[targeted "you" towards those fake ass folks]

Why am I suddenly "toxic" and I need to change if I'm distant and withdraw myself from others while you were fine with my asociality?

Why am I suddenly a "heartless monster" when I don't care about people dying and wars while you were fine with my apathy and lack of affective/compassionate empathy?

Why is it badly seen to have a Personality Disorder, showing the disordered side of a popularized disorder, having a barely known disorder? Or just showing those stigmatized traits without having a disorder?

No, someone not having morals doesn't mean they will suddenly do what most people consider "immoral" or crimes, most criminals and "mean" people still have morals from what I've seen. And not being prosocial or simply not being kind don't make a person "awful" either.

I named it SKN (simply "skin" shortened since I couldn't find a good text acronym). Yes, it's a crab. And the little crosses symbolize the skin picking scars.

Empathy (whatever the type), sympathy, compassion, pity, remorse, and care are all traits someone can have or lack. No it doesn't mean someone is shitty if them lack one, multiple, or all those traits.

If you want to support people who lack empathy, don't push down people lacking other traits in the process. Either you accept people lacking all the traits I said or you shut the fuck up.

The ICD-11 classification system for Personality Disorders is better than the DSM-5-TR one.

The system with Clusters and multiple Personality Disorders put people too much into strict boxes, while the one with 1 Personality Disorder diagnosis then a specified severity + Trait Specifiers is more accurate.

I think I've read there is something similar in the DSM-5-TR but is seems nobody use it.

You might have noticed I said "all types" an not "both types"; it's because some definitions say there are affective empathy, cognitive empathy, but also compassionate empathy; just compassionate empathy is honestly too close to sympathy + compassion so I usually never bring up this type.

Wanting to gruesomely beat or kill someone out of anger because my anger issues were triggered but not acting on them since getting in legal trouble is annoying, are those thoughts impulsive thoughts or intrusive thoughts?

Now she thinks I'm autistic or HPI because my behavior (of looking around the room I'm in, avoiding eye contact, fidgeting a bit) made her think I have ASD even at the 1st appointment but she tried to check if I didn't have hormonal issues first.

I will have to get tested for ASD and do an IQ test too.

She's the 3rd medical/social professional to think I'm autistic because of my behavior and partly think that since ASD is the most known neurodivergence.

Honestly I don't think I'm autistic, some traits are just me being awkward around people since my social skills are gone from never really socializing, some other are me checking my surroundings to find anything interesting to look at since I'm kinda bored, me avoiding eye contact is because it feels uncomfortable and I think it shouldn't be mandatory anyway, and the other traits are just the overlaps between SzPD and ASD.

No "Schizoid Dilemma" isn't some official psychology term, no "fear of engulfment" isn't some basic traits all schizoids have, etc (go see some of my other posts for more examples).

Yes those psychoanalysts surely had a lot of misdiagnosed patients such as some pwAvPD, some masking autistic people with trauma that leads to fear of engulfment and isolation, maybe even some pwStPD that they unknowingly used for making those theories. All this obviously mess up their conclusions.

I think this is one of the main cause of all the misinformation on internet about SzPD that I've talked about in former posts.