do you think that if shane and ilya were to start hanging out with more queer people sometimes ilya would have to be like "by the way dont mention being a landlord in front of these ones. i know the rich art collector gays we met the other week at that gala talked to you about property investment but i dont think this queer birdwatching club will take it as well"
The question of whether all landlords are bastards is a little more nuanced than you might always think, but we also gotta keep remembering that (book) Shane is something even worse and more evil than a landlord: he takes existing housing stock off the market to redevelop into luxury condos, and then he lets the condos sit vacant for five years so he can get railed. I mean the last part ... I get it. But it's guillotine behavior.
Empirically housing is a human right and no one should be able to profit from providing shelter to another person. In our current lived reality, it is unfortunately true that 1) being a landlord has historically been a path to economic mobility for POC (especially immigrants) who have been excluded from other avenues and 2) show me the biggest scumbag landlord you have ever met and I guarantee you that they have at least one tenant who would be sleeping under a bridge if that dirtbag wasn't renting to them. But all landlords are probably bastards. And large property owner corporations should obviously be burnt to the ground.
P.S. I just realized this might read like I'm ragging on the original post for calling Shane a landlord and I am not! Original post was very funny! But my diseased brain saw another opportunity to talk about my current special interest: Shane Hollander Property Redeveloping Monster.

















