Gay flag, Lesbian flag, Bi flag and Pan flag flying fox
h

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Monterey Bay Aquarium

romaâ

pixel skylines
macklin celebrini has autism

PR's Tumblrdome
Show & Tell

Andulka
Sade Olutola
Xuebing Du


Kiana Khansmith
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

bliss lane
Jules of Nature
hello vonnie

shark vs the universe
Not today Justin
seen from Italy
seen from Spain

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Bulgaria

seen from Ecuador
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Poland
seen from Iraq

seen from Thailand
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from T1

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Finland
seen from Canada

seen from TĂźrkiye
@tiekoot
Gay flag, Lesbian flag, Bi flag and Pan flag flying fox

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Flying Fox Flag Transgender, Asexual, Agender, Nonbinary
Flying fox art set Pride Month demiromantic, Demisexual Intersex progressive
Flying fox art set Pride Month Genderfluid Questioning aromantic straight ally art set 4

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
All women are forced to live under an arbitrary and unfair system which sorts us into the categories of âFuckableâ and âWorthless.â The solution to this is NOT to expand the definition of âFuckable.â
âAll women are beautifulâ is a cute sentiment and all but itâs ultimately the wrong one. All women are valuable, all women are people, whether you can be generous enough to find unconventional beauty in their appearance or not.
Do yâall know where the phrase âeat the richâ comes from or do you just repeat it cause you heard it elsewhere?
Itâs not a bad thing, I just saw someone say âwe never said who would eat the richâ and realized a lot of yâall might not have heard the full quote
Itâs from Rousseau and itâs âWhen the people shall have nothing more to eat, they will eat the rich"
And, well, thereâs a lot of people with nothing to eatâŚ
The poor cried,
"We are starving. There is no more bread, and we have nothing to eat."
The rich man said,
"Not my problem you don't work for your bread,"
as if he did not snatch away the grain by his own greedy hands and create filling bread for his own overflowing mouth.
The poor cried,
"We are dying. There is no more medicine, and we're all ill."
The rich man said,
"Not my problem you don't take care of yourselves,"
as if he did not buy all the medicine and raise prices so high
the gods themselves would not
be able to reach.
The poor people
stopped crying,
and the rich man was satisfied...
Until they came knocking at his door one night;
their faces were sunken,
their flesh decaying,
their eyes sightless.
They were monsters
of the rich man's
own making.
As they devoured his flesh,
the rich man cried,
"Please, spare me!"
The ravenous zombies said,
"Not our fault
you fattened yourself
for slaughter."
Holy fucking shit
Do you ever think you'll stop drawing fanart? No offense it just seems like the kind of thing you're supposed to grow out of. I'm just curious what your plans/goals are since it isn't exactly an art form that people take seriously.
Ah, fanart. Also known as the art that girls make.
Sad, immature girls no one takes seriously. Girls who are taught that itâs shameful to be excited or passionate about anything, that itâs pathetic to gush about what attracts them, that itâs wrong to be a geek, that they should feel embarrassed about having a crush, that theyâre not allowed to gaze or stare or wish or desire. Girls who need to grow out of it.
Thatâs the art you mean, right?
Because in my experience, when grown men make it, nobody calls it fanart. They just call it art. And everyone takes it very seriously.
Itâs interesting though â the culture of shame surrounding adult women and fandom. Even within fandom itâs heavily internalized: unsurprisingly, mind, given that fandom is largely comprised by young girls and, unfortunately, our culture runs on ensuring young girls internalize *all* messages no matter how toxic. But hereâs another way of thinking about it.
Sports is a fandom. It requires zealous attention to âseasons,â knowledge of details considered obscure to those not involved in that fandom, unbelievable amounts of merchandise, and even âfanficâ in the form of fantasy teams. But this is a masculine-coded fandom. And as such, itâs encouraged - built into our economy! Have you *seen* Dish networkâs âultimate fanâ advertisements, which literally base selling of a product around the normalization of all consuming (male) obsession? Or the very existence of sports bars, built around the link between fans and community enjoyment and analysis. Sport fandom is so ingrained in our culture that major events are treated like holidays (my gym closes for the Super Bowl) â and can you imagine being laughed at for admitting you didnât know the difference between Supernatural and The X Files the way you might if you admit you donât know the rules of football vs baseball, or basketball?
âFandomâ is not childish but we live in a culture that commodified womenâs time in such away that their hobbies have to be âfrivolous,â because âmatureâ womenâs interests are supposed to be marriage, family, and overall care taking: things that allow others to continue their own special interests, while leaving women without a space of their own.
So think about what youâre actually saying when you call someone âtoo oldâ for fandom. Because youâre suggesting they are âtoo oldâ for a consuming hobby, and I challenge you to answer â what do you think they should be doing instead?
#I love the fact Iâm âweirdâ for writing fic but some guy painting a team logo on his beer belly is normal
[x] [x]
This whole modern approach is also seriously undermining just how important fanfiction is - from a historical standpoint.
The concept of fanfiction formed and forged the earliest stages of literature in Europe. Because the majority of authors in France, Germany and Great Britain looked at that funky little Celtic dude Arthur and thought âhey, heâs neat. I wanna write about himâ.
The entire concept of a book outside of religious purposes was born out of fanfiction in my country.
There is no âfirst canonâ for Arthur where he came as the prince of Camelot, with his sidekicks Lancelot and Merlin and his endgame love interest Gwen.
Arthur was some random hunter when he started out.
Someoneâs fanfiction made him a prince.
Someone elseâs fanfiction gave him a round table.
Someone elseâs fanfiction gave him Merlin at his side.
Someone elseâs fanfiction gave him Morgana, gave him Gwen, gave him his swords.
And, to this day, we still write Arthurian fanfiction. Literally last year there was a movie adaptation that is, by all intends and purposes, fanfiction, because it wasnât even close to a literal adaptation of the source material (The Kid Who Would Be King). Heck, BBCâs Merlin, itself an Arthurian fanfiction, remains one of the biggest fandoms that people today write for on AO3.
You were a joke in the middle ages if you tried to write your own stuff. Whoâs interested in your stuff? You were only a respected author if you wrote fanfiction. The most famous medieval German authors are famous because they wrote fanfiction about some knightly OCs they created who served on Arthurâs court. That is the literary legacy of the middle ages. Arthurian fanfiction.
Yet somewhere along the way, this concept of âI find x story/element cool and want to elaborate on it more, shift the focus onto an aspect of this original source materialâ has gotten this âeh, itâs fanfictionâ connotation and lost respect.
Even though this very concept is still being used - even outside of the actual medium of fanfiction - and it is still being used for the very same purpose it was used for in medieval times. Original movies often donât get as much recognition as adaptations of existing source material that the audience is familiar with. People see a movie about a character theyâre familiar with and seem more inclined to buy a ticket to see the 10th new interpretation of Batman or Superman or Snow White. How are these new interpretations of familiar source material that usually add to the lore, reinterpret characterizations and dynamics, any different from fanfiction?
But heaven forbid we call The Dark Knight Nolanâs Batman fanfiction. No, fanfiction is that silly thing that we canât take seriously, but that new Joker movie, that however is high-end art.
SO IMPORTANT
You might be interested in âIâm done explaining why fanfic is okay.â Itâs pertinent to this entire discussion.
the worst part about studying languages is knowing that you will never be nearly as good at it as a literal baby
The only reason babies are better at language learning is because itâs their full time job and they donât get embarrassed
If you, a teenaged or adult human, wasnât embarrassed and could study language full time you would learn way faster than a baby.
In my defense, babies receive more positive reinforcement than I do as well. Babies will say ha ba bah dah ba hah and all the adults around them will be like 𤯠really? Wow đą that is so interesting đ great job! đ¤ and then what happened? đ¤
also people who are like âIâve been studying for a year and I only have an eight-year-oldâs grasp of the languageâ:
how long do you think it took the eight-year-old
also the baby is constantly immersed in the language all the time. unless youâre surrounded by people who speak your target language, youâre not gonna have that convenience. and thatâs ok.
when i watch old movies iâm constantly surprised by how much acting has improved. not that the acting in the classics is bad, itâs just often kind of artificial? itâs acting-y. itâs like stage acting.
it took some decades for the arts of acting and filmmaking to catch up to the potential that was in movies all along; stuff like microexpressions and silences and eyes, oh man people are SO much better at acting with their eyes than they were in the 40â˛s, or even the 70â˛s.
the performances we take for granted in adventure movies and comedies now wouldâve blown the criticsâ socks off in the days of âcasablancaâ.
thereâs a weird period in film where you can see the transition happening. right around the fifties, I think. the example my prof used when i learned about it was marlon brando in âa streetcar named desireâ - he was using stanislavski acting methods and this new hyper-realistic style and most or all of his costars were still using the old, highly-stylized way of acting. it makes it way more obvious how false it is.
i even noticed it in âthe stingâ, which was 1973. i actually think they used it on purpose to get the viewer fished in by the second layer of the con; the grifters at the bookieâs were acting like they were acting, and the grifters playing the feds were acting for reals. if youâre used to setting your suspension of disbelief at the first setâs level, then the second set are gonna blow right past you.
or possibly the guys playing the grifters playing the feds just happened to be using the realistic style for their own reason, and it coincidentally made the plot twist work better. but i like to think it was deliberate.
i was thinking about this again, and when you know what to look for, itâs really obvious: old movies are stage acting, not movie acting. it just didnât really occur to anyone to make the camera bend to the actors, rather than the other way around. just image search old movie screenshots and clips and gifs, youâll see it. the way people march up to their mark and stand there, the way they deliver their lines rather than inhabiting the character. the way theyâre framed in an unmoving center-stage.
this is a charming little tableau, quirky and unexpected, but itâs a tableau. it lives in a box.
now, i usually watch action movies, and i didnât think it was fair to compare an action movie with what appears to be an indoor sort of story, but i do watch some comedy tv. so i looked for a brooklyn 99 gif with a similar framing, intending to point out that the camera moves, and the characters arenât stuck inside the box. but i couldnât even find the framing. they literally never have all the characters in the same plane, facing the camera, interacting only within the staging area. even when theyâre not traveling, theyâre moving around, and they treat things outside the âstageâ as real and interact with them, even if itâs only to stare in delighted horror.
as for action, it took a while for the movies to figure out what, exactly they wanted to show us, and how to act it. hereâs a comedy punch:
here, also, is a comedy punch:
the first one looks like a stage direction written on a script. the second one looks like your friends horsing around and being jerks to each other. the first one is just not believable. the physics doesnât work. the reaction is fakey. everyoneâs stiff. even the movement of the camera is kind of wooden. the second one looks real right down to the cringe of his shoulder, and the camera feels startled too.
iâm not saying this to dis old movies, iâm just fascinated and impressed by how much the art has advanced!
Iâm going to bed, but I also want to say that I think, without actually bothering to explore it and make sure, that thereâs been a similar shift in comics, probably related to the shift in acting/camera work. And I think you still see remnants of old âstage actingâ comics in the three-panel style set ups (you might still see it in long form comics, but youâd probably call it bad composition)
Now can someone explain why people in old films talked Like That
Yâall, THATâS HOW PEOPLE TALKED.
Seriously, I used to work in a sound studio, and one series of projects required us to listen to LOTS of old audio recordings. Not of anything special - just people talking.
AND THEY TALKED LIKE THAT.
It was so fucking wild to hear just a couple of people being like,
âWELL HI THERE JEANINE, HOW ARE YOU TODAY?â
âOH, NOT TOO BAD, JOE, THOUGH MY HUSBANDâS BEEN AWAY ON BUSINESS FOR A FEW WEEKS AND I MISS HIM SOMETHING TERRIBLE.â
âWELL ITâS A HARD THING, JEANINE, BUT YOUâLL GET THROUGH IT.â
âWELL I SUPPOSE IâVE GOT TO, HAVENâT I JOE?â
All in that piercing, strident, rapid-fire style we associate with the films of the era. If youâve watched lots of old movies you can imagine the above in that speech pattern.
I donât know if people talked like that because it was in movies but I suspect itâs the other way around.
Same goes for the UK - When they made the TV series The Hour, set in the 1950s, they had to tell the very well spoken, privately educated Dominic West to tone down his imitation of a 1950s newsreader because being accurate would have sounded to a 2011 TV audience as if he was doing a parody. When you watch Brief Encounter theyâre not speaking like that because they canât act, theyâre speaking like that because it was the norm on screen. It now sounds unnatural because itâs not the norm any more.
Obviously there were people with regional accents and who didnât speak in a heightened manner, but they didnât get to be on TV or in movies unless they were villains. (And usually the villains were putting it on, like Richard Attenborough in Brighton Rock. Sure, he was Richard Attenborough, but he was brought up in the Midlands, and by the on-screen standards of the time, that was common.)
Even the Queenâs very posh accent has changed over the last 50 years and become âmore common"Â - check out newsreel footage etc for proof - and recordings of her father are almost like someone from a foreign country (well, it is the past).
There is, for many film historians/critics, an actual turning point from mannered, theatrical, or âoverplayedâ acting on screen to naturalistic/American Method realism on screen. It happens in the 1954 movie On the Waterfront, during a traveling shot in which Marlon Brandoâs character and Eva Marie Saintâs character are walking together. Eva Marie Saint accidentally drops her glove in the middle of the scene. Marlon Brando instinctively picks it up as his character, and continues the dialog, all the while playing with the gloveâturning it about, trying it on, etc. Eva Marie Saint stuck with him, never broke, and the director didnât call âcut.âÂ
Before that scene in that movie, if an actor dropped a prop by accident, they would have re-shot the sceneâbecause Brando mostly disappeared out of frame as he bent down to pick up the glove, and (as is explained above) movies were framed to keep the people in the scene in the frame. I
tâs a pretty famous scene in movies because Brandoâs character doesnât give the glove back, but instead uses it to amplify what the two characters are experiencing, naturally and without artifice. It is, for all intents and purposes, the exact moment that screen acting changed.
Okay, but hereâs the thing about television specifically: given the size of TV screens when they first came out? Stage acting was the only thing that could be READ. Watch Star Trek: TOS on a modern screen and it looks absurdly overacted. Film of the same era is not, and yet the TV is.
And thatâs not a fault of the actors; they were all very capable of naturalistic film acting (yes, even Shatner) â as the later movies would bear out. Itâs because they were acting for the small screen, not the big one.
Stage acting and stage makeup is what it is because people are far enough away from the stage that you have to cake on the makeup garishly and exaggerate the hell out of your for it to be VISIBLE. And in early television? Yeah, those constraints actually very much applied. You could move the camera, sure, but the quantity of visual information you could send was just damned limited.
Hereâs another example of that.
Watch some Classic Dr Who. You may or may not notice it without watching for it, but every shot of the TARDIS is taken from the same angle.
The TARDIS was, at that time, a stage set. The camera was behind the fourth (Sixth?) wall. It was fixed. And most TV sets were built like this. They had a specific fourth wall and everything was filmed from that angle.
Fast forward to the new series, and youâll see that the TARDIS is being filmed from different angles all the time, including following the actor around.
Three things have changed:
1. Cameras have become much smaller.
2. Set building for TV has developed as an art. Those early sets were built by people who were trained to build stage sets.
3. Overall technological improvement resulting in things being cheaper.
The TARDIS set that was just retired? Each of its walls was designed to slide out. So you could put the camera anywhere you wanted. Presumably this is the case with the new one too. They couldnât imagine doing that back in the day. Nor could they afford the complexities of a set like that.
Itâs actually my opinion that TV has very much matured as an art formâŚthis century. This decade. We are doing and seeing things that couldnât be done ten years ago, twenty. Heck, even five.
Going back to speech patterns for a moment â I was a young child in the 80s, so my memories of the norms of the time period are limited (especially because I was incredibly sheltered), but the books I read at the time and the popular movies of the time all have this kind of â whimsical, sardonic speech pattern going on. Think John Waters dialogue.Â
I always thought it was kind of stylized. But then I ended up in a weird part of YouTube one night and found someoneâs home video of just walking aroud a 7-11 convenience store at midnight talking to people in Orlando, Florida. Just trying out their new camcorder for shits and giggles, talking to other customers, talking to the cashier, etc. And you know what? They all talked like a goddamn John Waters movie. It was the weirdest thing, like I was watching outtakes from The Breakfast Club or Say Anything. I expected one of the Cusacks to walk into frame any second.
Anyway, so I think itâs super cool how human speech and interaction shifts over time, and if youâre living through the shift, you donât really notice it as it happens.
A) I think you mean John Hughes but Iâm very amused by the idea of everyone talking like itâs a John Waters movie
B) This is still happening only now you can pick up peopleâs net accents. My friends with tumblrs have tumblr diction. My friends who only spend time on facebook for social media sound VERY different. People who use twitter heavily put emphasis on different things and have a different meme literacy (you all know the difference between the way greentext sounds and the way âRIP but Iâm differentâ sounds).
Anyway have fun listening for tumblr accents now
What gets me is that I had a medium-strong tumblr accent before I joined tumblr. ( @magikarpjumpest and I have talked about this a few times) The way I break clauses, my stress patterns, hell, I do the Midsentence Emphatic Capitalization in speech. And I think that ties in to why I do the Giant Tumblr Rambles in a way that I just⌠donât, on FB. Iâm too rambly for twitter, and while I can use âtag group dialogueâ as a facebooker, and occasionally will in speech (yes, I code-switch my social media dialect in person; Iâm conscious of the fact that I mirror, but itâs not generally a thing I decide to do), thatâs not my default setting for phrasing. Established tone/accent conventions of tumblr already correspond somewhat to my natural way of speaking, and itâs much easier to get two forms of dialogue that are already close to merge. It also means that engaging with longposts here is much easier because people are more likely to be using humor and syntax that feels natural to me. Twitter threads have a concision to them. Greentext boards -I can read them, but itâs like reading something with a very heavy transcribed accent that I almost never hear in person -itâs a headache-inducing amount of effort thatâs usually not worth it to me for a downtime activity. FB doesnât do paragraph breaks the same way, and the emoticon usage is different enough that I donât like dealing with it.Â
This is a wild read from start to finish!!
Having lived through early Web 2.0, I can tell you that âaccents through timeâ also applies to internet âaccents.â
You know how people now will end sentences with âLolâ to indicate theyâre not mad (e.g. âI have to go now lol, Momâs homeâ)? Yeah, we didnât used to do that. We also used to have a sarcasm tag! Iâm going to apologize to the people with screen readers and tell you I promise this is reasonably short. It looked like this:
âYeah, well, Obama is a ~*~*~Muslim.~*~*~
The asterisk action tags used to be a non-ironic, non-cringey thing, too. Like this:
âNINA GUESS WHATâ
âWhat??? :Dâ
â(Typing notification)â
â*waits*â
The term âteal deerâ to replace âTL;drâ was a thing. And, of course, in the early 2000s you had 13375p34k, which for younger folks was âleetspeak.â One is the Homestuck characters uses it, but itâs not just a quirkâpeople really talked like that.
We are far enough into the internet era that even internet accents have changed.
This is a *fantastic* post and something I find very fascinating, because I tend to focus really strongly on character dialogue and speech. Also Iâve definitely noticed that my internet âaccentâ is definitely slightly antiquated. Iâm still much more likely to use a :3 or a -3- text emoticon over a smiley, and Iâm not in the habit of using reaction gifs, and I definitely still do actions inside asterixâ.Â
then again Iâm also the kind of person who uses words like antiquated, so I wonder if soon enough itâll all sound the same amount of old fashioned?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
tasia.m.s on Instagram
File this under âsuper obvious yet I always seem to forget it.â
I donât write romance (I totally respect people who do, though!) but this is also great writing advice in general! What is preventing the protagonist from achieving their goal?
Why canât these two people be together now?
Why canât the mystery be solved now?
Why canât they overthrow the evil overlord now?
If you donât have a solid answer for these questions, thatâs a good indicator that the plot could use some more work.
Also test your answer a little bit. If itâs as thin as theyâre just refusing to sit down and have a simple conversation, you might want to re-think how things are going.
As a beta reader/editor, I tend to ask this question a lot:Â âWhy are they doing it this way when thereâs a much easier path available?â Thatâs not to say that they should take the easier path, because that would usually be boring. Instead, the point is that the question needs an answerâeither eliminate the easier path or give them a very clear reason for not taking it. (And if Iâm asking the question, that reason isnât as clear as you think it might be.)
I find it very difficult to root for characters who have a sensible option available and just donât take it. If the only reason is âBecause there wouldnât be a story otherwise,â you havenât actually found the story yet.
And this is why the Big Misunderstanding as a primary plot device is almost universally disliked.
Watch:Â Bill Nye uses science to defend womenâs reproductive rights.
THIS MAN
Bill Nye is a god among men.
A list of my favorite POC/international cooking channels, if you no longer want to support Bon Appetit:
De Mi Rancho A Tu Cocina: an an abuela from Michuacan shows you how to make DELICIOUS rancho food and occasionally shows you scenes from around the rancho.
DoĂąa Lupita: Another abuela, this time from Guerrero, making incredible-looking food over a comal
Simply MamĂĄ Cooks: Tejano woman with a Korean-American husband makes recipes from both cultures, great for classic easy-to-make weeknight comfort food recipes, too
Li Ziqi: a real-life Disney princess from Sichuan who shows you how to make sauce with duck egg yolks, starting with hatching the ducks that lay the eggs
Dianxi Ziaoge:Â another Chinese farm girl, she shows you her idyllic life in rural Yunnan as she makes food with her HUGE RIDICULOUS FUFFYBOI, Dawang, often joining her on adventures
Wild Girl: Yet another Chinese farm girl, this time from Guizhou, who has a little bit more of an emphasis on cooking with food foraged from her gorgeous surroundings
Catch The Sea Official: A young woman living in the fishing city of Rizhao, foraging her own seafood and then cooking it up. I could watch her squeeze the water out of catâs eye turban snails all day.
Cooking with Sros, Sros Yummy Cooking Vlog: Sros makes delicious Cambodian food with a warm, sunny personality and a great accent!
Am Thuc Me Lam: A son who videos his mother farming and cooking in rural Vietnam
Traditional Me: Young woman in rural Sri Lanka lives with her grandmother and brother, makes incredible looking food set to jaunty music with lush scenery
Village Cooking Channel: Five VERY ENTHUSIASTIC Tamil men make large batches of food for their local old age home.
Veg Village Food: Pakistani granny makes huge batches of vegetarian food for local needy children.Â
Desi Food Recipes: Soothing Indian granny shows you how to make classic Desi dishes in non-giant size proportions
Maangchi: The Julia Child of Korean food, everyone fucking loves Maangchi
Junâs Kitchen: Japanese guy makes food with his cats, whatâs not to love?
i also really like Future Neighbor and ężí¤honeykki ! they both make (mostly) korean food and future neighborâs are more instructional while honeykkiâs are more ~aesthetic~
adding a couple for my vegans/plant-based people. i love Peaceful Cuisine, he makes the most wonderful food (a mix japanese and western recipes) and the videos are so soothing to watch. also, Pick Up Limes is a great channel for healthy-ish cooking, sheâs a vegan dietician and has so many plant-based recipes as well as videos on mindful eating and other lifestyle stuff. also maangchi has lots of vegan recipes because sheâs incredible, sheâs tagged in the original post. âĽď¸
Iâm putting my foot down, if you donât Know youâre flirting youâre not Flirting. Flirting requires knowledge and intent. If youâre not doing it on purpose youâre just bantering. I will die on this hill, yes.
I always feel like people think Iâm flirting and that makes me feel unsafe. this makes me feel like I have some agency and that I can just kinda say, âno, flirting requires forethought. weâre just talking and Iâm being nice.â
SAY THIS LOUDER
I feel obligated to share this because every time I acted with fucking common decency or was just nice to people, they would thought I was flirting and get mad when I wouldnât say yes to a date or something.
Iâm as aro as they can get and canât romance to save my life so I sure as hell ainât flirting.
Being nice is a thing.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
body positivity has largely failed because people started arguing for attractiveness and romantic prospects instead of respect and dignity
this is truly the best summary of what all of this SHOULD be about
âRemember what mattered most to you in the dark: not the easy answers. Not the remote platitudes of a dream life. It was simply presence, the hands that took your torn wrists and turned them to the sky, letting them be seen exactly as they were. The best you have to offer others will never be a cure-all method, a one-size-fits-most fix. The best you have to offer will always be yourself.â
â Mary Nikkel, âTo the Healing Healersâ