Billy's Inferno

Chapters of the videos we will COUNTER in this volume:

31. Haters LOVE Receiving YOUR Sympathy

32. How Haters Spend Their MONEY

33. (Will be added soon...)

+Before you see this, these documents will be really helpful to understand:

*

*

*

31.

In her 31st video, Mirei is providing her audience with a literal guide on "how to frame a victim's trauma as mere attention-seeking to justify mass-ostracism and blocking."

First, she claims that "a critic's or victim's cry of distress is nothing but a calculated 'sympathy trap' designed to manipulate public opinion." Here is what she says:

"If the person has faced public criticism, backlash, or accountability for toxic behavior, posting about a severe personal crisis like a relapse is a classic deflection tactic."

"They use vulnerability as a shield to instantly halt criticism, force people to feel sorry for them, and paint themselves as the victim."

Let us ask a very simple question: Who is the actual entity that has spent the last several years shamelessly weaponizing their own vulnerability and mental health as a shield to evade accountability? It is none other than Mirei herself—who consistently brought up her autism spectrum and mental health issues whenever her grooming scandals were exposed—alongside her sister Brittany, who enabled and defended her every step of the way. The fact that they continuously exploit mental health to deflect from reality and justify their own wrongdoings is an unerasable piece of historical data.

Furthermore, the severe emotional collapse and trauma relapse experienced by the victims are the direct, agonizing consequences of this duo's grooming and subsequent mass-blocking campaigns. Dismissing this genuine pain as a calculated "performance" for public opinion is an incredibly cruel, perpetrator-centered act of secondary victimization.

Second, she asserts that "anyone who shares their pain on the internet is just entirely desperate for attention." She states:

"However, the choice to broadcast it publicly rather than seeking private, professional help often reveals a deeply ingrained habit of weaponizing their own pain for public consumption."

"A hater might post a cryptic or alarming update specifically to see who reacts, who comes running to their defense, or who among their "enemies" breaks their silence to comment on it."

The true purpose of victims documenting and archiving their trauma and exposure posts online is not to beg for validation. It is a public interest effort to prevent these sisters from deceptive clout-washing and to protect new users from becoming their next targets. If their intent was genuinely malicious, why would these victims exhaust their own energy to gather massive amounts of evidence just to share their pain?

Moreover, this narrative of forcing victims to resolve their pain strictly in private is an insidious extension of the same rhetoric I dismantled in Vol. 1—where she claimed that "real victims remain silent." This is a sociopathic gagging tactic. It allows the perpetrator to hold onto power, isolate the victim from the community, and permanently bury the crimes away from public view.

She concludes the video with the following statement:

"The most common and effective response from observers is to refuse to take the bait, disengage entirely, and let professionals or genuine loved ones handle it if there is any actual danger."

Yes, this is fundamentally no different from commanding her audience that "a victim's pain is merely an emotional trap, so you must cut ties and ignore them completely." The complete disconnection ("disengage entirely") that Mirei currently preaches is nothing more than a hypocritical masquerade under the guise of protection. In reality, it is a meticulously constructed shield designed to provide a psychological excuse and a fake justification for Brittany's abnormal mass-blocking, blind censorship, and refusal of feedback on platforms like Bluesky.

Labeling the victims' suffering as a "dangerous emotional orbit" or "bait" to order the audience to "ignore and bypass them like machines" is an evil campaign. It is an insidious attempt to castrate the community's healthy capacity for critical thinking and human empathy, ultimately trying to socially erase the victims and treat them as invisible ghosts.

Do not let them trick you. Even if their words sound superficially plausible or right, this entire video is nothing but another classic display of DARVO.

32.

In her 32nd video, Mirei is providing her audience with another deceptive guide on "how to frame the community's rightful use of the boosting feature as a malicious smear campaign designed to weaponize money and trick the algorithm into destroying a creator's reputation." Since this video lacks a proper concluding remark at the very end, this section will be relatively short.

First, she claims that "the sole purpose of users spending money to boost exposure posts is to engage in targeted defamation and cut off a creator's financial backing." She asserts:

"Instead of relying on organic algorithms—which might limit a hateful post or controversy to a small circle—abusers use financial backing to inject toxic content, targeted attacks, or out-of-context clips directly into the feeds of wider audiences..."

"By boosting a post containing false claims, leaked private information, or manufactured drama, they artificially inflate its distribution. This forces the victim's followers, peers, or potential clients to see the negative content immediately upon opening their apps."

Let us ask a very straightforward question: What is the real reason users are paying out of their own pockets to boost these posts? It is because these sisters are actively engaging in abnormal "mass-blocking and collective censorship" across the community, trying to artificially bury the truth from the public.

The leaked logs of Mirei's inappropriate conversations with minors, her massive production of harmful NSFW art, and her recent, shameless bastardization of other users' original characters (OCs)—taking them without permission and twisting them entirely out of context to masquerade them as her own—are not some "manufactured drama." They are unerasable, concrete pieces of empirical evidence documenting actual systemic wrongdoing and blatant artistic theft.

Furthermore, framing a public interest exposure campaign and efforts to prevent further minor grooming as a mere "smear campaign" driven by money is a repulsive play on words. In her previous video, she shamelessly criticized her own fans for how they spend their money. Yet here, she completely contradicts herself, practically confessing that she is terrified of boosted posts because they warn her "potential clients" and might permanently dry up her financial income, commissions, and overall clout.

Second, she argues that "these exposure posts are just an exploitation of algorithmic loopholes for vanity metrics and a form of psychological warfare." She states:

"By pumping money into an inflammatory or rage-baiting post, abusers can rapidly generate thousands of reactions, arguments, and quote-shares. This tricks the platform's algorithm into treating the hostile content as "trending"..."

"The psychological impact of knowing someone spent actual money just to ensure people see content meant to mock, demean, or harass them is a potent form of intimidation... which can wear down the mental health and well-being of the target."

What on earth does she actually think of her own audience and critics? The true reason these exposure posts gain thousands of quote-shares and trend on the platform's recommendation feeds is not because users are using money to trick the system. It is because Mirei's minor grooming crimes, her inappropriate NSFW content, and Brittany's absolute refusal of feedback are critical pieces of data that the entire community has a rightful duty to share, archive, and monitor.

And why is the public so deeply enraged in the first place? The audience is not reacting because the posts are inherently "inflammatory." They are furious because the horrific actions committed by these sisters are genuinely infuriating to any decent human being.

While completely disregarding the mental health of the actual victims—who now suffer from lifelong, irreversible trauma and severe emotional abuse caused by her actions—she shamelessly tries to package her own financial stress as if she is the one enduring "psychological harassment." This is a textbook display of DARVO.

In the end, Mirei’s long-winded technical jargon about platform algorithms is nothing but a desperate smoke screen. She isn't actually terrified of "harassment" or "misinformation"—she is terrified that these boosted exposure posts are warning her "potential clients" and cutting off her stream of financial income and fame.

All these ugly truths have simply become too expensive for her to block.

*

*

*

Our resistance must remain steadfast, driven by a shared commitment to the truth rather than malice. In the end, this situation is no longer just about animation or personal grievances; it is a fundamental question of morality and accountability.

To ground the conclusion of this volume, I would like to reference a profound concept from the political philosopher Hannah Arendt, who extensively analyzed how systematic malice takes root when individuals willingly choose the "Inability to Think." She warned that the darkest compliance in human history does not require monsters, but rather ordinary minds who consciously embrace a specific moral blindness:

"The refusal to understand, and the deliberate inability to think from the standpoint of somebody else."

This timeless philosophical insight serves as a brutal, unyielding mirror to Mirei’s 31st and 32nd uploads. By instructing her remaining followers to classify the genuine trauma and emotional relapse of her victims as a calculated "sympathy trap" or "bait," and commanding them to "disengage entirely," Mirei is attempting something far more sinister than mere historical revisionism. She is trying to systematically castrate the basic human empathy of her fandom. She is conditioning her audience to paralyze their own capacity for compassion, demanding that they close their eyes to actual human suffering so they can remain comfortable, unfeeling shields for her reputation.

To those of us who have been unfairly branded as "haters," "manipulators," or "saboteurs" simply for refusing to turn a blind eye to the victims: do not let her pseudo-psychological trickery shake your resolve.

When creators resort to weaponizing terms like 'trauma' and 'relapse' to enforce an emotional quarantine around their income, they aren't displaying strength—they are exposing the absolute depth of their own panic. They are trying to rewrite history by terrorizing their own community into a state of chilling apathy, desperately hoping that enforced isolation will make the world look away from the cold, hard facts of their minor grooming, artistic theft, and the bastardization of other users' OCs. But we will not bow to this pathetic, corporate intimidation.

We are the ones standing firmly in the light of reality, holding up a mirror to a crumbling fortress of delusion. If they choose to treat an entire community's shared empathy as a hostile conspiracy and retreat into a vacuum built on blind praise, selective amnesia, and financial desperation, that is their downfall, not our burden.

True artistry cannot survive inside a vacuum of censorship, and a clean reputation cannot be manufactured through a frantic, mass-blocking spree. No matter how many manipulative smoke screens they throw from behind their screens, they can never erase the collective memory of this community. We are not emotional extortionists. We are the living, unbreakable evidence of their actions.

Let us rise above this absurd situation with the pride of those who have already broken free. Our refusal to accept their gaslighting is the ultimate proof that the truth cannot be mass-blocked.

Chapters of the videos we will COUNTER in this volume:

21. Haters want CONTROL

*

22. Haters Love Screenshots

23. Your haters identities can still be found even behind their Alternative ACCOUNTS

*

*

21.

In her 21st video, Mirei stages the absolute pinnacle of gaslighting by framing the community's public archiving and exposure as a serious felony: "Blackmail." Through this, she is treating the general public as mere criminals.

First, she twists our public outcry into a "felonious act driven by extortion." Here, she states:

"Blackmail is a serious crime that is fundamentally about power, control, and exploitation. When people—often referred to as 'haters'—resort to blackmail..."

And further claims:

"Financial Gain: Many perpetrators believe that the victim will pay any amount to keep their secret quiet, making it an 'easy' way to extort funds..."

Think about this. The title of this very playlist is "Some Advice For You," and its description reads: "This playlist is to spread awareness and help educate online creators." Yet, there is absolutely no actual advice that a real creator could benefit from. Instead, it is packed with nothing but strategies and warnings against "haters." And now, what? A felony? Is she out of her mind?

These sisters are actively defining the act of exposing their past scandals as a "blackmail and extortion" tactic used by low-life criminals to wring money or power out of them. However, what this community demanded was never money; it was "the truth and genuine reflection." What the victims want is an apology and the prevention of further harm, not financial compensation. To dare downgrade this into a petty, low-life crime is nothing more than a cowardly smokescreen to hide their own moral bankruptcy.

Furthermore, she brands her critics as "empathy-lacking contrarians seeking revenge." Here are the two exact sentences she uses:

"Revenge or Retaliation: If someone feels wronged... they may use information they possess to inflict maximum emotional or professional damage as a form of 'payback.'"

"Lack of Empathy and Ethical Boundaries: Individuals who turn to blackmail... view the victim merely as a resource to be exploited rather than a human being."

She is painting those of us who lead the public exposure—including myself and my friends—as if we are sociopaths burning with personal vindictiveness, trying to ruin someone's career without a shred of empathy.

Do not listen to a single word of this video. This, too, is a textbook act of DARVO.

Who is the one that genuinely shattered ethical boundaries and exploited the trust of minor fans? Who is the one that lacked empathy so severely that they stabbed their own fans and fellow creators in the back, choosing to control the entire fandom through the tool of mass-blocking? The true perpetrators are the sisters themselves. Their cruelty truly knows no bounds.

The most mind-boggling part has to be this next section. She stages a grand "victim cosplay" by presenting a set of safety guidelines:

"Important Safety Note: Blackmail is illegal... Do not pay... Do not engage..."

And she goes on to say:

"Report it: Contact local law enforcement. In the United States, you can also report online crimes to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)."

I cannot believe she is actually bringing the FBI into this. By explicitly mentioning a federal reporting channel like the IC3, she finishes her video with a dramatic masquerade, pretending they are victims of a massive national cybercrime syndicate. This is a classic scare tactic designed to instill legal fear into critics and force them into silence.

However, we have absolutely no reason to stop. Public criticism, rooted in undeniable evidence that is already openly available on the internet, can never be a subject of an FBI investigation. This desperate attempt to intimidate the public by hiding behind the names of federal laws and institutions is the ultimate proof of how cornered this pathetic "advice" series truly is.

This is barely the starting point of Vol. 3, and I honestly dread to imagine how the rest of their narrative will unfold.

22.

In her 22nd video, Mirei attempts a psychological analysis of the online exposure culture known as "Posting Receipts (sharing evidence screenshots)." Through this, she frames the victims and the fandom—who exposed their past predatory behavior (minor grooming)—as "clout-chasers, power-hungry criminals, and privacy violators," staging a pinnacle of gaslighting.

First, she claims that "exposing conversation captures (Receipts) is an act that tramples on privacy and trust." Here, she states:

"The Reality of the 'Receipts' Culture erodes the fundamental expectation of privacy in relationships. A screenshot is a static, narrow slice of a conversation that rarely captures the full history."

Shamelessly enough, despite the fact that this duo committed wrongdoings in the past, Brittany previously showed behavior of threatening the community and declaring mass-blocking rules in a video from three years ago, saying, "Don't talk trash about my sister, watch your mouth." When a powerful figure blocks communication and conceals the truth, the only remaining solution for the vulnerable is "public whistleblowing" by sharing objective evidence through conversation captures. Having created an environment where they themselves refuse communication and hide the truth, whining now that it is a "breach of privacy stripped of context" is nothing more than a logical fallacy aimed at shifting the nature of public whistleblowing into a personal betrayal.

Second, she claims that "those who post evidence are playing a power game (Power Play) to seize control of the narrative." Here, she states:

"Sharing a conversation is a way of seizing control of the narrative. It is a power play designed to humiliate the other person and demonstrate that they have the 'receipts' to ruin the other person's reputation."

Who is the actual entity that played a dictatorial power game? It is none other than these sisters themselves. They are the ones who ignored the copyright they had handed over to another artist and forced the unauthorized continuation of the series starting about three years ago, while recently mass-blocking 400 innocent fans without discrimination. For individual fans who hold absolutely no power in front of this massive creator privilege to bring out "Receipts" and unite is an exercise of the right to resistance for survival. For the duo—who previously silenced the fandom with absolute platform dictatorship—to turn around and call the solidarity of the weak a "power play fueled by a desire for control" is an absurd logic that completely reverses the dynamics of power.

(And although it has recently come to light through the latest posts/reblogs that SingularityOfKhaos, who took over the copyright of TPC, is not entirely innocent either, I still wanted to make it clear that what the sisters did was explicitly wrong, even when taking that into account.)

Her third claim was the most absurd. She asserts that "ignoring criticism and cutting off communication is the correct way to establish boundaries," stating:

"If someone is posting your private conversations to harass or discredit you, it is often best to avoid engaging with them publicly. Responding on the same platform usually just feeds the 'drama'..."

Perhaps those who have been relentlessly and permanently banned by these sisters while reading this text might already know. This claim connects flawlessly with the hypocrisy of the younger sister, Brittany, who newly posted OC Boundaries this year (2026), strictly shouting "Hell no to NSFW, no toxicity," acting as if she is a clean and pure creator.

It is a shameless and disgusting semantic whitewashing that downplays their past unauthorized serialization and the community's demand for moral accountability as mere lighthearted internet "drama," while wrapping their cowardly refusal to communicate as "mature maintenance of peace." For those who break rules as a daily routine yet shield each other while infringing on others' rights to turn around and impose strict moral standards and blocking rules onto the fans—such double standards can never be a righteous "boundary."

As I have stated previously, "A fandom has to be built on trust between the creator and the fans." They need to realize this. They need to understand that "because of the boundaries they speak of, trust has been shattered and the fandom is dying."

*

Furthermore, by uploading over 20 videos of gaslighting, they are destroying the values of the fans. Do not buy into their narrative. I sincerely hope that they, or at least Brittany, will eventually realize that building a fake fortress made of such easily shattered glass will yield nothing but an anticipated downfall.

23.

In her 23rd video, Mirei stages the absolute pinnacle of gaslighting by framing the community's mass-reporting as a serious cyber-attack. Through this, she is treating the general public as tech criminals.

First, she twists our public outcry into a "malicious spam attack." Here, she states:

"When a user is caught doing this, the platform typically penalizes the attacker, not the victim."

And further claims:

"If the platform can trace the fake accounts back to the perpetrator's legitimate primary account, that main account is usually permanently banned..."

Think about this. What they are completely ignoring here is that the "malicious spam reporting" platforms actually penalize refers to bots or macros flooding the system without cause. But the current fandom's reporting is a rightful exercise of user rights based on her actual guideline violations (grooming allegations, NSFW obsession, etc.). YouTube does not ban the main accounts of users exposing actual misconduct.

To dare downgrade this into a petty spam attack is nothing more than a cowardly smokescreen to hide their own moral bankruptcy. And if the platform truly "whitelisted" and protected Mirei completely like she claims, then why on earth did her younger sister, Brittany, have to desperately censor the comments and resort to a mass-blocking tyranny on her own channel? This is completely contradictory.

Secondly, she twists our public outcry into a "malicious asset damage." Here, she states:

"...such as getting a content creator wrongfully banned, resulting in a loss of income — it crosses the line into illegal territory."

And she claims:

"The attacker can be forced to pay for lost wages, reputational damage, and the victim's legal fees."

Are you kidding me? For a civil claim like "tortious interference" to hold weight, the financial loss must stem from an unlawful act. But the true cause of Mirei's revenue loss is her own violation of the platform's Terms of Service (TOS) through her unethical behavior. YouTube doesn't strip monetization over false claims. The architect of her financial ruin is Mirei herself, not the audience.

Do not listen to a single word of this video. In reality, when someone files a baseless lawsuit against rightful public exposure in Western courts, the perpetrator is hit with SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) regulations, forcing them to pay punitive fines. Do not let this sibling duo intimidate you with money. The moment her grooming evidence is presented in court, the only ones facing destruction are the sisters themselves.

Thirdly, she stages a grand "jail threat" by bringing up judge subpoenas:

"If charges are pressed, this can result in misdemeanor or felony convictions, carrying penalties of probation, steep fines, and even jail time."

And she goes on to say:

"...if a victim files a lawsuit or a police report, a judge can issue subpoenas to the platform and Internet Service Providers (ISPs)... making it remarkably easy to track the fake accounts right back to the real person's router."

I cannot believe she is actually bringing up a judge's subpoena into this. A judge only issues subpoenas to platforms and ISPs for severe felonies or national security threats, not because an internet creator is throwing a tantrum over public backlash. This is a classic scare tactic designed to instill legal fear into minors and force them into silence.

Also, for a defamation (libel) claim to exist, the statements must be false. But the public exposure of Mirei’s misconduct is substantiated truth backed by undeniable evidence. Under Anglo-American law, Truth is an absolute defense against defamation. In fact, the only one facing a genuine felony charge here is Mirei herself. And if real law enforcement ever gets involved, Brittany—who blindly enabled and defended her sister—won't be able to escape criminal charges or public shame either.

Frankly, this 23rd video was the most absurd thing ever. I never thought I’d be discussing actual law because of an online animator. This entire situation is just laughably pathetic to me. What on earth is she going to bring up next?

*

*

Our resistance must remain steadfast, driven by a shared commitment to the truth rather than malice. In the end, this situation is no longer just about animation or personal grievances; it is a fundamental question of morality and accountability.

I would like to speak to you all by quoting a passage from one of the most famous dystopian novel, George Orwell's 1984:

"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."

To those of us who have been unfairly branded as "criminals" or "blackmailers" simply for refusing to forget the truth: do not let their desperate threats shake your resolve. When creators resort to weaponizing federal agencies and masking public accountability as a federal felony, they aren't displaying strength—they are exposing the absolute depth of their own panic. They are trying to rewrite history by terrorizing their own community into silence, desperately hoping that fear will make us look away from the cold, hard facts of their misconduct. But we will not bow to this pathetic intimidation.

We are the ones standing firmly in the light of reality, holding up a mirror to a closed-off fortress of delusion. If they choose to treat an entire fandom as an enemy syndicate and retreat into a sanctuary built on blind praise and institutional fear, that is their downfall, not our burden. True artistry cannot survive inside a vacuum of censorship, and a clean reputation cannot be manufactured through a mass-blocking spree. No matter how many legal threats they throw from behind their screens, they can never erase the collective memory of this community. We are not extortionists. We are the unbreakable evidence of their actions.

Let us rise above this absurd situation with the pride of those who have already broken free. Our resistance is the proof that we are alive and pursuing the truth.