uwu

i think feminists must use 'socialisation', 'internalised misogyny', 'brainwashing', and other theories to attempt to make peace with the fact that they actually in practice just wouldn't like most women. most women are making choices that feminists fundamentally just do not agree with and cannot accept and they can't reconcile that with their performed love for women so they invent reasons for why those women would of course absolutely agree with them and make the exact same choices feminists make if only it weren't for the socialisation...

feminism isn't about loving women, it's about wanting to advance women's material interests. i'm well aware that a lot of women make choices i fundamentally don't agree with, so i support social engineering and authoritarian measures to lead them to make better choices.

i didn't say it was, and this post wasn't about that. it was about feminists manufacturing reasons for why women do things they don't agree with

fair enough, they certainly do that

i think feminists must use 'socialisation', 'internalised misogyny', 'brainwashing', and other theories to attempt to make peace with the fact that they actually in practice just wouldn't like most women. most women are making choices that feminists fundamentally just do not agree with and cannot accept and they can't reconcile that with their performed love for women so they invent reasons for why those women would of course absolutely agree with them and make the exact same choices feminists make if only it weren't for the socialisation...

feminism isn't about loving women, it's about wanting to advance women's material interests. i'm well aware that a lot of women make choices i fundamentally don't agree with, so i support social engineering and authoritarian measures to lead them to make better choices.

a lot of women denigrate the sciences because they resent their own lack of interest in them. suggesting an intrinsic connection between the sciences and maleness allows them to avoid taking accountability for their own lack of intelligence and discipline so they can continue being unserious under the guise of being in tune with their womanhood or whatever

under my totalitarian regime being a housewife will not be allowed. you WILL become an accomplished scientist

it’s some real rankass messaging that whenever a woman in power talks about taking pride in her job, or the challenges she has faced as a woman to rise to her current professional level, both men and women on the left start lobbing “girlboss” accusations at her. do you understand how demeaning that is??? and do you also understand that young girls can see this messaging, both online and in person, and immediately internalize that aspiring to be powerful in their chosen fields equals bad, cringe, or not progressive in some way?! it’s like your run-of-the-mill misogyny gets completely ignored because the professionally powerful women of the world, or should i say MOMMIES, are always expected to clean up this global mess, completely subvert the status quo, and somehow transform our capitalist society into a more equitable socialist one where i guess the position of leader becomes antiquated??? i swear, as someone very left of center myself, i think there is a not insubstantial number of self-proclaimed “leftists” who have reinvented the madonna-whore dichotomy, where a woman in power is either emma goldman (righteous) or margaret thatcher (evil), and there is no in between. please be so for fucking real right now.

people talk about girlboss feminism in the most deranged ways. god, i WISH girlboss feminism was as dominant a cultural force right now as it is in the delusional way some of you people talk about it. please read the room and look around you. where is sophia amoruso? what’s sheryl sandberg up to?? i don’t know because it isn’t fucking 2014 anymore! instead, we have a rapist as the united states president, a disturbing proliferation of tradwife propaganda around every fucking corner, and forced birth in the united states because a woman’s right to choose is no longer a federally protected right. if ONLY my biggest concern was rich women telling younger women and girls that they too can aspire to earn money, become professionally powerful, and be independent because we live in a global society where access to money equals power, independence, and self-autonomy. god forBID.

every time there's another post about how science is malebrained and the superior feminine way of understanding the world is via bullshit woo i like to imagine a 1920s misogynist nodding along thoughtfully whilst stroking his beard

the year is 2026 we are moving past calling random quirky behaviours male for no fucking reason.

"men love reading the wikipedia article for something while they-" men love looking out upon a world and seeing naught but ash. ash beneath their feet, ash in their bellies, ash in front of and behind their eyes. they love it so much.

Imagine if we started saying women should have their own sports leagues, chess leagues etc because we’re superior mentally and physically. They’d be flying in so fast to disprove us lmao

Of course, there’d be two camps - edgy mras and those sympathetic to maleness would be quick to ‘well actually 🤓’ us with stats about male and female physiology, whilst tras would lecture us about cissexism, whilst conveniently ignoring the obvious ‘cissexism’ of the mras. Both groups would bravely put aside their differences to own the ‘terfs’

obviously bigotry isnt rational but "women are naturally worse at spatial reasoning and math" is a wild opinion to have when women have historically been the primary textile producers in a lot of societies. have you ever seen a tablet weaving pattern