Goldey The Hamster

Chapters of the videos we will COUNTER in this volume:

21. Haters want CONTROL

22. Haters Love Screenshots

23. Your haters identities can still be found even behind their Alternative ACCOUNTS

*

24. Haters Are Afraid Of Accountability

25. Haters Love FANDOMS

*

*

21.

In her 21st video, Mirei stages the absolute pinnacle of gaslighting by framing the community's public archiving and exposure as a serious felony: "Blackmail." Through this, she is treating the general public as mere criminals.

First, she twists our public outcry into a "felonious act driven by extortion." Here, she states:

"Blackmail is a serious crime that is fundamentally about power, control, and exploitation. When people—often referred to as 'haters'—resort to blackmail..."

And further claims:

"Financial Gain: Many perpetrators believe that the victim will pay any amount to keep their secret quiet, making it an 'easy' way to extort funds..."

Think about this. The title of this very playlist is "Some Advice For You," and its description reads: "This playlist is to spread awareness and help educate online creators." Yet, there is absolutely no actual advice that a real creator could benefit from. Instead, it is packed with nothing but strategies and warnings against "haters." And now, what? A felony? Is she out of her mind?

These sisters are actively defining the act of exposing their past scandals as a "blackmail and extortion" tactic used by low-life criminals to wring money or power out of them. However, what this community demanded was never money; it was "the truth and genuine reflection." What the victims want is an apology and the prevention of further harm, not financial compensation. To dare downgrade this into a petty, low-life crime is nothing more than a cowardly smokescreen to hide their own moral bankruptcy.

Furthermore, she brands her critics as "empathy-lacking contrarians seeking revenge." Here are the two exact sentences she uses:

"Revenge or Retaliation: If someone feels wronged... they may use information they possess to inflict maximum emotional or professional damage as a form of 'payback.'"

"Lack of Empathy and Ethical Boundaries: Individuals who turn to blackmail... view the victim merely as a resource to be exploited rather than a human being."

She is painting those of us who lead the public exposure—including myself and my friends—as if we are sociopaths burning with personal vindictiveness, trying to ruin someone's career without a shred of empathy.

Do not listen to a single word of this video. This, too, is a textbook act of DARVO.

Who is the one that genuinely shattered ethical boundaries and exploited the trust of minor fans? Who is the one that lacked empathy so severely that they stabbed their own fans and fellow creators in the back, choosing to control the entire fandom through the tool of mass-blocking? The true perpetrators are the sisters themselves. Their cruelty truly knows no bounds.

The most mind-boggling part has to be this next section. She stages a grand "victim cosplay" by presenting a set of safety guidelines:

"Important Safety Note: Blackmail is illegal... Do not pay... Do not engage..."

And she goes on to say:

"Report it: Contact local law enforcement. In the United States, you can also report online crimes to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)."

I cannot believe she is actually bringing the FBI into this. By explicitly mentioning a federal reporting channel like the IC3, she finishes her video with a dramatic masquerade, pretending they are victims of a massive national cybercrime syndicate. This is a classic scare tactic designed to instill legal fear into critics and force them into silence.

However, we have absolutely no reason to stop. Public criticism, rooted in undeniable evidence that is already openly available on the internet, can never be a subject of an FBI investigation. This desperate attempt to intimidate the public by hiding behind the names of federal laws and institutions is the ultimate proof of how cornered this pathetic "advice" series truly is.

This is barely the starting point of Vol. 3, and I honestly dread to imagine how the rest of their narrative will unfold.

22.

In her 22nd video, Mirei attempts a psychological analysis of the online exposure culture known as "Posting Receipts (sharing evidence screenshots)." Through this, she frames the victims and the fandom—who exposed their past predatory behavior (minor grooming)—as "clout-chasers, power-hungry criminals, and privacy violators," staging a pinnacle of gaslighting.

First, she claims that "exposing conversation captures (Receipts) is an act that tramples on privacy and trust." Here, she states:

"The Reality of the 'Receipts' Culture erodes the fundamental expectation of privacy in relationships. A screenshot is a static, narrow slice of a conversation that rarely captures the full history."

Shamelessly enough, despite the fact that this duo committed wrongdoings in the past, Brittany previously showed behavior of threatening the community and declaring mass-blocking rules in a video from three years ago, saying, "Don't talk trash about my sister, watch your mouth." When a powerful figure blocks communication and conceals the truth, the only remaining solution for the vulnerable is "public whistleblowing" by sharing objective evidence through conversation captures. Having created an environment where they themselves refuse communication and hide the truth, whining now that it is a "breach of privacy stripped of context" is nothing more than a logical fallacy aimed at shifting the nature of public whistleblowing into a personal betrayal.

Second, she claims that "those who post evidence are playing a power game (Power Play) to seize control of the narrative." Here, she states:

"Sharing a conversation is a way of seizing control of the narrative. It is a power play designed to humiliate the other person and demonstrate that they have the 'receipts' to ruin the other person's reputation."

Who is the actual entity that played a dictatorial power game? It is none other than these sisters themselves. They are the ones who ignored the copyright they had handed over to another artist and forced the unauthorized continuation of the series starting about three years ago, while recently mass-blocking 400 innocent fans without discrimination. For individual fans who hold absolutely no power in front of this massive creator privilege to bring out "Receipts" and unite is an exercise of the right to resistance for survival. For the duo—who previously silenced the fandom with absolute platform dictatorship—to turn around and call the solidarity of the weak a "power play fueled by a desire for control" is an absurd logic that completely reverses the dynamics of power.

(And although it has recently come to light through the latest posts/reblogs that SingularityOfKhaos, who took over the copyright of TPC, is not entirely innocent either, I still wanted to make it clear that what the sisters did was explicitly wrong, even when taking that into account.)

Her third claim was the most absurd. She asserts that "ignoring criticism and cutting off communication is the correct way to establish boundaries," stating:

"If someone is posting your private conversations to harass or discredit you, it is often best to avoid engaging with them publicly. Responding on the same platform usually just feeds the 'drama'..."

Perhaps those who have been relentlessly and permanently banned by these sisters while reading this text might already know. This claim connects flawlessly with the hypocrisy of the younger sister, Brittany, who newly posted OC Boundaries this year (2026), strictly shouting "Hell no to NSFW, no toxicity," acting as if she is a clean and pure creator.

It is a shameless and disgusting semantic whitewashing that downplays their past unauthorized serialization and the community's demand for moral accountability as mere lighthearted internet "drama," while wrapping their cowardly refusal to communicate as "mature maintenance of peace." For those who break rules as a daily routine yet shield each other while infringing on others' rights to turn around and impose strict moral standards and blocking rules onto the fans—such double standards can never be a righteous "boundary."

As I have stated previously, "A fandom has to be built on trust between the creator and the fans." They need to realize this. They need to understand that "because of the boundaries they speak of, trust has been shattered and the fandom is dying."

Furthermore, by uploading over 20 videos of gaslighting, they are destroying the values of the fans. Do not buy into their narrative. I sincerely hope that they, or at least Brittany, will eventually realize that building a fake fortress made of such easily shattered glass will yield nothing but an anticipated downfall.

23.

In her 23rd video, Mirei stages the absolute pinnacle of gaslighting by framing the community's mass-reporting as a serious cyber-attack. Through this, she is treating the general public as tech criminals.

First, she twists our public outcry into a "malicious spam attack." Here, she states:

"When a user is caught doing this, the platform typically penalizes the attacker, not the victim."

And further claims:

"If the platform can trace the fake accounts back to the perpetrator's legitimate primary account, that main account is usually permanently banned..."

Think about this. What they are completely ignoring here is that the "malicious spam reporting" platforms actually penalize refers to bots or macros flooding the system without cause. But the current fandom's reporting is a rightful exercise of user rights based on her actual guideline violations (grooming allegations, NSFW obsession, etc.). YouTube does not ban the main accounts of users exposing actual misconduct.

To dare downgrade this into a petty spam attack is nothing more than a cowardly smokescreen to hide their own moral bankruptcy. And if the platform truly "whitelisted" and protected Mirei completely like she claims, then why on earth did her younger sister, Brittany, have to desperately censor the comments and resort to a mass-blocking tyranny on her own channel? This is completely contradictory.

Secondly, she twists our public outcry into a "malicious asset damage." Here, she states:

"...such as getting a content creator wrongfully banned, resulting in a loss of income — it crosses the line into illegal territory."

And she claims:

"The attacker can be forced to pay for lost wages, reputational damage, and the victim's legal fees."

Are you kidding me? For a civil claim like "tortious interference" to hold weight, the financial loss must stem from an unlawful act. But the true cause of Mirei's revenue loss is her own violation of the platform's Terms of Service (TOS) through her unethical behavior. YouTube doesn't strip monetization over false claims. The architect of her financial ruin is Mirei herself, not the audience.

Do not listen to a single word of this video. In reality, when someone files a baseless lawsuit against rightful public exposure in Western courts, the perpetrator is hit with SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) regulations, forcing them to pay punitive fines. Do not let this sibling duo intimidate you with money. The moment her grooming evidence is presented in court, the only ones facing destruction are the sisters themselves.

Thirdly, she stages a grand "jail threat" by bringing up judge subpoenas:

"If charges are pressed, this can result in misdemeanor or felony convictions, carrying penalties of probation, steep fines, and even jail time."

And she goes on to say:

"...if a victim files a lawsuit or a police report, a judge can issue subpoenas to the platform and Internet Service Providers (ISPs)... making it remarkably easy to track the fake accounts right back to the real person's router."

I cannot believe she is actually bringing up a judge's subpoena into this. A judge only issues subpoenas to platforms and ISPs for severe felonies or national security threats, not because an internet creator is throwing a tantrum over public backlash. This is a classic scare tactic designed to instill legal fear into minors and force them into silence.

Also, for a defamation (libel) claim to exist, the statements must be false. But the public exposure of Mirei’s misconduct is substantiated truth backed by undeniable evidence. Under Anglo-American law, Truth is an absolute defense against defamation. In fact, the only one facing a genuine felony charge here is Mirei herself. And if real law enforcement ever gets involved, Brittany—who blindly enabled and defended her sister—won't be able to escape criminal charges or public shame either.

Frankly, this 23rd video was the most absurd thing ever. I never thought I’d be discussing actual law because of an online animator. This entire situation is just laughably pathetic to me. What on earth is she going to bring up next?

24.

In her 24th video, Mirei stages the absolute pinnacle of gaslighting. Instead of reflecting on her own horrific misconduct, she frames the public’s rightful criticism and boycott as mere "hate comments driven by insecurities and cowardice" just to secure a desperate sense of psychological victory.

First, she claims that blocking creators like herself is a "Drive-By" strategy used by cowards who are afraid of confrontation. She states:

"By blocking you immediately, the individual ensures that you cannot respond, defend yourself... It is a one-sided interaction designed to deliver a 'hit' without the risk of an engaging or uncomfortable conversation."

As always, she is completely delusional and missing the point.

The public is not blocking this perpetrator because they are afraid of a debate or conversation with her. Deplatforming a perpetrator who committed such severe offenses is a firm and absolute 'statement of refusal'—refusing to give her any further platform to spew excuses, logical leaps, and gaslighting.

Furthermore, if we look back at her sister Brittany’s past channel notice—which openly stated that anyone saying anything "bad" about Mirei would be instantly banned—it was actually these two sisters who first avoided public accountability through mass deletion and blocking. For them to now turn around and project their own cowardly censorship onto the public is the textbook definition of absolute hypocrisy.

Second, she asserts that her critics are just failures in life who project their internal frustrations to envy and control creators. She states:

"Often, the hate directed at you is a projection of the person's own insecurities, envy, or unhappiness... By lashing out, they are attempting to externalize their own negative emotions by making them your problem."

This completely exposes her insufferable arrogance.

As I have stated before, the public is not calling her out because they are jealous of her content. They are furious because of the objective reality: she committed severe 'ethical and social misconduct' by engaging in erotic roleplay (ERP) and psychological gaslighting targeting minor fans.

The community is simply speaking out based on common-sense justice and solidarity with the victims.

Not only that, Mirei claims that the root cause of this distress lies within the critics' own minds. However, the true root cause of this entire outrage is Mirei's own past actions during her BreaBear Jones era. Shifting the blame from her own crimes to the mental state of the public is a classic psychological coping mechanism and blatant cognitive dissonance.

Third, she claims that "criticism is merely the price of a creator's fame, so you should ignore it and focus on your work." Here, she states:

"In the digital space, this is often just the 'cost of doing business' for creators... Once you identify the behavior for what it is—a desperate bid for attention and control—it becomes much easier to delete the message and move on."

Of course, generalized hate comments or groundless slander might be considered part of the "cost of doing business" that a creator has to endure.

However, the community’s boycott—sparked by exposure of grooming/minor exploitation and the unsolicited creation of inappropriate NSFW content—is absolutely not a mere price of fame. Rather, it is the direct consequence and rightful punishment for criminal actions. Downplaying this as a minor business risk is a severe form of secondary victimization against the actual victims.

Furthermore, she preaches in the video about "contributing to keeping your community space safe" or "not letting it affect your creative process."

Yet, the very people who single-handedly destroyed the safety of the fandom, leaving countless individuals traumatized and betrayed, are Mirei and Brittany themselves. Without a shred of reflection or self-awareness, they shamelessly attempt to preserve their YouTube revenue and status as creators. This is nothing more than a deceptive and manipulative attempt to whitewash their image.

I am always left wondering: how can anyone be this unapologetically thick-skinned?

It is completely absurd that they refuse to self-reflect, yet impose excessively strict rules on their fans and block anyone who doesn't fit their narrative.

*

The fandom is profoundly disappointed in them, and these sisters have absolutely no excuse for their actions.

25.

In her 25th video, Mirei introduces a 'victim-cosplay and fandom control manual' designed to completely block legitimate criticism. This sister duo, without fail, is once again trying to control and silence their fandom at their own whim.

First, she claims: "Those who criticize you are merely wearing the persona of a 'fan' to undermine your authority through targeted harassment."

Here, she states:

"They utilize the persona of a 'fan' to mask their true intentions. Thus attempting to camouflage their criticism as 'just a fan's opinion' rather than a targeted attack to harass you."

As always, public backlash does not happen without a cause. The true essence of why fans are speaking out is rooted in Mirei's own moral bankruptcy—including past grooming controversies involving minors, the younger sister Brittany’s unconditional shielding, and their pathetic attempts to wash away their history by changing their usernames.

There is a fundamental failure in basic ethics beyond just the facts of their actions. A creator with a basic moral compass would take accountability for their wrongdoings and provide clear explanations. Instead, Mirei is shifting the nature of public accountability into a malicious, personalized betrayal by framing legitimate fact-checks and requests for explanations as "targeted attacks by stalkers." This is nothing more than a toxic act of psychological projection and gaslighting designed to invalidate and trample upon the fans' genuine disappointment in order to conceal her own moral failings.

Second, she claims: "To protect your creative flow and peace as an artist, you must use moderation tools liberally to mass-block and filter out your critics."

Here, she states:

"Use moderation tools. You have no obligation to tolerate their presence on your platform. Use the block and mute functions liberally. You owe no stage to those who seek to tear you down."

Does this make any sense? Social media platforms are meant to be public squares built on mutual respect and open communication between creators and their fandom. Yet, data reveals that the younger sister, Brittany, has secretly mass-blocked nearly 400 innocent fans behind the scenes. This is definitive proof that their actions are not "platform management," but rather a repulsive, absolute dictatorship and censorship campaign.

That is not all. While they preach that their own artwork must be sacredly protected, Brittany's newly enforced 2026 OC Boundaries strictly ban fanfiction and fanart, stripping fans of their purest creative joy and passion. To suffocate the community into a silent vacuum while whining that only their space must remain peaceful is an absurd double standard that completely defies any standard of creative ethics. Do they honestly think their fandom won't wither and die if they continue to restrict them like this?

Third, she claims: "You must completely ignore external criticism and rely solely on your inner circle to demonstrate that you remain unbothered."

Here, she states:

"A simple, non-defensive post or announcement letting your true audience know you aren't bothered is often enough... Protect your inner circle."

This is highly ridiculous. If they were truly unbothered and ethically confident in their actions, they would not be desperately filtering keywords to blindfold the fans, nor would they be obsessively uploading over 25 videos of pure gaslighting just to fight back against their critics. They are visibly shaking from the impact, yet putting on a pathetic facade of being "mature and focused on creation."

Furthermore, hiding behind a toxic "inner circle" like Brittany Robinson—who willfully turns a blind eye to the truth and shields her sister's wrongdoings—is not healthy communication. It is no different from the behavior of a cowardly cult leader seeking validation inside a fragile, private fortress while lacking the moral courage to accept critical feedback.

"Remember, your art and your passion belong to you. The presence of someone trying to sour that experience doesn't make your work any less valuable or the joy you get from it any less real."

Does this even make sense? They have literally forbidden the fans from enjoying their own passion through their latest 2026 guidelines (OC Boundaries), yet they dare to preach about the sanctity of creation. And this really needs to be said. This closing remark is a massive, structural coping mechanism. It is a giant psychological defense wall built so she can say, "No matter how much you point out my ethical flaws with undeniable facts, I will just close my ears and remain eternally happy inside my own little world."

To mass-block 400 fans, censor every comment, and engage in narcissistic self-soothing within the shelter of an enabler sister is pathetic beyond words—it borders on bizarre. This series shows a total lack of even 1% remorse or basic accountability for the harm they have caused.

It is truly the worst possible conclusion.

*

*

Our resistance must remain steadfast, driven by a shared commitment to the truth rather than malice. In the end, this situation is no longer just about animation or personal grievances; it is a fundamental question of morality and accountability.

I would like to speak to you all by quoting a passage from one of the most famous dystopian novel, George Orwell's 1984:

"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."

To those of us who have been unfairly branded as "criminals" or "blackmailers" simply for refusing to forget the truth: do not let their desperate threats shake your resolve. When creators resort to weaponizing federal agencies and masking public accountability as a federal felony, they aren't displaying strength—they are exposing the absolute depth of their own panic. They are trying to rewrite history by terrorizing their own community into silence, desperately hoping that fear will make us look away from the cold, hard facts of their misconduct. But we will not bow to this pathetic intimidation.

We are the ones standing firmly in the light of reality, holding up a mirror to a closed-off fortress of delusion. If they choose to treat an entire fandom as an enemy syndicate and retreat into a sanctuary built on blind praise and institutional fear, that is their downfall, not our burden. True artistry cannot survive inside a vacuum of censorship, and a clean reputation cannot be manufactured through a mass-blocking spree. No matter how many legal threats they throw from behind their screens, they can never erase the collective memory of this community. We are not extortionists. We are the unbreakable evidence of their actions.

Let us rise above this absurd situation with the pride of those who have already broken free. Our resistance is the proof that we are alive and pursuing the truth.