Louis turning and consent pt. 1
To start this discussion we first need to discuss consent. Let’s lay down 3 terms I’m going to be using in this analysis.
Informed consent - Individuals must have the capacity to decide, understand the risks, benefits, and alternatives, and voluntarily agree to an action.
Dubious consent - consent is unclear, compromised, or exists in a gray area.
Violated consent - A violated consent occurs when a person's boundaries, agreement, or bodily autonomy are crossed or ignored.
Lestat is a vampire, and vampires by nature exist to explore these themes because they defy consent and coerce it. You cannot kill and eat someone with their consent. Reading someone’s mind is violating their consent. Stalking and watching someone without them knowing is violating consent. Lestat does all of this to Louis.
Lestat violated Louis consent before the turning itself, during the night with Miss Lily. Louis participates willingly and gives consent to a sexual encounter. While no verbal consent is given Louis has time to process this encounter as a sexual one and chooses to consent to it.
However the nature of the encounter changes suddenly from a sexual one to a vampiric one, with no time or enough information for Louis to consent to it. Louis doesn’t know vampires are real and that Lestat is one, he doesn’t know that a biting and blood drinking is about to occur.
Lestat doesn’t give Louis the time to react and no opportunity to leave the situation - Louis can’t give informed consent, it’s dubious consent at best, or a total violation of consent.
After this night we see how Louis decides to cut ties with Lestat. He no longer consents to any type of relationship with Lestat.
Louis does this by avoiding him, and when Lestat confronts him, he clearly states the boundary several times to Lestat, in many ways. All which Lestat violates.
Louis is grieving that night, mentally unstable and incredibly intoxicated. He is so drunk he’s stumbling, and unable to walk straight. He is not in at any capacity to give informed consent to anything.
Lestat stalks Louis to the church and kills the priests. Louis fights back against Lestat’s interference, and disagrees with Lestat’s notion that Louis is humiliating himself by seeking comfort in the church and fights back against Lestat killing the priests.
Then we have an incredibly beautiful love confession by Lestat. And he asks Louis to be his companion. A lot of this speech is not mentioned by Louis, but we know it ends with Louis nodding and giving a kiss of acceptance.
Is saying yes or nodding your head yes enough in this instance to be informed consent? Nope! It can’t be. It’s dubious consent at best.
There has been speculation and been said outside the show that Louis intended to kill himself that night. Was killing the priests Louis were confiding in a great suicide prevention? Or was it an act that isolated Louis to others to turn to?
We don’t know what might have happened that night. What actions father Mathias might have taken, that would perhaps given Louis the care he needed.
In the words of Claudia,
Was turning Louis in this moment when he couldn’t give consent the only available option to Lestat if he was afraid Louis would kill himself?
NOPE! There’s so many other alternative routes than offering eternal marriage to the guy that keeps rejecting you. Lestat could have given the offer and waited to turn Louis when he was in a state to give informed consent, watched over him if he was afraid he’d commit suicide, or inform others who could help Louis. Or anything else. But that would not be a very interesting choice to make in a show about vampires.
Loustat relationship up to and including the turning was muddied with issues of consent that is to be expected when a human deals with a vampire - how does their relationship and consent evolve when they are both vampires?
We will continue this in part 2.













