, not the victim."

And further claims:

"If the platform can trace the fake accounts back to the perpetrator's legitimate primary account, that main account is usually permanently banned..."

Think about this. What they are completely ignoring here is that the "malicious spam reporting" platforms actually penalize refers to bots or macros flooding the system without cause. But the current fandom's reporting is a rightful exercise of user rights based on her actual guideline violations (grooming allegations, NSFW obsession, etc.). YouTube does not ban the main accounts of users exposing actual misconduct.

To dare downgrade this into a petty spam attack is nothing more than a cowardly smokescreen to hide their own moral bankruptcy. And if the platform truly "whitelisted" and protected Mirei completely like she claims, then why on earth did her younger sister, Brittany, have to desperately censor the comments and resort to a mass-blocking tyranny on her own channel? This is completely contradictory.

Secondly, she twists our public outcry into a "malicious asset damage." Here, she states:

"...such as getting a content creator wrongfully banned, resulting in a loss of income — it crosses the line into illegal territory."

And she claims:

"The attacker can be forced to pay for lost wages, reputational damage, and the victim's legal fees."

Are you kidding me? For a civil claim like "tortious interference" to hold weight, the financial loss must stem from an unlawful act. But the true cause of Mirei's revenue loss is her own violation of the platform's Terms of Service (TOS) through her unethical behavior. YouTube doesn't strip monetization over false claims. The architect of her financial ruin is Mirei herself, not the audience.

Do not listen to a single word of this video. In reality, when someone files a baseless lawsuit against rightful public exposure in Western courts, the perpetrator is hit with SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) regulations, forcing them to pay punitive fines. Do not let this sibling duo intimidate you with money. The moment her grooming evidence is presented in court, the only ones facing destruction are the sisters themselves.

Thirdly, she stages a grand "jail threat" by bringing up judge subpoenas:

"If charges are pressed, this can result in misdemeanor or felony convictions, carrying penalties of probation, steep fines, and even jail time."

And she goes on to say:

"...if a victim files a lawsuit or a police report, a judge can issue subpoenas to the platform and Internet Service Providers (ISPs)... making it remarkably easy to track the fake accounts right back to the real person's router."

I cannot believe she is actually bringing up a judge's subpoena into this. A judge only issues subpoenas to platforms and ISPs for severe felonies or national security threats, not because an internet creator is throwing a tantrum over public backlash. This is a classic scare tactic designed to instill legal fear into minors and force them into silence.

Also, for a defamation (libel) claim to exist, the statements must be false. But the public exposure of Mirei’s misconduct is substantiated truth backed by undeniable evidence. Under Anglo-American law, Truth is an absolute defense against defamation. In fact, the only one facing a genuine felony charge here is Mirei herself. And if real law enforcement ever gets involved, Brittany—who blindly enabled and defended her sister—won't be able to escape criminal charges or public shame either.

Frankly, this 23rd video was the most absurd thing ever. I never thought I’d be discussing actual law because of an online animator. This entire situation is just laughably pathetic to me. What on earth is she going to bring up next?

*

*

Our resistance must remain steadfast, driven by a shared commitment to the truth rather than malice. In the end, this situation is no longer just about animation or personal grievances; it is a fundamental question of morality and accountability.

I would like to speak to you all by quoting a passage from one of the most famous dystopian novel, George Orwell's 1984:

"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."

To those of us who have been unfairly branded as "criminals" or "blackmailers" simply for refusing to forget the truth: do not let their desperate threats shake your resolve. When creators resort to weaponizing federal agencies and masking public accountability as a federal felony, they aren't displaying strength—they are exposing the absolute depth of their own panic. They are trying to rewrite history by terrorizing their own community into silence, desperately hoping that fear will make us look away from the cold, hard facts of their misconduct. But we will not bow to this pathetic intimidation.

We are the ones standing firmly in the light of reality, holding up a mirror to a closed-off fortress of delusion. If they choose to treat an entire fandom as an enemy syndicate and retreat into a sanctuary built on blind praise and institutional fear, that is their downfall, not our burden. True artistry cannot survive inside a vacuum of censorship, and a clean reputation cannot be manufactured through a mass-blocking spree. No matter how many legal threats they throw from behind their screens, they can never erase the collective memory of this community. We are not extortionists. We are the unbreakable evidence of their actions.

Let us rise above this absurd situation with the pride of those who have already broken free. Our resistance is the proof that we are alive and pursuing the truth.

Here's the videos of Mirei(formerly Breabear Jones) with my opinions:

Today, I would like to refute the logic regarding 'h8r' and 'victim' presented in Mirei Touyama’s recent videos. She has been frequently uploading content of this nature to YouTube lately. While some of you may have seen my recent posts, others might not be familiar with them yet. Being from a different linguistic background, I could not grasp every nuance; however, one thing is certain: this is a clear case of psychological projection, and the current situation reveals undeniably problematic aspects.

*

*

*

In her first video, she explained the 'Echo Chamber' effect: "If a hater reposts your work and uses five alt-accounts to leave negative comments, a random viewer might think, 'Oh, I guess everyone dislikes this,' and feel pressured to agree." She then suggested a 'Mass Block' as a massive time-saver—a statement I found utterly appalling. Ironically, this is precisely what Mirei and her sister, Brittany, are practicing now. According to 'Clearsky,' a website that tracks blocked users on Bluesky, Brittany has blocked over 200 users on her main account and about 120 on her sub-account, 'Brittany's Imagination'—exceeding 300 in total. Does this seem like a normal figure? If Gooseworx, the creator of The Amazing Digital Circus, had blocked that many users, it would have sparked a massive backlash online. Is this truly justifiable? There is a high probability that many of those they ousted as 'haters' are actually innocent people. It is evident that my friends were blocked in the same manner. On Brittany’s Bluesky, one gets blocked for not meeting a certain age requirement or for violating 'OC boundaries.' Despite my efforts to follow her guidelines, she labeled me a child and blocked me simply because I hadn't specified my age. When I politely asked her to clear up the misunderstanding, she merely 'liked' my post and unblocked me—without a single word of apology. She abandoned even the most basic courtesy; shouldn't one apologize after blocking a genuine fan? By engaging in these mass blocks, they seem to believe they are in the right. While I am not suggesting one must engage with everyone they dislike, in reality, social interaction involves encountering diverse perspectives. They seem oblivious to the fact that their current position is nothing more than a fragile fortress, ready to collapse at any moment.

In her second video, she brought up concepts such as 'The Mirror Effect (Projection),' 'Moving the Goalposts,' 'Cognitive Dissonance,' and the 'Crabs in a Bucket Mentality.' Among these, the 'Crabs in a Bucket' metaphor was particularly clear: the idea that haters find comfort in pulling down those who are trying to climb up and change their lives. However, isn't the reality exactly the opposite? If they are the ones "climbing up," does that make us the other crabs pulling them down? This logic is fundamentally flawed. Furthermore, she states, "When the results are visible, the denial usually says more about the critic's frustration than the creator's effort." To be clear, we are not suffering from persecutory delusions. We are perfectly capable of seeing the truth. She remains oblivious to her own actions, yet she is the one stripping away our freedom and dragging us down.

In her third video regarding 'gore,' she continues her narrative about 'haters.' As I understand it, she claims that these individuals are obsessed with posting graphic content and lack self-control; therefore, any negative reaction only serves to encourage them. Her advice is to ignore them entirely, document the evidence with screenshots, and report them. Certainly, any reasonable person would agree that excessively graphic gore warrants a report. However, most creators follow basic etiquette by applying appropriate labels or content warnings. There is a line that should not be crossed, and those who ignore it are the ones at fault. Yet, this brings us to a glaring hypocrisy. Even if we set aside other major controversies, it is well-known that during her 'Breabear' era, she created inappropriate illustrations and animations featuring her sister’s character—without any content warnings whatsoever. At the time, her channel was hosting 'The Pink Corruption' (a Just Shapes & Beats fan-made series), making it highly accessible to young children. Given the nature of that content, it would not have been surprising if it had been reported itself. Does she believe that gore produced by others deserves to be reported, while her own past inappropriate and suggestive works are exempt?

The fourth video was, in my opinion, the most appalling and contemptible of all. Under the section 'Important Distinction,' she states: 'Victims of actual abuse often struggle to speak up, blame themselves, and may minimize what happened to them.' This is an incredibly dangerous and irresponsible narrative. While it is true that trauma can make it difficult for victims to speak out, educational institutions in my country—and indeed, society at large—teach victims that they must never exaggerate or minimize their experiences; they must speak the truth as it is. We are taught that victims should never blame themselves and that those around them must provide a supportive environment to listen and offer comfort. Adhering to the logic in her video only risks allowing the abuse to escalate until it becomes irreversible. In many cases, victims finally speak out when they have reached a breaking point, desperately needing help and finally speak out. When they finally share their truth, are they merely 'playing the victim'? This rhetoric is deeply insulting and incredibly dangerous, especially to actual victims of violent crimes. Recently, one of my friends was almost sexually assaulted by their ex. To protect themselves, they had to gather a crowd—including mall employees, a security guard, and random onlookers—just to yell at her to step back. Even then, she refused to leave until the security guard finally threatened to arrest her. Fortunately, the assault was narrowingly avoided, but if my friend had not cried out for help, a truly horrific tragedy would have undoubtedly occurred. Crimes of this nature can only be prevented when victims are able to loudly alert those around them. While her criteria for distinguishing victims may not be entirely false in a vacuum, in this context, it sounds like nothing more than an order for real victims to remain silent. This rhetoric drags victims further into the abyss and is, quite frankly, a logic typically employed by perpetrators to suppress the truth.

The fifth video is equally preposterous. The core argument here is that the audience 'only knows the output, not the operator'—that our knowledge is merely a 'low-resolution snapshot' colored by our imagination. Let me be clear: we are not that ignorant. As someone who has produced stop-motion animation for academic projects and currently works as an illustrator, I am acutely aware of the immense labor involved in creation. I, along with many other artists and animators in the community, possess the empathy to wait for a creator’s growth. We understand the grueling reality of solo production—from OST and puppet making to storyboarding. However, there is a reason why fans occasionally grow impatient. Typical indie animators usually release 1–5 minute shorts every 3–6 months rather than long-form series. We know that a single long-form episode can take up to two years. Even major projects like Hazbin Hotel or Helluva Boss could only maintain their pace by expanding into professional studios. For a solo or small-scale creator like Brittany, completing even one season of 15–20 episodes is borderline impossible without a dedicated team. For instance, The Heroic Six took two years to produce a single 10-minute episode, and even then, the story had to be significantly condensed. When updates are this infrequent, the creator should ideally provide official information to sustain interest. Yet, there is a severe lack of substantial updates. To make matters worse, Brittany’s 'OC Boundaries' as of 2026 explicitly ban fanfiction, effectively stifling the community's ability to engage through headcanons or theories. If we are deprived of both official information and the freedom to hypothesize, what exactly are we expected to do?

The sixth video is essentially a repetition of the fourth, focusing on those who allegedly 'fake' being a victim. She describes a cycle: trying to help, having advice ignored, encountering a new 'crisis,' and then feeling guilty for not helping. Ironically, this perfectly describes the situation between her and us. We, who offered sincere advice, were dismissed as 'haters' and blocked. Is she really in a position to lecture others on this? These are words that should be coming from us, not from someone who is busy building a closed-off echo chamber. It is both frustrating and saddening to watch her fans and her sister blindly defend her. No matter how many of their posts I read, I cannot fathom their mindset.If this cycle continues, the stability of this fandom is at risk. This is a serious concern. The reasons behind the aggressive shift in tone toward the audience and the decision to post content without addressing previous controversies remain unclear. By limiting interactions to only those who offer praise and removing those who provide critical feedback, the environment becomes increasingly unbalanced. This structure creates a hierarchy where the relationship between the creator and the audience lacks the mutual respect typically found among peers or friends. Instead, it appears to be a rigid system where individuals are expected to conform to specific expectations or face exclusion. This transformation from an open community to a restricted one is a significant point of contention.

The seventh video is frankly speaking, an absolute stretch. The overarching narrative presented here is incredibly extreme. In reality, if anyone actually behaved the way she describes, the community would unanimously treat them as an anomaly. This only proves how utterly absurd the premise of this video truly is. As seen throughout her "some advice for you" video series, she repeatedly relies on clichés like, "Haters often look for a reason to invalidate someone's success." She claims that whether it is a tech upgrade, new art supplies, or just a simple dinner, critics will pounce on it. But let’s be real: unless someone is driven by a literal pathological obsession, who on earth would micromanage and nitpick such trivial matters? I sincerely hope Mirei and Brittany do not embarrass themselves by saying "they use it to build a narrative" in front of sensible people in real life.She then goes on to describe The "Sellout" Trap, whining that "If you buy something nice, they claim you've 'changed' or are 'out of touch.'" It is entirely natural for long-time followers to occasionally miss a creator's roots or "initial mindset." Yet, she exaggerates this into a malicious conspiracy. Who actually takes it to the malicious extreme she describes? The true colors of how these sisters view their audience are laid bare in this specific sentence: "The 'Irresponsible' Narrative: If they can't find a flaw in your work, they will look for a flaw in how you manage your life, using your spending as 'proof' that you aren't deserving of your platform." As I established in my previous posts, we are not the ones suffering from persecutory delusions. And speaking of "how you manage your life"—does that refer to their habit of mass-blocking anyone who mildly displeases them? Especially in Brittany’s case, it is laughable. How could people not talk about it? As the number of blocked users stealthily creeps closer to 400, even a complete outsider can look at that data and recognize that something is deeply abnormal. It is only natural that people are speaking out. Yes, it truly remains beyond ridiculous.

*

*

*

We must remain acutely aware of this situation and strive for meaningful change. Currently, they dismiss anyone who does not align with their views, constructing a secluded kingdom where the genuine outcries of fans are treated as nothing more than a nuisance. They refuse to listen to heartfelt advice, viewing their own community not as supporters, but as selfish individuals or even potential threats. To be honest, I am beginning to feel that expecting them to change might be a case of 'too little, too late.' Nevertheless, I firmly believe that if people read and share this message, we can achieve some form of progress. Although my words may have strayed slightly from my original intent, my ultimate hope is that they will come to their senses and foster the kind of healthy, respectful relationship seen in other communities. I truly wish for a future where creators and fans can coexist in a positive environment.

Thank you very much for taking the time to read this long post. I look forward to the day when we can once again enjoy her work freely and engage in creative fan activities without restraint. I sincerely hope that a day will come when we can express ourselves openly and participate vibrantly on Bluesky, the very platform where they are most active.

I would like to speak to you all by quoting a passage from my favorite novel:

"The bird fights its way out of the egg. The egg is the world. Who would be born must first destroy a world. The bird flies to God. That God’s name is Abraxas."

To those of us who have been unfairly labeled as "haters" simply for speaking the truth: Do not be discouraged. When someone labels every critical voice as "hate" and blocks out the world, they are choosing to stay trapped inside a thick, suffocating shell. They prefer the comfort of a fake world over the pain of real growth. Our resistance is not an act of malice. It is the necessary "destruction" that Hermann Hesse spoke of. We are the ones tapping on the shell, trying to bring light into a closed-off space. If they refuse to listen and retreat into blind praise, that is their limitation, not our fault. True growth requires embracing both light and dark, praise and criticism. Those who reject half of the truth will never truly fly. We are not "haters." We are the struggle itself. Let us overcome this absurd situation with the pride of those who have already broken free. Our resistance is the proof that we are alive and pursuing the truth.

Chapters of the videos we will COUNTER:

11. Your hater came by to leave you a comment, but why?

12. Your Hater isn't Sorry.

13. Haters love a "Gotcha" Moment.

14. Haters Make Low Effort Moves.

15. Your Haters Aren't Creative.

16. Haters DONT CHANGE

*

17. Haters Obsessed With Darkness

18. It's Not Too Late To Walk Away.

*

*

11.

To be quite frank, this eleventh video is utterly incomprehensible. It leaves me wondering whether this duo is genuinely oblivious to how they ended up in this position, or if they are simply acting out of sheer, calculated denial. In this video, Mirei argues that critics use the phrase "no one supports you" as a deliberate tactic to isolate creators and make them feel vulnerable. Ironically, the reality is the exact opposite. The audience is not trying to isolate them; the sisters have isolated themselves by building a closed-off, dictatorial echo chamber. They continue to evade all accountability, churn out bizarre "advice" videos to brainwash their remaining blind followers, and ruthlessly mass-block innocent fans who either speak the truth or genuinely care about their work—all simply because those fans don't fit their narrative. The fandom didn't isolate this duo; the sisters quarantined themselves because they are terrified of feedback and desperate to preserve their fragile image. One cannot help but question who in their right mind would continue to follow creators like this.

Mirei goes on to claim that anyone using absolute, extreme expressions like "no one" or "never" is an irrational attacker. This statement is laughably hypocritical when it is her own sister, Brittany Robinson, who has been aggressively throwing around absolute, dictatorial statements toward the audience. Look no further than Brittany's 2026 "OC Boundaries" which strictly enforces bans like "NSFW is HELL NO!", or her YouTube comment sections where she threatens that anyone asking about the next episode will be immediately blocked. Has Brittany conveniently forgotten that her own sister was the one who produced suggestive and NSFW content using her The Pink Corruption characters? It is completely absurd to declare that it is acceptable when the older sister does it, but strictly forbidden when the fandom does. Furthermore, if simply asking when the next episode drops warrants an immediate block, it makes one wonder what she truly thinks of her own audience. With these irrational claims, Mirei has essentially self-destructed and exposed her own sister's tyranny.

Finally, the sisters play the ultimate victim, claiming that haters try to sweep their hard work and genuine connections under the rug. Yet, the true perpetrators sweeping hard work under the rug are the sisters themselves. They are the ones who dictatorially stripped away the legitimacy, sweat, and tears of various creators within this diverse fandom—creators who poured their hearts into fan projects out of pure love for the work. Not only did the sisters bury those efforts, but they also ruthlessly crushed both the creations and the character of those artists. Our fandom must never fall for this pathetic gaslighting. We need to look directly at the truth, hold onto it, and make sure it is widely shared among us.

12.

The twelfth video is truly mind-blowing in its audacity.In this video, she discusses the concept of a "fake apology." She claims that those who give fake apologies weaponize their own suffering and mental health as excuses, effectively flipping the roles of victim and offender. Yet, this exact behavior is a carbon copy of what these sisters have been doing for years.

Whenever the sisters faced call-outs for severe misconduct—such as grooming allegations involving minors or their manipulative backtracking on copyright ownership—they would constantly bring up their autism spectrum disorder and mental illnesses, claiming that the public’s criticism was causing them immense suffering. This directly resulted in turning the fandom, which was merely demanding legitimate accountability, into "abusers," while flipping themselves into the victims. How utterly malicious is this? No amount of mental illness or autism can ever serve as a free pass for such toxic behavior.

Furthermore, she claims that words are incredibly cheap online, and that we must trust and watch the behavior after an apology, rather than the script. This is exactly what our fandom should be saying to them, not the other way around. In fact, the absolute reason why the fandom fundamentally distrusts these sisters is because their words and behavior are completely contradictory, just as that logic dictates. Mirei did release a script in 2024 apologizing for using her YouTube channel as a mere vent space in the past. However, she is now uploading this entire "Some Advice for You" series, essentially brainwashing their remaining fans and fully justifying all of their past actions. In other words, her 2024 apology was nothing more than a cheap public performance. The behavior she is exhibiting right now could arguably be considered far more malicious than before. This is because this video series carries an extremely high risk of twisting the core values of her blind followers in the wrong direction.

To make matters worse, she encourages blocking in this video, just as she always has. She states that even if you receive an apology, you can still keep the other party blocked and keep your boundary locked tight to protect your personal peace. This content is merely a cowardly pretext designed to retroactively justify her younger sister Brittany's abnormal mass-blocking data. Take my personal case, for instance: she arbitrarily branded a completely innocent fan as a "child" and blocked them over a trivial reason like missing an age indication or tag. Yet, even after the misunderstanding was completely cleared up, the absolute most she did was silently unblock them without a single word of apology. Is a simple apology really that difficult? Treating a fan like that out in the open and refusing to offer even a basic apology is a complete violation of human courtesy and moral duty. Furthermore, looking at her staggering block statistics, it seems highly likely that there are countless others who, like my friends, were blocked over the most trivial reasons. Simply put, the "boundary" these sisters preach is nothing more than a sophisticated shield designed to legitimize and dress up their dictatorial censorship and blatant disrespect.

These sisters need to realize something. They might sit there thinking that the public lacks accountability, but the reality is that the ones truly lacking accountability are themselves. A person who wouldn't even offer a single word of apology to a genuine fan after a misunderstanding was cleared, and a person who crossed the line first by drawing NSFW content of her younger sister's character—seeing these two gather in the exact same space to judge "other people's accountability and fake apologies" is the most massive, laugh-inducing comedy of this entire drama.

13.

In the 13th video, frankly speaking, it is nothing but the same utterly absurd and appalling nonsense we’ve seen throughout this entire series.

In this episode, Mirei claims that people look for "human errors"—like a minor typo, a slight continuity slip, or a tiny misstatement—and use it as "ammunition." According to her logic, the only reason the fandom is angry is because of their simple, innocent mistakes. But let me ask you this: are "minor grooming allegations involving minors," "the backstabbing of QuadragonX," and "the indiscriminate mass-blocking of hundreds of fans" just simple "human errors"?

She goes on to state, "spotting an error elevates them above the creator. It’s a classic projection of insecurity." She also lectures us on confirmation bias, claiming that haters will completely ignore 99% of what you did flawlessly just to "hyper-focus" on the 1% that was slightly off. Oh, the irony. The sisters themselves are the ultimate living proof of confirmation bias. They completely shut their eyes and ignore the 99% of legitimate, justified criticism from hundreds of independent individuals, choosing instead to hyper-focus on their own 1% narrative that this is all just a 'malicious conspiracy by jealous haters' to suit their own taste.

Finally, consider her concluding remark: "dealing with the messiness of the creative process means you're already miles ahead of anyone sitting on the sidelines keeping score." Do they honestly think they have the right to say this? As I already proved in Vol.1, the victim, QuadragonX, was never a bystander sitting on the sidelines. They were a true creator who poured their literal blood, sweat, and tears into the work day and night. Who was the one that ruthlessly trampled on and ousted that true creator? For them to sit there and preach about the "solitude and greatness of a creator" while blaming bystanders is deeply insulting.

They will probably never realize it. They will never understand how disgustingly hypocritical and malicious they are—writing this garbage, blindly agreeing with it, promoting it, and enforcing these twisted standards upon their audience.

14.

In her 14th video, she begins by stating: “Dealing with someone who explicitly dislikes you or your work, yet constantly watches it, screenshots it, and uses it for their own content, is incredibly frustrating.” She is essentially claiming that taking screenshots and using them in criticism is inherently "hypocritical and parasitic." However, anyone who understands the truth behind these events knows this is a textbook case of psychological projection. Mirei distorts the community’s pursuit of accountability, labeling it as mere 'parasitism to siphon views.'

Let us be clear: the public does not utilize screenshots for casual gossip. We use them because they serve as undeniable, objective evidence of the sisters' indelible misconduct—including the grooming and exploitation of minors, and the predatory usurpation of another creator's rights. Dismissing these screenshots as "parasitic" is nothing more than a cowardly tactic to muzzle the truth, trying to erase their crimes and suppress genuine victims by branding them as mere "rage-baiters."

If anyone is truly guilty of "The Clout Market (Riding Your Coattails)" and parasitizing someone else's original ideas and success, it is the Robinson sisters themselves. The fandom remembers exactly who backsabbed QuadragonX—the sole creator who poured blood, sweat, and tears into sustaining Pink Corruption Continued (PCC). They stripped QuadragonX of their rights and unilaterally resumed the series to hijack its success. To claim they "merely took back what was theirs" is a grotesque distortion that flies in the face of basic creative ethics.

She also targets critics by claiming it is “'Rage Farming' and Hate-Watching,” stating that we “start drama or frame ourselves as critics to get people talking” and use screenshots as a “visual anchor to make commentary look legitimate... to trigger a reaction.” No, absolutely not. This manifesto seeks zero profit and zero clout. The collective exposures across X, DeviantArt, Reddit, and Tumblr are not "rage farming" for views. They represent a legitimate exercise of consumer and community rights to prevent minor grooming and authoritarian censorship. Furthermore, no one in this fandom desires their toxic audience. Quite the contrary: this critique serves as the ultimate visual anchor to warn innocent fans who are still being gaslit and brainwashed by their false narratives to finally open their eyes.

The deception runs even deeper. She categorizes the criticism as “Intense Envy Masquerading as Criticism,” asserting that critics are “deeply envious of the community and recognition you've built, and tearing it down... is their misguided way of feeling equal to you.” In other words, she eagerly paints her critics as obsessed, inferior contrarians driven by pure envy. But the fandom does not monitor their footsteps out of jealousy; we watch them as a necessary vanguard, a Watcher, ensuring they never again groom another vulnerable minor or execute their tyrannical mass-blocking campaigns. The community has no desire to be "equal" to perpetrators. What we feel toward those who exploit children and stab fellow creators in the back is not envy—it is absolute moral contempt.

As for her practical options, she advises followers to “Starve Them of Oxygen” and entirely ignore critics. If ignoring criticism is the ultimate rule, then one must ask: Why did she feel so utterly compelled to manufacture 14 defensive videos? The answer is obvious. She is hyper-aware of her own unraveling reputation, and these videos are a desperate, frantic attempt to muzzle the community, legitimize her censorship, and sweep her past under the rug.

She flippantly suggests “Watermarking” to protect visuals, claiming it makes the original creator undeniable. But what good is a watermark? A watermark cannot erase the receipts of exploitation, the history of deceit, or the cold data of mass-blocking 300 to 400 innocent users. A watermark is a tool to protect intellectual property; it is not a detergent capable of washing away moral bankruptcy.

Finally, the sisters undoubtedly comfort themselves with the delusion to “Let Your Success Be the Ultimate Defense,” believing that “a copy or a bitter critic will never have the authenticity that made your series popular in the first place.” Yet, the "success" they boast of is a hollow monument built on hypocrisy, treating human beings as disposable tools. As of 2026, Brittany continues her dictatorial rule, slapping fans with aggressive "OC Boundaries" that outlaw fanfiction and threatening to instantly ban anyone who dares to ask about upcoming episodes.

A success built inside a "glass castle," constructed by trampling the authenticity of creators who genuinely loved the community and hiding behind a mass-block button, is entirely counterfeit. True "Authenticity" requires the courage to embrace both praise and critique, both light and shadow. Because these sisters have aggressively blocked out half of the truth, the word "authenticity" no longer belongs to them. They have none left.

15.

While the 15th video may seem plausible on the surface and appear to leave no room for rebuttal, it invariably contains glaring contradictions. In this video, Mirei attempts to lecture the fandom and the public, preaching that the internet is "never that serious."

In the video, she explains that "Shitposting is essentially low-quality content intentionally posted to derail a conversation or bait a reaction." If that is the case, are the exposures and criticism papers posted by the fandom on X (Twitter), DeviantArt, and Tumblr also mere shitposting? Right now, these sisters are forcefully pushing the public's legitimate and detailed demands for accountability into the low-tier internet culture categories of "shitposting" and "bait." This is nothing more than an intentional Category Error designed to devalue the discussion and evade the core issue.

She also claims that "the humor comes purely from consuming bizarre memes that are visually broken and make absolutely no sense out of context." However, the fandom is not that foolish. The fandom’s voice is not a contextless, bizarre meme; rather, it operates on a solid, historical context—namely, the clear misconduct the creator committed in the past (e.g., distributing inappropriate NSFW illustrations in spaces accessible to minors, and deceiving the community regarding the ownership of The Pink Corruption). Dismissing this as a contextless, random post is merely a reality-distorting framing tactic.

Furthermore, she argues that these posters "love to take a completely mundane opinion and crank it up to an eleven, passionately defending something completely ridiculous—like arguing that a toaster is a valid gaming console—just to see how seriously people take them." But are our arguments mere trolling? The "responsibility and morality as a creator" demanded by the fandom is not a ridiculous topic like a toaster debate; it is a basic requirement that any creator with a platform must possess. By portraying their fandom as an immature group that enjoys provoking reactions with absurd stubbornness, the sisters are subtly belittling them. It is a clever yet arrogant framing attempt to undermine the intellectual capacity of the serious critics and claim moral superiority.

Worse still, the sisters view the fandom’s critique as mere "blocks of text repeatedly copied and pasted across comment sections to flood the chat." The fandom’s critiques are not meaningless, copied-and-pasted texts; they are original writings, with each chapter containing its own distinct logic. Despite this, the sisters label the public's collective protest as a mere "copypasta" spam attack, creating a pretext to shut their ears. Lumping legitimate criticism voiced by hundreds of independent individuals into mindless spam is an utter insult to the public.

The most contradictory logic in this video lies in the golden rule of this culture: "It's never that serious." If the internet is truly such a low-stakes, lighthearted space, why did the sister react so defensively to minor differences in opinion or mentions of Original Characters (OC), mass-blocking nearly 400 users on Bluesky? While gaslighting and lecturing the public to "not take it so seriously" and "just be cool," they themselves display extreme hypocrisy, wielding controlling power with utmost bias and sensitivity over the slightest feedback. This petty attempt to hide behind low-subculture text to dismiss valid criticism as a "harmless joke" only proves they are admitting to their own authoritarian defense mechanism that has silenced hundreds of people. I hope they realize this someday, though that possibility seems increasingly slim.

16.

The 16th video in this series is a masterclass in psychological projection and a complete lack of self-awareness. It is, quite frankly, astonishing to witness. She opens the video by stating: "When someone claims they've changed, but their underlying resentment or hostility remains, they usually can't hide it for long."

She then goes on to list the signs of these so-called "haters." Let us dissect them one by one.

Mirei claims that haters, desperate to appear mature, mask their malice with backhanded praise like, "Wow, your new project is doing so well! It’s amazing you pulled this off without formal training." Yet, who is the one actually doing this? It is the Mirei duo themselves. They consistently diminish the work of other indie creators, fan artists, and even the achievements of Pink Corruption Continued(known as The Pink Corruption) (whose ownership was transferred away from them), snidely implying, "Well, the original still belongs to us." To invalidate the fandom's hard work while labeling any critical response as "hating" is a level of moral bankruptcy that speaks for itself.

She further claims that haters obsessively stalk your stories, profiles, and content just waiting for a mistake (slip-up), without ever offering support. This is a pathetic attempt to reframe public accountability as "stalking." As established before, the ones conducting constant surveillance and censorship are Mirei and Brittany. Brittany currently holds a track record of mass-blocking 300 to 400 users. Are we supposed to believe their censorship is a "mature method of self-protection" while the community's effort to preserve evidence is just "stalking"? The double standard is staggering.

Mirei warns against people who nitpick under the guise of "constructive criticism" or "doing it for your own good," claiming it only drains your motivation. But look at the very title of her own playlist: 《Some Advice For You》. She has produced over 16 gaslighting videos dedicated to lecturing others under the pretense of "offering advice." A genuine artist sharing tips would discuss overcoming art blocks or improving illustration techniques. Instead, her videos are filled with toxic rants: "No matter how much you try to bring me down, I won't blink an eye," or "Those who harass me will end up as failures in life." There is zero helpful advice here. It is merely a digital landfill where she dumps her rage and curses those who exposed her misdeeds. For someone who apologized years ago for using the internet as an emotional dumping ground, her regression into even more shameless behavior is pathetic. These videos serve as an echo chamber to justify their own actions, warp their remaining fans' perception of reality, and ruin the community's wellbeing.

The audacity reaches its peak when she claims that haters minimize past actions or gaslight victims by saying, "It was just a joke," or "You were being too sensitive." Look in the mirror. Who is currently deflecting responsibility for their actions? It is Mirei herself, who continuously dismisses her past minor-grooming allegations and the IP theft incident as "mere harassment from brainless haters." Creating an entire video series to run away from accountability, while describing that exact evasion as a trait of a "hater," goes beyond irony—it borders on pathological cognitive dissonance. What is the ultimate goal of blocking hundreds of people and isolating themselves with a handful of blind enablers? Following this path leads nowhere but total self-destruction.

Finally, she asserts that fake people treat you kindly during your struggles but turn cold and dismissive once you succeed. She defines the ultimate litmus test of true change as: "Whether they can offer a sincere apology and acknowledgement of their past actions without being forced to do so." She claims that anyone who acts like nothing happened while maintaining a hostile rivalry is just a "fake package."

Let us apply The Ultimate Litmus Test to Mirei Touyama and Brittany Robinson. They fail instantly. Mirei has never once offered a voluntary, sincere explanation or apology regarding her grooming and exploitation allegations. Instead, she simply rebranded her username and continues her activities acting as if nothing ever happened (Act like nothing ever happened). Meanwhile, Brittany blindly defends her, treating their own audience as potential criminals. Any polite inquiry or attempt to clear up misunderstandings from fans is weaponized, labeled as "hater malice," and met with an immediate block.

Do they truly believe that hiding behind a fragile, glass wall built on mass-blocking and censorship is the ultimate form of self-preservation? If so, they have proven themselves unfit to be called creators—or decent human beings. They must realize how fundamentally wrong it is to treat their audience not as equals, but as disposable objects.

17.

The 17th video appears to be an intensified version of the 3rd video that I previously covered in Vol. 1. While her arguments in this video might seem plausible at first glance to some, anyone who knows her actual track record will immediately see how utterly hypocritical this video truly is.

She claims that the goal of "haters" is merely to gain a reaction, and since ordinary insults no longer work, they resort to universally offensive and taboo themes like cults, human sacrifice, and torture to inflict fear and distress. However, what the public and the fandom are actually trying to evoke from her is not fear or distress—it is "Accountability" (moral and legal responsibility) for her grooming behavior involving minors. As I have explained before, during her past days as 'Breabear,' she was the very person who uploaded suggestive, bizarre, and explicit adult (NSFW) content featuring her sister's characters without any content warnings (CW) on a channel primarily viewed by young children. She herself brought actual "Shock Value" to the community. How utterly shameless is it for someone with such a history to twist legitimate exposure into a mere "psychological game played by haters"? She truly needs to look in the mirror and reflect on who created this situation and why things have escalated to this point.

Furthermore, she claims that these haters are deeply immersed in internet subcultures as "Edgelords," viewing the sharing of horrific images as a bizarre form of social currency, using them as mere "edgy memes" or intimidating personas while forgetting the grim reality of such horrors. Just how foolish does this sister think her fandom is? I will emphasize this as many times as it takes: the fandom is not that stupid. Community users are not clueless edgelords who have lost touch with reality. Just as popular indie animations like Murder Drones artistically use gore elements for narrative immersion, fans are simply analyzing the context of the work they created and expressing their opinions. Rather, she is the one who showed the ultimate toxicity of "Edgelord culture" by being abnormally obsessed with adult content and inappropriate sexual depictions behind the scenes of a space shared with minor fans. Choosing to mass-block all incoming criticism instead of reflecting on their own actions is an act completely devoid of conscience.

She even claims that obsessing over bizarre and ritualistic gore themes indicates a loss of reality or severe antisocial tendencies (mental health issues), adding a warning: "Dark, violent themes should be taken seriously, and your safety is the top priority." While it is true that ongoing harm is happening right now, I sincerely wish these sisters would stop insulting hundreds of independent users and fans—who are raising their voices for public interest with clear physical evidence from Discord logs and X timelines—by labeling them as an "antisocial attack by mentally ill people." Do they realize that their behavior—driving legitimate critics crazy and going on a blocking frenzy—is the textbook definition of "Narcissistic Rage" and "Antisocial Gaslighting"? They truly need to stop hiding behind psychological terms to insult both academia and the public at the same time.

This next part is perhaps the most hypocritical section of all. She tells her blind followers and other creators, "If you are being harassed, screenshot everything. Document Everything, including the date, time, and account name. Never delete them. They are needed as evidence." Yes, this particular sentence is the only thing she got right in this entire video, and it is the exact, perfect definition of what the fandom and victims are doing to them right now. Countless users, including my friends, are preserving clear screenshot evidence (Documentation) of her past grooming history involving minors, her gaslighting statements, and the DARVO tactics used to twist the survival methods of actual victims. According to her own logic, these records are not "harassment" but legitimate "legal evidence" that proves their grooming allegations and complicity in gaslighting.

Her final argument in this video is: "Do Not Engage with haters. Block them on all platforms and limit your privacy. Do not argue. And Report them using platform features." Yes, just like all the other videos in the 'Some Advice For You' playlist, these guidelines are not a manual for dealing with haters. They are a "cowardly escape manual" used by these sisters to censor and suppress legitimate criticism. Under the guise of this guideline, they have locked innocent fans demanding the truth into the frame of "H8RS" and shut their mouths, stealth-blocking nearly 400 people. Just because they close their ears and dismiss the public's rightful outcry as mere "clout-chasing" or "baiting," the history of exploitation and deception they committed will absolutely never be erased. If those who are currently busy building an echo chamber through exploitation and gaslighting do not stop this behavior immediately, it's safe to say there is virtually no chance for a bright future for them.

18.

Even at a glance, the 18th video might seem like a plausible piece of relationship advice. However, when contrasted with the sisters' past actions, it exposes an astonishing level of double standards and psychological projection. Here, Mirei suggests that creators should distance themselves from so-called "clout-chasers" who supposedly seek to exploit a creator’s recognition or follower count, presenting five reasons and a set of guidelines for setting boundaries.

Mirei states: "Moving on from friends who seem more interested in the 'clout' or social status you provide than in the friendship itself can be a difficult but necessary step for your well-being." However, her choice of words—specifically "clout" and "social status"—is incredibly arrogant. These terms subtly disguise a mindset that inherently categorizes friends, colleagues, and fans into a hierarchy, viewing them not as equals, but as inferiors trying to hitch a ride on her success. They twist mutual collaboration and networking into parasitic behavior, revealing a deep-seated elitism. Do people blinded by such self-importance ever realize that this very attitude makes them unwelcome wherever they go?

Furthermore, she claims: "If your friends are focused on what you represent—your reach, your art, or your online presence—they aren't actually seeing you. They are seeing a utility." Given how these sisters actually behave, this assertion is pure nonsense. If someone genuinely appreciates their art, they immediately build a defensive wall, assuming, "They just view me as a utility to exploit." In the online creative community, respecting a colleague's "reach" or "art" and connecting through it is not parasitic—it is a natural part of networking. This harsh, distrustful gaze that reduces others to mere utilities is not something created by their friends; it is a product of their own paranoia, projecting internal suspicion onto genuine goodwill.

This next part is particularly baffling, and anyone who has ever been blocked by Brittany will understand exactly why. Mirei describes clout-chasing behavior as: "Being asked to promote their work or give them exposure constantly..." Is this serious? If a request is too demanding or uncomfortable, a mature creator simply declines. Why must she escalate it by branding the other person as "parasitic" and trying to socially ostracize them? This is nothing but a passive-aggressive coping mechanism. She goes on to talk about: "Having your personal milestones overshadowed by their attempts to use those moments for their own engagement," and "Feeling drained after interactions, rather than uplifted, because the conversation always circles back to metrics, followers, or 'the grind.'" It is absurd. Labeling ordinary, everyday conversations between creators—such as sharing worries about metrics or followers—as energy-sucking, vampiric behavior is completely uncalled for. While the sisters might dismiss us as "paranoid," it is blindingly obvious that they are the ones suffering from severe paranoia.

This brings us to what is arguably the most hypocritical argument in the entire transcript. Mirei claims: "As a creator, your original projects—like the development of characters or your digital series—require an environment of honest feedback and creative safety," adding, "If friends are 'yes-men' because they want to stay in your circle... they can inadvertently steer your work away from what makes it special." These words should never come out of their mouths. These are the very people who labeled any form of constructive feedback or critique as "hate," stealthily blocking over 400 users (estimated at around 350 individual users, accounting for duplicates) to create an echo chamber. They built a tyrannical environment where only unquestioning praise was tolerated, and yet, they have the audacity to lecture others on the importance of an "environment of honest feedback." Blaming "yes-men" for ruining the work, when they themselves forced everyone to become one, is peak hypocrisy.

The delusion continues. She states: "Constantly questioning whether someone is reaching out because they care or because they want a shoutout breeds deep-seated suspicion," and concludes, "Dumping these associations clears the air, allowing you to focus on the people who show up for you when the camera is off." While preaching morality on public platforms like YouTube and Bluesky—desperately trying to look empathetic and appeal to other creators—they act entirely differently behind the scenes. In their own private spaces and comment sections, they gaslight fans and mass-block people in silence. When you look at their track record of blocking nearly 400 people and consider the controversies surrounding them, the response from other artists who actually know the truth is bound to be overwhelmingly negative. They can only put on this facade because newer creators are completely unaware of their true history.

Then comes the most malicious part of the video: "Having ten friends who genuinely support your growth is infinitely more valuable than having a hundred 'clout-adjacent' associates. By trimming the fat, you make space in your life for people who are invested in your journey, not just the destination of your follower count." To us, this sounds like a disturbing attempt to justify their mass-blocking sprees and ongoing censorship. Dehumanizing fans and critics who fail to meet their highly subjective, moving goalposts as "fat" that needs to be trimmed is chilling. They enforce absurdly strict boundaries, going as far as banning most forms of fanfiction and fanart, yet they expect a healthy community to survive under these conditions. It defies all logic.

The video concludes with a "Note on Setting Boundaries": "To distance oneself from clout-chasers without direct confrontation, one should deprioritize them by cutting off information about professional plans and shifting social interactions to mundane, non-networking environments; ultimately, by removing potential benefits, these relationships will naturally drift apart." Just how deep does their distrust of humanity run to create, validate, and promote a manual like this? This is a textbook manifestation of their desire to force everyone into a state of mutual distrust and hyper-vigilance. Like their previous videos, this is not a guide to healthy boundaries; it is a cowardly, passive-aggressive manipulation tactic designed to shut out the world without ever engaging in honest communication.

And to top it all off, it provides the ultimate tool for narcissistic reassurance: even when a friend naturally drifts away due to this cold shoulder, they can comfortably tell themselves, "See? They left because there was nothing left for them to 'gain.'" They trap themselves in a loop of self-righteousness, writing off everyone else as a parasite. What are fans supposed to learn from this? We must recognize this manual for what it truly is: a glorified, cowardly manifesto of passive-aggressive social control.

*

*

*

Our resistance must remain steadfast, driven by a shared commitment to the truth rather than malice. In the end, this situation is no longer just about animation or personal grievances; it is a fundamental question of morality and accountability.

To ground this struggle, I would like to speak to you all by referencing a core principle from the philosopher Immanuel Kant, known as the Categorical Imperative:

1. The Formula of Universal Law:

"Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."

This timeless philosophical law serves as a direct, unyielding mirror to the creative duo. Kant argues that an action is only moral if you are willing to let everyone else in the world behave the exact same way. If you claim that your actions are justified, then you must accept those same actions from others. Yet, the sisters continuously violate this absolute law. They weaponize "boundaries" to silence others, but refuse to respect the boundaries of their fandom. They demand total immunity for their own past suggestive creations, while systematically destroying the sweat and tears of other talented artists. They expect the community to sit in a silent vacuum, waiting for crumbs of content, while treating any innocent inquiry as an act of war.

2. The Formula of Humanity:

"Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never merely as a means to an end, but always at the same time as an end."

By stating this, Kant emphasizes that human beings should never be used as disposable tools for personal gain. Yet, the sisters completely shatter this principle. They treat their fandom and fellow creators not as individuals worthy of respect, but merely as transactional assets to fuel their own success and shield their pristine image.

By enforcing rules they themselves constantly break, they are trying to create a world where they are the ultimate exception. But reality does not bow to the whims of hypocrites. A healthy community cannot survive on double standards. To those of you who have been unfairly pushed into the dark and labeled as "haters" for simply expecting basic human decency: remember that our voice is the necessary friction against their delusion. We are not the ones tearing down this community; we are the ones standing on the moral ground they abandoned.

Let us rise above this absurd situation with the pride of those who choose accountability over comfort. Our refusal to accept their gaslighting is the ultimate proof that the truth cannot be mass-blocked.

Here's the videos of Mirei(formerly Breabear Jones):

Today, I would like to refute the logic regarding 'h8r' and 'victim' presented in Mirei Touyama’s recent videos. She has been frequently uploading content of this nature to YouTube lately. While some of you may have seen my recent posts, others might not be familiar with them yet. Being from a different linguistic background, I could not grasp every nuance; however, one thing is certain: this is a clear case of psychological projection, and the current situation reveals undeniably problematic aspects.

In her first video, she explained the 'Echo Chamber' effect: "If a hater reposts your work and uses five alt-accounts to leave negative comments, a random viewer might think, 'Oh, I guess everyone dislikes this,' and feel pressured to agree." She then suggested a 'Mass Block' as a massive time-saver—a statement I found utterly appalling. Ironically, this is precisely what Mirei and her sister, Brittany, are practicing now. According to 'Clearsky,' a website that tracks blocked users on Bluesky, Brittany has blocked over 200 users on her main account and about 120 on her sub-account, 'Brittany's Imagination'—exceeding 300 in total. Does this seem like a normal figure? If Gooseworx, the creator of The Amazing Digital Circus, had blocked that many users, it would have sparked a massive backlash online. Is this truly justifiable? There is a high probability that many of those they ousted as 'haters' are actually innocent people. It is evident that my friends were blocked in the same manner. On Brittany’s Bluesky, one gets blocked for not meeting a certain age requirement or for violating 'OC boundaries.' Despite my efforts to follow her guidelines, she labeled me a child and blocked me simply because I hadn't specified my age. When I politely asked her to clear up the misunderstanding, she merely 'liked' my post and unblocked me—without a single word of apology. She abandoned even the most basic courtesy; shouldn't one apologize after blocking a genuine fan? By engaging in these mass blocks, they seem to believe they are in the right. While I am not suggesting one must engage with everyone they dislike, in reality, social interaction involves encountering diverse perspectives. They seem oblivious to the fact that their current position is nothing more than a fragile fortress, ready to collapse at any moment.

In her second video, she brought up concepts such as 'The Mirror Effect (Projection),' 'Moving the Goalposts,' 'Cognitive Dissonance,' and the 'Crabs in a Bucket Mentality.' Among these, the 'Crabs in a Bucket' metaphor was particularly clear: the idea that haters find comfort in pulling down those who are trying to climb up and change their lives. However, isn't the reality exactly the opposite? If they are the ones "climbing up," does that make us the other crabs pulling them down? This logic is fundamentally flawed. Furthermore, she states, "When the results are visible, the denial usually says more about the critic's frustration than the creator's effort." To be clear, we are not suffering from persecutory delusions. We are perfectly capable of seeing the truth. She remains oblivious to her own actions, yet she is the one stripping away our freedom and dragging us down.

In her third video regarding 'gore,' she continues her narrative about 'haters.' As I understand it, she claims that these individuals are obsessed with posting graphic content and lack self-control; therefore, any negative reaction only serves to encourage them. Her advice is to ignore them entirely, document the evidence with screenshots, and report them. Certainly, any reasonable person would agree that excessively graphic gore warrants a report. However, most creators follow basic etiquette by applying appropriate labels or content warnings. There is a line that should not be crossed, and those who ignore it are the ones at fault. Yet, this brings us to a glaring hypocrisy. Even if we set aside other major controversies, it is well-known that during her 'Breabear' era, she created inappropriate illustrations and animations featuring her sister’s character—without any content warnings whatsoever. At the time, her channel was hosting 'The Pink Corruption' (a Just Shapes & Beats fan-made series), making it highly accessible to young children. Given the nature of that content, it would not have been surprising if it had been reported itself. Does she believe that gore produced by others deserves to be reported, while her own past inappropriate and suggestive works are exempt?

The fourth video was, in my opinion, the most appalling and contemptible of all. Under the section 'Important Distinction,' she states: 'Victims of actual abuse often struggle to speak up, blame themselves, and may minimize what happened to them.' This is an incredibly dangerous and irresponsible narrative. While it is true that trauma can make it difficult for victims to speak out, educational institutions in my country—and indeed, society at large—teach victims that they must never exaggerate or minimize their experiences; they must speak the truth as it is. We are taught that victims should never blame themselves and that those around them must provide a supportive environment to listen and offer comfort. Adhering to the logic in her video only risks allowing the abuse to escalate until it becomes irreversible. In many cases, victims finally speak out only when they have reached a breaking point, desperately needing help. When they finally share their truth, are they merely 'playing the victim'? While her criteria for distinguishing victims may not be entirely false in a vacuum, in this context, it sounds like nothing more than an order for real victims to remain silent. This rhetoric drags victims further into the abyss and is, quite frankly, a logic typically employed by perpetrators to suppress the truth.

The fifth video is equally preposterous. The core argument here is that the audience 'only knows the output, not the operator'—that our knowledge is merely a 'low-resolution snapshot' colored by our imagination. Let me be clear: we are not that ignorant. As someone who has produced stop-motion animation for academic projects and currently works as an illustrator, I am acutely aware of the immense labor involved in creation. I, along with many other artists and animators in the community, possess the empathy to wait for a creator’s growth. We understand the grueling reality of solo production—from OST and puppet making to storyboarding. However, there is a reason why fans occasionally grow impatient. Typical indie animators usually release 1–5 minute shorts every 3–6 months rather than long-form series. We know that a single long-form episode can take up to two years. Even major projects like Hazbin Hotel or Helluva Boss could only maintain their pace by expanding into professional studios. For a solo or small-scale creator like Brittany, completing even one season of 15–20 episodes is borderline impossible without a dedicated team. For instance, The Heroic Six took two years to produce a single 10-minute episode, and even then, the story had to be significantly condensed. When updates are this infrequent, the creator should ideally provide official information to sustain interest. Yet, there is a severe lack of substantial updates. To make matters worse, Brittany’s 'OC Boundaries' as of 2026 explicitly ban fanfiction, effectively stifling the community's ability to engage through headcanons or theories. If we are deprived of both official information and the freedom to hypothesize, what exactly are we expected to do?

The final video is essentially a repetition of the fourth, focusing on those who allegedly 'fake' being a victim. She describes a cycle: trying to help, having advice ignored, encountering a new 'crisis,' and then feeling guilty for not helping. Ironically, this perfectly describes the situation between her and us. We, who offered sincere advice, were dismissed as 'haters' and blocked. Is she really in a position to lecture others on this? These are words that should be coming from us, not from someone who is busy building a closed-off echo chamber. It is both frustrating and saddening to watch her fans and her sister blindly defend her. No matter how many of their posts I read, I cannot fathom their mindset.If this cycle continues, the stability of this fandom is at risk. This is a serious concern. The reasons behind the aggressive shift in tone toward the audience and the decision to post content without addressing previous controversies remain unclear. By limiting interactions to only those who offer praise and removing those who provide critical feedback, the environment becomes increasingly unbalanced. This structure creates a hierarchy where the relationship between the creator and the audience lacks the mutual respect typically found among peers or friends. Instead, it appears to be a rigid system where individuals are expected to conform to specific expectations or face exclusion. This transformation from an open community to a restricted one is a significant point of contention.

We must remain acutely aware of this situation and strive for meaningful change. Currently, they dismiss anyone who does not align with their views, constructing a secluded kingdom where the genuine outcries of fans are treated as nothing more than a nuisance. They refuse to listen to heartfelt advice, viewing their own community not as supporters, but as selfish individuals or even potential threats. To be honest, I am beginning to feel that expecting them to change might be a case of 'too little, too late.' Nevertheless, I firmly believe that if people read and share this message, we can achieve some form of progress. Although my words may have strayed slightly from my original intent, my ultimate hope is that they will come to their senses and foster the kind of healthy, respectful relationship seen in other communities. I truly wish for a future where creators and fans can coexist in a positive environment.

Thank you very much for taking the time to read this long post. I look forward to the day when we can once again enjoy her work freely and engage in creative fan activities without restraint. I sincerely hope that a day will come when we can express ourselves openly and participate vibrantly on Bluesky, the very platform where they are most active.

I would like to speak to you all by quoting a passage from my favorite novel:

"The bird fights its way out of the egg. The egg is the world. Who would be born must first destroy a world. The bird flies to God. That God’s name is Abraxas."

To those of us who have been unfairly labeled as "haters" simply for speaking the truth: Do not be discouraged.When someone labels every critical voice as "hate" and blocks out the world, they are choosing to stay trapped inside a thick, suffocating shell. They prefer the comfort of a fake world over the pain of real growth. Our resistance is not an act of malice. It is the necessary "destruction" that Hermann Hesse spoke of. We are the ones tapping on the shell, trying to bring light into a closed-off space. If they refuse to listen and retreat into blind praise, that is their limitation, not our fault. True growth requires embracing both light and dark, praise and criticism. Those who reject half of the truth will never truly fly. We are not "haters." We are the struggle itself. Let us overcome this absurd situation with the pride of those who have already broken free. Our resistance is the proof that we are alive and pursuing the truth.

ALT BLOGS

@foesfrombelow (FFB blog)

@mistervinney (G0re art blog)

Socials, Games and other things I'm on!

Youtube

CapraPantheraLeo Records (music channel)

VinnytheShapie (misc channel)

Tiktok

BillytheShapie

VRChat

VinnytheShapie (Main)

SC4P3GOAT (Alt)

Steam

VinnytheShapie

Discord

Caprinivin

Twitter (nope not calling it X)

VinnytheShapie

Strawpage

VinnytheShapie.straw.page

DNI?